Search (407 results, page 1 of 21)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Ballard, T.; Grimaldi, A.: Improve OPAC searching by reducing tagging errors in MARC records (1997) 0.19
    0.19344172 = product of:
      0.29016256 = sum of:
        0.13507548 = weight(_text_:title in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13507548 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.49232465 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
        0.1550871 = sum of:
          0.1016979 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1016979 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049257044 = queryNorm
              0.42718828 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
          0.053389195 = weight(_text_:22 in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.053389195 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049257044 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    One of the most common errors in cataloguing library materials involves miscoding of the nonfiling indicator of title fields. Notes the extent of the problem and its negative effect on searching in the library's online catalogue and surveys how librarians have approached solutions to the problems. Describes how the major library automation system address this problem
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  2. Zietz, S.J.: Ephemera: MARC-formatted cataloging records (1992) 0.15
    0.15493703 = product of:
      0.23240553 = sum of:
        0.16884434 = weight(_text_:title in 5527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16884434 = score(doc=5527,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.6154058 = fieldWeight in 5527, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5527)
        0.063561186 = product of:
          0.12712237 = sum of:
            0.12712237 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 5527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12712237 = score(doc=5527,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.5339854 = fieldWeight in 5527, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5527)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the problem of cataloguing ephemera, and advocates a hybrid cataloguing practice, combining from as many codes as necessary the most appropriate rules. Offers advice on constructing the following elements of MARC-formatted catalogue records: main entry; title and edition; publisher statement; date; physical extent; note area; and access
  3. Walravens, H.: Serials cataloging in Germany : the historical development (2003) 0.14
    0.14109348 = product of:
      0.21164021 = sum of:
        0.16714738 = weight(_text_:title in 5651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16714738 = score(doc=5651,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.6092207 = fieldWeight in 5651, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5651)
        0.04449283 = product of:
          0.08898566 = sum of:
            0.08898566 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 5651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08898566 = score(doc=5651,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.37378973 = fieldWeight in 5651, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5651)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper outlines the development of serials cataloguing in Germany, which started with entries usually in systematic catalogues. Cataloguing codes were developed first by individual major libraries; the establishment of a Prussian union catalogue called for generally recognized rules, but these focused mainly on sorting and filing. When, in the 1960s, the Prussian Instructions were given up in favor of RAK (Regeln für Alphabetische Katalogisierung), ISBD was adopted for the descriptive part. As to modern international cooperation, this paper explains that the main obstacles are not so much different cataloguing codes but the lack of consensus on the definition of a serial title. Recent revision efforts missed the opportunity of accepting an International Standard Serials Title.
  4. Brunt, R.: From main entry to work authority record : development of a cataloguing fundamental (1999) 0.14
    0.14109348 = product of:
      0.21164021 = sum of:
        0.16714738 = weight(_text_:title in 756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16714738 = score(doc=756,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.6092207 = fieldWeight in 756, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=756)
        0.04449283 = product of:
          0.08898566 = sum of:
            0.08898566 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08898566 = score(doc=756,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.37378973 = fieldWeight in 756, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=756)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Explores the confusion between main entry and main entry heading and attempts to finally lay the ghost to rest by shifting the emphasis onto the problem of work authority - the problem with which the theory of main entry is actually concerned. Concentrating on the second function of the catalogue as defined in the "Paris principles" of 1961, the paper examines various contributions on main entry including those delivered at the Toronto conference on AACR in 1997. Proposes the establishment of a global work authority file in which each individual work is primarily identified by a modified version of the uniform title, a departure which would restore the title (as opposed to the author) as principal identifier of the work.
