Search (24 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Wang, P.: ¬An empirical study of knowledge structures of research topics (1999) 0.05
    0.049418103 = product of:
      0.098836206 = sum of:
        0.098836206 = product of:
          0.19767241 = sum of:
            0.19767241 = weight(_text_:maps in 6667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19767241 = score(doc=6667,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.69412553 = fieldWeight in 6667, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6667)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    How knowledge is organized in human memory is of interest to both information science and cognitive science. The current information retrieval (IR) systems can be improved if we understand which conceptual structures could facilitate users in information processing and seeking. This project examined twenty-two cognitive maps on ten research topics generated by ten experts and eleven non-experts. Experts were those who had completed a research project on the topic prior to participating in this study, while non-experts were from the same academic department who were familiar with the topic but had not conducted any in-depth research on it. A research topic can be represented by a vocabulary and the relationships among the terms in the vocabulary. A cognitive map visualizes the vocabulary and its configuration in a plane. We observed that experts did not generate the maps much faster than non-experts. Both experts and non-experts modified the given vocabulary by either adding or dropping terms. The dominant configuration for the maps was top-down, while five maps were orientated in left-right or radical structure (from a center). Experts tended to use problem-oriented approach to organize the vocabulary while non-experts often applied discipline-oriented hierarchical structure. Despite of many differences in vocabulary and structure by individuals, there are terms clustered in a similar ways across maps indicating an agreed-upon semantic closeness among these terms
  2. Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The generation of aggregated journal-journal citation maps on the basis of the CD-ROM version of the Science Citation Index (1994) 0.04
    0.043756653 = product of:
      0.087513305 = sum of:
        0.087513305 = product of:
          0.17502661 = sum of:
            0.17502661 = weight(_text_:maps in 8281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17502661 = score(doc=8281,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.61460495 = fieldWeight in 8281, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8281)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a method for the generation of journal-journal citation maps on the basis of the CD-ROM version of the Science Citation Index. Discusses sources of potential error from this data. Offers strategies to counteract such errors. Analyzes a number of scientometric periodical mappings in relation to mappings from previous studies which have used tape data and/or data from ISI's Journal Citation Reports. Compares the quality of these mappings with the quality of those for previous years in order to demonstrate the use of such mappings as indicators for dynamic developments in the sciences
  3. Small, H.: Update on science mapping : creating large document spaces (1997) 0.04
    0.043756653 = product of:
      0.087513305 = sum of:
        0.087513305 = product of:
          0.17502661 = sum of:
            0.17502661 = weight(_text_:maps in 410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17502661 = score(doc=410,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.61460495 = fieldWeight in 410, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=410)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Science mapping projects have been revived by the advent of virtual reality (VR) software capable of navigating large sysnthetic 3 dimensional spaces. Unlike the earlier mapping efforts aimed at creating simple maps at either a global or local level, the focus is now on creating large scale maps displaying many thousands of documents which can be input into the new VR systems. Presents a general framework for creating large scale document spaces as well as some new methods which perform some of the individual processing steps. The methods are designed primarily for citation data but could be applied to other types of data, including hypertext links
  4. Kopcsa, A.; Schiebel, E.: Science and technology mapping : a new iteration model for representing multidimensional relationships (1998) 0.04
    0.0375057 = product of:
      0.0750114 = sum of:
        0.0750114 = product of:
          0.1500228 = sum of:
            0.1500228 = weight(_text_:maps in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1500228 = score(doc=326,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.5268042 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Much effort has been done to develop more objective quantitative methods to analyze and integrate survey information for understanding research trends and research structures. Co-word analysis is one class of techniques that exploits the use of co-occurences of items in written information. However, there are some bottlenecks in using statistical methods to produce mappings of reduced information in a comfortable manner. On one hand, often used statistical software for PCs has restrictions for the amount for calculable data; on the other hand, the results of the mufltidimensional scaling routines are not quite satisfying. Therefore, this article introduces a new iteration model for the calculation of co-word maps that eases the problem. The iteration model is for positioning the words in the two-dimensional plane due to their connections to each other, and its consists of a quick and stabile algorithm that has been implemented with software for personal computers. A graphic module represents the data in well-known 'technology maps'
  5. Small, H.: ¬A general framework for creating large scale maps of science in two or three dimensions : the SciViz system (1998) 0.04
    0.035360713 = product of:
      0.070721425 = sum of:
        0.070721425 = product of:
          0.14144285 = sum of:
            0.14144285 = weight(_text_:maps in 1039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14144285 = score(doc=1039,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.4966758 = fieldWeight in 1039, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1039)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Milman, B.L.: Individual co-citation clusters as nuclei of complete and dynamic informetric models of scientific and technological areas (1994) 0.03
    0.030940626 = product of:
      0.06188125 = sum of:
        0.06188125 = product of:
          0.1237625 = sum of:
            0.1237625 = weight(_text_:maps in 37) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1237625 = score(doc=37,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.43459132 = fieldWeight in 37, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=37)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the construction of improved informetric models of individual scientific and technological areas on the basis of individual co citation clusters. The developed methodology of replenishment of research front with accidently absent papers describes the model more completely. Proposes the simple method of cluster 'dynamization' for the study of evolution of research area. The transition under consideration from co citation clusters to lexical maps of papers and patents enables the monitoring of the relationshuip between R and D in a given technological area. Provides the example from modern chemical engineering of Pressure-Swing Adsorption
  7. Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998) 0.02
    0.024276167 = product of:
      0.048552334 = sum of:
        0.048552334 = product of:
          0.09710467 = sum of:
            0.09710467 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09710467 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:22:35
  8. Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994) 0.02
    0.02403218 = product of:
      0.04806436 = sum of:
        0.04806436 = product of:
          0.09612872 = sum of:
            0.09612872 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09612872 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
  9. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.02
    0.02403218 = product of:
      0.04806436 = sum of:
        0.04806436 = product of:
          0.09612872 = sum of:
            0.09612872 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09612872 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
  10. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : II. Resilience to ambiguity (1990) 0.02
    0.02403218 = product of:
      0.04806436 = sum of:
        0.04806436 = product of:
          0.09612872 = sum of:
            0.09612872 = weight(_text_:22 in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09612872 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:55
  11. Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995) 0.01
    0.0137326745 = product of:
      0.027465349 = sum of:
        0.027465349 = product of:
          0.054930698 = sum of:
            0.054930698 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054930698 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
  12. Pichappan, P.; Sangaranachiyar, S.: Ageing approach to scientific eponyms (1996) 0.01
    0.0137326745 = product of:
      0.027465349 = sum of:
        0.027465349 = product of:
          0.054930698 = sum of:
            0.054930698 = weight(_text_:22 in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054930698 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Report presented at the 16th National Indian Association of Special Libraries and Information Centres Seminar Special Interest Group Meeting on Informatrics in Bombay, 19-22 Dec 94
  13. Mommoh, O.M.: Subject analysis of post-graduate theses in library, archival and information science at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria (1995/96) 0.01
    0.0137326745 = product of:
      0.027465349 = sum of:
        0.027465349 = product of:
          0.054930698 = sum of:
            0.054930698 = weight(_text_:22 in 673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054930698 = score(doc=673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library focus. 13/14(1995/96), S.22-25
  14. Chongde, W.; Zhe, W.: Evaluation of the models for Bradford's law (1998) 0.01
    0.0137326745 = product of:
      0.027465349 = sum of:
        0.027465349 = product of:
          0.054930698 = sum of:
            0.054930698 = weight(_text_:22 in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054930698 = score(doc=3688,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:12:28
  15. Tijssen, R.J.W.; Wijk, E. van: ¬The global science base of information and communication technologies : bibliometric analysis of ICT research papers (1998) 0.01
    0.0137326745 = product of:
      0.027465349 = sum of:
        0.027465349 = product of:
          0.054930698 = sum of:
            0.054930698 = weight(_text_:22 in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054930698 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:26:54
  16. Zhang, Y.: ¬The impact of Internet-based electronic resources on formal scholarly communication in the area of library and information science : a citation analysis (1998) 0.01
    0.012138084 = product of:
      0.024276167 = sum of:
        0.024276167 = product of:
          0.048552334 = sum of:
            0.048552334 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048552334 = score(doc=2808,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 1.1999 17:22:22
  17. Neth, M.: Citation analysis and the Web (1998) 0.01
    0.01201609 = product of:
      0.02403218 = sum of:
        0.02403218 = product of:
          0.04806436 = sum of:
            0.04806436 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04806436 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 1.1999 16:22:37
  18. Haiqi, Z.: ¬The literature of Qigong : publication patterns and subject headings (1997) 0.01
    0.01201609 = product of:
      0.02403218 = sum of:
        0.02403218 = product of:
          0.04806436 = sum of:
            0.04806436 = weight(_text_:22 in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04806436 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.38-44
  19. Avramescu, A.: Teoria difuziei informatiei stiintifice (1997) 0.01
    0.01201609 = product of:
      0.02403218 = sum of:
        0.02403218 = product of:
          0.04806436 = sum of:
            0.04806436 = weight(_text_:22 in 3030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04806436 = score(doc=3030,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3030, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3030)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 16:16:11
  20. Falkingham, L.T.; Reeves, R.: Context analysis : a technique for analysing research in a field, applied to literature on the management of R&D at the section level (1998) 0.01
    0.01201609 = product of:
      0.02403218 = sum of:
        0.02403218 = product of:
          0.04806436 = sum of:
            0.04806436 = weight(_text_:22 in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04806436 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:18:46