Search (39 results, page 1 of 2)

0.07116841 = product of:
  0.14233682 = sum of:
    0.10386203 = weight(_text_:reference in 234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10386203 = score(doc=234,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.5393946 = fieldWeight in 234, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=234)
    0.038474776 = product of:
      0.07694955 = sum of:
        0.07694955 = weight(_text_:22 in 234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07694955 = score(doc=234,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16573904 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 234, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=234)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Pages

22 S

0.03462068 = product of:
  0.13848272 = sum of:
    0.13848272 = weight(_text_:reference in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13848272 = score(doc=2033,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.71919286 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.030293094 = product of:
  0.121172376 = sum of:
    0.121172376 = weight(_text_:reference in 2141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.121172376 = score(doc=2141,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.62929374 = fieldWeight in 2141, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2141)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.030293094 = product of:
  0.121172376 = sum of:
    0.121172376 = weight(_text_:reference in 3469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.121172376 = score(doc=3469,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.62929374 = fieldWeight in 3469, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3469)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.026234591 = product of:
  0.104938366 = sum of:
    0.104938366 = weight(_text_:reference in 5179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.104938366 = score(doc=5179,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.5449844 = fieldWeight in 5179, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5179)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Definition of a conceptual reference model to provide a framework for the analysis of non-administrative metadata relating to library resources. The resulting model definition was approved by the FRBR Review Group (November 2016), and then made available to the Standing Committees of the Sections on Cataloguing and Subject Analysis & Access, as well as to the ISBD Review Group, for comment in December 2016. The final document was approved by the IFLACommittee on Standards (August 2017).

Object

IFLA Library Reference Model

0.025965508 = product of:
  0.10386203 = sum of:
    0.10386203 = weight(_text_:reference in 3491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10386203 = score(doc=3491,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.5393946 = fieldWeight in 3491, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3491)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.025965508 = product of:
  0.10386203 = sum of:
    0.10386203 = weight(_text_:reference in 3104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10386203 = score(doc=3104,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.5393946 = fieldWeight in 3104, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3104)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.025965508 = product of:
  0.10386203 = sum of:
    0.10386203 = weight(_text_:reference in 3106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10386203 = score(doc=3106,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.5393946 = fieldWeight in 3106, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3106)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.024480518 = product of:
  0.09792207 = sum of:
    0.09792207 = weight(_text_:reference in 296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09792207 = score(doc=296,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.5085462 = fieldWeight in 296, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=296)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

A research project undertaken during 1996 by Capital Planning Information Ltd., and supported by British Library Research and Innovation Centre to update research undertaken 1983/84 which examined the position of the self designated UK regional reference libraries provided by the major city authorities. The research confirmed that the use of RRLs is growing and that it is beyond the capacity of local authorities to maintain the collections

0.022535421 = product of:
  0.090141684 = sum of:
    0.090141684 = product of:
      0.18028337 = sum of:
        0.18028337 = weight(_text_:file in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18028337 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25368783 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.71065044 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote

Als pdf-File unter: http://www.germ.univie.ac.at/aktuell.html

0.021420455 = product of:
  0.08568182 = sum of:
    0.08568182 = weight(_text_:reference in 4097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08568182 = score(doc=4097,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.4449779 = fieldWeight in 4097, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4097)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Reviews the literature of the Internet and WWW, since 1990, covering 446 references on the Internet and library and information services with particular reference to issues such as: academic libraries and scholarly research; collection development and cooperation; community colleges and networks; electronic publishing; document delivery and interloans; global and international networking; government information; Internet training; legal, ethical and security issues; OPACs; privatization and commercialization; public libraries; reference services; school libraries; special libraries; standards and protocols; and women, minorities, disabled and equality

0.021420455 = product of:
  0.08568182 = sum of:
    0.08568182 = weight(_text_:reference in 1614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08568182 = score(doc=1614,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.4449779 = fieldWeight in 1614, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1614)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Reports results of a project to develop guidelines, based on the development of a prototype system in the field of medicine, for producing computerized reference services capable of increasing the range and quality of responses to information needs. For instance, an automatic system that can be available 24 hours a day simultaneously to multiple enquirers over an intranet or the Internet. Genuine information requests from a variety of medical information settings were collected and analyzed to form a typology of needs, focusing particularly on qualitative aspects. The typology was mapped on to computerized techniques to form a system specification and developed into a prototype WWW system

0.01983998 = product of:
  0.07935992 = sum of:
    0.07935992 = weight(_text_:master in 6067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07935992 = score(doc=6067,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3116585 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5848994 = idf(docFreq=165, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.25463742 = fieldWeight in 6067, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.5848994 = idf(docFreq=165, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=6067)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Backgrund to the study: The question of multilingual access to bibliographic databases affects not only searchers in countries in which several languages are spoken such as Switzerland, but also all those who search material in databases containing material in more than one language, which is the case in the majority of scientific or research databases. he growth of networks means that we can easily access catalogues outside our own immediate circle - in another town, another country, another continent. In doing so we encounter problems concerning not only search interfaces, but also concerning subject access or even author access in another language. In France for example, each document, independently of the language in which it has been written, is indexed using a French-language subject heading language. Thus, in order to search by subject headings for documents written in English or German, held in the Bibliothèque nationale de France, the researcher from abroad has to master the French language. In theory, the indexer should be able to analyse a document and assign headings in his/her native language, while the user should be able to search in his/her native language. The language of the document itself should have no influence on the language of the subject heading language used for indexing nor on the language used for searching. (Practically speaking of course, there are restrictions, since there is a limit to the number of languages in which subject headings languages could be maintained and thus in which the user may search.) In the example below, we are concerned with three languages: German, French and English. If we can imagine a system in which there are equivalents among subject headings in these three languages, the following scenario may be envisaged: a German-speaking indexer will use German-language subject headings to index all the documents received, regardless of the language in which they are written. The user may search for these documents by entering subject headings in German, but also in French or in English, thanks to the equivalents that have been established, in French or in English without the necessity to know the other languages or the structure of the other SHLs. Ideally, this approach should not be confined to one database, but would allow the different databases to be brought together in virtual system: an English-speaking user in London should be able to search the database of the Deutsche Bibliothek in Frankfurt using English-language headings, and retrieving documents which have been indexed using the German subject headings' list.