  5. Genereux, C.: Building connections : a review of the serials literature 2004 through 2005 (2007) 0.13
    0.13032612 = product of:
      0.19548917 = sum of:
        0.17546822 = weight(_text_:title in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17546822 = score(doc=2548,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.63954854 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
        0.020020949 = product of:
          0.040041897 = sum of:
            0.040041897 = weight(_text_:22 in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040041897 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This review of 2004 and 2005 serials literature covers the themes of cost, management, and access. Interwoven through the serials literature of these two years are the importance of collaboration, communication, and linkages between scholars, publishers, subscription agents and other intermediaries, and librarians. The emphasis in the literature is on electronic serials and their impact on publishing, libraries, and vendors. In response to the crisis of escalating journal prices and libraries' dissatisfaction with the Big Deal licensing agreements, Open Access journals and publishing models were promoted. Libraries subscribed to or licensed increasing numbers of electronic serials. As a result, libraries sought ways to better manage licensing and subscription data (not handled by traditional integrated library systems) by implementing electronic resources management systems. In order to provide users with better, faster, and more current information on and access to electronic serials, libraries implemented tools and services to provide A-Z title lists, title by title coverage data, MARC records, and OpenURL link resolvers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  6. Shemberg, M.: From citation to piece in hand : the search for efficiency in accessing monographic series (1997) 0.12
    0.12093727 = product of:
      0.1814059 = sum of:
        0.14326918 = weight(_text_:title in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14326918 = score(doc=539,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.52218914 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
        0.038136713 = product of:
          0.07627343 = sum of:
            0.07627343 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07627343 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.3203912 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Looks at access problems that occur when the citations from indexes for articles in series differ from the way the items are catalogued. To illustrate the difficulties encountered,a search was conducted in the online catalogues of various libraries and a comparison made between the bibliographiuc entries found to citations both in electronic indexes and in authors' references. The series: New directions for community colleges (NDCC); was chosen as it has kept the same title, ISSN and editors since 1973; yet is still illusive to identify. Each issue of NDCC, beginning with issue 1, 1973, was examined for citation information, numbering systems and changes in description on the title page. The online catalogue at Ohio State University (OSCAR) was checked to see how each issue was handled over time. Indexes consulted included: ERIC, Education Index; ArticleFirst; and CARL UnCover. Results indicate that the ramifications of local cataloguing decisions affect all areas of librarianship. In this electronic age, the need is great to integrate the various sources of information needed for a patron to go from citation to piece in hand
  7. Walravens, H.: Serials cataloging in Germany : the historical development (2003) 0.12
    0.12093727 = product of:
      0.1814059 = sum of:
        0.14326918 = weight(_text_:title in 5650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14326918 = score(doc=5650,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.52218914 = fieldWeight in 5650, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5650)
        0.038136713 = product of:
          0.07627343 = sum of:
            0.07627343 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 5650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07627343 = score(doc=5650,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.3203912 = fieldWeight in 5650, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5650)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper outlines the development of serials cataloguing in Germany, which started with entries usually in systematic catalogues. Cataloguing codes were developed first by individual major libraries; the establishment of a Prussian union catalogue called for generally recognized rules, but these focused mainly on sorting and filing. When, in the 1960s, the Prussian Instructions were given up in favor of RAK (Regeln für Alphabetische Katalogisierung), ISBD was adopted for the descriptive part. As to modern international cooperation, this paper explains that the main obstacles are not so much different cataloguing codes but the lack of consensus on the definition of a serial title. Recent revision efforts missed the opportunity of accepting an International Standard Serials Title.
  8. Wells, K.L.: Cataloging standards in the '90s : infinite possibilities vs. financial realities (1994) 0.12
    0.120742284 = product of:
      0.18111342 = sum of:
        0.11819105 = weight(_text_:title in 1041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11819105 = score(doc=1041,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.43078408 = fieldWeight in 1041, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1041)
        0.062922366 = product of:
          0.12584473 = sum of:
            0.12584473 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 1041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12584473 = score(doc=1041,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.5286185 = fieldWeight in 1041, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1041)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Financial crisis in many libraries in the USA are leading to catalogue managers finding themselves faced with growing backlogs and fewer people to handle them. Considers the use of minimal level cataloging (MLC) to alleviate the problem. AACR2 allows for considerable variation in the amount of detail cataloguers can provide. Discusses the creation of a local MLC standard which could allow varying levels of description according to type of material. The financial realities of the 1990s mean that the ideal of creating a perfect catalogue record for each title must be balanced agianst the desirability of having a bibliographic record, albeit an imperfect one, available to patrons in the near future
  9. Smiraglia, R.P.; Lee, H.-L.: Rethinking the authorship principle (2012) 0.11
    0.11157423 = product of:
      0.16736135 = sum of:
        0.10130662 = weight(_text_:title in 5575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10130662 = score(doc=5575,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.3692435 = fieldWeight in 5575, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5575)
        0.06605473 = product of:
          0.13210946 = sum of:
            0.13210946 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 5575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13210946 = score(doc=5575,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.5549339 = fieldWeight in 5575, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5575)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The fundamental principle of order in the library catalogue is the authorship principle, which serves as the organizing node of an alphabetico-classed system, in which "texts" of "works" are organized first alphabetically by uniform title of the progenitor work and then are subarranged using titles for variant instantiations, under the heading for an "author." We analyze case studies of entries from (1) the first documented imperial library catalogue, the Seven Epitomes (Qilue [??]), in China; (2) Abelard's Works, which featured prominently in the 1848 testimony of Antonio Panizzi; and (3) The French Chef and the large family of instantiated works associated with it. Our analysis shows that the catalogue typically contains many large superwork sets. A more pragmatic approach to the design of catalogues is to array descriptions of resources in relation to the superwork sets to which they might belong. In all cases, a multidimensional faceted arrangement incorporating ideational nodes from the universe of recorded knowledge holds promise for greatly enhanced retrieval capability.
