-
Barnett, G.A.; Danowski, J.A.; Richards, W.D.: Communication networks and network analysis : a current assessment (1993)
0.18
0.17517957 = product of:
0.23357277 = sum of:
0.046423215 = weight(_text_:science in 833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046423215 = score(doc=833,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 833, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=833)
0.054458156 = weight(_text_:research in 833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054458156 = score(doc=833,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.37825575 = fieldWeight in 833, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=833)
0.1326914 = product of:
0.2653828 = sum of:
0.2653828 = weight(_text_:network in 833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2653828 = score(doc=833,freq=8.0), product of:
0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
1.1808791 = fieldWeight in 833, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=833)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- Introduces an issues devoted to communication networks and network analysis. Discusses the historical limitations of communication network research and its limits within the specialty of network analysis
- Source
- Progress in communication science. 12(1993) S.1-19
-
Shibata, N.; Kajikawa, Y.; Takeda, Y.; Matsushima, K.: Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation (2009)
0.17
0.17121324 = product of:
0.22828433 = sum of:
0.019343007 = weight(_text_:science in 2743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019343007 = score(doc=2743,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 2743, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2743)
0.064179555 = weight(_text_:research in 2743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064179555 = score(doc=2743,freq=16.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.44577867 = fieldWeight in 2743, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2743)
0.14476177 = sum of:
0.110576175 = weight(_text_:network in 2743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.110576175 = score(doc=2743,freq=8.0), product of:
0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.492033 = fieldWeight in 2743, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2743)
0.034185596 = weight(_text_:22 in 2743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034185596 = score(doc=2743,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2743, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2743)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- In this article, we performed a comparative study to investigate the performance of methods for detecting emerging research fronts. Three types of citation network, co-citation, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation, were tested in three research domains, gallium nitride (GaN), complex network (CNW), and carbon nanotube (CNT). Three types of citation network were constructed for each research domain, and the papers in those domains were divided into clusters to detect the research front. We evaluated the performance of each type of citation network in detecting a research front by using the following measures of papers in the cluster: visibility, measured by normalized cluster size, speed, measured by average publication year, and topological relevance, measured by density. Direct citation, which could detect large and young emerging clusters earlier, shows the best performance in detecting a research front, and co-citation shows the worst. Additionally, in direct citation networks, the clustering coefficient was the largest, which suggests that the content similarity of papers connected by direct citations is the greatest and that direct citation networks have the least risk of missing emerging research domains because core papers are included in the largest component.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 17:52:50
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.571-580
-
Ridenour, L.: Boundary objects : measuring gaps and overlap between research areas (2016)
0.16
0.15634362 = product of:
0.20845817 = sum of:
0.04020369 = weight(_text_:science in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04020369 = score(doc=2835,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.30244917 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
0.060886066 = weight(_text_:research in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060886066 = score(doc=2835,freq=10.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.42290276 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
0.10736841 = sum of:
0.0663457 = weight(_text_:network in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0663457 = score(doc=2835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.29521978 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
0.041022714 = weight(_text_:22 in 2835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041022714 = score(doc=2835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2835)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- The aim of this paper is to develop methodology to determine conceptual overlap between research areas. It investigates patterns of terminology usage in scientific abstracts as boundary objects between research specialties. Research specialties were determined by high-level classifications assigned by Thomson Reuters in their Essential Science Indicators file, which provided a strictly hierarchical classification of journals into 22 categories. Results from the query "network theory" were downloaded from the Web of Science. From this file, two top-level groups, economics and social sciences, were selected and topically analyzed to provide a baseline of similarity on which to run an informetric analysis. The Places & Spaces Map of Science (Klavans and Boyack 2007) was used to determine the proximity of disciplines to one another in order to select the two disciplines use in the analysis. Groups analyzed share common theories and goals; however, groups used different language to describe their research. It was found that 61% of term words were shared between the two groups.
-
Chen, C.: CiteSpace II : detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2006)
0.16
0.15585195 = product of:
0.2078026 = sum of:
0.027355144 = weight(_text_:science in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027355144 = score(doc=5272,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
0.06807269 = weight(_text_:research in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06807269 = score(doc=5272,freq=18.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.47281966 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
0.11237476 = sum of:
0.078189164 = weight(_text_:network in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.078189164 = score(doc=5272,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.34791988 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
0.034185596 = weight(_text_:22 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034185596 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- This article describes the latest development of a generic approach to detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. The work makes substantial theoretical and methodological contributions to progressive knowledge domain visualization. A specialty is conceptualized and visualized as a time-variant duality between two fundamental concepts in information science: research fronts and intellectual bases. A research front is defined as an emergent and transient grouping of concepts and underlying research issues. The intellectual base of a research front is its citation and co-citation footprint in scientific literature - an evolving network of scientific publications cited by research-front concepts. Kleinberg's (2002) burst-detection algorithm is adapted to identify emergent research-front concepts. Freeman's (1979) betweenness centrality metric is used to highlight potential pivotal points of paradigm shift over time. Two complementary visualization views are designed and implemented: cluster views and time-zone views. The contributions of the approach are that (a) the nature of an intellectual base is algorithmically and temporally identified by emergent research-front terms, (b) the value of a co-citation cluster is explicitly interpreted in terms of research-front concepts, and (c) visually prominent and algorithmically detected pivotal points substantially reduce the complexity of a visualized network. The modeling and visualization process is implemented in CiteSpace II, a Java application, and applied to the analysis of two research fields: mass extinction (1981-2004) and terrorism (1990-2003). Prominent trends and pivotal points in visualized networks were verified in collaboration with domain experts, who are the authors of pivotal-point articles. Practical implications of the work are discussed. A number of challenges and opportunities for future studies are identified.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:11:05
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.3, S.359-377
-
Ruge, G.: ¬A spreading activation network for automatic generation of thesaurus relationships (1991)
0.15
0.15234336 = product of:
0.30468673 = sum of:
0.054160424 = weight(_text_:science in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054160424 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
0.2505263 = sum of:
0.15480664 = weight(_text_:network in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15480664 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.6888462 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
0.09571967 = weight(_text_:22 in 4506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09571967 = score(doc=4506,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4506, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4506)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 8.10.2000 11:52:22
- Source
- Library science with a slant to documentation. 28(1991) no.4, S.125-130
-
Hu, D.; Kaza, S.; Chen, H.: Identifying significant facilitators of dark network evolution (2009)
0.15
0.14988557 = product of:
0.19984743 = sum of:
0.019343007 = weight(_text_:science in 2753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019343007 = score(doc=2753,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 2753, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2753)
0.0226909 = weight(_text_:research in 2753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0226909 = score(doc=2753,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.15760657 = fieldWeight in 2753, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2753)
0.15781352 = sum of:
0.12362792 = weight(_text_:network in 2753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12362792 = score(doc=2753,freq=10.0), product of:
0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.5501096 = fieldWeight in 2753, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2753)
0.034185596 = weight(_text_:22 in 2753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034185596 = score(doc=2753,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2753, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2753)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- Social networks evolve over time with the addition and removal of nodes and links to survive and thrive in their environments. Previous studies have shown that the link-formation process in such networks is influenced by a set of facilitators. However, there have been few empirical evaluations to determine the important facilitators. In a research partnership with law enforcement agencies, we used dynamic social-network analysis methods to examine several plausible facilitators of co-offending relationships in a large-scale narcotics network consisting of individuals and vehicles. Multivariate Cox regression and a two-proportion z-test on cyclic and focal closures of the network showed that mutual acquaintance and vehicle affiliations were significant facilitators for the network under study. We also found that homophily with respect to age, race, and gender were not good predictors of future link formation in these networks. Moreover, we examined the social causes and policy implications for the significance and insignificance of various facilitators including common jails on future co-offending. These findings provide important insights into the link-formation processes and the resilience of social networks. In addition, they can be used to aid in the prediction of future links. The methods described can also help in understanding the driving forces behind the formation and evolution of social networks facilitated by mobile and Web technologies.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 18:50:30
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.655-665
-
Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015)
0.15
0.14982328 = product of:
0.19976437 = sum of:
0.027355144 = weight(_text_:science in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027355144 = score(doc=2593,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
0.060034476 = weight(_text_:research in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060034476 = score(doc=2593,freq=14.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.41698778 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
0.11237476 = sum of:
0.078189164 = weight(_text_:network in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.078189164 = score(doc=2593,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.34791988 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
0.034185596 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034185596 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose The four major Subject Repositories (SRs), arXiv, Research Papers in Economics (RePEc), Social Science Research Network (SSRN) and PubMed Central (PMC), are all important within their disciplines but no previous study has systematically compared how often they are cited in academic publications. In response, the purpose of this paper is to report an analysis of citations to SRs from Scopus publications, 2000-2013. Design/methodology/approach Scopus searches were used to count the number of documents citing the four SRs in each year. A random sample of 384 documents citing the four SRs was then visited to investigate the nature of the citations. Findings Each SR was most cited within its own subject area but attracted substantial citations from other subject areas, suggesting that they are open to interdisciplinary uses. The proportion of documents citing each SR is continuing to increase rapidly, and the SRs all seem to attract substantial numbers of citations from more than one discipline. Research limitations/implications Scopus does not cover all publications, and most citations to documents found in the four SRs presumably cite the published version, when one exists, rather than the repository version. Practical implications SRs are continuing to grow and do not seem to be threatened by institutional repositories and so research managers should encourage their continued use within their core disciplines, including for research that aims at an audience in other disciplines. Originality/value This is the first simultaneous analysis of Scopus citations to the four most popular SRs.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Object
- Research Papers in Economics
Social Science Research Network
-
Morris, S.A.: Mapping research specialties (2008)
0.14
0.1419041 = product of:
0.18920547 = sum of:
0.061897624 = weight(_text_:science in 3962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061897624 = score(doc=3962,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 3962, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3962)
0.07261088 = weight(_text_:research in 3962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07261088 = score(doc=3962,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.504341 = fieldWeight in 3962, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3962)
0.054696955 = product of:
0.10939391 = sum of:
0.10939391 = weight(_text_:22 in 3962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10939391 = score(doc=3962,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3962, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3962)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 9:30:22
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 42(2008), S.xxx-xxx
-
Sillince, J.A.A.: Intelligent argumentation systems : requirements, models, research agenda, and applications (1997)
0.14
0.1419041 = product of:
0.18920547 = sum of:
0.061897624 = weight(_text_:science in 7774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061897624 = score(doc=7774,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 7774, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7774)
0.07261088 = weight(_text_:research in 7774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07261088 = score(doc=7774,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.504341 = fieldWeight in 7774, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7774)
0.054696955 = product of:
0.10939391 = sum of:
0.10939391 = weight(_text_:22 in 7774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10939391 = score(doc=7774,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7774, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7774)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.59, [=Suppl.22]
-
Stvilia, B.; Hinnant, C.C.; Schindler, K.; Worrall, A.; Burnett, G.; Burnett, K.; Kazmer, M.M.; Marty, P.F.: Composition of scientific teams and publication productivity at a national science lab (2011)
0.14
0.139606 = product of:
0.18614134 = sum of:
0.033503074 = weight(_text_:science in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033503074 = score(doc=4191,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.25204095 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
0.0226909 = weight(_text_:research in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0226909 = score(doc=4191,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.15760657 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
0.12994736 = sum of:
0.095761776 = weight(_text_:network in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095761776 = score(doc=4191,freq=6.0), product of:
0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.42611307 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
0.034185596 = weight(_text_:22 in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034185596 = score(doc=4191,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- The production of scientific knowledge has evolved from a process of inquiry largely based on the activities of individual scientists to one grounded in the collaborative efforts of specialized research teams. This shift brings to light a new question: how the composition of scientific teams affects their production of knowledge. This study employs data from 1,415 experiments conducted at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory (NHMFL) between 2005 and 2008 to identify and select a sample of 89 teams and examine whether team diversity and network characteristics affect productivity. The study examines how the diversity of science teams along several variables affects overall team productivity. Results indicate several diversity measures associated with network position and team productivity. Teams with mixed institutional associations were more central to the overall network compared with teams that primarily comprised NHMFL's own scientists. Team cohesion was positively related to productivity. The study indicates that high productivity in teams is associated with high disciplinary diversity and low seniority diversity of team membership. Finally, an increase in the share of senior members negatively affects productivity, and teams with members in central structural positions perform better than other teams.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 13:19:42
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.270-283
-
Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009)
0.14
0.1389678 = product of:
0.1852904 = sum of:
0.023211608 = weight(_text_:science in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023211608 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
0.027229078 = weight(_text_:research in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027229078 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.18912788 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
0.13484971 = sum of:
0.093826994 = weight(_text_:network in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.093826994 = score(doc=2742,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.41750383 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
0.041022714 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041022714 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- In this research, we aim to identify factors that significantly affect the clickthrough of Web searchers. Our underlying goal is determine more efficient methods to optimize the clickthrough rate. We devise a clickthrough metric for measuring customer satisfaction of search engine results using the number of links visited, number of queries a user submits, and rank of clicked links. We use a neural network to detect the significant influence of searching characteristics on future user clickthrough. Our results show that high occurrences of query reformulation, lengthy searching duration, longer query length, and the higher ranking of prior clicked links correlate positively with future clickthrough. We provide recommendations for leveraging these findings for improving the performance of search engine retrieval and result ranking, along with implications for search engine marketing.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 17:49:11
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.557-570
-
Milard, B.; Pitarch, Y.: Egocentric cocitation networks and scientific papers destinies (2023)
0.14
0.1389678 = product of:
0.1852904 = sum of:
0.023211608 = weight(_text_:science in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023211608 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.027229078 = weight(_text_:research in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027229078 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.18912788 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.13484971 = sum of:
0.093826994 = weight(_text_:network in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.093826994 = score(doc=918,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.41750383 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.041022714 = weight(_text_:22 in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041022714 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- To what extent is the destiny of a scientific paper shaped by the cocitation network in which it is involved? What are the social contexts that can explain these structuring? Using bibliometric data, interviews with researchers, and social network analysis, this article proposes a typology based on egocentric cocitation networks that displays a quadruple structuring (before and after publication): polarization, clusterization, atomization, and attrition. It shows that the academic capital of the authors and the intellectual resources of their research are key factors of these destinies, as are the social relations between the authors concerned. The circumstances of the publishing are also correlated with the structuring of the egocentric cocitation networks, showing how socially embedded they are. Finally, the article discusses the contribution of these original networks to the analyze of scientific production and its dynamics.
- Date
- 21. 3.2023 19:22:14
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.4, S.415-433
-
Elliott, P.: Reporting LIS research : a review article (1990)
0.14
0.13632768 = product of:
0.18177024 = sum of:
0.046423215 = weight(_text_:science in 5882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046423215 = score(doc=5882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 5882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5882)
0.0943243 = weight(_text_:research in 5882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0943243 = score(doc=5882,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.6551582 = fieldWeight in 5882, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5882)
0.041022714 = product of:
0.08204543 = sum of:
0.08204543 = weight(_text_:22 in 5882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08204543 = score(doc=5882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5882)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- Discusses the problem of library and information science research publishing and reviews the monographs, abstracting services and periodicals that disseminate information about research.
- Source
- Librarianship. 22(1990), no.4, S.257-264
-
Yu, C.; Xue, H.; An, L.; Li, G.: ¬A lightweight semantic-enhanced interactive network for efficient short-text matching (2023)
0.14
0.13603511 = product of:
0.18138015 = sum of:
0.019343007 = weight(_text_:science in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019343007 = score(doc=890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
0.032089777 = weight(_text_:research in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032089777 = score(doc=890,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.22288933 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
0.12994736 = sum of:
0.095761776 = weight(_text_:network in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095761776 = score(doc=890,freq=6.0), product of:
0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.42611307 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
0.034185596 = weight(_text_:22 in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034185596 = score(doc=890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- Knowledge-enhanced short-text matching has been a significant task attracting much attention in recent years. However, the existing approaches cannot effectively balance effect and efficiency. Effective models usually consist of complex network structures leading to slow inference speed and the difficulties of applications in actual practice. In addition, most knowledge-enhanced models try to link the mentions in the text to the entities of the knowledge graphs-the difficulties of entity linking decrease the generalizability among different datasets. To address these problems, we propose a lightweight Semantic-Enhanced Interactive Network (SEIN) model for efficient short-text matching. Unlike most current research, SEIN employs an unsupervised method to select WordNet's most appropriate paraphrase description as the external semantic knowledge. It focuses on integrating semantic information and interactive information of text while simplifying the structure of other modules. We conduct intensive experiments on four real-world datasets, that is, Quora, Twitter-URL, SciTail, and SICK-E. Compared with state-of-the-art methods, SEIN achieves the best performance on most datasets. The experimental results proved that introducing external knowledge could effectively improve the performance of the short-text matching models. The research sheds light on the role of lightweight models in leveraging external knowledge to improve the effect of short-text matching.
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 19:05:27
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.2, S.283-300
-
Noyons, E.C.M.; Raan, A.F.J. van: Monitoring scientific developments from a dynamic perspective : self-organized structuring to map neural network research (1998)
0.14
0.13579106 = product of:
0.18105474 = sum of:
0.038686015 = weight(_text_:science in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038686015 = score(doc=331,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
0.064179555 = weight(_text_:research in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064179555 = score(doc=331,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.44577867 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
0.078189164 = product of:
0.15637833 = sum of:
0.15637833 = weight(_text_:network in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15637833 = score(doc=331,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.69583976 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- With the help of bibliometric mapping techniques, we have developed a methodology of 'self-organized' structuring of scientific fields. This methodology is applied to the field of neural network research
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.1, S.68-81
-
Danowski, J.A.: Network analysis of message content (1993)
0.13
0.1348722 = product of:
0.1798296 = sum of:
0.038686015 = weight(_text_:science in 839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038686015 = score(doc=839,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 839, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=839)
0.0453818 = weight(_text_:research in 839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0453818 = score(doc=839,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.31521314 = fieldWeight in 839, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=839)
0.095761776 = product of:
0.19152355 = sum of:
0.19152355 = weight(_text_:network in 839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19152355 = score(doc=839,freq=6.0), product of:
0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.85222614 = fieldWeight in 839, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=839)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- Presents a theoretical model of messages and communication processes. Describes a way to create optimal persuasive messages from natural language texts. The model avoids the limitations of categorical content analysis, both manual and computerized. Network analysis provides a relational paradigm for statistically based message research. Illustrates applications of word-network theory and method to different problems using examples
- Source
- Progress in communication science. 12(1993) S.197-222
-
Building information infrastructure : issues in the development of the National Research and Education Network (1992)
0.13
0.13459748 = product of:
0.26919496 = sum of:
0.054458156 = weight(_text_:research in 3983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054458156 = score(doc=3983,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.37825575 = fieldWeight in 3983, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3983)
0.21473682 = sum of:
0.1326914 = weight(_text_:network in 3983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1326914 = score(doc=3983,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.59043956 = fieldWeight in 3983, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3983)
0.08204543 = weight(_text_:22 in 3983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08204543 = score(doc=3983,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3983, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3983)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 1. 3.2008 12:42:22
-
Haimson, O.L.; Carter, A.J.; Corvite, S.; Wheeler, B.; Wang, L.; Liu, T.; Lige, A.: ¬The major life events taxonomy : social readjustment, social media information sharing, and online network separation during times of life transition (2021)
0.13
0.12898596 = product of:
0.17198128 = sum of:
0.019343007 = weight(_text_:science in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019343007 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.0226909 = weight(_text_:research in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0226909 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.15760657 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.12994736 = sum of:
0.095761776 = weight(_text_:network in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095761776 = score(doc=263,freq=6.0), product of:
0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.42611307 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.034185596 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034185596 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- When people experience major life changes, this often impacts their self-presentation, networks, and online behavior in substantial ways. To effectively study major life transitions and events, we surveyed a large U.S. sample (n = 554) to create the Major Life Events Taxonomy, a list of 121 life events in 12 categories. We then applied this taxonomy to a second large U.S. survey sample (n = 775) to understand on average how much social readjustment each event required, how likely each event was to be shared on social media with different types of audiences, and how much online network separation each involved. We found that social readjustment is positively correlated with sharing on social media, with both broad audiences and close ties as well as in online spaces separate from one's network of known ties. Some life transitions involve high levels of sharing with both separate audiences and broad audiences on social media, providing evidence for what previous research has called social media as social transition machinery. Researchers can use the Major Life Events Taxonomy to examine how people's life transition experiences relate to their behaviors, technology use, and health and well-being outcomes.
- Date
- 10. 6.2021 19:22:47
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(2021) no.7, S.933-947
-
Dotz, P.; Bishop, A.P.; McClure, C.R.: ¬The National Research and Educational Network (NREN) : an empirical study of social and behavioural issues (1990)
0.13
0.12804228 = product of:
0.17072304 = sum of:
0.038297202 = weight(_text_:science in 5276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038297202 = score(doc=5276,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.2881068 = fieldWeight in 5276, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5276)
0.055022508 = weight(_text_:research in 5276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055022508 = score(doc=5276,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.38217562 = fieldWeight in 5276, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5276)
0.07740332 = product of:
0.15480664 = sum of:
0.15480664 = weight(_text_:network in 5276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15480664 = score(doc=5276,freq=8.0), product of:
0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.6888462 = fieldWeight in 5276, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5276)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- Describes a study of the use of electronic networks by scientists and engineers. The study of network use was conducted in order to make policy recommendations for the proposed Natioanl Research and Education Network (NREN) and combines traditional social science empirical methods with policy analysis. Argues that qualitative techniwues, such as semi-structured interviews and focus groups, provide data important to the development of user-based policies and that social and behavioural issues must be given more attention ny network policy makers
- Source
- ASIS'90: Information in the year 2000, from research to applications. Proc. of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Toronto, Canada, 4.-8.11.1990. Ed. by Diana Henderson
-
Tonta, Y.: Scholarly communication and the use of networked information sources (1996)
0.13
0.12556775 = product of:
0.16742367 = sum of:
0.032826174 = weight(_text_:science in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032826174 = score(doc=6389,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
0.027229078 = weight(_text_:research in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027229078 = score(doc=6389,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.18912788 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
0.10736841 = sum of:
0.0663457 = weight(_text_:network in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0663457 = score(doc=6389,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.29521978 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
0.041022714 = weight(_text_:22 in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041022714 = score(doc=6389,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17671488 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- Examines the use of networked information sources in scholarly communication. Networked information sources are defined broadly to cover: documents and images stored on electronic network hosts; data files; newsgroups; listservs; online information services and electronic periodicals. Reports results of a survey to determine how heavily, if at all, networked information sources are cited in scholarly printed periodicals published in 1993 and 1994. 27 printed periodicals, representing a wide range of subjects and the most influential periodicals in their fields, were identified through the Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index Journal Citation Reports. 97 articles were selected for further review and references, footnotes and bibliographies were checked for references to networked information sources. Only 2 articles were found to contain such references. Concludes that, although networked information sources facilitate scholars' work to a great extent during the research process, scholars have yet to incorporate such sources in the bibliographies of their published articles
- Source
- IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.3, S.240-245
