Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Indexierungsstudien"
  1. Ansari, M.: Matching between assigned descriptors and title keywords in medical theses (2005) 0.12
    0.11866939 = product of:
      0.17800409 = sum of:
        0.1462235 = weight(_text_:title in 4739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1462235 = score(doc=4739,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.5329571 = fieldWeight in 4739, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4739)
        0.031780593 = product of:
          0.063561186 = sum of:
            0.063561186 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 4739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063561186 = score(doc=4739,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.2669927 = fieldWeight in 4739, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4739)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - To examine the degree of exact and partial match between the assigned descriptors and title keywords of medical theses written in Farsi and submitted for a PhD degree.Design/methodology/approach - A sample population of 506 theses in Pediatrics, Gynecology, Cardiology and Psychiatry was randomly picked out of a total of 909 indexed in the Indexing Department of the Central Library of the Iran University of Medical Science and Health Care Services. The results obtained are compared with those reported for other documents written in Farsi and English. Where applicable, the influence of the foreign language and its structure is commented on.Findings - It is shown that the degree of match between the assigned descriptors and the title keywords is greater than 70 per cent, equaling those reported for Farsi books and Michigan University Library catalogue in USA. It is also shown that the frequency of the match has increased since 1982, indicating that the authors have become more attentive in their choice of title.Research limitations/implications - Detailed analysis of results, however, shows significant differences between the degree of exact match amongst the four categories, with psychiatry theses that use more common terms showing highest exact match findings (50 per cent).Originality/value - This paper highlights the need for a closer collaboration with medical institutions for definition of approved terms and their incorporation in indexation in order to improve findings in various medical categories.
  2. Subrahmanyam, B.: Library of Congress Classification numbers : issues of consistency and their implications for union catalogs (2006) 0.11
    0.10860509 = product of:
      0.16290763 = sum of:
        0.1462235 = weight(_text_:title in 5784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1462235 = score(doc=5784,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.5329571 = fieldWeight in 5784, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5784)
        0.016684124 = product of:
          0.03336825 = sum of:
            0.03336825 = weight(_text_:22 in 5784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03336825 = score(doc=5784,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5784, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5784)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This study examined Library of Congress Classification (LCC)-based class numbers assigned to a representative sample of 200 titles in 52 American library systems to determine the level of consistency within and across those systems. The results showed that under the condition that a library system has a title, the probability of that title having the same LCC-based class number across library systems is greater than 85 percent. An examination of 121 titles displaying variations in class numbers among library systems showed certain titles (for example, multi-foci titles, titles in series, bibliographies, and fiction) lend themselves to alternate class numbers. Others were assigned variant numbers either due to latitude in the schedules or for reasons that cannot be pinpointed. With increasing dependence on copy cataloging, the size of such variations may continue to decrease. As the preferred class number with its alternates represents a title more fully than just the preferred class number, this paper argues for continued use of alternates by library systems and for finding a method to link alternate class numbers to preferred class numbers for enriched subject access through local and union catalogs.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Booth, A.: How consistent is MEDLINE indexing? (1990) 0.09
    0.09436589 = product of:
      0.14154883 = sum of:
        0.11819105 = weight(_text_:title in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11819105 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.43078408 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
        0.023357773 = product of:
          0.046715546 = sum of:
            0.046715546 = weight(_text_:22 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046715546 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    A known-item search for abstracts to previously retrieved references revealed that 2 documents from the same annual volume had been indexed twice. Working from the premise that the whole volume may have been double-indexed, a search strategy was devised that limited the journal code to the year in question. 57 references were retrieved, comprising 28 pairs of duplicates plus a citation for the whole volume. Author, title, source and descriptors were requested off-line and the citations were paired with their duplicates. The 4 categories of descriptors-major descriptors, minor descriptors, subheadings and check-tags-were compared for depth and consistency of indexing and lessons that might be learnt from the study are discussed.
    Source
    Health libraries review. 7(1990) no.1, S.22-26
  4. Tonta, Y.: ¬A study of indexing consistency between Library of Congress and British Library catalogers (1991) 0.05
    0.045025162 = product of:
      0.13507548 = sum of:
        0.13507548 = weight(_text_:title in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13507548 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.49232465 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Indexing consistency between Library of Congress and British Library catalogers using the LCSH is compared.82 titles published in 1987 in the field of library and information science were identified for comparison, and for each title its LC subject headings, assigned by both LC and BL catalogers, were compared. By applying Hooper's 'consistency of a pair' equation, the average indexing consistency value was calculated for the 82 titles. The average indexing value between LC and BL catalogers is 16% for exact matches, and 36% for partial matches
  5. Bodoff, D.; Richter-Levin, Y.: Viewpoints in indexing term assignment (2020) 0.03
    0.033768874 = product of:
      0.10130662 = sum of:
        0.10130662 = weight(_text_:title in 5765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10130662 = score(doc=5765,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27436262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049257044 = queryNorm
            0.3692435 = fieldWeight in 5765, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.570018 = idf(docFreq=457, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5765)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The literature on assigned indexing considers three possible viewpoints-the author's viewpoint as evidenced in the title, the users' viewpoint, and the indexer's viewpoint-and asks whether and which of those views should be reflected in an indexer's choice of terms to assign to an item. We study this question empirically, as opposed to normatively. Based on the literature that discusses whose viewpoints should be reflected, we construct a research model that includes those same three viewpoints as factors that might be influencing term assignment in actual practice. In the unique study design that we employ, the records of term assignments made by identified indexers in academic libraries are cross-referenced with the results of a survey that those same indexers completed on political views. Our results indicate that in our setting, variance in term assignment was best explained by indexers' personal political views.
  6. Connell, T.H.: Use of the LCSH system : realities (1996) 0.01
    0.014830943 = product of:
      0.04449283 = sum of:
        0.04449283 = product of:
          0.08898566 = sum of:
            0.08898566 = weight(_text_:catalogue in 6941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08898566 = score(doc=6941,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.23806341 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.37378973 = fieldWeight in 6941, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8330836 = idf(docFreq=956, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6941)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Explores the question of whether academic libraries keep up with the changes in the LCSH system. Analysis of the handling of 15 subject headings in 50 academic library catalogues available via the Internet found that libraries are not consistently maintaining subject authority control, or making syndetic references and scope notes in their catalogues. Discusses the results from the perspective of the libraries' performance, performance on the headings overall, performance on references, performance on the type of change made to the headings,a nd performance within 3 widely used onlien catalogue systems (DRA, INNOPAC and NOTIS). Discusses the implications of the findings in relationship to expressions of dissatisfaction with the effectiveness of subject cataloguing expressed by discussion groups on the Internet
  7. Cleverdon, C.W.: ASLIB Cranfield Research Project : Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1960) 0.01
    0.0133473 = product of:
      0.040041897 = sum of:
        0.040041897 = product of:
          0.080083795 = sum of:
            0.080083795 = weight(_text_:22 in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.080083795 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.3, S.228 (G. Jahoda)
  8. Veenema, F.: To index or not to index (1996) 0.01
    0.0088982 = product of:
      0.026694598 = sum of:
        0.026694598 = product of:
          0.053389195 = sum of:
            0.053389195 = weight(_text_:22 in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053389195 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.2, S.1-22
  9. Neshat, N.; Horri, A.: ¬A study of subject indexing consistency between the National Library of Iran and Humanities Libraries in the area of Iranian studies (2006) 0.01
    0.0077859247 = product of:
      0.023357773 = sum of:
        0.023357773 = product of:
          0.046715546 = sum of:
            0.046715546 = weight(_text_:22 in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046715546 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    4. 1.2007 10:22:26
  10. Taniguchi, S.: Recording evidence in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata (2005) 0.01
    0.00667365 = product of:
      0.020020949 = sum of:
        0.020020949 = product of:
          0.040041897 = sum of:
            0.040041897 = weight(_text_:22 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040041897 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    18. 6.2005 13:16:22
  11. Leininger, K.: Interindexer consistency in PsychINFO (2000) 0.01
    0.00667365 = product of:
      0.020020949 = sum of:
        0.020020949 = product of:
          0.040041897 = sum of:
            0.040041897 = weight(_text_:22 in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040041897 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  12. White, H.; Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.: HIVEing : the effect of a semantic web technology on inter-indexer consistency (2014) 0.01
    0.005561375 = product of:
      0.016684124 = sum of:
        0.016684124 = product of:
          0.03336825 = sum of:
            0.03336825 = weight(_text_:22 in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03336825 = score(doc=1781,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of the Helping Interdisciplinary Vocabulary Engineering (HIVE) system on the inter-indexer consistency of information professionals when assigning keywords to a scientific abstract. This study examined first, the inter-indexer consistency of potential HIVE users; second, the impact HIVE had on consistency; and third, challenges associated with using HIVE. Design/methodology/approach - A within-subjects quasi-experimental research design was used for this study. Data were collected using a task-scenario based questionnaire. Analysis was performed on consistency results using Hooper's and Rolling's inter-indexer consistency measures. A series of t-tests was used to judge the significance between consistency measure results. Findings - Results suggest that HIVE improves inter-indexing consistency. Working with HIVE increased consistency rates by 22 percent (Rolling's) and 25 percent (Hooper's) when selecting relevant terms from all vocabularies. A statistically significant difference exists between the assignment of free-text keywords and machine-aided keywords. Issues with homographs, disambiguation, vocabulary choice, and document structure were all identified as potential challenges. Research limitations/implications - Research limitations for this study can be found in the small number of vocabularies used for the study. Future research will include implementing HIVE into the Dryad Repository and studying its application in a repository system. Originality/value - This paper showcases several features used in HIVE system. By using traditional consistency measures to evaluate a semantic web technology, this paper emphasizes the link between traditional indexing and next generation machine-aided indexing (MAI) tools.
  13. Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002) 0.00
    0.00222455 = product of:
      0.0066736494 = sum of:
        0.0066736494 = product of:
          0.013347299 = sum of:
            0.013347299 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013347299 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17248978 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049257044 = queryNorm
                0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05