  10. Antelman, K.: Identifying the serial work as a bibliographic entity (2004) 0.11
    0.10886009 = product of:
      0.16329013 = sum of:
        0.14326918 = weight(_text_:title in 130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14326918 = score(doc=130,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.52218914 = fieldWeight in 130, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=130)
        0.020020949 = product of:
          0.040041897 = sum of:
            0.040041897 = weight(_text_:22 in 130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040041897 = score(doc=130,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 130, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=130)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    A solid theoretical foundation has been built over the years exploring the bibliographic work and developing cataloging rules and practices to describe the work in the traditional catalog. With the increasing prevalence of multiple manifestations of serial titles, as well as tools that automate discovery and retrieval, bibliographic control of serials at a higher level of abstraction is more necessary than ever before. At the same time, models such as the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions' Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records offer new opportunities to control all bibliographic entities at this higher level and build more useful catalog displays. The bibliographic mechanisms that control the work for monographs - author, title, and uniform title - are weak identifiers for serials. New identifiers being adopted by the content industry are built on models and practices that are fundamentally different from those underlying the new bibliographic models. What is needed is a work identifier for serials that is both congruent with the new models and can enable us to meet the objective of providing work-level access to all resources in our catalogs.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. Hustand, S.: Problems of duplicate records (1986) 0.10
    0.103493385 = product of:
      0.15524007 = sum of:
        0.10130662 = weight(_text_:title in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10130662 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.3692435 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
        0.053933453 = product of:
          0.107866906 = sum of:
            0.107866906 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.107866906 = score(doc=266,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.45310158 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Duplicate records is a familiar problem in bibliographic databases. The problem is obvious when a union catalogue is established by automatically merging two or more separate and independent source of catalogue information. However, even in systems with on-line cataloguing and access to previous records, duplication is a problem. Author / title search search prior to cataloguing does not cut duplication to zero. A great deal of effort has been put into developing methods of duplicate detection. A major problem in this work has been efficiency. Particularly in the on-line setting is this of importance. Most studies have dealt with book and article material. The Research Libraries Group Inc. has described matching algorithms also for films, maps, recordings, scores and serials. Various methods of detecting duplicates will be discussed.
  12. Romero, L.: Original cataloguing errors : a comparison of errors found in entry-level cataloging with errors found in OCLC and RLIN (1994) 0.10
    0.103493385 = product of:
      0.15524007 = sum of:
        0.10130662 = weight(_text_:title in 2333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10130662 = score(doc=2333,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.3692435 = fieldWeight in 2333, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2333)
        0.053933453 = product of:
          0.107866906 = sum of:
