Search (77 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Volltextretrieval"
  1. Hider, P.: ¬The search value added by professional indexing to a bibliographic database (2017) 0.08
    0.08248278 = product of:
      0.13747129 = sum of:
        0.02177373 = weight(_text_:of in 3868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02177373 = score(doc=3868,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.28651062 = fieldWeight in 3868, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3868)
        0.08412271 = weight(_text_:subject in 3868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08412271 = score(doc=3868,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.48397237 = fieldWeight in 3868, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3868)
        0.03157485 = product of:
          0.0631497 = sum of:
            0.0631497 = weight(_text_:headings in 3868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0631497 = score(doc=3868,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23569997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04859849 = queryNorm
                0.2679241 = fieldWeight in 3868, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3868)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Gross et al. (2015) have demonstrated that about a quarter of hits would typically be lost to keyword searchers if contemporary academic library catalogs dropped their controlled subject headings. This paper reports on an analysis of the loss levels that would result if a bibliographic database, namely the Australian Education Index (AEI), were missing the subject descriptors and identifiers assigned by its professional indexers, employing the methodology developed by Gross and Taylor (2005), and later by Gross et al. (2015). The results indicate that AEI users would lose a similar proportion of hits per query to that experienced by library catalog users: on average, 27% of the resources found by a sample of keyword queries on the AEI database would not have been found without the subject indexing, based on the Australian Thesaurus of Education Descriptors (ATED). The paper also discusses the methodological limitations of these studies, pointing out that real-life users might still find some of the resources missed by a particular query through follow-up searches, while additional resources might also be found through iterative searching on the subject vocabulary. The paper goes on to describe a new research design, based on a before - and - after experiment, which addresses some of these limitations. It is argued that this alternative design will provide a more realistic picture of the value that professionally assigned subject indexing and controlled subject vocabularies can add to literature searching of a more scholarly and thorough kind.
  2. Hider, P.: ¬The search value added by professional indexing to a bibliographic database (2018) 0.08
    0.08055976 = product of:
      0.13426626 = sum of:
        0.0185687 = weight(_text_:of in 4300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0185687 = score(doc=4300,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 4300, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4300)
        0.08412271 = weight(_text_:subject in 4300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08412271 = score(doc=4300,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.48397237 = fieldWeight in 4300, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4300)
        0.03157485 = product of:
          0.0631497 = sum of:
            0.0631497 = weight(_text_:headings in 4300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0631497 = score(doc=4300,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23569997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04859849 = queryNorm
                0.2679241 = fieldWeight in 4300, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4300)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Gross et al. (2015) have demonstrated that about a quarter of hits would typically be lost to keyword searchers if contemporary academic library catalogs dropped their controlled subject headings. This article reports on an investigation of the search value that subject descriptors and identifiers assigned by professional indexers add to a bibliographic database, namely the Australian Education Index (AEI). First, a similar methodology to that developed by Gross et al. (2015) was applied, with keyword searches representing a range of educational topics run on the AEI database with and without its subject indexing. The results indicated that AEI users would also lose, on average, about a quarter of hits per query. Second, an alternative research design was applied in which an experienced literature searcher was asked to find resources on a set of educational topics on an AEI database stripped of its subject indexing and then asked to search for additional resources on the same topics after the subject indexing had been reinserted. In this study, the proportion of additional resources that would have been lost had it not been for the subject indexing was again found to be about a quarter of the total resources found for each topic, on average.
  3. Gross, T.; Taylor, A.G.; Joudrey, D.N.: Still a lot to lose : the role of controlled vocabulary in keyword searching (2015) 0.07
    0.07096866 = product of:
      0.118281096 = sum of:
        0.02599618 = weight(_text_:of in 2007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02599618 = score(doc=2007,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 2007, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2007)
        0.04808013 = weight(_text_:subject in 2007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04808013 = score(doc=2007,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.27661324 = fieldWeight in 2007, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2007)
        0.04420479 = product of:
          0.08840958 = sum of:
            0.08840958 = weight(_text_:headings in 2007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08840958 = score(doc=2007,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23569997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04859849 = queryNorm
                0.37509373 = fieldWeight in 2007, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2007)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    In their 2005 study, Gross and Taylor found that more than a third of records retrieved by keyword searches would be lost without subject headings. A review of the literature since then shows that numerous studies, in various disciplines, have found that a quarter to a third of records returned in a keyword search would be lost without controlled vocabulary. Other writers, though, have continued to suggest that controlled vocabulary be discontinued. Addressing criticisms of the Gross/Taylor study, this study replicates the search process in the same online catalog, but after the addition of automated enriched metadata such as tables of contents and summaries. The proportion of results that would be lost remains high.
