Search (146 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Bibliographische Software"
  1. Wurangian, N.: Using the OCLC Cataloging Micro Enhancer to produce a bibliography list (1993) 0.10
    0.09766095 = product of:
      0.16276824 = sum of:
        0.115422465 = weight(_text_:list in 5055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.115422465 = score(doc=5055,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25191793 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.183657 = idf(docFreq=673, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.45817488 = fieldWeight in 5055, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.183657 = idf(docFreq=673, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5055)
        0.021008085 = weight(_text_:of in 5055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021008085 = score(doc=5055,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 5055, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5055)
        0.026337698 = product of:
          0.052675396 = sum of:
            0.052675396 = weight(_text_:22 in 5055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052675396 = score(doc=5055,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17018363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04859849 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5055, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5055)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the work of the E. Del Webb Memorial Library, Loma Linda Univ., in using the OCLC Cataloging Micro Enhancer and Pro-Cite software to produce a bibliography listing the latest books added to the library collection. Describes the use of the macro facility of WordPerfect for Windows to process records downloaded using the recent PRISM version of the OCLC Cataloging Micro Enhancer
    Source
    OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.1, S.22-24
  2. Rothera, H.: Framing the subject : a subject indexing model for electronic bibliographic databases in the humanities (1998) 0.07
    0.071341135 = product of:
      0.118901886 = sum of:
        0.01485496 = weight(_text_:of in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01485496 = score(doc=3904,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
        0.07770923 = weight(_text_:subject in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07770923 = score(doc=3904,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.4470745 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
        0.026337698 = product of:
          0.052675396 = sum of:
            0.052675396 = weight(_text_:22 in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052675396 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17018363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04859849 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews in detail an MA dissertation to assess the scope and value of electronic bibliographic databases in the humanities. Develops and demonstrates a model to determine essential and desirable indexing terms and to highlight some inherent complexities. Assesses features of commercially available databases against this model. Presents personal observations on the dissertation experience and on prospects for further research in this area
    Source
    Library and information research news. 22(1998) no.71, S.24-33
  3. Ellsbury, S.H.; Roberts, L.: Selected list of software for organizing bibliographic references and creating bibliographies (1992) 0.07
    0.0712348 = product of:
      0.178087 = sum of:
        0.16323203 = weight(_text_:list in 5031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16323203 = score(doc=5031,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25191793 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.183657 = idf(docFreq=673, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.64795715 = fieldWeight in 5031, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.183657 = idf(docFreq=673, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5031)
        0.01485496 = weight(_text_:of in 5031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01485496 = score(doc=5031,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 5031, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5031)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a annotated list describing 13 commercially-produced software packages designed specifically to create, search, and print bibliographies. These annotations contain information pertaining to software programs designed specifically for organising bibliographic references and formatting bibliographies. The entry for each package includes the following information: software title, publisher, address, operating system(s), system requirements, bilbiography formats and special features. Provides a brief, alphabetical, quick access listing of the publishers
  4. Kelly, J.: Downloading information using bibliographic management software (1994) 0.06
    0.056460805 = product of:
      0.14115201 = sum of:
        0.115422465 = weight(_text_:list in 8356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.115422465 = score(doc=8356,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25191793 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.183657 = idf(docFreq=673, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.45817488 = fieldWeight in 8356, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.183657 = idf(docFreq=673, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8356)
        0.025729544 = weight(_text_:of in 8356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025729544 = score(doc=8356,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 8356, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8356)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the value of using bibliographic management software to handle the process of downloading of references from online or CD-ROM databases. 3 critical tasks are involved: building the database of references to periodical articles, books or similar materials; searching the database created; and generating a list of selected items from the database. Illustrates the main downloading features of 4 popular software packages: Reference Manager; Papyrus; Library Master; and Pro-Cite
  5. Schoonbaert, D.: Personal bibliographic systems (PBS) for the PC : a generic survey of features (1997) 0.05
    0.0534464 = product of:
      0.133616 = sum of:
        0.115422465 = weight(_text_:list in 7425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.115422465 = score(doc=7425,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25191793 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.183657 = idf(docFreq=673, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.45817488 = fieldWeight in 7425, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.183657 = idf(docFreq=673, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7425)
