Search (229 results, page 1 of 12)

0.13121365 = product of:
  0.2624273 = sum of:
    0.2624273 = sum of:
      0.21436293 = weight(_text_:maps in 5323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.21436293 = score(doc=5323,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050679237 = queryNorm
          0.75273424 = fieldWeight in 5323, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5323)
      0.04806436 = weight(_text_:22 in 5323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04806436 = score(doc=5323,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050679237 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5323, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5323)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article defines and outlines the characteristics of map series, map sets, map serials, maps in multiple editions and multi-sheet single maps. Brief instructions on sources of information and general methodology used in gathering information prior to creating the entry are presented. The different methods which may be used for cataloguing series and serials are explored. There is also a brief section on cataloguing bi- and multi-lingual works in a bilingual environment. For each relevant area of description, instructions and examples are given to illustrate problems. Sections on analysis (including multi-level cataloguing).

Date

26. 7.2006 10:44:22

Footnote

Teil eines Themenheftes zu: "Maps and related cartographic materials: cataloging, classification, and bibliographic control"

0.087513305 = product of:
  0.17502661 = sum of:
    0.17502661 = product of:
      0.35005322 = sum of:
        0.35005322 = weight(_text_:maps in 5332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.35005322 = score(doc=5332,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            1.2292099 = fieldWeight in 5332, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5332)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article identifies the types of publications containing maps and the need for access to maps contained in them. The emphasis is on older maps; the comments are opposite for cataloging of current maps. The needs of map users are discussed, identifying the points of access that are critical to successful map retrieval. Main entry for maps is discussed. Various categories of associated map and book items are identified, and suggestions made, with USMARC examples, as to how these maps might be treated by the cataloger

Footnote

Teil eines Themenheftes zu: "Maps and related cartographic materials: cataloging, classification, and bibliographic control"

0.0818612 = product of:
  0.1637224 = sum of:
    0.1637224 = product of:
      0.3274448 = sum of:
        0.3274448 = weight(_text_:maps in 472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3274448 = score(doc=472,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            1.1498206 = fieldWeight in 472, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=472)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Maps have bibliographic characteristics which present unusual challenges to traditional cataloging practices. Rare maps carry these challenges even further by requiring bibliographic descriptions that identify and distinguish the item in hand from any other copies. While it has been acknowledged that rare maps should be bibliographically described in a different manner than modern maps, as rare printed texts are described in a differently than modern texts, the map cataloging community is uncertain about how this should be accomplished. This article attempts to identify some problems unique to the cataloging of rare maps. It also discusses the appropriateness of current map cataloging rules for rare maps and the importance of thorough cartobibliographic research.

0.073640086 = product of:
  0.14728017 = sum of:
    0.14728017 = sum of:
      0.10608215 = weight(_text_:maps in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10608215 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050679237 = queryNorm
          0.37250686 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
      0.041198023 = weight(_text_:22 in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041198023 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050679237 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This comprehensive annotated webliography describes online cataloging resources that are free to use, currently updated, and of high quality. The major aim of this webliography is to provide assistance for catalogers who are new to the profession, unfamiliar with cataloging specific formats, or unable to access costly print and subscription resources. The annotated resources include general websites and webpages, databases, workshop presentations, streaming media, and local documentation. The scope of the webliography is limited to resources reflecting traditional cataloging practices using the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition, RDA: Resource Description and Access, and MAchine Readable Cataloging (MARC) standards. Non-MARC metadata schemas like Dublin Core are not covered. Most components of cataloging are represented in this webliography, such as authority control, classification, subject headings, and genre terms. Guidance also is provided for cataloging miscellaneous formats including sound and videorecordings, streaming media, e-books, video games, graphic novels, kits, rare materials, maps, serials, realia, government documents, and music.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.070721425 = product of:
  0.14144285 = sum of:
    0.14144285 = product of:
      0.2828857 = sum of:
        0.2828857 = weight(_text_:maps in 5325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2828857 = score(doc=5325,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.9933516 = fieldWeight in 5325, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5325)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article discusses areas of the bibliographic record where differences from cataloging monographs are commonly encountered in the descriptive cataloging of flat or folded sheet maps. Major fields in the bibliographic record are treated, such as title proper, main entry, and scale, pointing out common misunderstandings and errors which those unfamiliar with cataloging maps may experience. Hints, guidelines, illustrations, and examples for the resolution of these problems are given.

Footnote

Teil eines Themenheftes zu: "Maps and related cartographic materials: cataloging, classification, and bibliographic control"

0.07016674 = product of:
  0.14033347 = sum of:
    0.14033347 = product of:
      0.28066695 = sum of:
        0.28066695 = weight(_text_:maps in 5642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28066695 = score(doc=5642,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.9855604 = fieldWeight in 5642, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5642)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Although maps have been used for thousands of years, they have not been maintained or organized as well as printed books until relatively recently. Maps were often treated as ephemeral material. Early attempts at map cataloging are much more scattered than book cataloging, and printed catalogs of early libraries often omitted the mention of maps. It was only after map use became commonplace and thematic maps increased in number that cataloging and classification attempts began in earnest. The classification and cataloging of maps started to come together in the early part of the twentieth century. This article will examine how maps were organized in early collections and some of the advice provided for catalogers of map collections from the end of the nineteenth century and the first half of the twentieth.

0.07016674 = product of:
  0.14033347 = sum of:
    0.14033347 = product of:
      0.28066695 = sum of:
        0.28066695 = weight(_text_:maps in 5643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28066695 = score(doc=5643,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.9855604 = fieldWeight in 5643, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5643)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Although maps have been used for thousands of years, they have not been maintained or organized as well as printed books until relatively recently. Maps were often treated as ephemeral material. Early attempts at map cataloging are much more scattered than book cataloging, and printed catalogs of early libraries often omitted the mention of maps. It was only after map use became commonplace and thematic maps increased in number that cataloging and classification attempts began in earnest. The classification and cataloging of maps started to come together in the early part of the twentieth century. This article will examine how maps were organized in early collections and some of the advice provided for catalogers of map collections from the end of the nineteenth century and the first half of the twentieth.

0.06188125 = product of:
  0.1237625 = sum of:
    0.1237625 = product of:
      0.247525 = sum of:
        0.247525 = weight(_text_:maps in 5330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.247525 = score(doc=5330,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.86918265 = fieldWeight in 5330, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5330)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article explores one of OCLC's cooperative quality control efforts, the Enhance Program, specifically in the Maps Format. Various aspects of participation in the program, such as the application process, reasons for participation, training, typical experiences, types of changes made to records, and the benefits of participation are discussed. One cataloger's twelve-year experience with Maps Format records forms the basis for a list of the most common changes made to map records in the Enhance Program. The list is offered in the hope of further improving the quality of map cataloging in the creation of OCLC records.

Footnote

Teil eines Themenheftes zu: "Maps and related cartographic materials: cataloging, classification, and bibliographic control"

0.06188125 = product of:
  0.1237625 = sum of:
    0.1237625 = product of:
      0.247525 = sum of:
        0.247525 = weight(_text_:maps in 1896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.247525 = score(doc=1896,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.86918265 = fieldWeight in 1896, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1896)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This study presents a qualitative examination of the applicability of several taxonomies of bibliographic relationships to sheet maps. Examples of relationships between sheet maps are identified and typed using the systems developed by Tillett and Smiraglia and the taxonomy of relationships described in the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) conceptual model and in Resource Description and Access (RDA). This process reveals that while many of the relationship categories in these systems apply well to sheet maps, some are not applicable at all while others may apply with some redefinition.

0.053590734 = product of:
  0.10718147 = sum of:
    0.10718147 = product of:
      0.21436293 = sum of:
        0.21436293 = weight(_text_:maps in 5331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21436293 = score(doc=5331,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.75273424 = fieldWeight in 5331, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5331)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In the context of machine readable cataloging for national bibliographic databases, this paper describes the cataloging of monographic early printed maps whether published separately or extracted from other publications. It deals with description and access to capture the essence of a rare or ''antique'' map to create a useful surrogate. The step-by-step approach, rather than breaking new ground, integrates rules and guidance from multiple sources, both cataloging tools and supplementary materials, in a narrative fashion, with reference to the sources, their specific rules, and stated policies. Reference is made throughout the text to ten sample catalog records, with MARC 21 tagging, that are appended to the article.