            0.107866906 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 2333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.107866906 = score(doc=2333,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.45310158 = fieldWeight in 2333, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2333)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Statistically examines the data in 2 studies of cataloguing errors: the 1st concerning original cataloguing errors produced by entry-level cataloguers, and the second concerning cataloguing errors in the OCLC and RLIN database. The numer and percentage of errors were analyzed to determine whether or not certain 'areas of cataloguing difficulty' exist in monographic cataloguing. In some areas of the catalogue record, namely, description and headings, title ad statement or responsibility, and notes, no significant difference was found in the entry-level cataloguing and non-entry-level cataloguing. This suggests that there are areas within a catalogue record that cause difficulty simply because of their nature and are not unique to any particular group of cataloguing personnel. The implications of this finding for cataloguing instructors and administrators are discussed
  13. Bötte, G.-J.: Neuere Konzepte der autopsiegestützten Altbestandskatalogisierung unter Einsatz der elektronischen Datenverarbeitung (1992) 0.10
    0.103493385 = product of:
      0.15524007 = sum of:
        0.10130662 = weight(_text_:title in 1646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10130662 = score(doc=1646,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.3692435 = fieldWeight in 1646, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1646)
        0.053933453 = product of:
          0.107866906 = sum of:
            0.107866906 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 1646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.107866906 = score(doc=1646,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.45310158 = fieldWeight in 1646, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1646)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Die EDV-gestützte Erschließung der Altbestände wird in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland seit Anfang der 1980er Jahre in größerem Rahmen im Zuge der retrospektiven Katalogkonversion betrieben. Die Konversionsdaten sind lediglich geeignet, die gröbsten Defizite in der Literaturversorgung der historisch ausgerichteten Wissenschaftsdisziplinen zu kompensieren. Da sie unter Verzicht auf Autopsie erhoben werden müssen, sind sie von eingeschränktem bibliographischem Wert und bieten keinen hinreichenden Ersatz für den bislang fehlenden nationalbibliographischen Nachweis des deutschen Schrifttums vor allem des 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts. Die vorliegende Untersuchung möchte Anregungen geben, wie eine auf Autopsie basierende Rekatalogisierung Alter Drucke (und damit möglicherweise auch die sukzessive Aufwertung von Konversionsdaten) hinsichtlich der wünschenswerten Erschließungstiefe, der erforderlichen bibliographischen Präzision, der notwendigen Standards und Normierungen sowie der daraus resultierenden Zugriffsmöglichkeiten im Online-Katalog aussehen könnte. Zu diesem Zweck werden mit dem 'Catalogue Automatisé des Anonymes Anciens (Bibliothèque Nationale, Paris)' und dem 'Short Title Catalogue Netherlands (Königliche Bibliothek Den Haag)' zwei bedeutende Rekatalogisierungsprojekte des europäischen Auslands mit (quasi-) nationalbibliographischer Zielsetzung und Qualität vorgestellt und analysiert
  14. Hunter, E.J.; Bakewell, K.G.B.: Cataloguing (1983) 0.10
    0.103493385 = product of:
      0.15524007 = sum of:
        0.10130662 = weight(_text_:title in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10130662 = score(doc=2054,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.3692435 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
        0.053933453 = product of:
          0.107866906 = sum of:
            0.107866906 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.107866906 = score(doc=2054,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.45310158 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Originally published in 1979 as a title in the Outlines of Modern Librarianship' series this new edition has been expanded and updated in the light of recent developments in this rapidly developing field of librarianship, with particular reference to automation. As a consequence, this edition is substantially more than an outline of the subject. The authors take the reader through a comprehensive exposition of cataloguing - the definitions, arrangement and role of the catalogue: the history of its development; standardization and AACR2; the subject approach via pre-and post-coordinate indexing; analysis; filing rules and methods; the physical forms of the catalogue; the use of the computer in cataloguing; the role of networks; the management of cataloguing; and the relevance of book indexing. There is a detailed index, as well as a list of abbreviations and acronyms and a glossary of terms.
  15. Nistico, R.: Studio e indicizzazione delle dediche librarie (1998) 0.09
    0.09436589 = product of:
      0.14154883 = sum of:
        0.11819105 = weight(_text_:title in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11819105 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.43078408 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
        0.023357773 = product of:
          0.046715546 = sum of:
            0.046715546 = weight(_text_:22 in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046715546 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Book dedications by authors, often in verse form and appearing just before the title page, are one of the 6 elements describes by the French scholar Genette as paratextual. For some reasons dedications have failed to interest librarians, yet books containing them can be a valid object of bibliographic study, for the reasons that they carry special markings: are an example of a specific literary or semantic class; and reveal linguistic/stylistic features. Examines the history of literary dedications, citing examples by well-known writers, and suggests that cataloguing software should have a special field to record dedication
    Date
    22. 2.1999 20:41:06
  16. Bothmann, R.: Cataloging electronic books (2004) 0.09
    0.09436589 = product of:
      0.14154883 = sum of:
        0.11819105 = weight(_text_:title in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11819105 = score(doc=129,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.43078408 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
        0.023357773 = product of:
          0.046715546 = sum of:
            0.046715546 = weight(_text_:22 in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046715546 = score(doc=129,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Papers on the cataloging of electronic resources have focused on electronic journals and Internet resources such as Web sites and not on electronic books. Electronic books are nonserial monographic resources accessed with a computer either directly or remotely. Rules and standards for cataloging electronic resources have changed and continue to change. This article discusses the electronic book as a unique manifestation and provides practical instruction on the application of current cataloging rules. The cataloging elements covered are control fields and variable data fields, including classification, uniform titles, title information, edition information, type and extent of the resource, publication and distribution information, physical description, series statements, notes, and subject analysis.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  17. Mundgod, M.B.; Prasad, A.R.D.: Automatic identification of bibliographic data elements from the title pages of documents : a heuristic approach (1996) 0.09
    0.08809441 = product of:
      0.26428324 = sum of:
        0.26428324 = weight(_text_:title in 397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26428324 = score(doc=397,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.9632625 = fieldWeight in 397, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=397)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Attempts to develop the heuristics which would help in building an expert system for the automatic ientification of bibliographic data elements from the title pages of documents. A study focusing on the physical layout of 500 sample title pages identified the pattern of appearance of various bibliographic data elements such as title, author, publisher, sub-title, edition, year and place of publication, and heuristics for each field are developed. Suggests that an expert system should be developed to test the validity of the proposed heuristics with the aim of evaluating the use of such a system for automatic data entry in cataloguing
  18. Dunkle, C.B.: Outsourcing the catalog department : a mediation inspired by the business and library literature (1996) 0.08
    0.08217156 = product of:
      0.24651468 = sum of:
        0.24651468 = sum of:
          0.17977819 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17977819 = score(doc=4907,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049257044 = queryNorm
              0.75516933 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
          0.0667365 = weight(_text_:22 in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0667365 = score(doc=4907,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049257044 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Draws on parallels between outsourcing in business and in libraries to examine the difficulties and implications of outsourcing the catalogue department. Examines why cataloguing, in particular, has received outsourcing attention. 2 major reasons emerge: cataloguing is a non core activity, and catalogue departments are troublesome
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 22(1996) no.1, S.33-43
  19. Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 3: the Anglo-American cataloging codes (1995) 0.08
    0.080885045 = product of:
      0.121327564 = sum of:
        0.10130662 = weight(_text_:title in 4503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10130662 = score(doc=4503,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.3692435 = fieldWeight in 4503, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4503)
        0.020020949 = product of:
          0.040041897 = sum of:
            0.040041897 = weight(_text_:22 in 4503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040041897 = score(doc=4503,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4503, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4503)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Anglo-American codes are examined to determine the implicit or acting concept of work in each, in order to trace the development of our current implicit concept of work, as embodied in AACR2R. The following conditions are examined, using comparison tables. (1) same work with different appendages (illustrated works, music with text, texts with commentary and/or biographical/critical material, scholia); (2) separately published parts of a work produced by the exercise of several different functions; (3) appendages to a work published separately (commentaries without text, concordances, continuations, indexes, sequels, supplements); (4) change in title of a work. A trend away from the collocation of the editions of a work called for by the second objective of the catalog is identified. It is suggested that this tendency stems from failure to take advantage of newer technologies for building catalogs
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Pt.1: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.1, S.9-28; Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24
  20. Ellero, N.P.: Panning for gold : utility of the World Wide Web for metadata and authority control in special collections (2002) 0.08
    0.080885045 = product of:
      0.121327564 = sum of:
        0.10130662 = weight(_text_:title in 161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10130662 = score(doc=161,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.3692435 = fieldWeight in 161, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=161)
        0.020020949 = product of:
          0.040041897 = sum of:
            0.040041897 = weight(_text_:22 in 161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040041897 = score(doc=161,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 161, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=161)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes the use of the World Wide Web as a valuable name authority resource and tool for special collections analytic-level cataloging and the specific goal of fully discovering the names of people who lived in the past as well as those from the present. Current tools and initiatives such as the Name Authority Component of the Program for Cooperative Cataloging (NACO) and the Library of Congress Name Authority File have a specific mission and are partially helpful. Web resources encompassing special collections are often intricate and require global and enhanced resources to continue what have been the guiding principles, tradition, and value of cataloging: to discover works via many points of entry; to find works by or about the same person, topic, or title; and to continue the great cataloging legacies of standards and cooperation.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 374
  • m 19
  • b 15
  • el 12
  • s 7
  • r 4
  • ? 1
  • n 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…