        0.018193537 = weight(_text_:of in 7425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018193537 = score(doc=7425,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 7425, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7425)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    PBS have established themselves as popular software products that enable users to manage the input, storage, retrieval and output of bibliographic references. They can be adapted to accomodate periodical articles, books, book chapters, dissertations, reports and unpublished documents. Focuses on the characteristics, which make a PBS attractive with particular reference to: structural flexibility; retrieval options; input; display; and output formats; and interface related and management related issues. Concludes with a generic list of desirable PBS features
  6. Moore, D.: ¬La choix d'un logiciel de formatage bibliographique à la Bibliothèque de l'Assemblée Nationale de Quebec (1994) 0.05
    0.05202371 = product of:
      0.13005927 = sum of:
        0.100994654 = weight(_text_:list in 857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.100994654 = score(doc=857,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25191793 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.183657 = idf(docFreq=673, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.40090302 = fieldWeight in 857, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.183657 = idf(docFreq=673, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=857)
        0.029064612 = weight(_text_:of in 857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029064612 = score(doc=857,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 857, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=857)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the methodology used to evaluate 5 examples of bibliographic management software currently available. Provides a profile of the Library of the National Assemply of Quebec and the services it offers: reference, research, and reconstruction of debates. Identifies the problems it faces and presents an evaluation of its technical needs, needs relating to data control and bibliographies, and staff needs. Analyzes specialist information and the preliminary list of chosen programmes and compares the software using the following criteria: ease of use; assistance; customization; research; networking capabilities; transferabiblity; and price. Considers reasons for the ultimate choice of library master and discusses the question of staff training
  7. Smith-Cohen, D.: Developing an inhouse database from online sources (1993) 0.04
    0.040478792 = product of:
      0.10119698 = sum of:
        0.023487754 = weight(_text_:of in 4277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023487754 = score(doc=4277,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 4277, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4277)
        0.07770923 = weight(_text_:subject in 4277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07770923 = score(doc=4277,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.4470745 = fieldWeight in 4277, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4277)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the creation of a database of citations in a narrow subject area from references downloaded from commercial databases, with customised added indexing, for access by end users. The database was on the subject of biological environmental and physical aspects of arctic wetlands and was compiled by the US Army Corps of Engineers, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory. Databases were selected from the DIALOG and ORBIT hosts and downloaded records were loaded into a database using Pro-Cite software and searched using Inmagic search software
  8. Kelly, J.A.: Downloading information using bibliographic management software (1997) 0.03
    0.029473394 = product of:
      0.073683485 = sum of:
        0.021008085 = weight(_text_:of in 3254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021008085 = score(doc=3254,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 3254, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3254)
        0.052675396 = product of:
          0.10535079 = sum of:
            0.10535079 = weight(_text_:22 in 3254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10535079 = score(doc=3254,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17018363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04859849 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3254, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3254)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.59, [=Suppl.22]
  9. Stigleman, S.: Bibliography programs do Windows (1996) 0.03
    0.026181106 = product of:
      0.06545276 = sum of:
        0.010504043 = weight(_text_:of in 4905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010504043 = score(doc=4905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.13821793 = fieldWeight in 4905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4905)
        0.05494872 = weight(_text_:subject in 4905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05494872 = score(doc=4905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.31612942 = fieldWeight in 4905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4905)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews 3 bibliography formatting programs that run under Windows: EndNote Plus 2.0.0.0 for Windows; ProCite 3.0.5 for Windows and Reference Manager 7.0 for Windows. Covers: operating systems, types of materials, citations styles, assembling bibliography, subject bibliographies, importing with importing module, importing module, exporting, non-English characters, networking and price. Examines display styles, how to build a database, global editing, and searching
  10. Hanson, T.A.; Hanson, A.C.: Managing bibliographies with Pro-Cite (1989) 0.03
    0.025902629 = product of:
      0.06475657 = sum of:
        0.020551786 = weight(_text_:of in 5034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020551786 = score(doc=5034,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 5034, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5034)
        0.04420479 = product of:
          0.08840958 = sum of:
            0.08840958 = weight(_text_:headings in 5034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08840958 = score(doc=5034,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23569997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04859849 = queryNorm
                0.37509373 = fieldWeight in 5034, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5034)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Pro-Cite is a software package for managing personal bibliographic data bases from which printed bibliographies are frequently required. Condisers the kinds of project for which Pro-Cite is intended, and those for which it is not intended. In the latter category is included the management of large permanent data bases to which powerful online access is frequently required. Its strength lies in its specialisation: it provides pre-defined data structures for various kinds of printed and audiovisual output formats corresponding to a range of standard styles. Discusses the package under the following headings: editing, searching, printing and browsing, indexing, and sorting. Examnines the use of Biblio-Links which are reformatting devices used to convert downloaded on-line serch results to Pro-Cite format
  11. Goedeken, E.: Library Master, Version 3.0 (1996) 0.03
