Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"ja"
  1. Ito, J.: Bibliographic structure : a frame of reference for bibliographic relationships (1994) 0.02
    0.021420455 = product of:
      0.08568182 = sum of:
        0.08568182 = weight(_text_:reference in 3085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08568182 = score(doc=3085,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.4449779 = fieldWeight in 3085, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3085)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Attempts to provide a theoretical rationale for the taxonomy of bibliographic relationships between a given work and its related bibliographic entities. Examines the bibliographic structure of the document carrying the messages in terms of their bibliographic functions of use and preservation, since the most common bibliographic relationships are normally revealed within the document itself. Defines the bibliographic characteristics of the document from the perspective of an analysis of the pattern of their structural elements. Presents 4 dimensions of the bibliographic structure as a frame of reference for the categorisation of bibliographic relationships, together with their subordinate types of equivalent relationships, focusing on common structural patterns revealed with in each entity itself
  2. Watanabe, T.: ¬An experimental OPAC system using NDC8 to improve subject access (1994) 0.02
    0.015023614 = product of:
      0.060094457 = sum of:
        0.060094457 = product of:
          0.120188914 = sum of:
            0.120188914 = weight(_text_:file in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.120188914 = score(doc=403,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25368783 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047329273 = queryNorm
                0.47376698 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Description of an attempt to improve OPAC subject access at Kobe University Library using Nippon Decimal Classification, 8th ed. (NDC8). Examines the theoretical aspects of using a classification for subject searching, then explains the Kobe system. Using the NDC8 machine-readable data file, a database was created for the OPAC, incorporating class numbers and subject headings. Difficulties arise from subdivisions and the structure of NDC8 itself, but it is an important area for development
  3. Klein, R.D.: ¬The problem of cataloguing world literature using the Nippon Decimal Classification (1994) 0.01
    0.006412463 = product of:
      0.025649851 = sum of:
        0.025649851 = product of:
          0.051299702 = sum of:
            0.051299702 = weight(_text_:22 in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051299702 = score(doc=867,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047329273 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Nippon Decimal Classification (NDC) system, extensively used in Japanese libraries, was devised in 1929. It is difficult to use NDC to classify world literature, such as fiction in English by non American, non British writers. This is not necessarily straightforward in other classification schemes but a survey of 40 Japanese university libraries, of which 24 responded, showed remarkable inconsistencies in the treatment of 22 world literature authors. NDC clearly needs updating to deal with this problem