  4. Voorbij, H.: Title keywords and subject descriptors : a comparison of subject search entries of books in the humanities and social sciences (1998) 0.06
    0.057757486 = product of:
      0.14439371 = sum of:
        0.02542624 = weight(_text_:of in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02542624 = score(doc=4721,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.33457235 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
        0.11896747 = weight(_text_:subject in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11896747 = score(doc=4721,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.68444026 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    In order to compare the value of subject descriptors and title keywords as entries to subject searches, two studies were carried out. Both studies concentrated on monographs in the humanities and social sciences, held by the online public access catalogue of the National Library of the Netherlands. In the first study, a comparison was made by subject librarians between the subject descriptors and the title keywords of 475 records. They could express their opinion on a scale from 1 (descriptor is exactly or almost the same as word in title) to 7 (descriptor does not appear in title at all). It was concluded that 37 per cent of the records are considerably enhanced by a subject descriptor, and 49 per cent slightly or considerably enhanced. In the second study, subject librarians performed subject searches using title keywords and subject descriptors on the same topic. The relative recall amounted to 48 per cent and 86 per cent respectively. Failure analysis revealed the reasons why so many records that were found by subject descriptors were not found by title keywords. First, although completely meaningless titles hardly ever appear, the title of a publication does not always offer sufficient clues for title keyword searching. In those cases, descriptors may enhance the record of a publication. A second and even more important task of subject descriptors is controlling the vocabulary. Many relevant titles cannot be retrieved by title keyword searching because of the wide diversity of ways of expressing a topic. Descriptors take away the burden of vocabulary control from the user.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 54(1998) no.4, S.466-476
  5. Dubois, C.P.R.: Free text vs. controlled vocabulary; a reassessment (1987) 0.05
    0.0534464 = product of:
      0.133616 = sum of:
        0.115422465 = weight(_text_:list in 2048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.115422465 = score(doc=2048,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25191793 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.183657 = idf(docFreq=673, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.45817488 = fieldWeight in 2048, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.183657 = idf(docFreq=673, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2048)
        0.018193537 = weight(_text_:of in 2048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018193537 = score(doc=2048,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 2048, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2048)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Free text and controlled vocabulary searching can no longer be viewed as antagonistic techniques in information retrieval since they both display advantages and weaknesses dependent on a fairly wide range of context, with the option to use both increasingly favoured. An attempt is made to present a list of features associated with the two techniques and to suggest a methodology to assist in deciding on the optimal retrieval technique for a particular purpose. The relevance of the techniques in expert systems and full text contexts is also discussed. Finally, recommendations for further research are suggested, concentrating on survey techniques in real-life retrieval situations
  6. Cochrane, P.A.: Subject access - free text and controlled : the case of Papua New Guinea (1985) 0.05
    0.045347005 = product of:
      0.11336751 = sum of:
        0.018193537 = weight(_text_:of in 1459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018193537 = score(doc=1459,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 1459, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1459)
        0.09517398 = weight(_text_:subject in 1459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09517398 = score(doc=1459,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.5475522 = fieldWeight in 1459, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1459)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The online catalogue can provide the user with efficient and effective access through a variety of access points. New interests in subject heading is indicated. Keyword access and free text searching are considered alternatice methods. An investigation is suggested into the symbiotic relationship between classification and subject heading
    Source
    Online public access to library files. Conf. Proc. held at the Univ. of Bath, 3.-5.9.1984. Ed.: J. Kinsella
  7. Witt, M.: Au sujet des mots-clés (1997) 0.03
    0.030382723 = product of:
      0.07595681 = sum of:
        0.021008085 = weight(_text_:of in 1666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021008085 = score(doc=1666,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 1666, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1666)
        0.05494872 = weight(_text_:subject in 1666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05494872 = score(doc=1666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.31612942 = fieldWeight in 1666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1666)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Information research using keywords is largely ignored by readers but in medium sized libraries such as that of the City of Science and Industry (Paris), with a multimedia collection of some 200.000 documents, it is the most effective tool. The reader, however, needs guidance in using this technique, and in refining searches to reduce noise. Examples are given demonstrating how keyword searches can identify non-indexed material, documents in other languages, and collective authors
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: On the subject of keywords
  8. Sclafani, F.: Controlled subject heading searching versus keyword searching (1999) 0.02
    0.021979488 = product of:
      0.10989744 = sum of:
        0.10989744 = weight(_text_:subject in 3790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10989744 = score(doc=3790,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.63225883 = fieldWeight in 3790, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3790)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  9. Sievert, M.E.; McKinin, E.J.: Why full-text misses some relevant documents : an analysis of documents not retrieved by CCML or MEDIS (1989) 0.02
    0.019263169 = product of:
      0.048157923 = sum of:
        0.02840465 = weight(_text_:of in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02840465 = score(doc=3564,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.37376386 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
        0.019753272 = product of:
          0.039506543 = sum of:
            0.039506543 = weight(_text_:22 in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039506543 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17018363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04859849 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Searches conducted as part of the MEDLINE/Full-Text Research Project revealed that the full-text data bases of clinical medical journal articles (CCML (Comprehensive Core Medical Library) from BRS Information Technologies, and MEDIS from Mead Data Central) did not retrieve all the relevant citations. An analysis of the data indicated that 204 relevant citations were retrieved only by MEDLINE. A comparison of the strategies used on the full-text data bases with the text of the articles of these 204 citations revealed that 2 reasons contributed to these failure. The searcher often constructed a restrictive strategy which resulted in the loss of relevant documents; and as in other kinds of retrieval, the problems of natural language caused the loss of relevant documents.