    0.02539759 = product of:
      0.063493975 = sum of:
        0.022282438 = weight(_text_:of in 893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022282438 = score(doc=893,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 893, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=893)
        0.041211538 = weight(_text_:subject in 893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041211538 = score(doc=893,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.23709705 = fieldWeight in 893, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=893)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews Library Master, Verison 3.0, a sophisticated but easy-to-use database management software which, in addition to creating basic bibliographies can also be used for organizing other types of materials such as research notes, museum and archive records, and mailing lists. Library Master's main focus is on creating bibliographies to support research papers or other types of scholarly activity and it contains over two dozen templates covering many types of record. Lists of records can be searched in an number of ways, including by author, title, subject, record number, or by Boolean operators. Library Master will accept up to 65.000 individual records for each database and supports a number of citation styles. It can also extract pre-coded citations from the text of a research paper and create the bibliography from those references and is able to import data from a variety of online services
  12. Edelblute, T.: ¬A Pro-Cite authority file on a network (1995) 0.02
    0.02420348 = product of:
      0.0605087 = sum of:
        0.019297158 = weight(_text_:of in 3350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019297158 = score(doc=3350,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 3350, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3350)
        0.041211538 = weight(_text_:subject in 3350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041211538 = score(doc=3350,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.23709705 = fieldWeight in 3350, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3350)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the creation of a subject authority file, using Pro-Cite bibliographic management software for the US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service and the Agricultural Engineering Faculty at the University of Missouri at Columbia. Pro-Cite was selected for its flexible customization abilities. A workform was created in Pro-Cite with fields for authorized term, variant spellings, definitions, primary source consulted, other sources consulted, notes, cross references, and date of last edit. Using the authorized term and cross reference fields, an INDEX.LST file and a printed thesaurus were created. By putting Pro-Cite on a Novell network, it was hoped that all users would be able to view the authority file, and directly upload terms into their search strategies, but this proved not to be possible until the release of Pro-Cite 2.0. Further upgrades were needed to keep the authority file working properly. Further improvments in a network version of Pro-Cite that include password protection are needed
  13. Fleck, N.W.; Rust, M.: MicroMARC for Integrated Formats (1998) 0.02
    0.024049655 = product of:
      0.060124137 = sum of:
        0.015919344 = weight(_text_:of in 2500) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015919344 = score(doc=2500,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.20947541 = fieldWeight in 2500, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2500)
        0.04420479 = product of:
          0.08840958 = sum of:
            0.08840958 = weight(_text_:headings in 2500) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08840958 = score(doc=2500,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23569997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04859849 = queryNorm
                0.37509373 = fieldWeight in 2500, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2500)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Archives collection managers have employed the power and flexibility of the MicroMARC for Integrated Formats (MicroMARC:amc: Archival and Manuscripts Control) first developed on the campus of Michigan State University, since 1984. Now this MARC based information and storage retrieval software has been expanded to accomodate all MARC formats. Examines MicroMARC for Integrated Format version 1.2 and its data entry, searching, and reporting features, along with its latest upgrades. Features of the software include the ability to tranfer records to and from local systems, make global changes to headings in the database, create additional indexes, and create reports that can be downloaded into word processing documents if necessary. The software can be loaded on stand alone computers or into a LAN using DOS, Windows95 or WindowsNT
  14. Bellarby, L.: ¬A comparison of two personal bibliographic software packages : EndNote and Pro-Cite (1993) 0.02
    0.020826897 = product of:
      0.052067243 = sum of:
        0.025729544 = weight(_text_:of in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025729544 = score(doc=561,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
        0.026337698 = product of:
          0.052675396 = sum of:
            0.052675396 = weight(_text_:22 in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052675396 = score(doc=561,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17018363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04859849 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a summary of a more detailed study made of evaluation versions of these 2 US software packages, due to appear in 'C and L applications'. The packages are aimed at individual researchers, students and lecturers rather than libraries. Concludes that the cheaper package, EndNote, appears better suited to the students with occasional need for bibliographies, whereas the more complex (and expensive) Pro-Cite would suit a researcher or writer with a high output of professional papers. Pro-Cite could probably also be used by a small library as a means of creating a database
    Source
    Law librarian. 24(1993) no.1, S.22-23
  15. Brandt, D.S.: Ovid searching software (1996) 0.02
    0.020826897 = product of:
      0.052067243 = sum of:
        0.025729544 = weight(_text_:of in 6754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025729544 = score(doc=6754,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 6754, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6754)
        0.026337698 = product of:
          0.052675396 = sum of:
            0.052675396 = weight(_text_:22 in 6754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052675396 = score(doc=6754,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17018363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04859849 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6754, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6754)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews Ovid searching software, a system for searching and manipulating output from bibliographic databases. It allows fields of indexes to be searched, or for terms of a controlled vocabulary to be mapped, provides a variety of display options and permits customisation of system features. Output may be directed to e-mail. Ovid interface with over 80 commercial databases to exploit the features of each. Covers vendor and user profiles; operating environment; user interface, search strategies; display and manipulation of documents; and documentation
