Search (1389 results, page 1 of 70)

0.21691184 = product of:
  0.32536775 = sum of:
    0.2363821 = weight(_text_:title in 5274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2363821 = score(doc=5274,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049257044 = queryNorm
        0.86156815 = fieldWeight in 5274, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5274)
    0.08898566 = product of:
      0.17797132 = sum of:
        0.17797132 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 5274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17797132 = score(doc=5274,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.74757946 = fieldWeight in 5274, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5274)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

By A.D. 2000 the English-speaking countries will have their English Short Title Catalogue (ESTC), listing all works printed before 1801. No equivalent German work is planned at present. ESTC will be based on UK short title catalogues published earlier, covering 1475-1640 (Pollard and Redgrave) and 1641-1700 (Wing). Since 1970 a pilot project has run for a short title catalogue, in machine-readable form, of 18th century works. Libraries abroad will add entries to ESTC. Entry structure is in modified MARC format. By autumn 1990 over 285.000 ESTC entires were retrievable. Material from Pollard and Redgrave and from Wing will be converted into machine-readable form, resulting in a national union catalogue. An ESTC of 19th century works is under consideration

0.17529124 = product of:
  0.26293686 = sum of:
    0.19102558 = weight(_text_:title in 6926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19102558 = score(doc=6926,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049257044 = queryNorm
        0.6962522 = fieldWeight in 6926, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6926)
    0.071911275 = product of:
      0.14382255 = sum of:
        0.14382255 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 6926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14382255 = score(doc=6926,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.60413545 = fieldWeight in 6926, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6926)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Digitization of old material in libraries speeds up access and makes rare works better known and more accessible than before. 3 digitization projects are described: the Incipit project in the Incunabula Short Title Catalogue; incorporating of graphic title pages representation for catalogue retrieval from the Oettingen-Wallerstein collection at Augsburg University; the VD17, the index of 17th century printed material in German-speaking countries

0.1612497 = product of:
  0.24187453 = sum of:
    0.19102558 = weight(_text_:title in 3625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19102558 = score(doc=3625,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049257044 = queryNorm
        0.6962522 = fieldWeight in 3625, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3625)
    0.05084895 = product of:
      0.1016979 = sum of:
        0.1016979 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 3625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1016979 = score(doc=3625,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.42718828 = fieldWeight in 3625, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3625)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

BVB-KAT is the catalogue data bank of the Bavarian Library Cooperative. In June 91 BVB-KAT contained 2,9 million entries. Linkes with this central system are local integrated systems which include an OPAC service. BVB-KAT comprises 4 linked files, including the title file, containing all bibliographic data included in ISBD except corporate bodies; these are in a separate data file, which can be linked to the title file on demand. The extensive use of the corporate body file in the cooperative leads to rationalisation and unification of data. Both files permit free text retrieval

0.1350755 = product of:
  0.40522647 = sum of:
    0.40522647 = weight(_text_:title in 638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.40522647 = score(doc=638,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049257044 = queryNorm
        1.476974 = fieldWeight in 638, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=638)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

Vol.1: By abbreviation; vol.2: By title; vol.3: new periodical title abbreviations

0.1243886 = product of:
  0.1865829 = sum of:
    0.10130662 = weight(_text_:title in 3250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10130662 = score(doc=3250,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049257044 = queryNorm
        0.3692435 = fieldWeight in 3250, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3250)
    0.085276276 = product of:
      0.17055255 = sum of:
        0.17055255 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 3250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17055255 = score(doc=3250,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.7164165 = fieldWeight in 3250, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3250)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Traditionally, catalogue records have contained a complete description of the item to ensure retrieval by a wide variety of approaches. An alternative approach, user centered design, requires a study of user behaviour and cognition related to interaction with the catalogue to determine inform design decisions. To support known item searching, it is necessary to users' conceptions of the item being sought, what the users know about them, and which pieces of known information are viewed by the users as most appropriate for inclusion in a search. Reports results of a pilot study, at the Davis Library, North Caroline University at Chapel Hill, in which 103 catalogue users described 386 searches and any written information known by the searchers was photocopied. Searchers generally knew the title, publication date, and page numbers (particular for periodical articles). Results indicated that this approach to catalogue design was feasible and valid, and provided a preliminary picture of nkown item searching in 1 library's catalogue

