Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Abstracting"
  1. Goh, A.; Hui, S.C.; Chan, S.K.: ¬A text extraction system for news reports (1996) 0.04
    0.039797 = product of:
      0.119390994 = sum of:
        0.119390994 = weight(_text_:title in 6601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.119390994 = score(doc=6601,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.43515766 = fieldWeight in 6601, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6601)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the design and implementation of a text extraction tool, NEWS_EXT, which aztomatically produces summaries from news reports by extracting sentences to form indicative abstracts. Selection of sentences is based on sentence importance, measured by means of sentence scoring or simple linguistic analysis of sentence structure. Tests were conducted on 4 approaches for the functioning of the NEWS_EXT system; extraction by keyword frequency; extraction by title keywords; extraction by location; and extraction by indicative phrase. Reports results of a study to compare the results of the application of NEWS_EXT with manually produced extracts; using relevance as the criterion for effectiveness. 48 newspaper articles were assessed (The Straits Times, International Herald Tribune, Asian Wall Street Journal, and Financial Times). The evaluation was conducted in 2 stages: stage 1 involving abstracts produced manually by 2 human experts; stage 2 involving the generation of abstracts using NEWS_EXT. Results of each of the 4 approaches were compared with the human produced abstracts, where the title and location approaches were found to give the best results for both local and foreign news. Reports plans to refine and enhance NEWS_EXT and incorporate it as a module within a larger newspaper clipping system
  2. Yeh, J.-Y.; Ke, H.-R.; Yang, W.-P.; Meng, I.-H.: Text summarization using a trainable summarizer and latent semantic analysis (2005) 0.03
    0.028140724 = product of:
      0.08442217 = sum of:
        0.08442217 = weight(_text_:title in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08442217 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.3077029 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper proposes two approaches to address text summarization: modified corpus-based approach (MCBA) and LSA-based T.R.M. approach (LSA + T.R.M.). The first is a trainable summarizer, which takes into account several features, including position, positive keyword, negative keyword, centrality, and the resemblance to the title, to generate summaries. Two new ideas are exploited: (1) sentence positions are ranked to emphasize the significances of different sentence positions, and (2) the score function is trained by the genetic algorithm (GA) to obtain a suitable combination of feature weights. The second uses latent semantic analysis (LSA) to derive the semantic matrix of a document or a corpus and uses semantic sentence representation to construct a semantic text relationship map. We evaluate LSA + T.R.M. both with single documents and at the corpus level to investigate the competence of LSA in text summarization. The two novel approaches were measured at several compression rates on a data corpus composed of 100 political articles. When the compression rate was 30%, an average f-measure of 49% for MCBA, 52% for MCBA + GA, 44% and 40% for LSA + T.R.M. in single-document and corpus level were achieved respectively.
  3. Goh, A.; Hui, S.C.: TES: a text extraction system (1996) 0.01
    0.0088982 = product of:
      0.026694598 = sum of:
        0.026694598 = product of:
          0.053389195 = sum of:
            0.053389195 = weight(_text_:22 in 6599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053389195 = score(doc=6599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6599)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    26. 2.1997 10:22:43
  4. Robin, J.; McKeown, K.: Empirically designing and evaluating a new revision-based model for summary generation (1996) 0.01
    0.0088982 = product of:
      0.026694598 = sum of:
        0.026694598 = product of:
          0.053389195 = sum of:
            0.053389195 = weight(_text_:22 in 6751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053389195 = score(doc=6751,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6751, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6751)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  5. Jones, P.A.; Bradbeer, P.V.G.: Discovery of optimal weights in a concept selection system (1996) 0.01
    0.0088982 = product of:
      0.026694598 = sum of:
        0.026694598 = product of:
          0.053389195 = sum of:
            0.053389195 = weight(_text_:22 in 6974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053389195 = score(doc=6974,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6974, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6974)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  6. Vanderwende, L.; Suzuki, H.; Brockett, J.M.; Nenkova, A.: Beyond SumBasic : task-focused summarization with sentence simplification and lexical expansion (2007) 0.01
    0.00667365 = product of:
      0.020020949 = sum of:
        0.020020949 = product of:
          0.040041897 = sum of:
            0.040041897 = weight(_text_:22 in 948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040041897 = score(doc=948,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 948, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=948)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In recent years, there has been increased interest in topic-focused multi-document summarization. In this task, automatic summaries are produced in response to a specific information request, or topic, stated by the user. The system we have designed to accomplish this task comprises four main components: a generic extractive summarization system, a topic-focusing component, sentence simplification, and lexical expansion of topic words. This paper details each of these components, together with experiments designed to quantify their individual contributions. We include an analysis of our results on two large datasets commonly used to evaluate task-focused summarization, the DUC2005 and DUC2006 datasets, using automatic metrics. Additionally, we include an analysis of our results on the DUC2006 task according to human evaluation metrics. In the human evaluation of system summaries compared to human summaries, i.e., the Pyramid method, our system ranked first out of 22 systems in terms of overall mean Pyramid score; and in the human evaluation of summary responsiveness to the topic, our system ranked third out of 35 systems.
  7. Wu, Y.-f.B.; Li, Q.; Bot, R.S.; Chen, X.: Finding nuggets in documents : a machine learning approach (2006) 0.01
    0.005561375 = product of:
      0.016684124 = sum of:
        0.016684124 = product of:
          0.03336825 = sum of:
            0.03336825 = weight(_text_:22 in 5290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03336825 = score(doc=5290,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5290, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5290)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:25:48
  8. Kim, H.H.; Kim, Y.H.: Generic speech summarization of transcribed lecture videos : using tags and their semantic relations (2016) 0.01
    0.005561375 = product of:
      0.016684124 = sum of:
        0.016684124 = product of:
          0.03336825 = sum of:
            0.03336825 = weight(_text_:22 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03336825 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 12:29:41
  9. Oh, H.; Nam, S.; Zhu, Y.: Structured abstract summarization of scientific articles : summarization using full-text section information (2023) 0.01
    0.005561375 = product of:
      0.016684124 = sum of:
        0.016684124 = product of:
          0.03336825 = sum of:
            0.03336825 = weight(_text_:22 in 889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03336825 = score(doc=889,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 889, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=889)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:57:12
  10. Jiang, Y.; Meng, R.; Huang, Y.; Lu, W.; Liu, J.: Generating keyphrases for readers : a controllable keyphrase generation framework (2023) 0.01
    0.005561375 = product of:
      0.016684124 = sum of:
        0.016684124 = product of:
          0.03336825 = sum of:
            0.03336825 = weight(_text_:22 in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03336825 = score(doc=1012,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2023 14:55:20