Search (3702 results, page 3 of 186)

  1. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.05 
    0.052045174 = product of:
  0.10409035 = sum of:
    0.10409035 = product of:
      0.31227103 = sum of:
        0.31227103 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31227103 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41671842 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04915285 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  2. #2434 0.05 
    0.04661673 = product of:
  0.09323346 = sum of:
    0.09323346 = product of:
      0.18646692 = sum of:
        0.18646692 = weight(_text_:22 in 2433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18646692 = score(doc=2433,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1721249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04915285 = queryNorm
            1.0833232 = fieldWeight in 2433, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2433)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    4. 9.2011 12:28:22
  3. #2819 0.05 
    0.04661673 = product of:
  0.09323346 = sum of:
    0.09323346 = product of:
      0.18646692 = sum of:
        0.18646692 = weight(_text_:22 in 2818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18646692 = score(doc=2818,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1721249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04915285 = queryNorm
            1.0833232 = fieldWeight in 2818, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2818)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 19:49:25
  4. #4316 0.05 
    0.04661673 = product of:
  0.09323346 = sum of:
    0.09323346 = product of:
      0.18646692 = sum of:
        0.18646692 = weight(_text_:22 in 4315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18646692 = score(doc=4315,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1721249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04915285 = queryNorm
            1.0833232 = fieldWeight in 4315, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=4315)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 19:49:25
  5. #7401 0.05 
    0.04661673 = product of:
  0.09323346 = sum of:
    0.09323346 = product of:
      0.18646692 = sum of:
        0.18646692 = weight(_text_:22 in 7400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18646692 = score(doc=7400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1721249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04915285 = queryNorm
            1.0833232 = fieldWeight in 7400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=7400)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 19:49:25
  6. Cousins, S.A.: Enhancing subject access to OPACs : controlled vocabulary vs. natural language (1992) 0.05 
    0.04572599 = product of:
  0.09145198 = sum of:
    0.09145198 = product of:
      0.18290396 = sum of:
        0.18290396 = weight(_text_:translating in 2230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18290396 = score(doc=2230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36826274 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04915285 = queryNorm
            0.49666703 = fieldWeight in 2230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2230)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Experimental evidence suggests that enhancing the subject content of OPAC records can improve retrieval performance. This is based on the use of natural language index terms derived from the table of contents and back-of-the-book index of documents. The research reported here investigates the alternative approach of translating these natural language terms into controlled vocabulary. Subject queries were collected by interview at the catalogue, and indexing of the queries demonstrated the impressive ability of PRECIS, and to a lesser extent LCSH, to represent users' information needs. DDC performed poorly in this respect. The assumption was made that an index language adequately specific to represent users' queries should be adequate to represent document contents. Searches were carried out on three test databases, and both natural language and PRECIS enhancement of MARC records increased the number of relevant documents found, with PRECIS showing the better performance. However, with weak stemming the advantage of PRECIS was lost. Consideration must also be given to the potential advantages of controlled vocabulary, over and above basic retrieval performance measures
  7. Park, K.S.; Kim, S.H.: Fuzzy cognitive maps considering time relationships (1995) 0.05 
    0.04572599 = product of:
  0.09145198 = sum of:
    0.09145198 = product of:
      0.18290396 = sum of:
        0.18290396 = weight(_text_:translating in 2794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18290396 = score(doc=2794,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36826274 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04915285 = queryNorm
            0.49666703 = fieldWeight in 2794, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2794)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Casual knowledge is often cyclic and fuzzy, thus it is hard to represent in the form of trees. A fuzzy cognitive map (FCM) can represent casual knowledge as a sogned directed graph with feedback. Provides an intuitive framework in which to form decision problems as perceived by decision makers and to incorporate the knowledge of experts. Proposes a fuzzy time cognitive map (FTCM), which is a FCM introduced to a time relationship on arrows. Discusses the characteristics and basic assumptions of the FCM, and present a description of casual propagation in a FCM with the causalities of negative positive neutral interval [-1,1]. Develops a method of translating the FTCM, that has a different time lag, into the FTCM that has 1 or the same unit time lag, which is a value preserving translation. With the FTCM, illustrates analyzing the change of causalities among factors according to lapse of time
  8. Cataloging and classification standards and rules (1996) 0.05 
    0.04572599 = product of:
  0.09145198 = sum of:
    0.09145198 = product of:
      0.18290396 = sum of:
        0.18290396 = weight(_text_:translating in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18290396 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36826274 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04915285 = queryNorm
            0.49666703 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: McCALLUM, S.: What makes a standard?; HOLLEY, R.P.: IFLA and international standards in the area of bibliographical control; STERN, B.: Internationalizing the rules in AACR2: adopting and translating AACR2 for use in non-Anglo-American and non-English-speaking cataloging environments; GUILES, K., R. EWALD u. B. TILLETT: The evolution of LCRIs: from de facto standards to ?; SPICHER, K.M.: The development of the MARC format; THOMAS, S.E.: The core bibliographic record and the program for cooperative cataloging; PALOWITCH, C. u. L. HOROWITZ: Meta-information structures for networked information resources; KUHAGEN, J.A.: Standards for name and series authority records; WILLIAMSON, N.: Standards and rules for subject access; GUENTHER, R.S.: Automating the Library of Congress Classification Scheme: implementation of the USMARC Format for Classification Data; LEAZER, G.H.: Recent research on the sequential bibliographical relationship and its implications for standards and the library catalog: an examination of serials
  9. Maniez, J.: Database merging and the compatibility of indexing languages (1997) 0.05 
    0.04572599 = product of:
  0.09145198 = sum of:
    0.09145198 = product of:
      0.18290396 = sum of:
        0.18290396 = weight(_text_:translating in 1211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18290396 = score(doc=1211,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36826274 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04915285 = queryNorm
            0.49666703 = fieldWeight in 1211, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1211)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Compatibility is the paradise lost of information scientists, the dream of a universal communication between information languages. Paradoxically the information languages increase the difficulties of cooperation between the different information databases. This noxious side-effect has become flagrant for the latest decade since the shared cataloguing and the telecharging facilities have increased the exchanges. After defining the notion of information compatibility, the author shows that it meets the same care of semantic coherence as the information languages themselves. Then, relying on the lessons of linhuistics and automatic translating, he describes two types of viable solutions: the harmonization of several information languages (an uneasy and costly processing); and the automatic harmonization of the indexing formulas through prefabricated concordance tables, an easier solution which can however be hampered by structural discrepancies. Last he sketches a critical view of the concept of switching language
  10. Green, R.: Conceptual universals in knowledge organization and representation (2003) 0.05 
    0.04572599 = product of:
  0.09145198 = sum of:
    0.09145198 = product of:
      0.18290396 = sum of:
        0.18290396 = weight(_text_:translating in 2629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18290396 = score(doc=2629,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36826274 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04915285 = queryNorm
            0.49666703 = fieldWeight in 2629, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2629)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Within the overall conference theme-integration of knowledge across boundaries-an important subtheme is universality: Where universals of knowledge organization and representation exist, knowledge integration is more likely. Thus, knowledge of conceptual universals should inform efforts at knowledge integration. In this paper, natural language is used as a model for exploring conceptual universals, since the phenomenon of translating between languages validates, but also circumscribes, the existence of semantic and lexical universals. The paper explores a representative inventory of semantic and lexical universals that should be accounted for in knowledge organization and representation systems, especially those that aim to be comprehensive.
  11. Taylor, M.; Dickmeiss, A.: Delivering MARC/XML records from the Library of Congress catalogue using the open protocols SRW/U and Z39.50 (2005) 0.05 
    0.04572599 = product of:
  0.09145198 = sum of:
    0.09145198 = product of:
      0.18290396 = sum of:
        0.18290396 = weight(_text_:translating in 4350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18290396 = score(doc=4350,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36826274 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04915285 = queryNorm
            0.49666703 = fieldWeight in 4350, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4350)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The MARC standard for representing catalogue records and the Z39.50 standard for locating and retrieving them have facilitated interoperability in the library domain for more than a decade. With the increasing ubiquity of XML, these standards are being superseded by MARCXML and MarcXchange for record representation and SRW/U for searching and retrieval. Service providers moving from the older standards to the newer generally need to support both old and new forms during the transition period. YAZ Proxy uses a novel approach to provide SRW/MARCXML access to the Library of Congress catalogue, by translating requests into Z39.50 and querying the older system directly. As a fringe benefit, it also greatly accelerates Z39.50 access.
  12. Kwasnik, B.H.; Rubin, V.L.: Stretching conceptual structures in classifications across languages and cultures (2003) 0.05 
    0.04572599 = product of:
  0.09145198 = sum of:
    0.09145198 = product of:
      0.18290396 = sum of:
        0.18290396 = weight(_text_:translating in 5517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18290396 = score(doc=5517,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36826274 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04915285 = queryNorm
            0.49666703 = fieldWeight in 5517, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5517)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The authors describe the difficulties of translating classifications from a source language and culture to another language and culture. To demonstrate these problems, kinship terms and concepts from native speakers of fourteen languages were collected and analyzed to find differences between their terms and structures and those used in English. Using the representations of kinship terms in the Library of Congress Classification (LCC) and the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) as examples, the authors identified the source of possible lack of mapping between the domain of kinship in the fourteen languages studied and the LCC and DDC. Finally, some preliminary suggestions for how to make translated classifications more linguistically and culturally hospitable are offered.
  13. Networked Knowledge Organisation Systems and Services - TPDL 2011 : The 10th European Networked Knowledge Organisation Systems (NKOS) Workshop (2011) 0.05 
    0.04572599 = product of:
  0.09145198 = sum of:
    0.09145198 = product of:
      0.18290396 = sum of:
        0.18290396 = weight(_text_:translating in 6033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18290396 = score(doc=6033,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36826274 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04915285 = queryNorm
            0.49666703 = fieldWeight in 6033, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6033)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Programm mit Links auf die Präsentationen: Armando Stellato, Ahsan Morshed, Gudrun Johannsen, Yves Jacques, Caterina Caracciolo, Sachit Rajbhandari, Imma Subirats, Johannes Keizer: A Collaborative Framework for Managing and Publishing KOS - Christian Mader, Bernhard Haslhofer: Quality Criteria for Controlled Web Vocabularies - Ahsan Morshed, Benjamin Zapilko, Gudrun Johannsen, Philipp Mayr, Johannes Keizer: Evaluating approaches to automatically match thesauri from different domains for Linked Open Data - Johan De Smedt: SKOS extensions to cover mapping requirements - Mark Tomko: Translating biological data sets Into Linked Data - Daniel Kless: Ontologies and thesauri - similarities and differences - Antoine Isaac, Jacco van Ossenbruggen: Europeana and semantic alignment of vocabularies - Douglas Tudhope: Complementary use of ontologies and (other) KOS - Wilko van Hoek, Brigitte Mathiak, Philipp Mayr, Sascha Schüller: Comparing the accuracy of the semantic similarity provided by the Normalized Google Distance (NGD) and the Search Term Recommender (STR) - Denise Bedford: Selecting and Weighting Semantically Discovered Concepts as Social Tags - Stella Dextre Clarke, Johan De Smedt. ISO 25964-1: a new standard for development of thesauri and exchange of thesaurus data
  14. Toivonen, J.; Pirkola, A.; Keskustalo, H.; Visala, K.; Järvelin, K.: Translating cross-lingual spelling variants using transformation rules (2005) 0.05 
    0.04572599 = product of:
  0.09145198 = sum of:
    0.09145198 = product of:
      0.18290396 = sum of:
        0.18290396 = weight(_text_:translating in 1052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18290396 = score(doc=1052,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36826274 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04915285 = queryNorm
            0.49666703 = fieldWeight in 1052, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1052)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  15. Hassanzadeh, O.; Kementsietsidis, A.; Lim, L.; Miller, R.J.; Wang, M.: Semantic link discovery over relational data (2012) 0.05 
