-
Williams, R.M.: ISI search network research front specialties (1983)
0.08
0.0805359 = product of:
0.1610718 = sum of:
0.07261088 = weight(_text_:research in 1474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07261088 = score(doc=1474,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.504341 = fieldWeight in 1474, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1474)
0.08846094 = product of:
0.17692187 = sum of:
0.17692187 = weight(_text_:network in 1474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17692187 = score(doc=1474,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.7872528 = fieldWeight in 1474, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1474)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
-
Williams, R.M.: ISI search network research front specialities (1983)
0.07
0.07046892 = product of:
0.14093783 = sum of:
0.06353451 = weight(_text_:research in 445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06353451 = score(doc=445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.44129837 = fieldWeight in 445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=445)
0.07740332 = product of:
0.15480664 = sum of:
0.15480664 = weight(_text_:network in 445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15480664 = score(doc=445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22473325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.6888462 = fieldWeight in 445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=445)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
-
Peritz, B.C.: Citation characteristics in library science : some further results from a bibliometric survey (1981)
0.07
0.06725425 = product of:
0.1345085 = sum of:
0.061897624 = weight(_text_:science in 4170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061897624 = score(doc=4170,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 4170, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4170)
0.07261088 = weight(_text_:research in 4170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07261088 = score(doc=4170,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.504341 = fieldWeight in 4170, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4170)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Library research. 3(1981), S.47-65
-
Malanga, G.: Classifying and screening journal literature with citation data (1982)
0.04
0.042033907 = product of:
0.084067814 = sum of:
0.038686015 = weight(_text_:science in 553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038686015 = score(doc=553,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 553, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=553)
0.0453818 = weight(_text_:research in 553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0453818 = score(doc=553,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.31521314 = fieldWeight in 553, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=553)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Object
- Science citation index
- Source
- Universal classification I: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
-
MacRoberts, M.H.; MacRoberts, B.R.: Quantitative measures of communication in science : a study of the formal level (1986)
0.02
0.021884115 = product of:
0.08753646 = sum of:
0.08753646 = weight(_text_:science in 7777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08753646 = score(doc=7777,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.6585298 = fieldWeight in 7777, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7777)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Social studies of science. 16(1986), S.151-172
-
Small, H.; Sweeney, E.: Clustering the Science Citation Index using co-citations (1985)
0.02
0.015474406 = product of:
0.061897624 = sum of:
0.061897624 = weight(_text_:science in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061897624 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Moed, H.F.; Vriens, M.: Possible inaccuracies occuring in citation analysis (1989)
0.02
0.015474406 = product of:
0.061897624 = sum of:
0.061897624 = weight(_text_:science in 6900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061897624 = score(doc=6900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 6900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6900)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 15(1989), S.95-107
-
MacRoberts, M.H.; MacRoberts, B.R.: Problems of citation analysis : a critical review (1989)
0.02
0.015474406 = product of:
0.061897624 = sum of:
0.061897624 = weight(_text_:science in 6901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061897624 = score(doc=6901,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 6901, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6901)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 40(1989), S.342-349
-
Cronin. B.: Some reflections on citation habits in psychology (1980)
0.02
0.015474406 = product of:
0.061897624 = sum of:
0.061897624 = weight(_text_:science in 7775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061897624 = score(doc=7775,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 7775, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7775)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 2(1980), S.309-311
-
Rajan, T.N.; Guha, B.; Sayanarayana, R.: Associate relationship of concepts as seen through citations and citation index (1982)
0.01
0.013614539 = product of:
0.054458156 = sum of:
0.054458156 = weight(_text_:research in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054458156 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14397179 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.37825575 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Universal classification II: subject analysis and ordering systems. Proc. of the 4th Int. Study Conf. on Classification research, Augsburg, 28.6.-2.7.1982. Ed.: I. Dahlberg
-
Brooks, T.A.: Private acts and public objects : an investigation of citer motivations (1985)
0.01
0.013540106 = product of:
0.054160424 = sum of:
0.054160424 = weight(_text_:science in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054160424 = score(doc=649,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 36(1985), S.223-229
-
Brooks, T.A.: Evidence of complex citer motivation (1986)
0.01
0.013540106 = product of:
0.054160424 = sum of:
0.054160424 = weight(_text_:science in 650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054160424 = score(doc=650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=650)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 37(1986), S.34-36
-
McCain, K.W.: Co-cited author mapping as a valid representation of intellectual structure (1986)
0.01
0.013540106 = product of:
0.054160424 = sum of:
0.054160424 = weight(_text_:science in 5505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054160424 = score(doc=5505,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 5505, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5505)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 37(1986), S.111-122
-
MacRoberts, M.H.; MacRoberts, B.R.: Author motivation for not citing influences : a methodological note (1988)
0.01
0.011605804 = product of:
0.046423215 = sum of:
0.046423215 = weight(_text_:science in 648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046423215 = score(doc=648,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 648, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=648)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 39(1988), S.432-433
-
East, J.W.: Citations to conference papers and the implications for cataloging (1985)
0.01
0.006770053 = product of:
0.027080212 = sum of:
0.027080212 = weight(_text_:science in 7928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027080212 = score(doc=7928,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 7928, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7928)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Problems in the cataloging of conference proceedings, and their treatment by some of the major cataloging codes, are briefly reviewed. To determine how conference papers are cited in the literature, and thus how researchers are likely to be seeking them in the catalog, fifty conference papers in the field of chemistry, delivered in 1970 and subsequently published, were searches in the Science Citation Index covering a ten-year period. The citations to the papers were examined to ascertain the implications of current citation practices for the cataloging of conference proceedings. The results suggest that conference proceedings are customarily cited like any other work of collective authorship and that the conference name is of little value as an access point
-
Garfield, E.: Citation indexes for science (1985)
0.01
0.006700615 = product of:
0.02680246 = sum of:
0.02680246 = weight(_text_:science in 3632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02680246 = score(doc=3632,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.20163277 = fieldWeight in 3632, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3632)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Indexes in general seek to provide a "key" to a body of literature intending to help the user in identifying, verifying, and/or locating individual or related items. The most common devices for collocation in indexes are authors' names and subjects. A different approach to collocating related items in an index is provided by a method called "citation indexing." Citation indexes attempt to link items through citations or references, in other works, by bringing together items cited in a particular work and the works citing a particular item. Citation indexing is based an the concept that there is a significant intellectual link between a document and each bibliographic item cited in it and that this link is useful to the scholar because an author's references to earlier writings identify relevant information to the subject of his current work. One of the major differences between the citation index and the traditional subject index is that the former, while listing current literature, also provides a retrospec tive view of past literature. While each issue of a traditional index is normally concerned only with the current literature, the citation index brings back retrospective literature in the form of cited references, thereby linking current scholarly works with earlier works. The advantages of the citation index have been considered to be its value as a tool for tracing the history of ideas or discoveries, for associating ideas between current and past work, and for evaluating works of individual authors or library collections. The concept of citation indexing is not new. It has been applied to legal literature since 1873 in a legal reference tool called Shepard's Citations. In the 1950s Eugene Garfield, a documentation consultant and founder and President of the Institute for Scientific Information (Philadelphia), developed the technique of citation indexing for scientific literature. This new application was facilitated by the availability of computer technology, resulting in a series of services: Science Citation Index (1955- ), Social Sciences Citation Index (1966- ), and the Arts & Humanities Index (1976- ). All three appear in printed versions and as machine-readable databases. In the following essay, the first in a series of articles and books elucidating the citation indexing system, Garfield traces the origin and beginning of this idea, its advantages, and the methods of preparing such indexes.
- Footnote
- Original in: Science 122 (1955) S.108-111.
-
Pao, M.L.; Worthen, D.B.: Retrieval effectiveness by semantic and citation searching (1989)
0.01
0.005802902 = product of:
0.023211608 = sum of:
0.023211608 = weight(_text_:science in 2288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023211608 = score(doc=2288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 2288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2288)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 40(1989), S.226-235
-
MacCain, K.W.: Descriptor and citation retrieval in the medical behavioral sciences literature : retrieval overlaps and novelty distribution (1989)
0.01
0.005802902 = product of:
0.023211608 = sum of:
0.023211608 = weight(_text_:science in 2290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023211608 = score(doc=2290,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1329271 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.050463587 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 2290, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2290)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 40(1989), S.110-114
