-
Z39.53-199X: Language codes (1993)
0.11
0.106852196 = product of:
0.2671305 = sum of:
0.24484804 = weight(_text_:list in 8038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24484804 = score(doc=8038,freq=4.0), product of:
0.25191793 = queryWeight, product of:
5.183657 = idf(docFreq=673, maxDocs=44218)
0.04859849 = queryNorm
0.97193575 = fieldWeight in 8038, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.183657 = idf(docFreq=673, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8038)
0.022282438 = weight(_text_:of in 8038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022282438 = score(doc=8038,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04859849 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 8038, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8038)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This draft standard defines almost 400 separate three-character alphabetic codes to indicate language in the interchange of information. The list is based on the US MARC list, the revision updates the first one of 1987
-
Kaplan, A.G.; Riedling, A.M.: Catalog it! : a guide to cataloging school library materials (2015)
0.05
0.047428716 = product of:
0.07904786 = sum of:
0.013130054 = weight(_text_:of in 2379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013130054 = score(doc=2379,freq=8.0), product of:
0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04859849 = queryNorm
0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 2379, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2379)
0.034342952 = weight(_text_:subject in 2379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034342952 = score(doc=2379,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04859849 = queryNorm
0.19758089 = fieldWeight in 2379, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2379)
0.03157485 = product of:
0.0631497 = sum of:
0.0631497 = weight(_text_:headings in 2379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0631497 = score(doc=2379,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23569997 = queryWeight, product of:
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.04859849 = queryNorm
0.2679241 = fieldWeight in 2379, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2379)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- This invaluable cataloging resource gives pre-service and practicing school library media specialists the tools they need to be intelligent consumers of commercial cataloging and competent organizers of new materials in their collections. The second edition contains expanded information on Library of Congress Subject Headings and electronic cataloging and cataloging systems, as well as Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) and Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC). Whether you're a practicing cataloger looking for a short text to update you on the application of RDA to cataloging records or a school librarian who needs a quick resource to answer cataloging questions, this guide is for you. - Thoroughly updates a best-selling, essential guide to cataloging - Addresses the new standards specifically as they apply to school libraries - Helps school librarians understand and implement the new cataloging standards in their collections - Distills the latest information and presents it in a format that is clear and accessible - Fills the need for up-to-the-minute cataloging guidance for the busy librarian who wants information in a hurry
-
Statement of principles (1961)
0.03
0.02871116 = product of:
0.0717779 = sum of:
0.02757311 = weight(_text_:of in 3285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02757311 = score(doc=3285,freq=18.0), product of:
0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04859849 = queryNorm
0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 3285, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3285)
0.04420479 = product of:
0.08840958 = sum of:
0.08840958 = weight(_text_:headings in 3285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08840958 = score(doc=3285,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23569997 = queryWeight, product of:
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.04859849 = queryNorm
0.37509373 = fieldWeight in 3285, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3285)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The principles here stated apply only to the choice and form of headings and entry words - i.e. to the principal elements determining the order of entries - in catalogues of printed books in which entries under authors' names and, where these are inappropriate or insufficient, under the titles of works are combined in one alphabetical sequence. They are framed with special reference to catalogues enumerating the contents of large general libraries: but their application to the catalogues of other libraries and to other alphabetical lists of books is also recommended, with such modifications as may be required by the purposes of these catalogues and lists.
-
SKOS Core Guide (2005)
0.02
0.02482194 = product of:
0.06205485 = sum of:
0.020843314 = weight(_text_:of in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020843314 = score(doc=4689,freq=14.0), product of:
0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04859849 = queryNorm
0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
0.041211538 = weight(_text_:subject in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041211538 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04859849 = queryNorm
0.23709705 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- SKOS Core provides a model for expressing the basic structure and content of concept schemes such as thesauri, classification schemes, subject heading lists, taxonomies, 'folksonomies', other types of controlled vocabulary, and also concept schemes embedded in glossaries and terminologies. The SKOS Core Vocabulary is an application of the Resource Description Framework (RDF), that can be used to express a concept scheme as an RDF graph. Using RDF allows data to be linked to and/or merged with other data, enabling data sources to be distributed across the web, but still be meaningfully composed and integrated. This document is a guide using the SKOS Core Vocabulary, for readers who already have a basic understanding of RDF concepts. This edition of the SKOS Core Guide [SKOS Core Guide] is a W3C Public Working Draft. It is the authoritative guide to recommended usage of the SKOS Core Vocabulary at the time of publication.
-
SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Primer (2009)
0.02
0.02420348 = product of:
0.0605087 = sum of:
0.019297158 = weight(_text_:of in 4795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019297158 = score(doc=4795,freq=12.0), product of:
0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04859849 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 4795, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4795)
0.041211538 = weight(_text_:subject in 4795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041211538 = score(doc=4795,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04859849 = queryNorm
0.23709705 = fieldWeight in 4795, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4795)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organisation System) provides a model for expressing the basic structure and content of concept schemes such as thesauri, classification schemes, subject heading lists, taxonomies, folksonomies, and other types of controlled vocabulary. As an application of the Resource Description Framework (RDF) SKOS allows concepts to be documented, linked and merged with other data, while still being composed, integrated and published on the World Wide Web. This document is an implementors guide for those who would like to represent their concept scheme using SKOS. In basic SKOS, conceptual resources (concepts) can be identified using URIs, labelled with strings in one or more natural languages, documented with various types of notes, semantically related to each other in informal hierarchies and association networks, and aggregated into distinct concept schemes. In advanced SKOS, conceptual resources can be mapped to conceptual resources in other schemes and grouped into labelled or ordered collections. Concept labels can also be related to each other. Finally, the SKOS vocabulary itself can be extended to suit the needs of particular communities of practice.
-
ISO/DIS 5127: Information and documentation - foundation and vocabulary (2013)
0.02
0.022833949 = product of:
0.057084873 = sum of:
0.022741921 = weight(_text_:of in 6070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022741921 = score(doc=6070,freq=24.0), product of:
0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04859849 = queryNorm
0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 6070, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6070)
0.034342952 = weight(_text_:subject in 6070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034342952 = score(doc=6070,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17381717 = queryWeight, product of:
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.04859849 = queryNorm
0.19758089 = fieldWeight in 6070, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6070)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This standard provides the basic terms and their definitions in the field of information and documentation for the purpose of promoting and facilitating knowledge sharing and information exchange. This International Standard presents terms and definitions of selected concepts relevant to the field of information and documentation. If a definition is from other standards, the priority of selection is TC46 technical standards, then technical standards in relevant field, and then terminology related standards. The scope of this International Standard corresponds to that of ISO/TC46, Standardization of practices relating to libraries, documentation and information centres, publishing, archives, records management, museum documentation, indexing and abstracting services, and information science. ISO 5127 was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 46, Information and Documentation, WG4, Terminology of information and documentation. This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition (ISO 5127:2001), which has been technically revised to overcome problems in the practical application of ISO 5127:2001 and to take account of the new developments in the field of information and documentation.
- Content
- This document is not an ISO International Standard. It is distributed for review and comment. It is subject to change without notice and may not be referred to as an International Standard.
-
OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004)
0.02
0.018938314 = product of:
0.047345784 = sum of:
0.021008085 = weight(_text_:of in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021008085 = score(doc=4685,freq=8.0), product of:
0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04859849 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
0.026337698 = product of:
0.052675396 = sum of:
0.052675396 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052675396 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17018363 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04859849 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This document contains and presents test cases for the Web Ontology Language (OWL) approved by the Web Ontology Working Group. Many of the test cases illustrate the correct usage of the Web Ontology Language (OWL), and the formal meaning of its constructs. Other test cases illustrate the resolution of issues considered by the Working Group. Conformance for OWL documents and OWL document checkers is specified.
- Date
- 14. 8.2011 13:33:22
-
Z39.19-1993: Guidelines for the construction, format, and management of monolingual thesauri (1993)
0.02
0.016477063 = product of:
0.04119266 = sum of:
0.01485496 = weight(_text_:of in 4092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01485496 = score(doc=4092,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04859849 = queryNorm
0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 4092, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4092)
0.026337698 = product of:
0.052675396 = sum of:
0.052675396 = weight(_text_:22 in 4092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052675396 = score(doc=4092,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17018363 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04859849 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4092, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4092)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This 1993 edition is the authoritative guide constructing single-language thesauri, one of the most powerful tools for information retrieval. Written by experts, Z39.19 shows how to formulate descriptors, establish relationships among terms, and present the information in print and on a screen. Also included are thesaurus maintenance procedures and recommended features for thesaurus management systems
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.3/4, S.180-181 (M. Hudon)
-
ISO 999.4: Guidelines for the content, organization and presentation of indexes : Committee draft (1991)
0.01
0.007277415 = product of:
0.036387075 = sum of:
0.036387075 = weight(_text_:of in 8088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036387075 = score(doc=8088,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04859849 = queryNorm
0.47880095 = fieldWeight in 8088, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8088)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Imprint
- Ottawa : Office of Library Standards, National Library of Canada
-
ISO 999: Index of a publication (1975)
0.01
0.0059419842 = product of:
0.02970992 = sum of:
0.02970992 = weight(_text_:of in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02970992 = score(doc=486,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04859849 = queryNorm
0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Imprint
- Geneva : International Organization of Standardization
-
ISO 3166: Codes for the representation of names of countries (199?)
0.01
0.0059419842 = product of:
0.02970992 = sum of:
0.02970992 = weight(_text_:of in 4135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02970992 = score(doc=4135,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04859849 = queryNorm
0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 4135, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4135)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
ISO 639: Codes for the representation of names of languages (199?)
0.01
0.0059419842 = product of:
0.02970992 = sum of:
0.02970992 = weight(_text_:of in 3894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02970992 = score(doc=3894,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04859849 = queryNorm
0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 3894, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3894)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
OWL Web Ontology Language Overview (2004)
0.01
0.0052256957 = product of:
0.026128478 = sum of:
0.026128478 = weight(_text_:of in 4682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026128478 = score(doc=4682,freq=22.0), product of:
0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04859849 = queryNorm
0.34381276 = fieldWeight in 4682, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4682)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- The OWL Web Ontology Language is designed for use by applications that need to process the content of information instead of just presenting information to humans. OWL facilitates greater machine interpretability of Web content than that supported by XML, RDF, and RDF Schema (RDF-S) by providing additional vocabulary along with a formal semantics. OWL has three increasingly-expressive sublanguages: OWL Lite, OWL DL, and OWL Full. This document is written for readers who want a first impression of the capabilities of OWL. It provides an introduction to OWL by informally describing the features of each of the sublanguages of OWL. Some knowledge of RDF Schema is useful for understanding this document, but not essential. After this document, interested readers may turn to the OWL Guide for more detailed descriptions and extensive examples on the features of OWL. The normative formal definition of OWL can be found in the OWL Semantics and Abstract Syntax.
-
ISO 999:1996: Guidelines for the content, organization and presentation of indexes (1996)
0.01
0.0051992363 = product of:
0.02599618 = sum of:
0.02599618 = weight(_text_:of in 868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02599618 = score(doc=868,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04859849 = queryNorm
0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 868, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=868)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Imprint
- Geneva : International Organization of Standardization
-
Panizzi, A.: Rules for the compilation of the catalogue (1841)
0.01
0.005145909 = product of:
0.025729544 = sum of:
0.025729544 = weight(_text_:of in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025729544 = score(doc=4940,freq=12.0), product of:
0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04859849 = queryNorm
0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Editor
- British Museum / Department of Printed Books
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch: Crestadoro, A.: The art of making catalogues of libraries: or, a method to obtain in a short time a most perfect, complete, and satisfactory printed catalog of the British Museum Library / by a reader therein [i.e. A. Crestadoro]. London: Published and sold by The Literary, Scientific & Artistic Reference Office 1856.
- Imprint
- London : British Museum / Department of Printed Books
-
ISO 25964 Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies (2008)
0.00
0.0047920197 = product of:
0.023960099 = sum of:
0.023960099 = weight(_text_:of in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023960099 = score(doc=1169,freq=74.0), product of:
0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04859849 = queryNorm
0.31528005 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
8.602325 = tf(freq=74.0), with freq of:
74.0 = termFreq=74.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- T.1: Today's thesauri are mostly electronic tools, having moved on from the paper-based era when thesaurus standards were first developed. They are built and maintained with the support of software and need to integrate with other software, such as search engines and content management systems. Whereas in the past thesauri were designed for information professionals trained in indexing and searching, today there is a demand for vocabularies that untrained users will find to be intuitive. ISO 25964 makes the transition needed for the world of electronic information management. However, part 1 retains the assumption that human intellect is usually involved in the selection of indexing terms and in the selection of search terms. If both the indexer and the searcher are guided to choose the same term for the same concept, then relevant documents will be retrieved. This is the main principle underlying thesaurus design, even though a thesaurus built for human users may also be applied in situations where computers make the choices. Efficient exchange of data is a vital component of thesaurus management and exploitation. Hence the inclusion in this standard of recommendations for exchange formats and protocols. Adoption of these will facilitate interoperability between thesaurus management systems and the other computer applications, such as indexing and retrieval systems, that will utilize the data. Thesauri are typically used in post-coordinate retrieval systems, but may also be applied to hierarchical directories, pre-coordinate indexes and classification systems. Increasingly, thesaurus applications need to mesh with others, such as automatic categorization schemes, free-text search systems, etc. Part 2 of ISO 25964 describes additional types of structured vocabulary and gives recommendations to enable interoperation of the vocabularies at all stages of the information storage and retrieval process.
T.2: The ability to identify and locate relevant information among vast collections and other resources is a major and pressing challenge today. Several different types of vocabulary are in use for this purpose. Some of the most widely used vocabularies were designed a hundred years ago and have been evolving steadily. A different generation of vocabularies is now emerging, designed to exploit the electronic media more effectively. A good understanding of the previous generation is still essential for effective access to collections indexed with them. An important object of ISO 25964 as a whole is to support data exchange and other forms of interoperability in circumstances in which more than one structured vocabulary is applied within one retrieval system or network. Sometimes one vocabulary has to be mapped to another, and it is important to understand both the potential and the limitations of such mappings. In other systems, a thesaurus is mapped to a classification scheme, or an ontology to a thesaurus. Comprehensive interoperability needs to cover the whole range of vocabulary types, whether young or old. Concepts in different vocabularies are related only in that they have the same or similar meaning. However, the meaning can be found in a number of different aspects within each particular type of structured vocabulary: - within terms or captions selected in different languages; - in the notation assigned indicating a place within a larger hierarchy; - in the definition, scope notes, history notes and other notes that explain the significance of that concept; and - in explicit relationships to other concepts or entities within the same vocabulary. In order to create mappings from one structured vocabulary to another it is first necessary to understand, within the context of each different type of structured vocabulary, the significance and relative importance of each of the different elements in defining the meaning of that particular concept. ISO 25964-1 describes the key characteristics of thesauri along with additional advice on best practice. ISO 25964-2 focuses on other types of vocabulary and does not attempt to cover all aspects of good practice. It concentrates on those aspects which need to be understood if one of the vocabularies is to work effectively alongside one or more of the others. Recognizing that a new standard cannot be applied to some existing vocabularies, this part of ISO 25964 provides informative description alongside the recommendations, the aim of which is to enable users and system developers to interpret and implement the existing vocabularies effectively. The remainder of ISO 25964-2 deals with the principles and practicalities of establishing mappings between vocabularies.
-
Pepper, S.; Moore, G.; TopicMaps.Org Authoring Group: XML Topic Maps (XTM) 1.0 : TopicMaps.Org Specification (2001)
0.00
0.004726819 = product of:
0.023634095 = sum of:
0.023634095 = weight(_text_:of in 1623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023634095 = score(doc=1623,freq=18.0), product of:
0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04859849 = queryNorm
0.3109903 = fieldWeight in 1623, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1623)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- This specification provides a model and grammar for representing the structure of information resources used to define topics, and the associations (relationships) between topics. Names, resources, and relationships are said to be characteristics of abstract subjects, which are called topics. Topics have their characteristics within scopes: i.e. the limited contexts within which the names and resources are regarded as their name, resource, and relationship characteristics. One or more interrelated documents employing this grammar is called a topic map.TopicMaps.Org is an independent consortium of parties developing the applicability of the topic map paradigm [ISO13250] to the World Wide Web by leveraging the XML family of specifications. This specification describes version 1.0 of XML Topic Maps (XTM) 1.0 [XTM], an abstract model and XML grammar for interchanging Web-based topic maps, written by the members of the TopicMaps.Org Authoring Group. More information on XTM and TopicMaps.Org is available at http://www.topicmaps.org/about.html. All versions of the XTM Specification are permanently licensed to the public, as provided by the Charter of TopicMaps.Org.
