Search (68 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchmaschinen"
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Bilal, D.; Wang, P.: Children's conceptual structures of science categories and the design of Web directories (2005) 0.06
    0.064961776 = product of:
      0.12992355 = sum of:
        0.12992355 = product of:
          0.2598471 = sum of:
            0.2598471 = weight(_text_:maps in 4341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2598471 = score(doc=4341,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.9124516 = fieldWeight in 4341, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4341)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Eleven middle school children constructed hierarchical maps for two science categories selected from two Web directories, Yahooligans! and KidsClick! For each category, children constructed a pair of maps: one without links and one with links. Forty-tour maps were analyzed to identify similarities and differences. The structures of the maps were compared to the structures employed by the directories. Children were able to construct hierarchical maps and articulate the relationships among the concepts. At the global level (whole map), children's maps were not alike and did not match the structures of the Web directories. At the local levels (superordinate and subordinate), however, children shared similarities in the conceptual configurations, especially for the concrete concepts. For these concepts, substantial overlap was found between the children's structures and those employed in the directories. For the abstract concepts the configurations were diverse and did not match those in the directories. The findings of this study have impl!cations for design of systems that are more supportive of children's conceptual structures.
  2. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.04
    0.040246032 = product of:
      0.080492064 = sum of:
        0.080492064 = product of:
          0.24147618 = sum of:
            0.24147618 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24147618 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.42965913 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
  3. Dodge, M.: ¬A map of Yahoo! (2000) 0.03
    0.029319555 = product of:
      0.05863911 = sum of:
        0.05863911 = product of:
          0.11727822 = sum of:
            0.11727822 = weight(_text_:maps in 1555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11727822 = score(doc=1555,freq=22.0), product of:
                0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.4118218 = fieldWeight in 1555, product of:
                  4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                    22.0 = termFreq=22.0
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1555)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    The View From Above Browsing for a particular piece on information on the Web can often feel like being stuck in an unfamiliar part of town walking around at street level looking for a particular store. You know the store is around there somewhere, but your viewpoint at ground level is constrained. What you really want is to get above the streets, hovering half a mile or so up in the air, to see the whole neighbourhood. This kind of birds-eye view function has been memorably described by David D. Clark, Senior Research Scientist at MIT's Laboratory for Computer Science and the Chairman of the Invisible Worlds Protocol Advisory Board, as the missing "up button" on the browser [3] . ET-Map is a nice example of a prototype for Clark's "up-button" view of an information space. The goal of information maps, like ET-Map, is to provide the browser with a sense of the lie of the information landscape, what is where, the location of clusters and hotspots, what is related to what. Ideally, this 'big-picture' all-in-one visual summary needs to fit on a single standard computer screen. ET-Map is one of my favourite examples, but there are many other interesting information maps being developed by other researchers and companies (see inset at the bottom of this page). How does ET-Map work? Here is a sequence of screenshots of a typical browsing session with ET-Map, which ends with access to Web pages on jazz musician Miles Davis. You can also tryout ET-Map for yourself, using a fully working demo on the AI Lab's website [4] . We begin with the top-level map showing forty odd broad entertainment 'subject regions' represented by regularly shaped tiles. Each tile is a visual summary of a group of Web pages with similar content. These tiles are shaded different colours to differentiate them, while labels identify the subject of the tile and the number in brackets telling you how many individual Web page links it contains. ET-Map uses two important, but common-sense, spatial concepts in its organisation and representation of the Web. Firstly, the 'subject regions' size is directly related to the number of Web pages in that category. For example, the 'MUSIC' subject area contains over 11,000 pages and so has a much larger area than the neighbouring area of 'LIVE' which only has 4,300 odd pages. This is intuitively meaningful, as the largest tiles are visually more prominent on the map and are likely to be more significant as they contain the most links. In addition, a second spatial concept, that of neighbourhood proximity, is applied so 'subject regions' closely related in term of content are plotted close to each other on the map. For example, 'FILM' and 'YEAR'S OSCARS', at the bottom left, are neighbours in both semantic and spatial space. This make senses as many things in the real-world are ordered in this way, with things that are alike being spatially close together (e.g. layout of goods in a store, or books in a library). Importantly, ET-Map is also a multi-layer map, with sub-maps showing greater informational resolution through a finer degree of categorization. So for any subject region that contains more than two hundred Web pages, a second-level map, with more detailed categories is generated. This subdivision of information space is repeated down the hierarchy as far as necessary. In the example, the user selected the 'MUSIC' subject region which, not surprisingly, contained many thousands of pages. A second-level map with numerous different music categories is then presented to the user. Delving deeper, the user wants to learn more about jazz music, so clicking on the 'JAZZ' tile leads to a third-level map, a fine-grained map of jazz related Web pages. Finally, selecting the 'MILES DAVIS' subject region leads to more a conventional looking ranking of pages from which the user selects one to download.
    Information Maps There are many other fascinating examples that employ two dimensional interactive maps to provide a 'birds-eye' view of information. They use various underlying techniques of textual analysis and clustering to turn the mass of information into a useful summary map (see "Mining in Textual Mountains" in Mappa.Mundi Magazine). In terms of visual representations they can be divided into two groups, those that generate smooth surfaces and those that produce regular, tiled maps. Unfortunately, we don't have space to examine them in detail, but they are well worth spending some time exploring. I will be covering some of them in future columns.
    Research Prototypes Visual SiteMap Developed by Xia Lin, based at the College of Library and Information Science, Drexel University. CVG Cyberspace geography visualization, developed by Luc Girardin, at The Graduate Institute of International Studies, Switzerland. WEBSOM Maps the thousands of articles posted on Usenet newsgroups. It is being developed by researchers at the Neural Networks Research Centre, Helsinki University of Technology in Finland. TreeMaps Developed by Brian Johnson, Ben Shneiderman and colleagues in the Human-Computer Interaction Lab at the University of Maryland. Commercial Information Maps: NewsMaps Provides interactive information landscapes summarizing daily news stories, developed Cartia, Inc. Web Squirrel Creates maps known as information farms. It is developed by Eastgate Systems, Inc. Umap Produces interactive maps of Web searches. Map of the Market An interactive map of the market performance of the stocks of major US corporations developed by SmartMoney.com."
    Source
    http://mappa.mundi.net/maps/maps_009/
  4. El-Ramly, N.; Peterson. R.E.; Volonino, L.: Top ten Web sites using search engines : the case of the desalination industry (1996) 0.03
    0.026520537 = product of:
      0.053041074 = sum of:
        0.053041074 = product of:
          0.10608215 = sum of:
            0.10608215 = weight(_text_:maps in 945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10608215 = score(doc=945,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.37250686 = fieldWeight in 945, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=945)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The desalination industry involves the desalting of sea or brackish water and achieves the purpose of increasing the worls's effective water supply. There are approximately 4.000 desalination Web sites. The six major Internet search engines were used to determine, according to each of the six, the top twenty sites for desalination. Each site was visited and the 120 gross returns were pared down to the final ten - the 'Top Ten'. The Top Ten were then analyzed to determine what it was that made the sites useful and informative. The major attributes were: a) currency (up-to-date); b) search site capability; c) access to articles on desalination; d) newsletters; e) databases; f) product information; g) online conferencing; h) valuable links to other sites; l) communication links; j) site maps; and k) case studies. Reasons for having a Web site and the current status and prospects for Internet commerce are discussed
  5. MacLeod, R.: Promoting a subject gateway : a case study from EEVL (Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library) (2000) 0.02
    0.024276167 = product of:
      0.048552334 = sum of:
        0.048552334 = product of:
          0.09710467 = sum of:
            0.09710467 = weight(_text_:22 in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09710467 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:40:22
  6. Vidmar, D.J.: Darwin on the Web : the evolution of search tools (1999) 0.02
    0.02403218 = product of:
      0.04806436 = sum of:
        0.04806436 = product of:
          0.09612872 = sum of:
            0.09612872 = weight(_text_:22 in 3175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09612872 = score(doc=3175,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3175, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3175)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Computers in libraries. 19(1999) no.5, S.22-28
  7. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.02
    0.02403218 = product of:
      0.04806436 = sum of:
        0.04806436 = product of:
          0.09612872 = sum of:
            0.09612872 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09612872 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  8. Dunning, A.: Do we still need search engines? (1999) 0.02
    0.02403218 = product of:
      0.04806436 = sum of:
        0.04806436 = product of:
          0.09612872 = sum of:
            0.09612872 = weight(_text_:22 in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09612872 = score(doc=6021,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Ariadne. 1999, no.22
  9. Bawden, D.: Google and the universe of knowledge (2008) 0.02
    0.02403218 = product of:
      0.04806436 = sum of:
        0.04806436 = product of:
          0.09612872 = sum of:
            0.09612872 = weight(_text_:22 in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09612872 = score(doc=844,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 6.2008 16:22:20
  10. Birmingham, J.: Internet search engines (1996) 0.02
    0.020599011 = product of:
      0.041198023 = sum of:
        0.041198023 = product of:
          0.082396045 = sum of:
            0.082396045 = weight(_text_:22 in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.082396045 = score(doc=5664,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10.11.1996 16:36:22
  11. Hock, R.E.: How to do field searching in Web search engines : a field trip (1998) 0.02
    0.019420935 = product of:
      0.03884187 = sum of:
        0.03884187 = product of:
          0.07768374 = sum of:
            0.07768374 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07768374 = score(doc=3601,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.18-22
  12. Price, A.: Five new Danish subject gateways under development (2000) 0.02
    0.017165843 = product of:
      0.034331687 = sum of:
        0.034331687 = product of:
          0.06866337 = sum of:
            0.06866337 = weight(_text_:22 in 4878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06866337 = score(doc=4878,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4878, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4878)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:41:31
  13. Conhaim, W.W.: Search tools (1996) 0.01
    0.0137326745 = product of:
      0.027465349 = sum of:
        0.027465349 = product of:
          0.054930698 = sum of:
            0.054930698 = weight(_text_:22 in 4738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054930698 = score(doc=4738,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4738, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4738)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:39:31
  14. Fong, W.W.: Searching the World Wide Web (1996) 0.01
    0.0137326745 = product of:
      0.027465349 = sum of:
        0.027465349 = product of:
          0.054930698 = sum of:
            0.054930698 = weight(_text_:22 in 6597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054930698 = score(doc=6597,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6597, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6597)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of library and information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.15-36
  15. Duval, B.K.; Main, L.: Searching on the Net : general overview (1996) 0.01
    0.0137326745 = product of:
      0.027465349 = sum of:
        0.027465349 = product of:
          0.054930698 = sum of:
            0.054930698 = weight(_text_:22 in 7268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054930698 = score(doc=7268,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7268, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7268)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  16. Notess, G.R.: Toward more comprehensive Web searching : single searching versus megasearching (1998) 0.01
    0.0137326745 = product of:
      0.027465349 = sum of:
        0.027465349 = product of:
          0.054930698 = sum of:
            0.054930698 = weight(_text_:22 in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054930698 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.2, S.73-76
  17. Berinstein, P.: Turning visual : image search engines on the Web (1998) 0.01
    0.0137326745 = product of:
      0.027465349 = sum of:
        0.027465349 = product of:
          0.054930698 = sum of:
            0.054930698 = weight(_text_:22 in 3595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054930698 = score(doc=3595,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3595, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3595)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.37-38,40-42
  18. Amato, G.; Rabitti, F.; Savino, P.: Multimedia document search on the Web (1998) 0.01
    0.0137326745 = product of:
      0.027465349 = sum of:
        0.027465349 = product of:
          0.054930698 = sum of:
            0.054930698 = weight(_text_:22 in 3605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054930698 = score(doc=3605,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3605, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3605)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  19. Gardner, T.; Iannella, R.: Architecture and software solutions (2000) 0.01
    0.0137326745 = product of:
      0.027465349 = sum of:
        0.027465349 = product of:
          0.054930698 = sum of:
            0.054930698 = weight(_text_:22 in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054930698 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:24
  20. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.01
    0.0137326745 = product of:
      0.027465349 = sum of:
        0.027465349 = product of:
          0.054930698 = sum of:
            0.054930698 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054930698 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050679237 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23

Types

  • a 62
  • el 7
  • m 3
  • More… Less…