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  16. Boeder, R.: Database applications for libraries : an introduction (1996) 0.02
    0.019930182 = product of:
      0.049825452 = sum of:
        0.023487754 = weight(_text_:of in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023487754 = score(doc=340,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
        0.026337698 = product of:
          0.052675396 = sum of:
            0.052675396 = weight(_text_:22 in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052675396 = score(doc=340,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17018363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04859849 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Overviews database applications in libraries. Explains the 2 basic types of databases, flat-file and relational, outlines the uses and advantages of relationship systems. Librarians can utilise a number of software packages for database management and design a database in cooperation with a programmer. The librarian needs to be involved in the conceptual and external level of database design. Offers advice on finding a database designer. Outlines ideas for library related applications of database software
    Source
    Colorado libraries. 22(1996) no.1, S.25-28
  17. UNIMARC and CDS/ISIS : Proceedings of the Workshops held in Budapest, 21.-22. June 1993 and Barcelona, 26. August 1993 (1994) 0.02
    0.018945074 = product of:
      0.047362685 = sum of:
        0.024317201 = weight(_text_:of in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024317201 = score(doc=8779,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
        0.023045486 = product of:
          0.04609097 = sum of:
            0.04609097 = weight(_text_:22 in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04609097 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17018363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04859849 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: CAMPOS, F.: UNIMARC: state of the art on the universal format for international exchange; HOLT, B.: The maintenance of UNIMARC; WILLER, M.: UNIMARC / Authorities format; HOPKINSON, A.: CDS/ISIS as a tool for implementing UNIMARC; BERKE, S. u. M. SIPOS: The comprehensive information system of the National Széchényi Library and the Hungarian MARC format; SHRAIBERG, Y.: Application of the CDS/ISIS software package and UNIMARC format in the automated systems of the Russian National Public Library for Science and Technology and other libraries of the Russian Federation; STOKLASOVA, B.: Exchange formats in the Czech Republic: past, present and future
  18. Kirkwood, H.P.: Ovid Web Gateway (1998) 0.02
    0.018938314 = product of:
      0.047345784 = sum of:
        0.021008085 = weight(_text_:of in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021008085 = score(doc=2878,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
        0.026337698 = product of:
          0.052675396 = sum of:
            0.052675396 = weight(_text_:22 in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052675396 = score(doc=2878,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17018363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04859849 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Ovid has supported a sophisticated interface for searching bibliographic and full text databases for some time. It is now offering a Web based version of this interface that is capable of accessing Z39.50-compliant OPACs and databases anywhere in the world. The Ovid Web Gateway builds on the Ovid Server, thus allowing for a variety of functions and configurations at user, group and database-specific level. The Web Gateway has a selection of download formats and delivery options
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  19. Kiem, C.M.; Middleton, M.: ¬An evaluation of textual storage and retrieval software : CDS/ISIS and InMagic (1998) 0.02
    0.017812494 = product of:
      0.044531234 = sum of:
        0.018193537 = weight(_text_:of in 1974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018193537 = score(doc=1974,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 1974, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1974)
        0.026337698 = product of:
          0.052675396 = sum of:
            0.052675396 = weight(_text_:22 in 1974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052675396 = score(doc=1974,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17018363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04859849 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1974, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1974)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    A comparison was made between CDS/ISIS, ist Windows version WINISIS, and InMagic's INMAGIC and DB/TextWorks software. Packages were evaluated for their database creation, information retrieval and report production capabilities. Windows versions were found to provide significant enhancements over DOS versions of software. The evaluation aimed to determine the advantages to a developing country of creating bibliographic databases using commercial software
    Date
    22. 2.1999 13:54:49
  20. Perez, E.: Industrial strength database publishing : Inmagic DB/Textworks WebPublisher (1997) 0.02
    0.017438909 = product of:
      0.043597274 = sum of:
        0.020551786 = weight(_text_:of in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020551786 = score(doc=679,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
        0.023045486 = product of:
          0.04609097 = sum of:
            0.04609097 = weight(_text_:22 in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04609097 = score(doc=679,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17018363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04859849 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The availability of powerful indexing and database products with easy Web connections means that libraries able to gather and edit their own data are emancipated from the large vendors. The Oregon State Library staff used the Data Magician translation utility as part of a complex, but speedy, database converison project. The Oregon Index database of approximately 300.000 records was converted from a BRS database host over to the Inmagic WebPublisher system. Describes the planning and action stepts used in producing the Web accessible index database of considerable size. Participants have high ratings to effectiveness of both the translation utility and the database engine
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 127
  • i 5
  • d 3
  • f 3
  • nl 3
  • ru 2
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 127
  • m 11
  • s 4
  • el 3
  • b 1
  • h 1
  • i 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications