Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Notationen / Signaturen"
  1. Savic, D.: CUTT-x: an expert system for automatic assignment of Cutter numbers (1996) 0.04
    0.044660024 = product of:
      0.1786401 = sum of:
        0.1786401 = sum of:
          0.12505318 = weight(_text_:engine in 6582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12505318 = score(doc=6582,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.26447627 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.349498 = idf(docFreq=570, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049439456 = queryNorm
              0.47283328 = fieldWeight in 6582, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.349498 = idf(docFreq=570, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6582)
          0.053586908 = weight(_text_:22 in 6582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.053586908 = score(doc=6582,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17312855 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049439456 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6582, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6582)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Briefly describes the form and function of Cutter numbers in the classification of books and describes the CUTT-x expert system for the automatic assignment of Cutter numbers with particular reference to the 3 basic elements in the system: knowledge base; inference engine; and user interface. The system was designed, tested and implemented in the Library of the International Civil Aviation Organization and was developed using the MS Access relational database management system in a Windows environment
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.71-87
  2. Starchan, D.: ¬A chance to make UDC notation more computer-friendly (2000) 0.01
    0.011722136 = product of:
      0.046888545 = sum of:
        0.046888545 = product of:
          0.09377709 = sum of:
            0.09377709 = weight(_text_:22 in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09377709 = score(doc=393,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17312855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049439456 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.43-44
  3. Gnoli, C.: Notation (2018) 0.01
    0.00989803 = product of:
      0.03959212 = sum of:
        0.03959212 = weight(_text_:search in 4650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03959212 = score(doc=4650,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17183559 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049439456 = queryNorm
            0.230407 = fieldWeight in 4650, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4650)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Notations are systems of symbols that can be combined according to syntactical rules to represent meanings in a specialized domain. In knowledge organization, they are systems of numerals, letters and punctuation marks associated to a concept that mechanically produce helpful sequences of them for arranging books on shelves, browsing subjects in directories and displaying items in catalogues. Most bibliographic classification systems, like Dewey Decimal Classification, use a positional notation allowing for expression of increasingly specific subjects by additional digits. However, some notations like that of Bliss Bibliographic Classification are purely ordinal and do not reflect the hierarchical degree of a subject. Notations can also be expressive of the syntactical structure of compound subjects (common auxiliaries, facets etc.) in various ways. In the digital media, notation can be recorded and managed in databases and exploited to provide appropriate search and display functionalities.
  4. Broughton, V.: Notational expressivity : the case for and against the representation of internal subject structure in notational coding (1999) 0.01
    0.0050237724 = product of:
      0.02009509 = sum of:
        0.02009509 = product of:
          0.04019018 = sum of:
            0.04019018 = weight(_text_:22 in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04019018 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17312855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049439456 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    10. 8.2001 13:22:14
  5. Jansen, U.: ¬Die Herren der Striche sitzen in Köln : Seit 1974 vergibt GS 1 Kodes zur Erleichterung des Warenverkehrs (2005) 0.00
    0.0033491817 = product of:
      0.013396727 = sum of:
        0.013396727 = product of:
          0.026793454 = sum of:
            0.026793454 = weight(_text_:22 in 3219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026793454 = score(doc=3219,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17312855 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049439456 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3219, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3219)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22