-
Agnese Galeffi, A.; Bertolini, M.V.; Bothmann, R.L.; Rodríguez, E.E.; McGarry, D.: Statement of International Cataloguing Principles (ICP) 2016 (2016)
0.00
0.004578606 = product of:
0.02289303 = sum of:
0.02289303 = weight(_text_:of in 3284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02289303 = score(doc=3284,freq=38.0), product of:
0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04859849 = queryNorm
0.30123898 = fieldWeight in 3284, product of:
6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
38.0 = termFreq=38.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3284)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- The original Statement of Principles - commonly known as the "Paris Principles" - was approved by the International Conference on Cataloguing Principles in 1961. Its goal of serving as a basis for international standardization in cataloguing has certainly been achieved: most of the cataloguing codes that were developed worldwide since that time have followed the Principles strictly or at least to a high degree. More than fifty years later, having a common set of international cataloguing principles is still necessary as cataloguers and users around the world use online catalogues as search and discovery systems. At the beginning of the 21st century, IFLA produced a new statement of principles (published in 2009) applicable to online library catalogues and beyond. The current version has been reviewed and updated in 2014 and 2015, and approved in 2016. The 2009 Statement of Principles replaced and explicitly broadened the scope of the Paris Principles from just textual resources to all types of resources, and from just the choice and form of entry to all aspects of bibliographic and authority data used in library catalogues. It included not only principles and objectives, but also guiding rules that should be included in cataloguing codes internationally, as well as guidance on search and retrieval capabilities. This 2016 edition takes into consideration new categories of users, the open access environment, the interoperability and the accessibility of data, features of discovery tools and the significant change of user behaviour in general. This statement builds on the great cataloguing traditions of the world, as well as on the conceptual models in the IFLA Functional Requirements family.
- Content
- This statement covers: - Scope - General Principles - Entities, Attributes, and Relationships - Bibliographic Description - Access Points - Objectives and Functions of the Catalogue - Foundations for Search Capabilities Vgl. auch: http://www.ifla.org/publications/node/11015.
- Editor
- IFLA Cataloguing Section and IFLA Meetings of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code
-
Z39.19-2005: Guidelines for the construction, format, and management of monolingual controlled vocabularies (2005)
0.00
0.004456488 = product of:
0.022282438 = sum of:
0.022282438 = weight(_text_:of in 708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022282438 = score(doc=708,freq=16.0), product of:
0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04859849 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 708, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=708)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- This Standard presents guidelines and conventions for the contents, display, construction, testing, maintenance, and management of monolingual controlled vocabularies. This Standard focuses on controlled vocabularies that are used for the representation of content objects in knowledge organization systems including lists, synonym rings, taxonomies, and thesauri. This Standard should be regarded as a set of recommendations based on preferred techniques and procedures. Optional procedures are, however, sometimes described, e.g., for the display of terms in a controlled vocabulary. The primary purpose of vocabulary control is to achieve consistency in the description of content objects and to facilitate retrieval. Vocabulary control is accomplished by three principal methods: defining the scope, or meaning, of terms; using the equivalence relationship to link synonymous and nearly synonymous terms; and distinguishing among homographs.
-
Austin, D.; Dale, P.: Guidelines for the establishment and development of monolingual thesauri (1981)
0.00
0.004201617 = product of:
0.021008085 = sum of:
0.021008085 = weight(_text_:of in 20) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021008085 = score(doc=20,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07599624 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.04859849 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 20, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=20)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
