Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Gnoli, C."
  1. Gnoli, C.; Merli, G.; Pavan, G.; Bernuzzi, E.; Priano, M.: Freely faceted classification for a Web-based bibliographic archive : the BioAcoustic Reference Database (2010) 0.04
    0.038616225 = product of:
      0.07723245 = sum of:
        0.061201297 = weight(_text_:reference in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061201297 = score(doc=3739,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.31784135 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
        0.016031157 = product of:
          0.032062314 = sum of:
            0.032062314 = weight(_text_:22 in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032062314 = score(doc=3739,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047329273 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Object
    BioAcoustic Reference Database
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  2. Gnoli, C.: Boundaries and overlaps of disciplines in Bloch's methodology of historical knowledge (2014) 0.04
    0.035584204 = product of:
      0.07116841 = sum of:
        0.051931016 = weight(_text_:reference in 1414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051931016 = score(doc=1414,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.2696973 = fieldWeight in 1414, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1414)
        0.019237388 = product of:
          0.038474776 = sum of:
            0.038474776 = weight(_text_:22 in 1414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038474776 = score(doc=1414,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047329273 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1414, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1414)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Marc Bloch's famous methodological essay, The Historian's Craft, contains many relevant considerations on knowledge organization. These have been selected and grouped into four main themes: terminology problems in history; principles for the organization of historical knowledge, with special reference to the genetic principle; sources of historical information, to be found not only in archives but also in very different media and contexts; and the nature and boundaries of history as a discipline. Analysis of them shows that knowledge organization is an important part of historians' work, and suggests that it can be especially fruitful when a cross-medial, interdisciplinary approach is adopted.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  3. Gnoli, C.: ¬The meaning of facets in non-disciplinary classifications (2006) 0.01
    0.010818963 = product of:
      0.04327585 = sum of:
        0.04327585 = weight(_text_:reference in 2291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04327585 = score(doc=2291,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.22474778 = fieldWeight in 2291, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2291)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Disciplines are felt by many to be a constraint in classification, though they are a structuring principle of most bibliographic classification schemes. A non-disciplinary approach has been explored by the Classification Research Group, and research in this direction has been resumed recently by the Integrative Level Classification project. This paper focuses on the role and the definition of facets in non-disciplinary schemes. A generalized definition of facets is suggested with reference to predicate logic, allowing for having facets of phenomena as well as facets of disciplines. The general categories under which facets are often subsumed can be related ontologically to the evolutionary sequence of integrative levels. As a facet can be semantically connected with phenomena from any other part of a general scheme, its values can belong to three types, here called extra-defined foci (either special or general), and context-defined foci. Non-disciplinary freely faceted classification is being tested by applying it to little bibliographic samples stored in a MySQL database, and developing Web search interfaces to demonstrate possible uses of the described techniques.
  4. Gnoli, C.: Knowledge organization in Italy (2004) 0.01
    0.010710227 = product of:
      0.04284091 = sum of:
        0.04284091 = weight(_text_:reference in 3750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04284091 = score(doc=3750,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.22248895 = fieldWeight in 3750, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3750)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    "Subject headings Many Italian libraries create subject headings for their catalogues, using as a reference guide the "Soggettario per i catalogui delle biblioteche italiane." This is basically a list of subject terms created by the Biblioteca nazionale centrale di Firenze (BNCF), first published in 1956 and later updated with various lists of new subject headings. Though the Soggettario is still the main available reference, librarians are generally aware that it is outdated in both vocabulary and structure, especially as it does not provide explicit principles and rules to create and combine subject headings. A research group, called the Gruppo di ricerca sull'indicizzazione per soggetto (GRIS), was founded in 1990. It was devoted to improving the principles and consistency of subject indexing. Its members have performed in depth investigations of the structure of subject headings, starting with the principles of facet analysis used in PRECIS and including original developments. Results of their work are coded into the Guida all'indicizzazione per soggetto, published in 1996 and available also online <http:// wwwaib.it/aib/commiss/gris/gulda.htm>. The GRIS guide does not concern vocabulary, but morphological and syntactical rules for choosing and combining terms according to a sound citation order, based an a "role scheme." Unfortunately, GRIS principles have been applied only in a small number of libraries, mainly in Tuscany, rohere most GRIS members are located. A new project is now attempting to blend the traditional authority of the Soggettario with the more advanced principles of GRIS. A working group has been formed with people from BNCF, GRIS, and others, to study the feasibility of a renewal of the Soggettario. The group produced a report book in 2002, specifying the desirable features of the new system, and is at present searching for grants to implement it.
  5. Lardera, M.; Gnoli, C.; Rolandi, C.; Trzmielewski, M.: Developing SciGator, a DDC-based library browsing tool (2017) 0.00
    0.004809347 = product of:
      0.019237388 = sum of:
        0.019237388 = product of:
          0.038474776 = sum of:
            0.038474776 = weight(_text_:22 in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038474776 = score(doc=4144,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047329273 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Beitrag eines Special Issue: ISKO-Italy: 8' Incontro ISKO Italia, Università di Bologna, 22 maggio 2017, Bologna, Italia.
  6. Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : part 4: themes and rhemes (2018) 0.00
    0.004809347 = product of:
      0.019237388 = sum of:
        0.019237388 = product of:
          0.038474776 = sum of:
            0.038474776 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038474776 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047329273 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    17. 2.2018 18:22:25
  7. Gnoli, C.: Classification transcends library business : the case of BiblioPhil (2010) 0.00
    0.0040077893 = product of:
      0.016031157 = sum of:
        0.016031157 = product of:
          0.032062314 = sum of:
            0.032062314 = weight(_text_:22 in 3698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032062314 = score(doc=3698,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047329273 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3698, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3698)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2010 20:40:08