0.12394962 = product of:
  0.18592443 = sum of:
    0.13507548 = weight(_text_:title in 7216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13507548 = score(doc=7216,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049257044 = queryNorm
        0.49232465 = fieldWeight in 7216, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7216)
    0.05084895 = product of:
      0.1016979 = sum of:
        0.1016979 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 7216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1016979 = score(doc=7216,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.42718828 = fieldWeight in 7216, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7216)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

The search system CANAL/LS simplifies the searching of library catalogues by analyzing search questions linguistically and translating them if required. The linguistic analysis reduces the search question words to their basic forms so that they can be compared with basic title forms. Consequently all variants of words and parts of compounds in German can be found. Presents the results of an analysis of search questions in a catalogue of 45.000 titles in the field of psychology

0.120742284 = product of:
  0.18111342 = sum of:
    0.11819105 = weight(_text_:title in 2517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11819105 = score(doc=2517,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049257044 = queryNorm
        0.43078408 = fieldWeight in 2517, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2517)
    0.062922366 = product of:
      0.12584473 = sum of:
        0.12584473 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 2517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12584473 = score(doc=2517,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.5286185 = fieldWeight in 2517, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2517)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Describes the function and problems of the traditional card catalogue compared with a computerised catalogue. Examines library cataloguing with the computer, linked to rules for subject cataloguing, as well as the oppor-tunities offered by computerised title entries, the transfer of data from outside, data base structure and indexing. Also looks at techniques for searching catalogues with computers, including search rules with Boolean operators, searches restricted to specific fields of free search in all fields for a vague concept. Other topics cover the essential principles of the OPAC, its information functions, mail box function and hardware configuration.

0.10845592 = product of:
  0.16268387 = sum of:
    0.11819105 = weight(_text_:title in 1529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11819105 = score(doc=1529,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049257044 = queryNorm
        0.43078408 = fieldWeight in 1529, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1529)
    0.04449283 = product of:
      0.08898566 = sum of:
        0.08898566 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 1529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08898566 = score(doc=1529,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.37378973 = fieldWeight in 1529, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1529)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Summarises the findings of apilot project at the Austrian Planning centre for Academic Libraries to assess the ÖZDB-Compactsystem on CD-ROM, the first system for serials on CD-ROM to be used in the German speaking countries. The system makes available 47,713 titles from Vienna, Graz, Linz and Salzburg university Libraries locally on an Apple Macintosh computer. The firm was able to provide information about CD-ROM and to supply the hardware for the 6-week project. The whole programme was prepared centrally. It was possible to call up records both by title and by institution responsible, and of the desired degree of specificity. The systems allows the additional advantages option of CD-PAC (Compact Disc Public Access Catalogue) wich can be used in conjunction with the already established BIBOS system.

0.103493385 = product of:
  0.15524007 = sum of:
    0.10130662 = weight(_text_:title in 1646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10130662 = score(doc=1646,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049257044 = queryNorm
        0.3692435 = fieldWeight in 1646, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1646)
    0.053933453 = product of:
      0.107866906 = sum of:
        0.107866906 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 1646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.107866906 = score(doc=1646,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.45310158 = fieldWeight in 1646, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1646)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Die EDV-gestützte Erschließung der Altbestände wird in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland seit Anfang der 1980er Jahre in größerem Rahmen im Zuge der retrospektiven Katalogkonversion betrieben. Die Konversionsdaten sind lediglich geeignet, die gröbsten Defizite in der Literaturversorgung der historisch ausgerichteten Wissenschaftsdisziplinen zu kompensieren. Da sie unter Verzicht auf Autopsie erhoben werden müssen, sind sie von eingeschränktem bibliographischem Wert und bieten keinen hinreichenden Ersatz für den bislang fehlenden nationalbibliographischen Nachweis des deutschen Schrifttums vor allem des 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts. Die vorliegende Untersuchung möchte Anregungen geben, wie eine auf Autopsie basierende Rekatalogisierung Alter Drucke (und damit möglicherweise auch die sukzessive Aufwertung von Konversionsdaten) hinsichtlich der wünschenswerten Erschließungstiefe, der erforderlichen bibliographischen Präzision, der notwendigen Standards und Normierungen sowie der daraus resultierenden Zugriffsmöglichkeiten im Online-Katalog aussehen könnte. Zu diesem Zweck werden mit dem 'Catalogue Automatisé des Anonymes Anciens (Bibliothèque Nationale, Paris)' und dem 'Short Title Catalogue Netherlands (Königliche Bibliothek Den Haag)' zwei bedeutende Rekatalogisierungsprojekte des europäischen Auslands mit (quasi-) nationalbibliographischer Zielsetzung und Qualität vorgestellt und analysiert

0.09296223 = product of:
  0.13944334 = sum of:
    0.10130662 = weight(_text_:title in 4502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10130662 = score(doc=4502,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049257044 = queryNorm
        0.3692435 = fieldWeight in 4502, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4502)
    0.038136713 = product of:
      0.07627343 = sum of:
        0.07627343 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 4502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07627343 = score(doc=4502,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.3203912 = fieldWeight in 4502, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4502)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Seit über 20 Jahren finanziert die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft die Redaktionsstelle des »Incunabula Short Title Catalogue« der British Library London an der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek München. Der bevorstehende Abschluss dieses Unternehmens gibt Anlass, den aktuellen Stand der Erschließung von Wiegendrucken in elektronischen Nachweisinstrumenten aus lokaler, regionaler und internationaler Sicht Revue passieren zu lassen. Im vergangenen Jahrzehnt sind neben diese oft langfristig angelegten Vorhaben zunehmend Projekte zur Digitalisierung von Wiegendrucken getreten. So wurden im Rahmen eines DFG-Projekts der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek seit 2008 bereits mehr als 4.000 Inkunabeln vollständig digitalisiert. Der Beitrag stellt dar, welche Konsequenzen für die Aufnahme von Inkunabeln in Verbundkataloge und lokale OPACs und die gegenseitige Vernetzung der Ressourcen sich daraus ergeben, und entwirft Perspektiven für eine zukünftige koordinierte Digitalisierung von Inkunabelbeständen deutscher Bibliotheken.

0.07754355 = product of:
  0.23263064 = sum of:
    0.23263064 = sum of:
      0.15254685 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15254685 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049257044 = queryNorm
          0.6407824 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
      0.080083795 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.080083795 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049257044 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

It was decided to close the Göttingen card catalogue for jubjects and continue withe the PICA Basisklassifikation and SWD

Source

SUB-Kultur. 1(1991) Nr.1, S.20-22

0.067404196 = product of:
  0.10110629 = sum of:
    0.08442217 = weight(_text_:title in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08442217 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049257044 = queryNorm
        0.3077029 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
    0.016684124 = product of:
      0.03336825 = sum of:
        0.03336825 = weight(_text_:22 in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03336825 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Catalogs have for centuries been the main tool that enabled users to search for items in a library by author, title, or subject. A catalog can be interpreted as a set of bibliographic records, where each record acts as a surrogate for a publication. Every record describes a specific publication and contains the data that is used to create the indexes of search systems and the information that is presented to the user. Bibliographic records are often captured and exchanged by the use of the MARC format. Although there are numerous rdquodialectsrdquo of the MARC format in use, they are usually crafted on the same basis and are interoperable with each other -to a certain extent. The data model of a MARC-based catalog, however, is rdquo[...] extremely non-normalized with excessive replication of datardquo [1]. For instance, a literary work that exists in numerous editions and translations is likely to yield a large result set because each edition or translation is represented by an individual record, that is unrelated to other records that describe the same work.

Source

Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003

0.06573725 = product of:
  0.19721174 = sum of:
    0.19721174 = sum of:
      0.14382255 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14382255 = score(doc=2502,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049257044 = queryNorm
          0.60413545 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
      0.053389195 = weight(_text_:22 in 2502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053389195 = score(doc=2502,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049257044 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2502, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2502)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Examines a simpler cataloguing format offered by PCs, without disturbing compatibility, using A-Z cataloguing rules for data input, category codes for tagging and computer-supported data input through windows. Gives numerous examples of catalogue entries, basing techniques on certain category schemes set out by Klaus Haller and Hans Popst. Examines catalogue entries in respect of categories of data bases for authors and corporate names, titles, single volume works, serial issues of collected works, and limited editions of works in several volumes.

Source

Bibliotheksdienst. 22(1988) H.9, S.841-856

0.05458566 = product of:
  0.08187849 = sum of:
    0.06519437 = product of:
      0.1955831 = sum of:
        0.1955831 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1955831 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41760176 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.016684124 = product of:
      0.03336825 = sum of:
        0.03336825 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03336825 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Content

1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968

0.05422796 = product of:
  0.08134194 = sum of:
    0.059095524 = weight(_text_:title in 514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059095524 = score(doc=514,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049257044 = queryNorm
        0.21539204 = fieldWeight in 514, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=514)
    0.022246415 = product of:
      0.04449283 = sum of:
        0.04449283 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04449283 = score(doc=514,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.18689486 = fieldWeight in 514, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=514)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Content

"Definition der im VD 16 zu verzeichnenden Drucke Das "Verzeichnis der im deutschen Sprachbereich erschienenen Drucke des 16. Jahrhunderts" (VD 16) schließt zeitlich an die Inkunabelverzeichnung an, die traditionellerweise mit dem Jahr 1500 endet. Damit wird auch der Berichtszeitraum definiert, der nicht ganz mit den Jahrhundertgrenzen übereinstimmt: 1501 bis 1600 einschließlich. Er wirkt sich aus für das VD 17, das Drucke von 1601 bis einschließlich 1700 verzeichnet und für ein VD 18, das auch das Jahr 1800 enthalten wird. Das VD 16 erschließt "die im deutschen Sprachbereich erschienenen Drucke". Entscheidend ist also der Druck- bzw. Verlagsort der Ausgaben, wobei die Publikation von Josef Benzing zu den Druckern und Verlegern im deutschen Sprachbereich, die gerade bei Harrassowitz in neuer Bearbeitung erschienen ist,2 den geografischen Raum absteckt. Diese Definition, die VD 17 und VD 18 übernehmen, ist einerseits für eine Nationalbibliografie allein richtig, bereitet aber andererseits Schwierigkeiten, wenn man an die Selektion dieser Drucke denkt, die nur über normierte Druck- und Verlagsorte, Drucker und Verleger möglich ist. Die Nationalbibliografie sollte ferner - nach dem Vorbild des englischen Short Title Catalogue (ESTC) - auch alle in deutscher Sprache außerhalb des deutschen Sprachbereichs erschienenen Drucke verzeichnen. Diese Erweiterung wurde für das VD 16 erst Ende 2006 entschieden, um es in Analogie zum VD 17 zu bringen. Eine systematische Ergänzung dieser Drucke steht noch aus. Anders als das VD 17 verzeichnet das VD 16 keine Einblattdrucke3, wie das VD 17 keine Karten und Noten: für diese Materialien gibt es einschlägige Spezialbibliografien.

0.052155495 = product of:
  0.15646648 = sum of:
    0.15646648 = product of:
      0.46939945 = sum of:
        0.46939945 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.46939945 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41760176 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.0516957 = product of:
  0.1550871 = sum of:
    0.1550871 = sum of:
      0.1016979 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1016979 = score(doc=4431,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049257044 = queryNorm
          0.42718828 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
      0.053389195 = weight(_text_:22 in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053389195 = score(doc=4431,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.049257044 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

A method is outlined which would permit a large number of libraries of all types to use centralised cataloguing facilities without the need for their own automatic data processing equipment and outlay. The method is seen as an alternative to the OCLC on-line data bank, and permits the ordering of printed catalogue cards by machine-readable but hand-prepared data cards, such as the loan cards which readers at the Münster library are at present required to complete. The proposed sequence of ordering is set out in 11 stages

Source

Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 22(1975) H.5, S.387-390

0.04794085 = product of:
  0.14382255 = sum of:
    0.14382255 = product of:
      0.2876451 = sum of:
        0.2876451 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 3969) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2876451 = score(doc=3969,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            1.2082709 = fieldWeight in 3969, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3969)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

0.039397016 = product of:
  0.11819105 = sum of:
    0.11819105 = weight(_text_:title in 1174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11819105 = score(doc=1174,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049257044 = queryNorm
        0.43078408 = fieldWeight in 1174, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1174)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The test ran between Nov 95-Aug 96 in Cologne Fachhochschule fur Bibliothekswesen (College of Librarianship).The test basis was a database of 190,000 book titles published between 1990-95. MILOS II mechanized indexing methods proved helpful in avoiding or reducing numbers of unsatisfied/no result retrieval searches. Retrieval from mechanised indexing is 3 times more successful than from title keyword data. MILOS II also used a standardized semantic vocabulary. Mechanised indexing demands high quality software and output data

0.039397016 = product of:
  0.11819105 = sum of:
    0.11819105 = weight(_text_:title in 86) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11819105 = score(doc=86,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049257044 = queryNorm
        0.43078408 = fieldWeight in 86, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=86)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

Vgl. unter: https://www.degruyter.com/view/title/554542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110657807.