Search (317 results, page 1 of 16)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Miller, F.: Archival description (1997) 0.08 
    0.07900827 = product of:
  0.15801653 = sum of:
    0.09792207 = weight(_text_:reference in 498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09792207 = score(doc=498,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.5085462 = fieldWeight in 498, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=498)
    0.060094457 = product of:
      0.120188914 = sum of:
        0.120188914 = weight(_text_:file in 498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.120188914 = score(doc=498,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25368783 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.47376698 = fieldWeight in 498, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=498)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Archival records having a common creator are described collectively in finding aids known as inventories, which like archival collections themselves are arranged by file series. Collection level MARC records direct users not to individual documents, but to finding aids. Repositories may also develop other tools to describe their holdings such as automated in-house indexes, subject specific lists, and published guides. In the near future, MARC records and finding aids should be linked electronically, with both available through searchable databases on the Internet
    Footnote
    Contribution to an issue devoted to reference services for archives and manuscripts
    Source
    Reference librarian. 1997, no.56, S.55-66
  2. Lee, E.: Cataloguing (and reference) at the crossroads (1996) 0.06 
    0.061785962 = product of:
  0.123571925 = sum of:
    0.09792207 = weight(_text_:reference in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09792207 = score(doc=499,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.5085462 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
    0.025649851 = product of:
      0.051299702 = sum of:
        0.051299702 = weight(_text_:22 in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051299702 = score(doc=499,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Alerts librarians to directions in research in artificial intelligence relevant to information retrieval which will change current technology and user expectations and consequently the requirements for data provision and access at the base level. Predicts a reevaluation of priorities for using the expertise of cataloguers (and reference librarians) and of cataloguing methodologies. Debates the future of cataloguing, arguing for the need to monitor developments in adjacent research areas and to plan with these in mind
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.68-75
  3. Delozier, E.P.: Identifying and documenting objects and services on the Internet : the Uniform Resource Locator (1996) 0.06 
    0.057835408 = product of:
  0.115670815 = sum of:
    0.051931016 = weight(_text_:reference in 7271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051931016 = score(doc=7271,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.2696973 = fieldWeight in 7271, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7271)
    0.0637398 = product of:
      0.1274796 = sum of:
        0.1274796 = weight(_text_:file in 7271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1274796 = score(doc=7271,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25368783 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.5025058 = fieldWeight in 7271, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7271)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Discusses the role of the URL as a menas od uniquely identifying an item of information on the WWW in the context of traditional methods. Includes: standard bibliographic description; LoC card number; ISBN, ISSN; MEDLINE Unique Identifier and OCLC Control Number. Presents the general URL model and the basic structure of URL codes. Discusses specific URL structures: file related URLs (file and ftp); WWW URLs (http); Gopher URLs (gopher); electronic mail URLs (mailto); Usenet newsgroups URLs (news); and remote login URLs (telnet and tn3270). Notes other proposals for identifying Internet resources and services that often become misinterpreted as URLs and lists some of the characters which may not be used within a URL. Although the URL is an official standard for referencing WWW resources, it is not yet recognized as a universal citation model for Internet resources
    Source
    Medical reference services quarterly. 15(1996) no.4, S.57-62
  4. Kulczak, D.E.: Name authority work for OCLC copy cataloging : is it worth the effort? (1999) 0.06 
    0.057835408 = product of:
  0.115670815 = sum of:
    0.051931016 = weight(_text_:reference in 5341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051931016 = score(doc=5341,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.2696973 = fieldWeight in 5341, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5341)
    0.0637398 = product of:
      0.1274796 = sum of:
        0.1274796 = weight(_text_:file in 5341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1274796 = score(doc=5341,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25368783 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.5025058 = fieldWeight in 5341, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5341)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    In 1996, a study was undertaken at the University of Arkansas Libraries to evaluate the practice of front-end authority work for monographs copy cataloging. A sample of 283 name headings originating from Library of Congress, OCLC "Enhance" member, and general member copy was examined, and analysis revealed that 47.3 percent of headings correctly matched authority records already present in the library's local file. Another 41.3 percent exactly matched records in the OCLC authority file. These findings prompted the library to cease checking name headings at the point of cataloging. However, the level of inaccuracies present, combined with the value of authority records for cross-reference and note information, ensured that the Database Maintenance Unit would continue to review local headings reports and perform needed authority work.
  5. Cochenour, D.: Linking remote users and information : cataloguing Internet publications (1994) 0.05 
    0.047445606 = product of:
  0.09489121 = sum of:
    0.06924136 = weight(_text_:reference in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06924136 = score(doc=2170,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.35959643 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
    0.025649851 = product of:
      0.051299702 = sum of:
        0.051299702 = weight(_text_:22 in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051299702 = score(doc=2170,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Libraries can add value to Internet resources by adding them to the library's catalogue in a manner consistent with the other resources held within the collection. Reports on OCLC studies into cataloguing Internet resources and accessing electronic periodicals. Existing retrieval methods on the Internet are limited because of shallow directory structures and idiosyncratic naming conventions. Catalogue entries for electronic resources need to provide a complete description of the access methodology if they are to satisfactorily connect remote users without the immediate possibility of backup from reference staff
    Date
    17.10.1995 18:22:54
  6. Graham, C.: Rethinking national policy for cataloging microform reproductions (1986) 0.05 
    0.045348525 = product of:
  0.1813941 = sum of:
    0.1813941 = weight(_text_:master in 371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1813941 = score(doc=371,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3116585 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5848994 = idf(docFreq=165, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.5820284 = fieldWeight in 371, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.5848994 = idf(docFreq=165, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=371)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Current national cataloging policy requires the creation of unique cataloging records for an original publication and each of its microfilm reproductions. Such redundant entries are difficult to decipher and expensive to produce and maintain. The case of serial publications is most urgent, especially due to the proliferation of preservation microfilming efforts and union list projects. The master record concept used in the United States Newspaper Project offers a viable alternative method. Librarians should lobby to have the single record approach adopted as national policy.
  7. Seaman, D.M.: Selection, access, and control in a library of electronic texts (1996) 0.04 
    0.041514903 = product of:
  0.08302981 = sum of:
    0.060586188 = weight(_text_:reference in 6733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060586188 = score(doc=6733,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.31464687 = fieldWeight in 6733, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6733)
    0.02244362 = product of:
      0.04488724 = sum of:
        0.04488724 = weight(_text_:22 in 6733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04488724 = score(doc=6733,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6733, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6733)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The Electronic Text Center, Virginia University, has been mounting SGML full text databases online since 1992 and is actively building a user community around this Internet based resource. Reports the Library's efforts to integrate these databases into the training, cataloguing, preservation and collection development areas of the library's operations with particular reference to problems such as: the desire for software and platform independent texts; and attempts to solve the cataloguing problems involving SGML bibliographic records using such techniques as the Text Encoding Initiative
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
  8. Frohnsdorff, G.: Facts? of publication : cataloging problems posed by deceptive information (1999) 0.04 
    0.041514903 = product of:
  0.08302981 = sum of:
    0.060586188 = weight(_text_:reference in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060586188 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.31464687 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
    0.02244362 = product of:
      0.04488724 = sum of:
        0.04488724 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04488724 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    False imprint information and other deceptive publication details present problems for catalogers. In this article, I describe different types of misleading information, including fictitions names of publishers, incorrect places of publication, and false dates; mention possible reasons for deception, including fear of prosecution, and emphasize the need for catalogers to be suspicious when handling certain types of material. Erotic printed materials and bootleg sound recordings are discussed in detail, and examples of misleading information in each medium and explanations of how cataloging rules address or fail to address specific circumstances are included. Catalogers need to be aware of both the potential problems associated with certain types of materials and the types of reference sources to consult when dealing with those materials.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. Letarte, K.M.; Turvey, M.R.; Bornemann, D.; Adams, D.L.: Practitioner perspectives on cataloging education for entry-level academic Librarians (2002) 0.04 
    0.041514903 = product of:
  0.08302981 = sum of:
    0.060586188 = weight(_text_:reference in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060586188 = score(doc=158,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.31464687 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
    0.02244362 = product of:
      0.04488724 = sum of:
        0.04488724 = weight(_text_:22 in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04488724 = score(doc=158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The role of cataloging education within the library profession is a topic of considerable interest and debate. Fifty-five heads of reference and sixty-five heads of cataloging in Association of Research Librarians institutions responded to a survey based upon the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Educational Policy Statement, Appendix: Knowledge and Skills, Intellectual Access and Information Organization, concerning the importance of cataloging competencies for all entry-level academic librarians. The survey found that practitioners agreed upon a definite set of core cataloging competencies that all entry-level academic librarians should possess. This finding holds larger implications for library education for academic librarians and for the profession as a whole.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  10. Pappas, E.: ¬An analysis of eight RLIN-members' authority controlled access points for purposes of speeding copy cataloging work flow (1996) 0.04 
    0.041488595 = product of:
  0.16595438 = sum of:
    0.16595438 = sum of:
      0.1274796 = weight(_text_:file in 5530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1274796 = score(doc=5530,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.25368783 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047329273 = queryNorm
          0.5025058 = fieldWeight in 5530, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5530)
      0.038474776 = weight(_text_:22 in 5530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038474776 = score(doc=5530,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047329273 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5530, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5530)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The authority controlled headings in a random sample of cataloguing records from RLIN member libraries were examined to determine the extent to which they either matched the forms a sestablished in RLIN's online authority files or, in cases where no headings existed in the files, had been formulated according to AACR2R principles and LoC guidelines. The study analzed all of the authority controlled access points in the records sample to determine the extent to ehich these access points matched the LoC Name Authority File (LoC NAF) and LoC Subject Authority File (LoC SAF) entries; it sought to determine which types of errors occured most frequently in instances where access points did not match the NAF and SAF files; and used the results of this analysis to add data to a list of preferred libraries kept by the Monograph Cataligng Section of the New York Public Library and used to increase the speed and efficiency of its copy cataloguing work flow
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.29-47
  11. Bénauda, C.-L.; Bordeianu, S.: OCLC's WorldShare Management Services : a brave new world for catalogers (2015) 0.04 
    0.03967996 = product of:
  0.15871984 = sum of:
    0.15871984 = weight(_text_:master in 2617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15871984 = score(doc=2617,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3116585 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5848994 = idf(docFreq=165, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.50927484 = fieldWeight in 2617, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.5848994 = idf(docFreq=165, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2617)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Like other recent library management systems, OCLC's WorldShare Management Services (WMS) is cloud-based. But unlike the others, WMS opens WorldCat for applications beyond its traditional role as a source of bibliographic records. It enables catalogers to work directly from the Master Record, which no longer needs to be exported to a local system. This article describes the impact of WMS on the roles and functions of cataloging departments, and asks if it is changing the meaning of cataloging. It concludes that while the workflows are changed dramatically, the profession of cataloging remains relevant.
  12. Schaffner, V.: FRBR in MAB2 und Primo - ein kafkaesker Prozess? : Möglichkeiten der FRBRisierung von MAB2-Datensätzen in Primo exemplarisch dargestellt an Datensätzen zu Franz Kafkas "Der Process" (2011) 0.04 
    0.039272975 = product of:
  0.1570919 = sum of:
    0.1570919 = weight(_text_:master in 907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1570919 = score(doc=907,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.3116585 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5848994 = idf(docFreq=165, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.5040514 = fieldWeight in 907, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.5848994 = idf(docFreq=165, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=907)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) ist ein logisches Denkmodell für bibliographische Datensätze, welches zur benutzerfreundlicheren Gestaltung von Browsing in Online-Bibliothekskatalogen herangezogen werden kann. Im Österreichischen Bibliothekenverbund (OBV) werden bibliographische Datensätze nach den Regeln für die alphabetische Katalogisierung in wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken (RAK-WB) erstellt und liegen im Datenformat MAB2 (Maschinelles Austauschformat für Bibliotheken) vor. Mit der Software Primo von Ex Libris, die 2009 implementiert wurde, besteht die Möglichkeit bibliographische Datensätze für die Anzeige neu aufzubereiten. Wie ausgehend von MAB2-Daten eine möglichst FRBR-konforme Datenpräsentation in Primo geleistet werden kann und welche Probleme sich dabei ergeben, ist die zentrale Fragestellung dieser Master Thesis. Exemplarisch dargestellt wird dies anhand von Datensätzen des Österreichischen Bibliothekenverbundes zu Franz Kafkas "Der Process". Im Fokus stehen drei Aspekte, welche im Zusammenhang mit FRBR, MAB2 und Primo als besonders problematisch und diskussionswürdig erscheinen: das Konzept des "Werkes", Expressionen als praxistaugliche Entitäten und Aggregate bzw. mehrbändig begrenzte Werke. Nach einer Einführung in das FRBR-Modell wird versucht einen idealen FRBRBaum zu Kafkas "Der Process" in seinen unterschiedlichen Ausprägungen (Übersetzungen, Verfilmungen, Textvarianten, Aggregate etc.) darzustellen: Schon hier werden erste Grenzen des Modells sichtbar. Daran anschließend werden Datensätze des OBV einer Analyse unterzogen, um die FRBRTauglichkeit von MAB2 und die Möglichkeit der FRBR keys in Primo zu beleuchten. Folgende Einschränkungen wurden deutlich: Die derzeitige Herangehensweise und Praxis der Formalerschließung ist nicht auf FRBR vorbereitet. Die vorliegenden Metadaten sind zu inkonsistent, um ein maschinelles Extrahieren für eine FRBR-konforme Datenpräsentation zu ermöglichen. Die Möglichkeiten des Werkclusterings und der Facettierung in Primo bieten darüber hinaus zwar einen Mehrwert für das Browsing in Trefferlisten, jedoch nur bedingt im FRBR-Sinne.
    Content
    Master Thesis im Rahmen des Universitätslehrganges Library and Information Studies MSc an der Universität Wien in Kooperation mit der Österreichischen Nationalbibliothek. Vgl. auch: http://eprints.rclis.org/16193/1/Master%20Thesis_Schaffner%20Verena.pdf.
  13. Ranta, J.A.: Queens Borough Public Library's Guidelines for cataloging community information (1996) 0.04 
    0.037513137 = product of:
  0.15005255 = sum of:
    0.15005255 = sum of:
      0.1051653 = weight(_text_:file in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1051653 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25368783 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047329273 = queryNorm
          0.4145461 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
      0.04488724 = weight(_text_:22 in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04488724 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047329273 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Currently, few resources exist to guide libraries in the cataloguing of community information using the new USMARC Format for Cammunity Information (1993). In developing a community information database, Queens Borough Public Library, New York City, formulated their own cataloguing procedures for applying AACR2, LoC File Interpretations, and USMARC Format for Community Information to community information. Their practices include entering corporate names directly whenever possible and assigning LC subject headings for classes of persons and topics, adding neighbourhood level geographic subdivisions. The guidelines were specially designed to aid non cataloguers in cataloguing community information and have enabled library to maintain consistency in handling corporate names and in assigning subject headings, while creating database that is highly accessible to library staff and users
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.51-69
  14. Arnzen, M.A.: Cyber citations : documenting Internet sources presents some thorny problems (1996) 0.03 
    0.034011394 = product of:
  0.13604558 = sum of:
    0.13604558 = weight(_text_:master in 5755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13604558 = score(doc=5755,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3116585 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5848994 = idf(docFreq=165, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.4365213 = fieldWeight in 5755, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.5848994 = idf(docFreq=165, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5755)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Highlights 2 problems with thinking of the Internet as a virtual library. Documents on the Internet, unlike books in a library, are difficult to catalogue, Internet holdings can change by the minute, and 'books' can disappear off the shelf without warning leaving scholars unable to verify cited sources. Sets out strategies to adopt, including: printing out sources or saving to hard disc; opt for signed articles; gauge the reliability of the material; contact the web master if problems arise. A major problem concerns bibliographic description and the actual, physical form of cited Internet references. Recommends 2 major guides for college writing: The Modern Language Association (MLA) Handbook for Writers of Research Papers; and the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA). Includes actual samples of citations from electronic mail; web site; FTP; Gopher; Usenet news; or mailing list, taken from the MLA web site (http://www.falcon.eku.edu/honors/beyond-mla)
  15. Danskin, A.: ¬The Anglo-American Authority File : an idea whose time has come? (1996) 0.03 
    0.033593822 = product of:
  0.13437529 = sum of:
    0.13437529 = product of:
      0.26875058 = sum of:
        0.26875058 = weight(_text_:file in 6069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26875058 = score(doc=6069,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.25368783 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            1.0593752 = fieldWeight in 6069, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6069)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The Anglo American Authority File is the working title for an agreement between the British Library and the Library of Congress to develop a common authority file based on the existing US Name Authority File, a copy of which will be held at he British Library and maintained by overnight file transfer. Discusses discrepancies between BL and LoC main entry pairs
  16. Ellero, N.P.: Panning for gold : utility of the World Wide Web for metadata and authority control in special collections (2002) 0.03 
    0.032154113 = product of:
  0.12861645 = sum of:
    0.12861645 = sum of:
      0.090141684 = weight(_text_:file in 161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.090141684 = score(doc=161,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25368783 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047329273 = queryNorm
          0.35532522 = fieldWeight in 161, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=161)
      0.038474776 = weight(_text_:22 in 161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038474776 = score(doc=161,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047329273 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 161, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=161)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This article describes the use of the World Wide Web as a valuable name authority resource and tool for special collections analytic-level cataloging and the specific goal of fully discovering the names of people who lived in the past as well as those from the present. Current tools and initiatives such as the Name Authority Component of the Program for Cooperative Cataloging (NACO) and the Library of Congress Name Authority File have a specific mission and are partially helpful. Web resources encompassing special collections are often intricate and require global and enhanced resources to continue what have been the guiding principles, tradition, and value of cataloging: to discover works via many points of entry; to find works by or about the same person, topic, or title; and to continue the great cataloging legacies of standards and cooperation.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  17. Patton, G.: Local creation / global use : bibliographic data in the international arena (2000) 0.03 
    0.032154113 = product of:
  0.12861645 = sum of:
    0.12861645 = sum of:
      0.090141684 = weight(_text_:file in 183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.090141684 = score(doc=183,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.25368783 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047329273 = queryNorm
          0.35532522 = fieldWeight in 183, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=183)
      0.038474776 = weight(_text_:22 in 183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038474776 = score(doc=183,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047329273 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 183, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=183)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    OCLC has grown from the original group of Ohio academic libraries to 27,000 libraries located in North America, Europe, Asia, Latin American, and South Africa. Each of the records in WorldCat (the OCLC Online Union Catalog) is a local creation that is available for use across the globe for different purposes. Common issues that must be faced with the expansion of a bibliographic utility include cataloging standards, subject access in languages appropriate to the user, local needs versus global usefulness, and character sets. Progress has been made with the cooperative creation of an international name authority file and the uniform application of ISBD principles. A method of linking various subject vocabularies and an improved infrastructure of MARC formats and character sets are needed. Librarians need new automated tools to provide preliminary access to date available in electronic form and to assist them in organizing and storing that data.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  18. Taniguchi, S.: Mapping and merging of IFLA Library Reference Model and BIBFRAME 2.0 (2018) 0.03 
    0.030600648 = product of:
  0.12240259 = sum of:
    0.12240259 = weight(_text_:reference in 5162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12240259 = score(doc=5162,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.6356827 = fieldWeight in 5162, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5162)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Object
    IFLA Library Reference Model
  19. Tillett, B.B.: Authority control at the international level (2000) 0.03 
    0.029653504 = product of:
  0.05930701 = sum of:
    0.04327585 = weight(_text_:reference in 191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04327585 = score(doc=191,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.22474778 = fieldWeight in 191, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=191)
    0.016031157 = product of:
      0.032062314 = sum of:
        0.032062314 = weight(_text_:22 in 191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032062314 = score(doc=191,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 191, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=191)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    International efforts to provide authority control include the work of IFLA, the AUTHOR Project funded by the European Commission, and related work conducted under the auspices of the ICA/CDS. IFLA developed the guidelines Form and Structure of Corporate Headings, documented the formulation of names along the lines of national origin in its publication Names of Persons, and published Guidelines for Authority and Reference Entries. Attention has shifted from a single authority record for each entity that would be shared internationally through the exchange of records to linking parallel authority records for the same entity. The access control of the future will account for difference in cataloging rules, transliteration standards, and cultural differences within the same language as well as for the need for different languages and scripts and will enable users to display the script and form of a heading that they expect. Project AUTHOR is a shared set of resource national authority files that used selections from the authority files of France, the United Kingdom, Spain, Portugal, and Belgium. The prototype tested an adaptation of Z39.50 server software for authority records and displays for user interface. An international standard for authority control records has been developed for corporate bodies, persons, and families. Through joint meetings efforts have been synchronized to develop authority control at the international level.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  20. AG Kooperative Verbundanwendungen : "Praxisregel zur Katalogisierung von Nachdrucken" veröffentlicht (2012) 0.03 
    0.028342828 = product of:
  0.11337131 = sum of:
    0.11337131 = weight(_text_:master in 186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11337131 = score(doc=186,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3116585 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5848994 = idf(docFreq=165, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.36376774 = fieldWeight in 186, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.5848994 = idf(docFreq=165, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=186)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    "Aufgrund der veränderten Herstellungsprozesse werden Bücher zunehmend in kleineren Auflagen gedruckt und häufig nachgedruckt bzw. nur auf Bestellung in Einzelexemplaren von einem digitalen Master hergestellt. Dies führt in den Bibliotheken zu einem Nebeneinander von identischen Drucken, die sich letztlich nur in ihrem Herstellungsjahr voneinander unterscheiden. Nach RAK-WB ist das Erscheinungsjahr ein zentrales Kriterium bei der Frage, ob eine neue Ausgabe vorliegt oder nicht. Gemäß RAK-WB müssten daher in solchen Fällen eigene Titelaufnahmen angelegt werden. Dies ist jedoch - vor allem im Verbundkontext - weder benutzerfreundlich noch arbeitseffizient. Die Regeln müssen deshalb an die veränderten Rahmenbedingungen angepasst werden: Da die Herstellung einer Ausgabe mittlerweile sozusagen in einem zeitlichen "Kontinuum" erfolgt, kann das Herstellungsjahr nicht mehr als Unterscheidungskriterium dienen. Stattdessen bietet es sich an, sich an der angloamerikanischen Katalogisierungstradition zu orientieren, in der schon immer zwischen dem Jahr der"edition" (Erscheinungsjahr) und dem Herstellungsjahr unterschieden wurde. Die AG Kooperative Verbundanwendungen hat die Erfassung von Nachdrucken diskutiert und verbundübergreifende einheitliche Erfassungsvorschriften erarbeitet. Es wurde festgelegt, die Vereinbarungen ab 01.01.2012 in den Verbundsystemen (außer ZDB) und in der DNB verbindlich anzuwenden. Die "Praxisregel zur Katalogisierung von Nachdrucken" steht auf den Webseiten der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme unter http://www.d-nb.de/wir /kooperation/ag_verbund_dok_publ.htm zum Download zur Verfügung."

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 283
  • m 19
  • b 16
  • el 10
  • s 10
  • n 5
  • x 3
  • r 2
  • ? 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications