Search (97 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Liechti, O.; Sifer, M.J.; Ichikawa, T.: Structured graph format : XML metadata for describing Web site structure (1998) 0.09
    0.085913435 = product of:
      0.17182687 = sum of:
        0.17182687 = sum of:
          0.1237625 = weight(_text_:maps in 3597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1237625 = score(doc=3597,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679237 = queryNorm
              0.43459132 = fieldWeight in 3597, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3597)
          0.04806436 = weight(_text_:22 in 3597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04806436 = score(doc=3597,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679237 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3597, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3597)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    To improve searching, filtering and processing of information on the Web, a common effort is made in the direction of metadata, defined as machine understandable information about Web resources or other things. In particular, the eXtensible Markup Language (XML) aims at providing a common syntax to emerging metadata formats. Proposes the Structured Graph Format (SGF) an XML compliant markup language based on structured graphs, for capturing Web sites' structure. Presents SGMapper, a client-site tool, which aims to facilitate navigation in large Web sites by generating highly interactive site maps using SGF metadata
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  2. Lin, X.; Li, J.; Zhou, X.: Theme creation for digital collections (2008) 0.09
    0.085913435 = product of:
      0.17182687 = sum of:
        0.17182687 = sum of:
          0.1237625 = weight(_text_:maps in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1237625 = score(doc=2635,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679237 = queryNorm
              0.43459132 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
          0.04806436 = weight(_text_:22 in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04806436 = score(doc=2635,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050679237 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Object
    Topic maps
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  3. Kuzma, M.: Are you able to find the maps you need? (2019) 0.06
    0.06188125 = product of:
      0.1237625 = sum of:
        0.1237625 = product of:
          0.247525 = sum of:
            0.247525 = weight(_text_:maps in 4569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.247525 = score(doc=4569,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.86918265 = fieldWeight in 4569, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4569)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Garshol, L.M.: Metadata? Thesauri? Taxonomies? Topic Maps! : making sense of it all (2005) 0.05
    0.053041074 = product of:
      0.10608215 = sum of:
        0.10608215 = product of:
          0.2121643 = sum of:
            0.2121643 = weight(_text_:maps in 4729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2121643 = score(doc=4729,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.7450137 = fieldWeight in 4729, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4729)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The task of an information architect is to create web sites where users can actually find the information they are looking for. As the ocean of information rises and leaves what we seek ever more deeply buried in what we don't seek, this discipline becomes ever more relevant. Information architecture involves many different aspects of web site creation and organization, but its principal tools are information organization techniques developed in other disciplines. Most of these techniques come from library science, such as thesauri, taxonomies, and faceted classification. Topic maps are a relative newcomer to this area and bring with them the promise of better-organized web sites, compared to what is possible with existing techniques. However, it is not generally understood how topic maps relate to the traditional techniques, and what advantages and disadvantages they have, compared to these techniques. The aim of this paper is to help build a better understanding of these issues.
    Object
    Topic maps
  5. Smits, J.: Spatial metadata : an international survey on clearinghouses and infrastructures (1999) 0.04
    0.043756653 = product of:
      0.087513305 = sum of:
        0.087513305 = product of:
          0.17502661 = sum of:
            0.17502661 = weight(_text_:maps in 5334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17502661 = score(doc=5334,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.61460495 = fieldWeight in 5334, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5334)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Consistency and interoperability are objectives when creating standards for spatial metadata. Besides FGDC-metadata standards some other international standards are in use or will be in use soon. The use of these standards forms the basis for geospatial data infrastructures (GDI) and clearinghouses. Though most GDIs and clearinghouses are in the planning stage, the contours of regional and a global geospatial data infrastructure (GGDI) are slowly emerging. Maps should be part of the interfaces, which provide access to the GDIs and clearinghouses.