Footnote

Teil eines Themenheftes zu: "Maps and related cartographic materials: cataloging, classification, and bibliographic control"

0.0500076 = product of:
  0.1000152 = sum of:
    0.1000152 = product of:
      0.2000304 = sum of:
        0.2000304 = weight(_text_:maps in 6391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2000304 = score(doc=6391,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.70240563 = fieldWeight in 6391, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6391)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This paper describes an empirical project designed to examine the following questions: (i) what constitutes the concept of "map author," and (ii) of the responsibility functions appearing in a sample of 178 maps under consideration, which responsibility functions participate significantly in the process of map-making? This study, exploratory in nature, considered single-sheet maps produced by three U.S. publishers after 1981 as found in the OCLC online database, retrieved, and examined by the investigator.

0.045934916 = product of:
  0.09186983 = sum of:
    0.09186983 = product of:
      0.18373966 = sum of:
        0.18373966 = weight(_text_:maps in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18373966 = score(doc=1149,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.6452008 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In this article, we examine some of the proposals which have dealt with the problems in cataloging in 2 different technological contexts: printed-card catalogs and online catalogs. We first look at some of the measures which attempted to deal with the 'crisis in cataloging' at the Library of Congress in the 1940s. Then we address some of the current problems in cataloging in the era of OPACs. In particular, we discuss the extent to which minimal-level cataloging, as defines by AACR and implemented in the OCLC database, works for maps. Our discussion is organized around 2 main groups of access points: controlled vocabulary data elements, including name data elements, and free-text data elements. In closing, we discuss prospects that the next generation of online catalogs uisng the Z39.50 protocol and SGML format might offer to minimal-level cataloging for maps

0.04420089 = product of:
  0.08840178 = sum of:
    0.08840178 = product of:
      0.17680356 = sum of:
        0.17680356 = weight(_text_:maps in 5317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17680356 = score(doc=5317,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.6208447 = fieldWeight in 5317, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5317)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Teil eines Themenheftes zu: "Maps and related cartographic materials: cataloging, classification, and bibliographic control"

0.04420089 = product of:
  0.08840178 = sum of:
    0.08840178 = product of:
      0.17680356 = sum of:
        0.17680356 = weight(_text_:maps in 5339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17680356 = score(doc=5339,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.6208447 = fieldWeight in 5339, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5339)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Although much has been written about the need for, methodologies, costs, and other aspects of retrospective conversion little exists in the literature regarding retrospective conversion of cartographic materials, and map collections specifically. Reference is usually made to the need to survey the collection for conversion, but the author was unable to locate a description of a random sampling technique that explains how it is applied and what the outcome was. This article introduces the use of a random sampling technique with a major university map collection. The University of Georgia's Maps Collection was surveyed to ascertain how much of the existing maps card catalog needed to be converted to an electronic form for use in the local online public access catalog. In addition, the samples pulled from the survey were searched against the OCLC union catalog to determine the proportions of records that could be found in OCLC and loaded into the Georgia Libraries Information Network (GALIN), the online catalog, with no cataloging intervention versus the degree to which the maps cataloger would have to either adjust existing records available or create original records for the online catalog.

Footnote

Teil eines Themenheftes zu: "Maps and related cartographic materials: cataloging, classification, and bibliographic control"

0.043756653 = product of:
  0.087513305 = sum of:
    0.087513305 = product of:
      0.17502661 = sum of:
        0.17502661 = weight(_text_:maps in 5319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17502661 = score(doc=5319,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.61460495 = fieldWeight in 5319, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5319)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In some existing cataloging records, there is evidence of considerable confusion in cataloging graphic representations of geologic measurements. The cataloging of geologic sections differs from the cataloging of maps in six areas: leader fields in a USMARC-formatted record; 0xx fields in a USMARC-formatte record; Scale; Physical description; Notes; and Subject headings. This paper will explain the use and importance of geologic sections, clarify why they should be cataloged in the USMARC Map Format, explain why they are called ''sections,'' define what is meant by ''geologic section,'' prescribe the rules for cataloging, and demonstrate the proper procedure for cataloging a geologic section.

Footnote

Teil eines Themenheftes zu: "Maps and related cartographic materials: cataloging, classification, and bibliographic control"

0.043756653 = product of:
  0.087513305 = sum of:
    0.087513305 = product of:
      0.17502661 = sum of:
        0.17502661 = weight(_text_:maps in 5322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17502661 = score(doc=5322,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.61460495 = fieldWeight in 5322, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5322)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This introduction gives an overview of the contents of the issue, and includes a list of articles for which no writer could be found. The volume begins with preliminary information (acronyms used; a fixed field crosswalk table between MARC 21, OCLC, and RLIN; and a MARC tag table). The first article looks closely at survey results on map cataloging activities. However, its focus is six articles on cataloging specific material types (maps generally; map series and serials; globes; geologic sections; atlases; and aerial photographs and remote-sensing images).

Footnote

Einführung zu einem Themenheft: "Maps and related cartographic materials: cataloging, classification, and bibliographic control"

0.043756653 = product of:
  0.087513305 = sum of:
    0.087513305 = product of:
      0.17502661 = sum of:
        0.17502661 = weight(_text_:maps in 5326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17502661 = score(doc=5326,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.61460495 = fieldWeight in 5326, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5326)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Remote-sensing images are valuable library resources, which provide highly useful information to a variety of library patrons. They are graphic representations of spatial relationships recorded by a device that was not in physical contact with the geographic entity being studied. Effective access and description in the library catalog is necessary so that these images may be found and used. This article discusses characteristics of remote-sensing images and maps: how to identify them; and how to catalog, classify and provide subject access for them. A variety of remote-sensing items and their catalog records are reproduced and discussed, including application of the new Remote-sensing 007 field.

Footnote

Teil eines Themenheftes zu: "Maps and related cartographic materials: cataloging, classification, and bibliographic control"

0.043756653 = product of:
  0.087513305 = sum of:
    0.087513305 = product of:
      0.17502661 = sum of:
        0.17502661 = weight(_text_:maps in 5329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17502661 = score(doc=5329,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.61460495 = fieldWeight in 5329, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5329)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The cataloging of early atlases presents a multitude of challenges to catalogers. This is true primarily because an atlas is a collection of maps in ''book'' form but also because the item is an early or ''rare'' item. This article attempts to provide the cataloger with the necessary guidance for cataloging early atlases by reviewing the relevant cataloging sources, discussing the issues relevant to early atlas cataloging, and providing examples of early atlas cataloging. The article is intended to serve as a ''reference source'' for those individuals who will be cataloging early atlases.

Footnote

Teil eines Themenheftes zu: "Maps and related cartographic materials: cataloging, classification, and bibliographic control"

0.043756653 = product of:
  0.087513305 = sum of:
    0.087513305 = product of:
      0.17502661 = sum of:
        0.17502661 = weight(_text_:maps in 5336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17502661 = score(doc=5336,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.61460495 = fieldWeight in 5336, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5336)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article is intended to provide information to the person faced with an uncataloged map collection. The article will discuss how various projects to catalog and classify a large existing map collection were completed at the University of Washington Libraries (UW). Project planning, standards, personnel issues and costs will be discussed. Information will be presented about outsourcing map cataloging, utilizing MARCIVE/U.S. Government Printing Office cataloging records and completing a shelflist conversion project. This article deals with the cataloging and classification of print maps and aerial photographs; atlases an electronic mapping products were not included in these projects.

Footnote

Teil eines Themenheftes zu: "Maps and related cartographic materials: cataloging, classification, and bibliographic control"

0.03884187 = product of:
  0.07768374 = sum of:
    0.07768374 = product of:
      0.15536748 = sum of:
        0.15536748 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15536748 = score(doc=4362,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050679237 = queryNorm
            0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 1.2000 19:22:27