Search (347 results, page 1 of 18)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Languages of the world : cataloguing issues and problems (1993) 0.07
    0.07073785 = product of:
      0.21221356 = sum of:
        0.21221356 = sum of:
          0.12922472 = weight(_text_:index in 4242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12922472 = score(doc=4242,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.22304957 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05104385 = queryNorm
              0.5793543 = fieldWeight in 4242, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4242)
          0.08298884 = weight(_text_:22 in 4242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08298884 = score(doc=4242,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17874686 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05104385 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4242, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4242)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    15. 6.1996 18:06:22
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Catalogue & index. 1995, no.117, S.12,16 (G. Muirhead)
  2. Bloss, M.E.: Testing RDA at Dominican University's Graduate School of Library and Information Science : the students' perspectives (2011) 0.05
    0.047765817 = product of:
      0.071648724 = sum of:
        0.047443643 = weight(_text_:science in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047443643 = score(doc=1899,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.35285735 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
        0.02420508 = product of:
          0.04841016 = sum of:
            0.04841016 = weight(_text_:22 in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04841016 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17874686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05104385 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Dominican University's Graduate School of Library and Information Science (GSLIS) was one of a funnel group of graduate schools of library and information science selected to test RDA. A seminar specifically for this purpose was conducted from August to December 2010. Fifteen students participated in the test, creating records in AACR2 and in RDA, encoding them in the MARC format, and responding to the required questionnaires. In addition to record creation, the students were also asked to submit a final paper in which they described their experiences and recommended whether or not to accept RDA as a replacement for AACR2.
    Date
    25. 5.2015 18:36:22
  3. Subramaniyan, V.K.: Dr. S.R. Ranganathan in Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition : a survey and observations (1994) 0.04
    0.043388095 = product of:
      0.06508214 = sum of:
        0.027391598 = weight(_text_:science in 1585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027391598 = score(doc=1585,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 1585, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1585)
        0.037690543 = product of:
          0.075381085 = sum of:
            0.075381085 = weight(_text_:index in 1585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075381085 = score(doc=1585,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22304957 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05104385 = queryNorm
                0.33795667 = fieldWeight in 1585, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1585)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Highlights the striking parallels between S.R. Ranganathan' Classified Catalogue Rules (CCC) and the AACR2. Analyses the following concepts of the Canons of Cataloguing in CCC: ascertainability, prepotency, individualization, currency, consistency, laws of interpretation, principle of local variation, principle of osmosis, centralied cataloguing and printing of cards, and prenatal cataloguing. Studies the canon of individualization and its application to the names of persons, corporate bodies and conferences, georgraphic names, uniform titles, monographic series and serials. Analyses the concepts of classis, isolates, types of reference, book index entry, multi volumed book, union catalogue, national bibliography, indexing, tracing, and new kind of documents
    Source
    Library science with a slant to documentation and information studies. 31(1994) no.3, S.135-151
  4. Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005) 0.04
    0.039311755 = product of:
      0.05896763 = sum of:
        0.031304684 = weight(_text_:science in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031304684 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
        0.027662948 = product of:
          0.055325896 = sum of:
            0.055325896 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055325896 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17874686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05104385 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    As libraries attempt to incorporate increasing amounts of electronic resources into their catalogs, utilizing a growing variety of metadata standards, library and information science programs are grappling with how to educate catalogers to meet these challenges. In this paper, an employer considers the characteristics and skills that catalogers will need and how they might acquire them.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Zuccala, A.; Breum, M.; Bruun, K.; Wunsch, B.T.: Metric assessments of books as families of works (2018) 0.04
    0.038425755 = product of:
      0.05763863 = sum of:
        0.019565428 = weight(_text_:science in 4018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019565428 = score(doc=4018,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 4018, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4018)
        0.0380732 = product of:
          0.0761464 = sum of:
            0.0761464 = weight(_text_:index in 4018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0761464 = score(doc=4018,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.22304957 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05104385 = queryNorm
                0.3413878 = fieldWeight in 4018, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4018)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    We describe the intellectual and physical properties of books as manifestations, expressions, and works and assess the current indexing and metadata structure of monographs in the Book Citation Index (BKCI). Our focus is on the interrelationship of these properties in light of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR). Data pertaining to monographs were collected from the Danish PURE repository system as well as the BKCI (2005-2015) via their International Standard Book Numbers (ISBNs). Each ISBN was then matched to the same ISBN and family-related ISBNs cataloged in two additional databases: OCLC-WorldCat and Goodreads. With the retrieval of all family-related ISBNs, we were able to determine the number of monograph expressions present in the BKCI and their collective relationship to one work. Our results show that the majority of missing expressions from the BKCI are emblematic (i.e., first editions of monographs) and that both the indexing and metadata structure of this commercial database could significantly improve with the introduction of distinct expression IDs (i.e., for every distinct edition) and unifying work-related IDs. This improved metadata structure would support the collection of more accurate publication and citation counts for monographs and has implications for developing new indicators based on bibliographic levels.
    Object
    Book Citation Index
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.1, S.146-157
  6. Park, J.-r.; Lu, C.; Marion, L.: Cataloging professionals in the digital environment : a content analysis of job descriptions (2009) 0.04
    0.03596723 = product of:
      0.053950842 = sum of:
        0.03320363 = weight(_text_:science in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03320363 = score(doc=2766,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
        0.02074721 = product of:
          0.04149442 = sum of:
            0.04149442 = weight(_text_:22 in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04149442 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17874686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05104385 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This study assesses the current state of responsibilities and skill sets required of cataloging professionals. It identifies emerging roles and competencies focusing on the digital environment and relates these to the established knowledge of traditional cataloging standards and practices. We conducted a content analysis of 349 job descriptions advertised in AutoCAT in 2005-2006. Multivariate techniques of cluster and multidimensional-scaling analyses were applied to the data. Analysis of job titles, required and preferred qualifications/skills, and responsibilities lends perspective to the roles that cataloging professionals play in the digital environment. Technological advances increasingly demand knowledge and skills related to electronic resource management, metadata creation, and computer and Web applications. Emerging knowledge and skill sets are increasingly being integrated into the core technical aspects of cataloging such as bibliographic and authority control and integrated library-system management. Management of cataloging functions is also in high demand. The results of the study provide insight on current and future curriculum design of library and information-science programs.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:20:24
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.844-857
  7. Aalberg, T.; Haugen, F.B.; Husby, O.: ¬A Tool for Converting from MARC to FRBR (2006) 0.03
    0.03439779 = product of:
      0.05159668 = sum of:
        0.027391598 = weight(_text_:science in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027391598 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
        0.02420508 = product of:
          0.04841016 = sum of:
            0.04841016 = weight(_text_:22 in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04841016 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17874686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05104385 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Series
    Lecture notes in computer science; vol.4172
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  8. Snow, K.; Hoffman, G.L.: What makes an effective cataloging course? : a study of the factors that promote learning (2015) 0.03
    0.03439779 = product of:
      0.05159668 = sum of:
        0.027391598 = weight(_text_:science in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027391598 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
        0.02420508 = product of:
          0.04841016 = sum of:
            0.04841016 = weight(_text_:22 in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04841016 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17874686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05104385 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents the results of a research study, a survey of library and information science master's degree holders who have taken a beginning cataloging course, to identify the elements of a beginning cataloging course that help students to learn cataloging concepts and skills. The results suggest that cataloging practice (the hands-on creation of bibliographic records or catalog cards), the effectiveness of the instructor, a balance of theory and practice, and placing cataloging in a real-world context contribute to effective learning. However, more research is needed to determine how, and to what the extent, each element should be incorporated into beginning cataloging courses.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. D'Angelo, C.A.; Giuffrida, C.; Abramo, G.: ¬A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments (2011) 0.03
    0.029483816 = product of:
      0.044225723 = sum of:
        0.023478512 = weight(_text_:science in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023478512 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
        0.02074721 = product of:
          0.04149442 = sum of:
            0.04149442 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04149442 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17874686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05104385 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:06:52
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.257-269
  10. Devaul, H.; Diekema, A.R.; Ostwald, J.: Computer-assisted assignment of educational standards using natural language processing (2011) 0.03
    0.029483816 = product of:
      0.044225723 = sum of:
        0.023478512 = weight(_text_:science in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023478512 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
        0.02074721 = product of:
          0.04149442 = sum of:
            0.04149442 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04149442 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17874686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05104385 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:25:32
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.395-405
  11. O'Neill, E.; Zumer, M.; Mixter, J.: FRBR aggregates : their types and frequency in library collections (2015) 0.03
    0.029483816 = product of:
      0.044225723 = sum of:
        0.023478512 = weight(_text_:science in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023478512 = score(doc=2610,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
        0.02074721 = product of:
          0.04149442 = sum of:
            0.04149442 = weight(_text_:22 in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04149442 = score(doc=2610,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17874686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05104385 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Aggregates have been a frequent topic of discussion between library science researchers. This study seeks to better understand aggregates through the analysis of a sample of bibliographic records and review of the cataloging treatment of aggregates. The study focuses on determining how common aggregates are in library collections, what types of aggregates exist, how aggregates are described in bibliographic records, and the criteria for identifying aggregates from the information in bibliographic records. A sample of bibliographic records representing textual resources was taken from OCLC's WorldCat database. More than 20 percent of the sampled records represented aggregates and more works were embodied in aggregates than were embodied in single work manifestations. A variety of issues, including cataloging practices and the varying definitions of aggregates, made it difficult to accurately identify and quantify the presence of aggregates using only the information from bibliographic records.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  12. Das, S.; Paik, J.H.: Gender tagging of named entities using retrieval-assisted multi-context aggregation : an unsupervised approach (2023) 0.03
    0.029483816 = product of:
      0.044225723 = sum of:
        0.023478512 = weight(_text_:science in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023478512 = score(doc=941,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
        0.02074721 = product of:
          0.04149442 = sum of:
            0.04149442 = weight(_text_:22 in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04149442 = score(doc=941,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17874686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05104385 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2023 12:00:14
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.4, S.461-475
  13. RAK-NBM : Interpretationshilfe zu NBM 3b,3 (2000) 0.03
    0.026080877 = product of:
      0.07824263 = sum of:
        0.07824263 = product of:
          0.15648526 = sum of:
            0.15648526 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15648526 = score(doc=4362,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17874686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05104385 = queryNorm
                0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2000 19:22:27
  14. Hunt, S.: ¬The cataloguing of internet resources (2001) 0.03
    0.025127029 = product of:
      0.075381085 = sum of:
        0.075381085 = product of:
          0.15076217 = sum of:
            0.15076217 = weight(_text_:index in 4159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15076217 = score(doc=4159,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22304957 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05104385 = queryNorm
                0.67591333 = fieldWeight in 4159, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4159)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Catalogue and index. 2001, no.141, S.1-5
  15. Hsieh-Yee, I.: Cataloging and metatdata education in North American LIS programs (2004) 0.02
    0.024569847 = product of:
      0.03685477 = sum of:
        0.019565428 = weight(_text_:science in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019565428 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
        0.017289342 = product of:
          0.034578685 = sum of:
            0.034578685 = weight(_text_:22 in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034578685 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17874686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05104385 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents findings of a survey an the state of cataloging and metadata education. in ALA-accredited library and information science progranis in North America. The survey was conducted in response to Action Item 5.1 of the "Bibliographic Control of Web Resources: A Library of Congress Action Plan," which focuses an providing metadata education to new LIS professionals. The study found LIS programs increased their reliance an introductory courses to cover cataloging and metadata, but fewer programs than before had a cataloging course requirement. The knowledge of cataloging delivered in introductory courses was basic, and the coverage of metadata was limited to an overview. Cataloging courses showed similarity in coverage and practice and focused an print mater!als. Few cataloging educators provided exercises in metadata record creation using non-AACR standards. Advanced cataloging courses provided in-depth coverage of subject cataloging and the cataloging of nonbook resources, but offered very limited coverage of metadata. Few programs offered full courses an metadata, and even fewer offered advanced metadata courses. Metadata topics were well integrated into LIS curricula, but coverage of metadata courses varied from program to program, depending an the interests of instructors. Educators were forward-looking and agreed an the inclusion of specific knowledge and skills in metadata instruction. A series of actions were proposed to assist educators in providing students with competencies in cataloging and metadata.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  16. Mönch, C.; Aalberg, T.: Automatic conversion from MARC to FRBR (2003) 0.02
    0.024569847 = product of:
      0.03685477 = sum of:
        0.019565428 = weight(_text_:science in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019565428 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
        0.017289342 = product of:
          0.034578685 = sum of:
            0.034578685 = weight(_text_:22 in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034578685 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17874686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05104385 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Series
    Lecture notes in computer science; vol.2769
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
  17. Savoy, J.: Estimating the probability of an authorship attribution (2016) 0.02
    0.024569847 = product of:
      0.03685477 = sum of:
        0.019565428 = weight(_text_:science in 2937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019565428 = score(doc=2937,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 2937, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2937)
        0.017289342 = product of:
          0.034578685 = sum of:
            0.034578685 = weight(_text_:22 in 2937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034578685 = score(doc=2937,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17874686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05104385 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2937, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2937)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    7. 5.2016 21:22:27
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.6, S.1462-1472
  18. Kim, J.(im); Kim, J.(enna): Effect of forename string on author name disambiguation (2020) 0.02
    0.024569847 = product of:
      0.03685477 = sum of:
        0.019565428 = weight(_text_:science in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019565428 = score(doc=5930,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
        0.017289342 = product of:
          0.034578685 = sum of:
            0.034578685 = weight(_text_:22 in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034578685 = score(doc=5930,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17874686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05104385 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    11. 7.2020 13:22:58
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.7, S.839-855
  19. Zhang, L.; Lu, W.; Yang, J.: LAGOS-AND : a large gold standard dataset for scholarly author name disambiguation (2023) 0.02
    0.024569847 = product of:
      0.03685477 = sum of:
        0.019565428 = weight(_text_:science in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019565428 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
        0.017289342 = product of:
          0.034578685 = sum of:
            0.034578685 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034578685 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17874686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05104385 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:40:36
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.2, S.168-185
  20. Electronic cataloging : AACR2 and metadata for serials and monographs (2003) 0.02
    0.021694047 = product of:
      0.03254107 = sum of:
        0.013695799 = weight(_text_:science in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013695799 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.101861134 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
        0.018845271 = product of:
          0.037690543 = sum of:
            0.037690543 = weight(_text_:index in 3082) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037690543 = score(doc=3082,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22304957 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05104385 = queryNorm
                0.16897833 = fieldWeight in 3082, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3082)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Electronic Cataloging is the undertaking of three pioneers in library science: Sheila S. Intner, Sally C. Tseng, and Mary L. Larsgaard, who co-edited Maps and Related Cartographic Materials: Cataloging Classification, and Bibliographic Control (Haworth, 2000). With illustrations, references, additional reading lists, and case studies, this research tool offers you tips and strategies to make metadata work for you and your library. No one currently involved in information cataloging should be without this book! For a complete list of contents, visit our Web site at www.HaworthPress.com. Electronic Cataloging: AACR2 and Metadata for Serials and Monographs is a collection of papers about recent developments in metadata and its practical applications in cataloging. Acknowledged experts examine a wide variety of techniques for managing serials and monographs using standards and schemas like MARC, AACR2, ISSN, ISBD, and Dublin Core. From the broadest introduction of metadata usage to the revisions of AACR2 through 2000, this book offers vital analysis and strategy for achieving Universal Bibliographic Control. Electronic Cataloging is divided into three parts. The first is an introduction to metadata, what it is, and its relationship to the library in general. The second portion focuses in more an how metadata can be utilized by a library system and the possibilities in the near future. The third portion is very specific, dealing with individual standards of metadata and elements, such as AACR2 and MARC, as well as current policies and prospects for the future. Information covered in Electronic Cataloging includes: an overview of metadata and seriality and why it is important to the cataloging community Universal Bibliographic Control: what has succeeded so far in cataloging and how metadata will evolve the step-by-step process for creating an effective metadata repository for the community the inherent problems that accompany cataloging nonprint research materials, such as electronic serials and the Web metadata schemas and the use of controlled vocabularies and classification systems standards of metadata, including MARC, Dublin Core, RDF, and AACR2, with emphasis an the revisions and efforts made with AACR2 through 2000 an overview of the ISSN (International Serials Standard Number) and its relationships to current codes and metadata standards, including AACR2 and much more!
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: Editors' Introduction (Sheila S. Intner, Sally C. Tseng, and Mary Lynette Larsgaard) PART 1. Cataloging in an Electronic Age (Michael Gorman) Why Metadata? Why Me? Why Now? (Brian E. C. Schottlaender) PART 2. Developing a Metadata Strategy (Grace Agnew) Practical Issues in Applying Metadata Schemas and Controlled Vocabularies to Cultural Heritage Information (Murtha Baca) Digital Resources and Metadata Application in the Shanghai Library (Yuanliang Ma and Wei Liu) Struggling Toward Retrieval: Alternatives to Standard Operating Procedures Can Help Librarians and the Public (Sheila S. Intner) PART 3. AACR2 and Other Metadata Standards: The Way Forward (Ann Huthwaite) AACR2 and Metadata: Library Opportunities in the Global Semantic Web (Barbara B. Tillett) Seriality: What Have We Accomplished? What's Next? (Jean Hirons) MARC and Mark-Up (Erik Jul) ISSN: Dumb Number, Smart Solution (Regina Romano Reynolds) Index Reference Notes Included

Years

Languages

  • e 292
  • d 42
  • i 4
  • chi 3
  • ja 3
  • ? 1
  • f 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 316
  • m 22
  • b 15
  • s 10
  • el 6
  • x 2
  • ? 1
  • l 1
  • More… Less…