    Footnote
    Teil eines Themenheftes zu: "Maps and related cartographic materials: cataloging, classification, and bibliographic control"
  6. Hook, P.A.; Gantchev, A.: Using combined metadata sources to visualize a small library (OBL's English Language Books) (2017) 0.04
    0.038279098 = product of:
      0.076558195 = sum of:
        0.076558195 = product of:
          0.15311639 = sum of:
            0.15311639 = weight(_text_:maps in 3870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15311639 = score(doc=3870,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.53766733 = fieldWeight in 3870, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3870)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Data from multiple knowledge organization systems are combined to provide a global overview of the content holdings of a small personal library. Subject headings and classification data are used to effectively map the combined book and topic space of the library. While harvested and manipulated by hand, the work reveals issues and potential solutions when using automated techniques to produce topic maps of much larger libraries. The small library visualized consists of the thirty-nine, digital, English language books found in the Osama Bin Laden (OBL) compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan upon his death. As this list of books has garnered considerable media attention, it is worth providing a visual overview of the subject content of these books - some of which is not readily apparent from the titles. Metadata from subject headings and classification numbers was combined to create book-subject maps. Tree maps of the classification data were also produced. The books contain 328 subject headings. In order to enhance the base map with meaningful thematic overlay, library holding count data was also harvested (and aggregated from duplicates). This additional data revealed the relative scarcity or popularity of individual books.
  7. Maule, R.W.: Cognitive maps, AI agents and personalized virtual environments in Internet learning experiences (1998) 0.04
    0.035360713 = product of:
      0.070721425 = sum of:
        0.070721425 = product of:
          0.14144285 = sum of:
            0.14144285 = weight(_text_:maps in 5221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14144285 = score(doc=5221,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.4966758 = fieldWeight in 5221, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5221)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Schaefer, M.T.: Demystifying metadata : initiatives for web document description (1998) 0.03
    0.030940626 = product of:
      0.06188125 = sum of:
        0.06188125 = product of:
          0.1237625 = sum of:
            0.1237625 = weight(_text_:maps in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1237625 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.43459132 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Examines international efforts to promote metadata as a common, interactive resource description tool for the Internet. These efforts centre on the Dublin Core Element Set, but include qualifiers such as those promoted by the Canberra Qualifiers. The LoC Network Development and MARC Standards Office maintains the Dublin Core / MARC / GILS (Government Information Location Standards) crosswalk which maps the common and correlative elements of each system. Describes current international initiatives and issues. Describes the Nordic metadata project which is aiming to create the basic elements of a metadata production and utilization system based on the Dublin Core Metadata Element Set. Describes the WWW consortium efforts in this area
  9. Smits, J.: Metadata : an introduction (1999) 0.03
    0.030940626 = product of:
      0.06188125 = sum of:
        0.06188125 = product of:
          0.1237625 = sum of:
            0.1237625 = weight(_text_:maps in 5333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1237625 = score(doc=5333,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.43459132 = fieldWeight in 5333, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5333)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Teil eines Themenheftes zu: "Maps and related cartographic materials: cataloging, classification, and bibliographic control"
  10. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.03
    0.029131403 = product of:
      0.058262806 = sum of:
        0.058262806 = product of:
          0.11652561 = sum of:
            0.11652561 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11652561 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  11. Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000) 0.03
    0.027465349 = product of:
      0.054930698 = sum of:
        0.054930698 = product of:
          0.109861396 = sum of:
            0.109861396 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.109861396 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16. 7.2000 20:58:22
  12. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.03
    0.027465349 = product of:
      0.054930698 = sum of:
        0.054930698 = product of:
          0.109861396 = sum of:
            0.109861396 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.109861396 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  13. Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001) 0.02
    0.02403218 = product of:
      0.04806436 = sum of:
        0.04806436 = product of:
          0.09612872 = sum of:
            0.09612872 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09612872 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 3.2002 9:22:34
  14. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02
    0.02403218 = product of:
      0.04806436 = sum of:
        0.04806436 = product of:
          0.09612872 = sum of:
            0.09612872 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09612872 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  15. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.02
    0.02403218 = product of:
      0.04806436 = sum of:
        0.04806436 = product of:
          0.09612872 = sum of:
            0.09612872 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09612872 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  16. McCallum, S.H.: Library of Congress metadata landscape (2003) 0.02
    0.022100445 = product of:
      0.04420089 = sum of:
        0.04420089 = product of:
          0.08840178 = sum of:
            0.08840178 = weight(_text_:maps in 1760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08840178 = score(doc=1760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.31042236 = fieldWeight in 1760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1760)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress (LC) has many of the same challenges as other libraries, especially large ones. LC has many different types of resources - books, journals, maps, music, manuscripts, audio, moving image, still image, artifacts, electronic - with large collections of each. Different levels of access are needed for this material: for some, collection level bibliographic description is adequate; for many, item level access is adequate; but for others, such as sound recordings, analytic, or sub unit access is highly desirable.The sizes of the LC collections are a major challenge - over 125 million non-electronic and over 3 million electronic items (and growing rapidly). And finally, electronic resources are presenting us with new issues - from metadata to preservation to storage to linking techniques. LC has tried to approach these challenges from a service perspective. Access must be successful for the end user, which mandates as much coherence and consistency in the metadata as possible and access systems that are easy to use. This paper focuses an the Library of Congress' perspective an metadata in the following three areas: (1) descriptive metadata in our current operations, (2) pathways that are developing that will support possible evolution in the future, and (3) broader metadata needs with digital material. The discussion is from a metadata element set and format point of view, not a cataloging data and cataloging rules view. Most acronyms used in this paper are expanded in an Appendix.