    0.04572599 = product of:
  0.09145198 = sum of:
    0.09145198 = product of:
      0.18290396 = sum of:
        0.18290396 = weight(_text_:translating in 412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18290396 = score(doc=412,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36826274 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04915285 = queryNorm
            0.49666703 = fieldWeight in 412, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=412)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    From small research groups to large organizations, there has been tremendous effort in the last few years in publishing data online so that it is widely accessible to a large community. These efforts have been successful across a number of domains and have resulted in a proliferation of online sources. In the field of biology, there were 1.330 major online molecular databases at the beginning of 2011, which is 96 more than a year earlier. In the Linking Open Data (LOD) community project at the W3C, the number of published RDF triples has grown from 500 million in May 2007 to over 28 billion triples in March 2011. Fueling this data publishing explosion are tools for translating relational and semistructured data into RDF. In this chapter, we present LinQuer, a generic and extensible framework for integrating link discovery methods over relational data.
  16. Coyle, K.: Simplicity in data models (2015) 0.05 
    0.04572599 = product of:
  0.09145198 = sum of:
    0.09145198 = product of:
      0.18290396 = sum of:
        0.18290396 = weight(_text_:translating in 2025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18290396 = score(doc=2025,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36826274 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04915285 = queryNorm
            0.49666703 = fieldWeight in 2025, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2025)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Evolving from database models using punch cards, strict linear relational databases and predefined object-oriented data structures, the triple statements underlying Semantic Web technologies bypass many design constraints to offer endless flexibility. Overcoming structure is challenging, especially the relatively recent structure formalized in the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR). Though geared to easier access and interoperability and recognizing a multilevel bibliographic model, FRBR remains tied to translating entity-relation diagrams to data structures. Resource Description Framework (RDF) provides a more flexible way to express concepts, in which bibliographic models may be thought of as graphs of properties and relationships. But even RDF-based models can undermine that flexibility by mixing concept classes and data structures. The advantage of RDF classes is to provide semantics that enable a user to focus on similarities, not bound by contextual constraints.and success metrics.
  17. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.05 
    0.045539528 = product of:
  0.091079056 = sum of:
    0.091079056 = product of:
      0.27323717 = sum of:
        0.27323717 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27323717 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41671842 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04915285 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  18. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.05 
    0.045539528 = product of:
  0.091079056 = sum of:
    0.091079056 = product of:
      0.27323717 = sum of:
        0.27323717 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27323717 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41671842 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04915285 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  19. Bowker, L.; Ciro, J.B.: Machine translation and global research : towards improved machine translation literacy in the scholarly community (2019) 0.04 
    0.043110877 = product of:
  0.086221755 = sum of:
    0.086221755 = product of:
      0.17244351 = sum of:
        0.17244351 = weight(_text_:translating in 5970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17244351 = score(doc=5970,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.36826274 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04915285 = queryNorm
            0.46826217 = fieldWeight in 5970, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.4921947 = idf(docFreq=66, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5970)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    LCSH
    Machine translating
    Subject
    Machine translating
  20. Bravo, B.R. -> Rodriguez Bravo, B.: 0.04 
    0.039957196 = product of:
  0.07991439 = sum of:
    0.07991439 = product of:
      0.15982878 = sum of:
        0.15982878 = weight(_text_:22 in 1) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15982878 = score(doc=1,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1721249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04915285 = queryNorm
            0.92856276 = fieldWeight in 1, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=1)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 4.2007 19:43:53

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 3084
  • m 352
  • el 167
  • s 145
  • b 39
  • x 36
  • i 23
  • r 17
  • ? 8
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • n 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications