-
McIlwaine, I.C.: ¬The Universal Decimal Classification : some factors concerning its origins, development, and influence (1997)
0.15
0.14565465 = product of:
0.1942062 = sum of:
0.11337131 = weight(_text_:master in 141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11337131 = score(doc=141,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3116585 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5848994 = idf(docFreq=165, maxDocs=44218)
0.047329273 = queryNorm
0.36376774 = fieldWeight in 141, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.5848994 = idf(docFreq=165, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=141)
0.04327585 = weight(_text_:reference in 141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04327585 = score(doc=141,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.047329273 = queryNorm
0.22474778 = fieldWeight in 141, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=141)
0.037559036 = product of:
0.07511807 = sum of:
0.07511807 = weight(_text_:file in 141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07511807 = score(doc=141,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25368783 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
0.047329273 = queryNorm
0.29610437 = fieldWeight in 141, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=141)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- Outlines the bibliographic enterprise envisaged by Otlet and LaFontaine, which resulted in the UDC being developed in 1895, and the subsequent history of the scheme. Relationship with DDC from which it was derived deteriorated in the early 20th century and changes in funding, location, and editorship of Duyvis from 1929-59 had a profound effect on the scheme's development and management. Lloyd, Duyvis successor, reformed the revision structure, and further management changes from 1975 to the present day, culminated in the formation of the UDC Consortium in 1992. Notes the subsequent creation of a machine-readable Master Reference File and speedier revision procedures. Examines the scheme's structure, development, and influence on classification theory, problems caused by longevity and lack of standrad procedures, and highlights proposals for their reform to improve the scheme's suitability for an automated world. Explores research projects in 1960s which foreshadowed possibilities today, such as a complementary thesaurus and individualisation of single concepts notationally. Emphasizes the value of classification in a multilingual environment and outlines the future developments
-
Foskett, D.J.: ¬'A rustic in the library' : The first Dr. Pafford Memorial Lecture (1997)
0.04
0.035584204 = product of:
0.07116841 = sum of:
0.051931016 = weight(_text_:reference in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051931016 = score(doc=538,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.047329273 = queryNorm
0.2696973 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
0.019237388 = product of:
0.038474776 = sum of:
0.038474776 = weight(_text_:22 in 538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038474776 = score(doc=538,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047329273 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 538, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=538)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The elements that comprise 'style' in creative writing are directly applicable to librarians, in the choice of books and periodicals, and in the process of cataloguing and classification to make them accessible to users. By the selection and arrangement of their stock librarians reveal professional accounts of the culture they have inherited and are endeavouring to pass on to future generations. Illustrates the discussion with particular reference to the life and career of Dr. John Henry Pyle Pafford, Librarian at London University, and in particular to his views on the development of general classification schemes, such as the DDC and BC, and the work of the CRG. Concludes by noting his work in the fields of education, national and international library cooperation, and as Library-Keeper of the University
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
-
Granthana, M.N.: Classification of knowledge : a study in the foundation of library science (1991)
0.02
0.01731034 = product of:
0.06924136 = sum of:
0.06924136 = weight(_text_:reference in 3677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06924136 = score(doc=3677,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.047329273 = queryNorm
0.35959643 = fieldWeight in 3677, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3677)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Attempts to present a logical analysis of the concept of classification with special reference to library science. examines the view that the objective of classification adopted in the library is not to categorise books but knowledge and focuses on the concept of knowledge. With regard to classification of knowledge, it has been pointed out that there are no natural classes and all classifications are artificial. Classification of knowledge can never be absolute and final as knowledge is neither static not circumscribed
-
LaBarre, K.: ¬The heritage of early FC in document reference retrieval systems : 1920-1969 (2007)
0.02
0.01731034 = product of:
0.06924136 = sum of:
0.06924136 = weight(_text_:reference in 689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06924136 = score(doc=689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.047329273 = queryNorm
0.35959643 = fieldWeight in 689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=689)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
-
Craig, B.L.: Twilight of a Victorian registry : the treasury's paper room before 1920 (2010)
0.02
0.01626354 = product of:
0.06505416 = sum of:
0.06505416 = product of:
0.13010833 = sum of:
0.13010833 = weight(_text_:file in 3484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13010833 = score(doc=3484,freq=6.0), product of:
0.25368783 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
0.047329273 = queryNorm
0.5128678 = fieldWeight in 3484, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3484)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Experiential knowledge of government business among clerks in the Treasury's paper room stimulated new logs to control transit of records and classified indexes to expand recall of business beyond personal memory. Despite a flowering of expertise in records matters before the First World War, effective changes were compromised by the volume of paper work, inherent limitations of format, and the increased speed of business. Additional staff was the favoured option for keeping up because it did not imply re-thinking the format of records, optimum linking of their physical and intellectual control, or changed operations of the paper room and re-assignment of staff. Classified indexes, a Victorian achievement in the Treasury, held the central service together until the restrictions of format and space for files and for registration notes and for paper room operations led to a new system of registration and classification in 1920. The Victorian separation of initial registration from ultimate classification was replaced by the union of the two processes at the beginning; the principle of file formation changed from one letter, one file, to one subject, one file.
-
Santoro, M.: Ripensare la CDU (1995)
0.02
0.015146547 = product of:
0.060586188 = sum of:
0.060586188 = weight(_text_:reference in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060586188 = score(doc=4940,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.047329273 = queryNorm
0.31464687 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- A detailed examination of the UDC's history, function and future prospects. Among topics discussed are: the early pioneering work of P. Otlet and H. LaFontaine; the development of Colon Classification; the 'UDC versus switching language' debate in the 1970s; the FID standard reference code project; and the recent scheme by Williamson and McIlwaine to restructure UDC completely, converting it into a Colon Classification and also creating a thesaurus drawn from the same classification. Comments that UDC, far from being a 'prehistoric monster', is becoming a sort of test laboratory for developing new and interesting documentation structures
-
Holiday, J.: Subject access: new technology and philosophical perspectives (1989)
0.01
0.012982754 = product of:
0.051931016 = sum of:
0.051931016 = weight(_text_:reference in 971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051931016 = score(doc=971,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.047329273 = queryNorm
0.2696973 = fieldWeight in 971, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=971)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This paper examines how classification schemes provide subject access. Concept arrangement before computers is compared to its role after machine-based exact match techniques have evolved. The change in retrieval techniques corresponds to a change in philosophy of knowledge. Classification schemes, emerging from Aristotelian philosophy, provide conceptual frameworks for direct human interaction to foster reference and communication. Computer-based systems provide access with a different emphasis on conceptual arrangement. Employing a philosophy of knowledge as facets, computer programs use word-frequency analyses, uncontrolled vocabulary, and feedback procedures to define subject access. Classification for machine processing optimizes the power of these systems. Though the influence of Aristotelian philosophy declines, structures for concept communication continue to be instrumental in the efficient operation of computer-based systems. Ongoing classification work can help direct vague inquiries and reflect human and social relationships to knowledge
-
Hansson, J.: Why public libraries in Sweden did not choose Dewey (1997)
0.01
0.012982754 = product of:
0.051931016 = sum of:
0.051931016 = weight(_text_:reference in 312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051931016 = score(doc=312,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.047329273 = queryNorm
0.2696973 = fieldWeight in 312, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=312)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The article identifies 2 distinct sections, one within the public library sphere and one in academic libraries, relevant for the development of a unique Swedish classification system (the SAB-system) to be used in public libraries. These are used to analyse the social and discursive influences that led to a rejection of the DDC as the common classification system for the public libraries in Sweden. The author analyses the debate that took place in the 1910s in various publications and idetifies theoretical as well as some practical reasons for rejecting the DDC. Reference is also made to the situation in Norway and Denmark at this time and their attempts to influence Sweden to accept the DDC as had been done in these countries. Conclusions are drawn that the reasons for rejection of the DDC not only is to be sought in theoretical or even practical problems regarding the system itself but in the academic library sector which, through the SAB-system, could create a lasting influence on the knowledge organisation in public libraries in order to uphold the national identity of thre Swedish library system
-
Wellisch, H.H.: Organisatorische Neuordnung des DK-Systems (1971)
0.01
0.012824926 = product of:
0.051299702 = sum of:
0.051299702 = product of:
0.102599405 = sum of:
0.102599405 = weight(_text_:22 in 1168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.102599405 = score(doc=1168,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047329273 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1168, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1168)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971), S.55-63
-
Dewey, M.: Decimal classification beginnings (1990)
0.01
0.009618694 = product of:
0.038474776 = sum of:
0.038474776 = product of:
0.07694955 = sum of:
0.07694955 = weight(_text_:22 in 3554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07694955 = score(doc=3554,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047329273 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3554, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3554)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 25.12.1995 22:28:43
-
Hulme, E.W.: Principles of book classification (1985)
0.01
0.00865517 = product of:
0.03462068 = sum of:
0.03462068 = weight(_text_:reference in 3626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03462068 = score(doc=3626,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.047329273 = queryNorm
0.17979822 = fieldWeight in 3626, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3626)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- One of the earliest works on the theory of classification appeared in a series of six chapters an the "Principles of Book Classification" published between October 1911 and May 1912 in the Library Association Record. In this publication, the author, E. Wyndham Hulme (1859-1954) whose career included twenty-five years as Librarian of the British Patent Office, set forth the fundamentals of classification as manifested in both the classed and the alphabetical catalogs. The work and the ideas contained therein have largely been forgotten. However, one phrase stands out and has been used frequently in the discussions of classification and indexing, particularly in reference to systems such as Library of Congress Classification, Dewey Decimal Classification, and Library of Congress Subject Headings. That phrase is "literary warrant"-meaning that the basis for classification is to be found in the actual published literature rather than abstract philosophical ideas or concepts in the universe of knowledge or the "order of nature and system of the sciences." To the extent that classification and indexing systems should be based upon existing literature rather than the universe of human knowledge, the concept of "literary warrant" defines systems used in library and information services, as distinguished from a purely philosophical classification. Library classification attempts to classify library materials-the records of knowledge-rather than knowledge itself; the establishment of a class or a heading for a subject is based an existing literature treating that subject. The following excerpt contains Hulme's definition of "literary warrant." Hulme first rejects the notion of using "the nature of the subject matter to be divided" as the basis for establishing headings, then he proceeds to propose the use of "literary warrant," that is, "an accurate survey and measurement of classes in literature," as the determinant.
-
Kaiser, J.O.: Systematic indexing (1985)
0.01
0.00865517 = product of:
0.03462068 = sum of:
0.03462068 = weight(_text_:reference in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03462068 = score(doc=571,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.047329273 = queryNorm
0.17979822 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- A native of Germany and a former teacher of languages and music, Julius Otto Kaiser (1868-1927) came to the Philadelphia Commercial Museum to be its librarian in 1896. Faced with the problem of making "information" accessible, he developed a method of indexing he called systematic indexing. The first draft of his scheme, published in 1896-97, was an important landmark in the history of subject analysis. R. K. Olding credits Kaiser with making the greatest single advance in indexing theory since Charles A. Cutter and John Metcalfe eulogizes him by observing that "in sheer capacity for really scientific and logical thinking, Kaiser's was probably the best mind that has ever applied itself to subject indexing." Kaiser was an admirer of "system." By systematic indexing he meant indicating information not with natural language expressions as, for instance, Cutter had advocated, but with artificial expressions constructed according to formulas. Kaiser grudged natural language its approximateness, its vagaries, and its ambiguities. The formulas he introduced were to provide a "machinery for regularising or standardising language" (paragraph 67). Kaiser recognized three categories or "facets" of index terms: (1) terms of concretes, representing things, real or imaginary (e.g., money, machines); (2) terms of processes, representing either conditions attaching to things or their actions (e.g., trade, manufacture); and (3) terms of localities, representing, for the most part, countries (e.g., France, South Africa). Expressions in Kaiser's index language were called statements. Statements consisted of sequences of terms, the syntax of which was prescribed by formula. These formulas specified sequences of terms by reference to category types. Only three citation orders were permitted: a term in the concrete category followed by one in the process category (e.g., Wool-Scouring); (2) a country term followed by a process term (e.g., Brazil - Education); and (3) a concrete term followed by a country term, followed by a process term (e.g., Nitrate-Chile-Trade). Kaiser's system was a precursor of two of the most significant developments in twentieth-century approaches to subject access-the special purpose use of language for indexing, thus the concept of index language, which was to emerge as a generative idea at the time of the second Cranfield experiment (1966) and the use of facets to categorize subject indicators, which was to become the characterizing feature of analytico-synthetic indexing methods such as the Colon classification. In addition to its visionary quality, Kaiser's work is notable for its meticulousness and honesty, as can be seen, for instance, in his observations about the difficulties in facet definition.
-
Hopwood, H.V.: Dewey expanded (1985)
0.01
0.007511807 = product of:
0.030047229 = sum of:
0.030047229 = product of:
0.060094457 = sum of:
0.060094457 = weight(_text_:file in 3629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060094457 = score(doc=3629,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25368783 = queryWeight, product of:
5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
0.047329273 = queryNorm
0.23688349 = fieldWeight in 3629, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3629)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Toward the end of the nineteenth century, Paul Otlet and Henri LaFontaine of Belgium initiated the compilation of an index to all recorded knowledge. Instead of an alphabetical file, they decided to adopt a classified arrangement. For the basis of such an arrangement, they turned to the Dewey Decimal Classification, a system which was gaining wide acceptance in American libraries. With permission secured from Melvil Dewey to expand the system to include details required for an indexing tool, Otlet and LaFontaine began developing what was to become the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC). Following the establishment of the Institut International de Bibliographie (IIB), later the Fédération Internationale de Documentation (FID), in 1895, work an the universal index and the classification scheme proceeded under its aegis. In 1905, the classification scheme was published as the Manuel du Répertoire bibliographique universel. While the initial, ambitious project of the universal index was abandoned, the classification scheme itself was widely adopted, particularly in special libraries in Europe. A second edition was published in 1927-1933 under the title Classification décimale universelle. The development and maintanance of the scheme continued with the support of the FID. In the course of its development, the UDC moved further and further away from its prototype, the Dewey Decimal Classification. One of the major differences between the two systems is the use of relators in UDC. The notation adopted by Melvil Dewey for his scheme is a hierarchical one; in other words, the notation reflects the hierarchical relationships among subjects. However, it does not display the relationships among the facets, or aspects, of a particular subject. Furthermore, the use of auxiliaries in the Dewey Decimal Classification, beginning with the form subdivisions and gradually expanding to include geographic subdivisions and finally other auxiliaries in the most recent editions, has been relatively restricted. As an indexing tool, Otlet and LaFontaine felt that their system needed commonly applicable auxiliaries which they called "determinatives."` To this end, a series of special symbols were introduced into the system for the purpose of combining related subjects and indicating different facets or aspects of the main subject. The use of these symbols, called relators, with the auxiliaries has rendered the Universal Decimal Classification a synthetic scheme. In this respect, the UDC has moved much more rapidly than the Dewey Decimal Classification toward becoming a faceted classification. In the following paper, Henry V. Hopwood, a Senior Assistant at the British Patent Office Library during the 1900s, explains the use and rationale of relators, or "marks," as he calls them, in the Universal Decimal Classification.
-
Sveistrup, H.: ¬Der neue Realkatalog der SUB Hamburg (1947)
0.01
0.006412463 = product of:
0.025649851 = sum of:
0.025649851 = product of:
0.051299702 = sum of:
0.051299702 = weight(_text_:22 in 6607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051299702 = score(doc=6607,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047329273 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6607, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6607)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Probleme des Wiederaufbaus im wissenschaftlichen Bibliothekswesen: aus d. Verhandlungen des 1. Bibliothekartagung der britischen Zone in Hamburg vom 22.-24.10.1946
-
Rayward, W.B.: ¬The origins of information science and the International Institute of Bibliography / International Federation for Information and Documentation (FID) (1997)
0.01
0.005610905 = product of:
0.02244362 = sum of:
0.02244362 = product of:
0.04488724 = sum of:
0.04488724 = weight(_text_:22 in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04488724 = score(doc=75,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047329273 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.2, S.3-15
-
Broughton, V.: Henry Evelyn Bliss : the other immortal or a prophet without honour? (2008)
0.01
0.005610905 = product of:
0.02244362 = sum of:
0.02244362 = product of:
0.04488724 = sum of:
0.04488724 = weight(_text_:22 in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04488724 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047329273 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
-
Heuvel, C. van den: Multidimensional classifications : past and future conceptualizations and visualizations (2012)
0.01
0.005610905 = product of:
0.02244362 = sum of:
0.02244362 = product of:
0.04488724 = sum of:
0.04488724 = weight(_text_:22 in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04488724 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047329273 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 11:31:25
-
Barat, A.H.: Hungarians in the history of the UDC (2014)
0.00
0.004809347 = product of:
0.019237388 = sum of:
0.019237388 = product of:
0.038474776 = sum of:
0.038474776 = weight(_text_:22 in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038474776 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047329273 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Dousa, T.M.: ¬The simple and the complex in E. C. Richardson's theory of classification : observations on an early KO model of the relationship between ontology and epistemology (2010)
0.00
0.0040077893 = product of:
0.016031157 = sum of:
0.016031157 = product of:
0.032062314 = sum of:
0.032062314 = weight(_text_:22 in 3509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032062314 = score(doc=3509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047329273 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Pages
- S.15-22
-
Satija, M.P.: Abridged Dewey-15 (2012) in historical perspectives (2012)
0.00
0.0040077893 = product of:
0.016031157 = sum of:
0.016031157 = product of:
0.032062314 = sum of:
0.032062314 = weight(_text_:22 in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032062314 = score(doc=116,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047329273 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 3. 3.2016 18:59:22
