Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Referieren"
  1. Palais, E.S.: Abstracting for reference librarians (1988) 0.07
    0.07278971 = product of:
      0.14557941 = sum of:
        0.11992956 = weight(_text_:reference in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11992956 = score(doc=2832,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.62283933 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
        0.025649851 = product of:
          0.051299702 = sum of:
            0.051299702 = weight(_text_:22 in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051299702 = score(doc=2832,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047329273 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reference librarians, who are thoroughly familiar with the purpose, scope and arrangement of abstract periodicals, are uniquely qualified for the task of writing abstracts. The procedures described here offer a relatively simple way for them to write acceptable abstracts from the outset. Although research is being conducted in the area of machine generated abstracts, there wll continue to be a role for human abstractors.
    Source
    Reference librarian. 1988, no.22, S.297-308
  2. Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995) 0.06
    0.05930701 = product of:
      0.11861402 = sum of:
        0.0865517 = weight(_text_:reference in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0865517 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.44949555 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
        0.032062314 = product of:
          0.06412463 = sum of:
            0.06412463 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06412463 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047329273 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses briefly the application of hypertext in library user training with particular reference to a specific hypertext based tutorial designed to teach library school students the basics knowledge of abstracts and abstracting process
    Date
    27. 1.1996 18:22:06
  3. Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996) 0.04
    0.035584204 = product of:
      0.07116841 = sum of:
        0.051931016 = weight(_text_:reference in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051931016 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.2696973 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
        0.019237388 = product of:
          0.038474776 = sum of:
            0.038474776 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038474776 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047329273 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the principles of indexing and the intellectual skills involved in order to determine what automatic indexing systems would be required in order to supplant or complement the human indexer. Good indexing requires: considerable prior knowledge of the literature; judgement as to what to index and what depth to index; reading skills; abstracting skills; and classification skills, Illustrates these features with a detailed description of abstracting and indexing processes involved in generating entries for the mechanical engineering database POWERLINK. Briefly assesses the possibility of replacing human indexers with specialist indexing software, with particular reference to the Object Analyzer from the InTEXT automatic indexing system and using the criteria described for human indexers. At present, it is unlikely that the automatic indexer will replace the human indexer, but when more primary texts are available in electronic form, it may be a useful productivity tool for dealing with large quantities of low grade texts (should they be wanted in the database)
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  4. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996) 0.00
    0.004809347 = product of:
      0.019237388 = sum of:
        0.019237388 = product of:
          0.038474776 = sum of:
            0.038474776 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038474776 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047329273 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
  5. Wan, X.; Yang, J.; Xiao, J.: Incorporating cross-document relationships between sentences for single document summarizations (2006) 0.00
    0.004809347 = product of:
      0.019237388 = sum of:
        0.019237388 = product of:
          0.038474776 = sum of:
            0.038474776 = weight(_text_:22 in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038474776 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047329273 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  6. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996) 0.00
    0.0040077893 = product of:
      0.016031157 = sum of:
        0.016031157 = product of:
          0.032062314 = sum of:
            0.032062314 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032062314 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047329273 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356