Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × theme_ss:"Wissensrepräsentation"
  1. Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006) 0.11
    0.11143058 = product of:
      0.22286116 = sum of:
        0.22286116 = sum of:
          0.18290396 = weight(_text_:translating in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18290396 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.36826274 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04915285 = queryNorm
              0.49666703 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
          0.039957196 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.039957196 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1721249 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04915285 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    One of the major problems facing systems for Computer Aided Design (CAD), Architecture Engineering and Construction (AEC) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) applications today is the lack of interoperability among the various systems. When integrating software applications, substantial di culties can arise in translating information from one application to the other. In this paper, we focus on semantic di culties that arise in software integration. Applications may use di erent terminologies to describe the same domain. Even when appli-cations use the same terminology, they often associate di erent semantics with the terms. This obstructs information exchange among applications. To cir-cumvent this obstacle, we need some way of explicitly specifying the semantics for each terminology in an unambiguous fashion. Ontologies can provide such specification. It will be the task of this paper to explain what ontologies are and how they can be used to facilitate interoperability between software systems used in computer aided design, architecture engineering and construction, and geographic information processing.
    Date
    3.12.2016 18:39:22
  2. Networked Knowledge Organisation Systems and Services - TPDL 2011 : The 10th European Networked Knowledge Organisation Systems (NKOS) Workshop (2011) 0.05
    0.04572599 = product of:
      0.09145198 = sum of:
        0.09145198 = product of:
          0.18290396 = sum of:
            0.18290396 = weight(_text_:translating in 6033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18290396 = score(doc=6033,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.36826274 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04915285 = queryNorm
                0.49666703 = fieldWeight in 6033, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6033)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Programm mit Links auf die Präsentationen: Armando Stellato, Ahsan Morshed, Gudrun Johannsen, Yves Jacques, Caterina Caracciolo, Sachit Rajbhandari, Imma Subirats, Johannes Keizer: A Collaborative Framework for Managing and Publishing KOS - Christian Mader, Bernhard Haslhofer: Quality Criteria for Controlled Web Vocabularies - Ahsan Morshed, Benjamin Zapilko, Gudrun Johannsen, Philipp Mayr, Johannes Keizer: Evaluating approaches to automatically match thesauri from different domains for Linked Open Data - Johan De Smedt: SKOS extensions to cover mapping requirements - Mark Tomko: Translating biological data sets Into Linked Data - Daniel Kless: Ontologies and thesauri - similarities and differences - Antoine Isaac, Jacco van Ossenbruggen: Europeana and semantic alignment of vocabularies - Douglas Tudhope: Complementary use of ontologies and (other) KOS - Wilko van Hoek, Brigitte Mathiak, Philipp Mayr, Sascha Schüller: Comparing the accuracy of the semantic similarity provided by the Normalized Google Distance (NGD) and the Search Term Recommender (STR) - Denise Bedford: Selecting and Weighting Semantically Discovered Concepts as Social Tags - Stella Dextre Clarke, Johan De Smedt. ISO 25964-1: a new standard for development of thesauri and exchange of thesaurus data
  3. Miles, A.; Matthews, B.; Beckett, D.; Brickley, D.; Wilson, M.; Rogers, N.: SKOS: A language to describe simple knowledge structures for the web (2005) 0.03
    0.026673492 = product of:
      0.053346984 = sum of:
        0.053346984 = product of:
          0.10669397 = sum of:
            0.10669397 = weight(_text_:translating in 517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10669397 = score(doc=517,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.36826274 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04915285 = queryNorm
                0.2897224 = fieldWeight in 517, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=517)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    "Textual content-based search engines for the web have a number of limitations. Firstly, many web resources have little or no textual content (images, audio or video streams etc.) Secondly, precision is low where natural language terms have overloaded meaning (e.g. 'bank', 'watch', 'chip' etc.) Thirdly, recall is incomplete where the search does not take account of synonyms or quasi-synonyms. Fourthly, there is no basis for assisting a user in modifying (expanding, refining, translating) a search based on the meaning of the original search. Fifthly, there is no basis for searching across natural languages, or framing search queries in terms of symbolic languages. The Semantic Web is a framework for creating, managing, publishing and searching semantically rich metadata for web resources. Annotating web resources with precise and meaningful statements about conceptual aspects of their content provides a basis for overcoming all of the limitations of textual content-based search engines listed above. Creating this type of metadata requires that metadata generators are able to refer to shared repositories of meaning: 'vocabularies' of concepts that are common to a community, and describe the domain of interest for that community.
  4. Drewer, P.; Massion, F; Pulitano, D: Was haben Wissensmodellierung, Wissensstrukturierung, künstliche Intelligenz und Terminologie miteinander zu tun? (2017) 0.02
    0.016648833 = product of:
      0.033297665 = sum of:
        0.033297665 = product of:
          0.06659533 = sum of:
            0.06659533 = weight(_text_:22 in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06659533 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1721249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04915285 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13.12.2017 14:17:22
  5. Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007) 0.02
    0.016648833 = product of:
      0.033297665 = sum of:
        0.033297665 = product of:
          0.06659533 = sum of:
            0.06659533 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06659533 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1721249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04915285 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:22:07
  6. OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004) 0.01
    0.013319066 = product of:
      0.026638132 = sum of:
        0.026638132 = product of:
          0.053276263 = sum of:
            0.053276263 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053276263 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1721249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04915285 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    14. 8.2011 13:33:22
  7. Hauff-Hartig, S.: Wissensrepräsentation durch RDF: Drei angewandte Forschungsbeispiele : Bitte recht vielfältig: Wie Wissensgraphen, Disco und FaBiO Struktur in Mangas und die Humanities bringen (2021) 0.01
    0.013319066 = product of:
      0.026638132 = sum of:
        0.026638132 = product of:
          0.053276263 = sum of:
            0.053276263 = weight(_text_:22 in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053276263 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1721249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04915285 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  8. Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie : Ontologie-basiertes Information-Filtering und -Retrieval mit relationalen Datenbanken (2005) 0.01
    0.011654182 = product of:
      0.023308365 = sum of:
        0.023308365 = product of:
          0.04661673 = sum of:
            0.04661673 = weight(_text_:22 in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04661673 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1721249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04915285 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 2.2011 18:22:25
  9. Mayfield, J.; Finin, T.: Information retrieval on the Semantic Web : integrating inference and retrieval 0.01
    0.011654182 = product of:
      0.023308365 = sum of:
        0.023308365 = product of:
          0.04661673 = sum of:
            0.04661673 = weight(_text_:22 in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04661673 = score(doc=4330,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1721249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04915285 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    12. 2.2011 17:35:22
  10. Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.01
    0.011654182 = product of:
      0.023308365 = sum of:
        0.023308365 = product of:
          0.04661673 = sum of:
            0.04661673 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04661673 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1721249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04915285 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  11. Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (2003) 0.01
    0.009989299 = product of:
      0.019978598 = sum of:
        0.019978598 = product of:
          0.039957196 = sum of:
            0.039957196 = weight(_text_:22 in 1652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039957196 = score(doc=1652,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1721249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04915285 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1652, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1652)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 8.2010 14:22:28
  12. Hollink, L.; Assem, M. van: Estimating the relevance of search results in the Culture-Web : a study of semantic distance measures (2010) 0.01
    0.009989299 = product of:
      0.019978598 = sum of:
        0.019978598 = product of:
          0.039957196 = sum of:
            0.039957196 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039957196 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1721249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04915285 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:40:22
  13. Priss, U.: Description logic and faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.01
    0.009989299 = product of:
      0.019978598 = sum of:
        0.019978598 = product of:
          0.039957196 = sum of:
            0.039957196 = weight(_text_:22 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039957196 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1721249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04915285 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  14. Beppler, F.D.; Fonseca, F.T.; Pacheco, R.C.S.: Hermeneus: an architecture for an ontology-enabled information retrieval (2008) 0.01
    0.009989299 = product of:
      0.019978598 = sum of:
        0.019978598 = product of:
          0.039957196 = sum of:
            0.039957196 = weight(_text_:22 in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039957196 = score(doc=3261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1721249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04915285 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28.11.2016 12:43:22
  15. Monireh, E.; Sarker, M.K.; Bianchi, F.; Hitzler, P.; Doran, D.; Xie, N.: Reasoning over RDF knowledge bases using deep learning (2018) 0.01
    0.008324416 = product of:
      0.016648833 = sum of:
        0.016648833 = product of:
          0.033297665 = sum of:
            0.033297665 = weight(_text_:22 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033297665 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1721249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04915285 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16.11.2018 14:22:01