Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bornmann, L."
  1. Bornmann, L.; Haunschild, R.: Overlay maps based on Mendeley data : the use of altmetrics for readership networks (2016) 0.06
    0.064961776 = product of:
      0.12992355 = sum of:
        0.12992355 = product of:
          0.2598471 = sum of:
            0.2598471 = weight(_text_:maps in 3230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2598471 = score(doc=3230,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.9124516 = fieldWeight in 3230, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3230)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Visualization of scientific results using networks has become popular in scientometric research. We provide base maps for Mendeley reader count data using the publication year 2012 from the Web of Science data. Example networks are shown and explained. The reader can use our base maps to visualize other results with the VOSViewer. The proposed overlay maps are able to show the impact of publications in terms of readership data. The advantage of using our base maps is that it is not necessary for the user to produce a network based on all data (e.g., from 1 year), but can collect the Mendeley data for a single institution (or journals, topics) and can match them with our already produced information. Generation of such large-scale networks is still a demanding task despite the available computer power and digital data availability. Therefore, it is very useful to have base maps and create the network with the overlay technique.
  2. Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: Mapping (USPTO) patent data using overlays to Google Maps (2012) 0.05
    0.053041074 = product of:
      0.10608215 = sum of:
        0.10608215 = product of:
          0.2121643 = sum of:
            0.2121643 = weight(_text_:maps in 288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2121643 = score(doc=288,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.7450137 = fieldWeight in 288, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=288)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A technique is developed using patent information available online (at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office) for the generation of Google Maps. The overlays indicate both the quantity and the quality of patents at the city level. This information is relevant for research questions in technology analysis, innovation studies, and evolutionary economics, as well as economic geography. The resulting maps can also be relevant for technological innovation policies and research and development management, because the U.S. market can be considered the leading market for patenting and patent competition. In addition to the maps, the routines provide quantitative data about the patents for statistical analysis. The cities on the map are colored according to the results of significance tests. The overlays are explored for the Netherlands as a "national system of innovations" and further elaborated in two cases of emerging technologies: ribonucleic acid interference (RNAi) and nanotechnology.
  3. Bornmann, L.; Leydesdorff, L.: Which cities produce more excellent papers than can be expected? : a new mapping approach, using Google Maps, based on statistical significance testing (2011) 0.03
    0.026520537 = product of:
      0.053041074 = sum of:
        0.053041074 = product of:
          0.10608215 = sum of:
            0.10608215 = weight(_text_:maps in 4767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10608215 = score(doc=4767,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.37250686 = fieldWeight in 4767, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4767)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.02
    0.020599011 = product of:
      0.041198023 = sum of:
        0.041198023 = product of:
          0.082396045 = sum of:
            0.082396045 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.082396045 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22
  5. Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014) 0.01
    0.0137326745 = product of:
      0.027465349 = sum of:
        0.027465349 = product of:
          0.054930698 = sum of:
            0.054930698 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054930698 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:05:18
  6. Bornmann, L.: How to analyze percentile citation impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics : the statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes, and top-cited papers (2013) 0.01
    0.010299506 = product of:
      0.020599011 = sum of:
        0.020599011 = product of:
          0.041198023 = sum of:
            0.041198023 = weight(_text_:22 in 656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041198023 = score(doc=656,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 656, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=656)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:44:17
  7. Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019) 0.01
    0.010299506 = product of:
      0.020599011 = sum of:
        0.020599011 = product of:
          0.041198023 = sum of:
            0.041198023 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041198023 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8. 1.2019 18:22:45
  8. Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011) 0.01
    0.008582922 = product of:
      0.017165843 = sum of:
        0.017165843 = product of:
          0.034331687 = sum of:
            0.034331687 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034331687 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 12:51:07