Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Martínez-Ávila, D."
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Sales, R. de; Martínez-Ávila, D.; Chaves Guimarães, J.A.: James Duff Brown : a librarian committed to the public library and the subject classification (2021) 0.01
    0.007826171 = product of:
      0.023478512 = sum of:
        0.023478512 = weight(_text_:science in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023478512 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    After two decades in the 21st Century, and despite all the advances in the area, some very important names from past centuries still do not have the recognition they deserve in the global history of library and information science and, specifically, of knowledge organization. Although acknowledged in British librarianship, the name of James Duff Brown (1862-1914) still does not have a proper recognition on a global scale. His contributions to a free and more democratic library had a prominent place in the works and projects he developed during his time at the libraries of Clerkenwell and Islington in London. Free access to the library shelves, an architecture centered on books and people, and classifications that are more dynamic were dreams fulfilled by Brown. With this biographical article, we hope to live up to his legacy and pay homage to a true librarian and an advocate of the public library and subject classification.
  2. Machado, L.; Martínez-Ávila, D.; Barcellos Almeida, M.; Borges, M.M.: Towards a moderate realistic foundation for ontological knowledge organization systems : the question of the naturalness of classifications (2023) 0.01
    0.007826171 = product of:
      0.023478512 = sum of:
        0.023478512 = weight(_text_:science in 894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023478512 = score(doc=894,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 894, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=894)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 54(2023) no.x, S.xx-xx
  3. Krishnamurthy, M.; Satija, M.P.; Martínez-Ávila, D.: Classification of classifications : species of library classifications (2024) 0.01
    0.007826171 = product of:
      0.023478512 = sum of:
        0.023478512 = weight(_text_:science in 1158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023478512 = score(doc=1158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 1158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1158)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Acknowledging the importance of classification not only for library and information science but also for the study and mapping of the world phenomena, in this paper we revisit and systematize the main types of classifications and focus on the species of classification mainly drawing on the work of S. R. Ranganathan. We trace the evolution of library classification systems by their structures and modes of design of various shades of classification systems and make a comparative study of enumerative and faceted species of library classifications. The value of this paper is to have a picture of the whole spectrum of existing classifications, which may serve for the study of future developments and constructions of new systems. This paper updates previous works by Comaromi and Ranganathan and is also theoretically inspired by them.