  17. Özel, S.A.; Altingövde, I.S.; Ulusoy, Ö.; Özsoyoglu, G.; Özsoyoglu, Z.M.: Metadata-Based Modeling of Information Resources an the Web (2004) 0.02
    0.022100445 = product of:
      0.04420089 = sum of:
        0.04420089 = product of:
          0.08840178 = sum of:
            0.08840178 = weight(_text_:maps in 2093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08840178 = score(doc=2093,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.31042236 = fieldWeight in 2093, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2093)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper deals with the problem of modeling Web information resources using expert knowledge and personalized user information for improved Web searching capabilities. We propose a "Web information space" model, which is composed of Web-based information resources (HTML/XML [Hypertext Markup Language/Extensible Markup Language] documents an the Web), expert advice repositories (domain-expert-specified metadata for information resources), and personalized information about users (captured as user profiles that indicate users' preferences about experts as well as users' knowledge about topics). Expert advice, the heart of the Web information space model, is specified using topics and relationships among topics (called metalinks), along the lines of the recently proposed topic maps. Topics and metalinks constitute metadata that describe the contents of the underlying HTML/XML Web resources. The metadata specification process is semiautomated, and it exploits XML DTDs (Document Type Definition) to allow domain-expert guided mapping of DTD elements to topics and metalinks. The expert advice is stored in an object-relational database management system (DBMS). To demonstrate the practicality and usability of the proposed Web information space model, we created a prototype expert advice repository of more than one million topics/metalinks for DBLP (Database and Logic Programming) Bibliography data set. We also present a query interface that provides sophisticated querying fa cilities for DBLP Bibliography resources using the expert advice repository.
  18. Tallerås, C.; Dahl, J.H.B.; Pharo, N.: User conceptualizations of derivative relationships in the bibliographic universe (2018) 0.02
    0.022100445 = product of:
      0.04420089 = sum of:
        0.04420089 = product of:
          0.08840178 = sum of:
            0.08840178 = weight(_text_:maps in 4247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08840178 = score(doc=4247,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.31042236 = fieldWeight in 4247, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4247)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose Considerable effort is devoted to developing new models for organizing bibliographic metadata. However, such models have been repeatedly criticized for their lack of proper user testing. The purpose of this paper is to present a study on how non-experts in bibliographic systems map the bibliographic universe and, in particular, how they conceptualize relationships between independent but strongly related entities. Design/methodology/approach The study is based on an open concept-mapping task performed to externalize the conceptualizations of 98 novice students. The conceptualizations of the resulting concept maps are identified and analyzed statistically. Findings The study shows that the participants' conceptualizations have great variety, differing in detail and granularity. These conceptualizations can be categorized into two main groups according to derivative relationships: those that apply a single-entity model directly relating document entities and those (the majority) that apply a multi-entity model relating documents through a high-level collocating node. These high-level nodes seem to be most adequately interpreted either as superwork devices collocating documents belonging to the same bibliographic family or as devices collocating documents belonging to a shared fictional world. Originality/value The findings can guide the work to develop bibliographic standards. Based on the diversity of the conceptualizations, the findings also emphasize the need for more user testing of both conceptual models and the bibliographic end-user systems implementing those models.
  19. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.02
    0.020599011 = product of:
      0.041198023 = sum of:
        0.041198023 = product of:
          0.082396045 = sum of:
            0.082396045 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.082396045 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  20. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.02
    0.019420935 = product of:
      0.03884187 = sum of:
        0.03884187 = product of:
          0.07768374 = sum of:
            0.07768374 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07768374 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 86
  • d 9
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 88
  • el 8
  • s 6
  • m 3
  • b 2
  • More… Less…