-
Bell, H.K.: Indexing biographies, and other stories of human lives (1992)
0.02
0.021488791 = product of:
0.085955165 = sum of:
0.085955165 = weight(_text_:22 in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085955165 = score(doc=5396,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18513593 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052868344 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.46-47 (R. Fugmann)
-
Lathrop, L.: ¬An indexer's guide to the Internet (1999)
0.02
0.021488791 = product of:
0.085955165 = sum of:
0.085955165 = weight(_text_:22 in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085955165 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18513593 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052868344 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Indexer 22(2000) no.1, S.51 (R. Davis)
-
Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996)
0.02
0.020259827 = product of:
0.08103931 = sum of:
0.08103931 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08103931 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18513593 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052868344 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 8. 3.1997 20:22:25
- Source
- Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
-
Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991)
0.01
0.014325862 = product of:
0.057303447 = sum of:
0.057303447 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057303447 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18513593 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052868344 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative
-
Diodato, V.: Duplicate entries versus see cross references in back-of-the book indexes (1994)
0.01
0.014325862 = product of:
0.057303447 = sum of:
0.057303447 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057303447 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18513593 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052868344 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Considers whether, when there is a choice, a back-of-book indexer should use a duplicate entry or a see reference. Guidelines suggest that it is preferable to use the duplicate entry if it would not add to the length or complexity of the index. Studies 1.100 see references in 202 back-of-book indexes and concludes that 22% of the see references should have been replaced by duplicate entries. Failure to select a duplicate entry instead of a see reference occurs most frequently in science and techology books and in indexes with no subheadings
-
Shuttleworth, C.: Marot, Hofstadter, index (1998)
0.01
0.014325862 = product of:
0.057303447 = sum of:
0.057303447 = weight(_text_:22 in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057303447 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18513593 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052868344 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Indexer. 21(1998) no.1, S.22-23
-
Hodge, G.M.: Automated support to indexing (1992)
0.01
0.012535129 = product of:
0.050140515 = sum of:
0.050140515 = weight(_text_:22 in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050140515 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18513593 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052868344 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIS 44(1993) no.2, S.119-121 (B.H. Weinberg); International cataloguing and bibliographic control 22(1993) no.2, S.34 (E. Svenonius); Information processing and management 29(1993) no.4, S.528-531 (L.L.Hill)
-
Schroeder, K.A.: Layered indexing of images (1998)
0.01
0.012535129 = product of:
0.050140515 = sum of:
0.050140515 = weight(_text_:22 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050140515 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18513593 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052868344 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 9. 4.2000 17:22:00