    Date
    9. 1.1996 10:22:31
    Source
    ASIS'89. Managing information and technology. Proceedings of the 52nd annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Washington D.C., 30.10.-2.11.1989. Vol.26. Ed.by J. Katzer and G.B. Newby
  10. Ellis, D.; Furner, J.; Willett, P.: On the creation of hypertext links in full-text documents : measurement of retrieval effectiveness (1996) 0.01
    0.0073105046 = product of:
      0.036552522 = sum of:
        0.036552522 = weight(_text_:of in 4214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036552522 = score(doc=4214,freq=62.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.480978 = fieldWeight in 4214, product of:
              7.8740077 = tf(freq=62.0), with freq of:
                62.0 = termFreq=62.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4214)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    An important stage in the process or retrieval of objects from a hypertext database is the creation of a set of internodal links that are intended to represent the relationships existing between objects; this operation is often undertaken manually, just as index terms are often manually assigned to documents in a conventional retrieval system. In an earlier article (1994), the results were published of a study in which several different sets of links were inserted, each by a different person, between the paragraphs of each of a number of full-text documents. These results showed little similarity between the link-sets, a finding that was comparable with those of studies of inter-indexer consistency, which suggest that there is generally only a low level of agreement between the sets of index terms assigned to a document by different indexers. In this article, a description is provided of an investigation into the nature of the relationship existing between (i) the levels of inter-linker consistency obtaining among the group of hypertext databases used in our earlier experiments, and (ii) the levels of effectiveness of a number of searches carried out in those databases. An account is given of the implementation of the searches and of the methods used in the calculation of numerical values expressing their effectiveness. Analysis of the results of a comparison between recorded levels of consistency and those of effectiveness does not allow us to draw conclusions about the consistency - effectiveness relationship that are equivalent to those drawn in comparable studies of inter-indexer consistency
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.4, S.287-300
  11. Ro, J.S.: ¬An evaluation of the applicability of ranking algorithms to improve the effectiveness of full-text retrieval : 1. On the effectiveness of full-text retrieval (1988) 0.01
    0.0070463265 = product of:
      0.03523163 = sum of:
        0.03523163 = weight(_text_:of in 4030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03523163 = score(doc=4030,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.46359703 = fieldWeight in 4030, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4030)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 39(1988), S.73-78
  12. Meunier, J.-G.; Bertrand-Gastaldy, S.; Lebel, H.: ¬A call for enhanced representation of content as a means of improving online full-text retrieval (1987) 0.01
    0.0068779425 = product of:
      0.034389712 = sum of:
        0.034389712 = weight(_text_:of in 2049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034389712 = score(doc=2049,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.45251858 = fieldWeight in 2049, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2049)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Given the phenomena of growth and diversification which affect both text databases and their users, it is essential to reflect on the nature of textual information and its representation within the very particular framework of interactive retrieval systems. The latter aim to correlate two types of conceptual structures, that of the user and that of the text, by way of a third structure - the interface. A typology of levels, of representation is proposed (typographical, lexical, statistical, linguistic, semiotic, and pragmatic). These representations, obtained by means of a multiplicity of strategies (intra-sentence, intratextual, intertextual) applied to different units of information and interrelated, render the interaction between diverse users and the database more flexible and more adaptable
  13. Poler, E.M.: Overcoming limitations in database searches (1992) 0.01
    0.0058719385 = product of:
      0.029359693 = sum of:
        0.029359693 = weight(_text_:of in 2329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029359693 = score(doc=2329,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.38633084 = fieldWeight in 2329, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2329)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the advantages of full text databases and full text searching, particularly in the context of law databases, the drawbacks to such searching in terms of recall, precision and errors, and methods of overcoming some of these problems
  14. Böhle, K.; Riehm, U.: German fulltexts in working contexts : empirical findings on how end-users make use of fulltext databases (1989) 0.01
    0.0055582174 = product of:
      0.027791087 = sum of:
        0.027791087 = weight(_text_:of in 2877) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027791087 = score(doc=2877,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 2877, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2877)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reports the result of a brief review of West German full text data bases and a user survey of over 40 users in the fields of medicine, law and economics. Questions common assumptions about the advantages and disadvantages of full text data bases.
    Source
    Online Information 89. Proceedings of the 13th International Online Information Meeting, London, 12-14 December 1989
  15. Dow Jones unveils knowledge indexing system (1997) 0.01
    0.0055582174 = product of:
      0.027791087 = sum of:
        0.027791087 = weight(_text_:of in 751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027791087 = score(doc=751,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 751, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=751)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Dow Jones Interactive Publishing has developed a sophisticated automatic knowledge indexing system that will allow searchers of the Dow Jones News / Retrieval service to get highly targeted results from a search in the service's Publications Library. Instead of relying on a thesaurus of company names, the new system uses a combination of that basic algorithm plus unique rules based on the editorial styles of individual publications in the Library. Dow Jones have also announced its acceptance of the definitions of 'selected full text' and 'full text' from Bibliodata's Fulltext Sources Online directory
  16. Wildemuth, B.M.: Measures of success in searching a full-text fact base (1990) 0.01
    0.005514622 = product of:
      0.02757311 = sum of:
        0.02757311 = weight(_text_:of in 2050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02757311 = score(doc=2050,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 2050, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2050)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The traditional measures of online searching proficiency (recall and precision) are less appropriate when applied to the searching of full text databases. The pilot study investigated and evaluated 5 measures of overall success in searching a full text data bank. Data was drawn from INQUIRER searches conducted by medical students at North Carolina Univ. at Chapel Hill. INQUIRER ia an online database of facts and concepts in microbiology. The 5 measures were: success/failure; precision; search term overlap; number of search cycles; and time per search. Concludes that the last 4 measures look promising for the evaluation of fact data bases such as ENQUIRER
    Source
    ASIS'90: Information in the year 2000, from research to applications. Proc. of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Toronto, Canada, 4.-8.11.1990. Ed. by Diana Henderson
  17. Hane, P.J.: AOL acquires Personal Library Software (1998) 0.01
    0.005514622 = product of:
      0.02757311 = sum of:
        0.02757311 = weight(_text_:of in 1813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02757311 = score(doc=1813,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 1813, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1813)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    In Jan 1997 AOL annouced its acquisition of Personal Library Software, a leading developer of information indexing and search technologies, which are at the core of online a CD-ROM products from major providers such as Dow Jones and Knight Ridder. AOL is the world's leading Internet online service. Quotes the company heads concerning the advantages of the deal for searchers but reports that no specific details of its terms have been released. Outlines the history of the companies focusing on the role of Matthew Koll founder of Personal Library Software and now joining AOL and the reactions of information professionals
  18. Huang, Y.-L.: ¬A theoretic and empirical research of cluster indexing for Mandarine Chinese full text document (1998) 0.01
    0.005514622 = product of:
      0.02757311 = sum of:
        0.02757311 = weight(_text_:of in 513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02757311 = score(doc=513,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04859849 = queryNorm
            0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 513, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=513)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Since most popular commercialized systems for full text retrieval are designed with full text scaning and Boolean logic query mode, these systems use an oversimplified relationship between the indexing form and the content of document. Reports the use of Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) to develop a Cluster Indexing Model (CIM) based on a Vector Space Model (VSM) in orer to explore the index theory of cluster indexing for chinese full text documents. From a series of experiments, it was found that the indexing performance of CIM is better than traditional VSM, and has almost equivalent effectiveness of the authority control of index terms
    Source
    Bulletin of library and information science. 1998, no.24, S.44-68
  19. Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993) 0.01
    0.0052675395 = product of:
      0.026337698 = sum of:
        0.026337698 = product of:
          0.052675396 = sum of:
            0.052675396 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052675396 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17018363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04859849 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:22:09
  20. Reinisch, F.: Wer suchet - der findet? : oder Die Überwindung der sprachlichen Grenzen bei der Suche in Volltextdatenbanken (2000) 0.01
    0.0052675395 = product of:
      0.026337698 = sum of:
        0.026337698 = product of:
          0.052675396 = sum of:
            0.052675396 = weight(_text_:22 in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052675396 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17018363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04859849 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 17:48:06

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 74
  • s 2
  • el 1
  • m 1
  • More… Less…