0.018590774 = product of:
  0.0743631 = sum of:
    0.0743631 = product of:
      0.1487262 = sum of:
        0.1487262 = weight(_text_:file in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1487262 = score(doc=1440,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25368783 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047329273 = queryNorm
            0.58625674 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.3600616 = idf(docFreq=564, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Reports results of a National Council on Archives project: to sourvey the state of automation of archival searching aids in the UK; and assesses the feasibility of establishing a National Name Authority File (NNAF). The investigation encompassed 3 elements: extent of use of computerised archival searching aids in record offices and other archives; preparedness of archivists to cooperate with the creation of national name authority files for personal, family, place and corporate names; and requirements and costings for establishing a central server to maintain and disseminate the authority files. Reports results of a questionnaire survey of record offices and archives, followed up by visits to representatives of the major national institutions to establish the context within which the NNAF might be created and used

0.018550657 = product of:
  0.07420263 = sum of:
    0.07420263 = weight(_text_:reference in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07420263 = score(doc=1800,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.38536215 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The SAC Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures was authorized at the 1995 Midwinter Meeting and appointed shortly before Annual Conference. Its creation was one result of a discussion of how (and why) to promote the display and use of broader-term subject heading references, and its charge reads as follows: To investigate: (1) the kinds of relationships that exist between subjects, the display of which are likely to be useful to catalog users; (2) how these relationships are or could be recorded in authorities and classification formats; (3) options for how these relationships should be presented to users of online and print catalogs, indexes, lists, etc. By the summer 1996 Annual Conference, make some recommendations to SAC about how to disseminate the information and/or implement changes. At that time assess the need for additional time to investigate these issues. The Subcommittee's work on each of the imperatives in the charge was summarized in a report issued at the 1996 Annual Conference (Appendix A). Highlights of this work included the development of a taxonomy of 165 subject relationships; a demonstration that, using existing MARC coding, catalog systems could be programmed to generate references they do not currently support; and an examination of reference displays in several CD-ROM database products. Since that time, work has continued on identifying term relationships and display options; on tracking research, discussion, and implementation of subject relationships in information systems; and on compiling a list of further research needs.

Content

Enthält: Appendix A: Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures - REPORT TO THE ALCTS/CCS SUBJECT ANALYSIS COMMITTEE - July 1996 Appendix B (part 1): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (alphabetical display) (Separat in: http://web2.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/CCS/committees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/msrscu2.pdf) Appendix B (part 2): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (hierarchical display) Appendix C: Checklist of Candidate Subject Relationships for Information Retrieval. Compiled by Dee Michel, Pat Kuhr, and Jane Greenberg; edited by Greg Wool - June 1997 Appendix D: Review of Reference Displays in Selected CD-ROM Abstracts and Indexes by Harriette Hemmasi and Steven Riel Appendix E: Analysis of Relationships in Six LC Subject Authority Records by Harriette Hemmasi and Gary Strawn Appendix F: Report of a Preliminary Survey of Subject Referencing in OPACs by Gregory Wool Appendix G: LC Subject Referencing in OPACs--Why Bother? by Gregory Wool Appendix H: Research Needs on Subject Relationships and Reference Structures in Information Access compiled by Jane Greenberg and Steven Riel with contributions from Dee Michel and others edited by Gregory Wool Appendix I: Bibliography on Subject Relationships compiled mostly by Dee Michel with additional contributions from Jane Greenberg, Steven Riel, and Gregory Wool

0.01836039 = product of:
  0.07344156 = sum of:
    0.07344156 = weight(_text_:reference in 2384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07344156 = score(doc=2384,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.38140965 = fieldWeight in 2384, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2384)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Reports results of a study to monitor information activities of selected UK public libraries and special libraries and to collect enquiry data from 7 different information services (2 public reference libraries; 2 public lending libraries; a tourist information centre; and 2 special libraries). Data was categorized according to length of answer, mode of enquiring; type of enquiry; and subject of enquiry. Results indicated that the special libraries had longer enquiries and received more by telephone, fax transmission and letter than the public libraries. Furthermore, they made most use of computerized information services. Business and commerce enquiries were most freqeuntly asked at the public reference libraries. Answering community information and children's enquiries were the common tasks of public lending libraries. Minimal overlap accured in the provision of tourist information

0.01836039 = product of:
  0.07344156 = sum of:
    0.07344156 = weight(_text_:reference in 3741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07344156 = score(doc=3741,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.38140965 = fieldWeight in 3741, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3741)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Mit dieser Publikation veröffentlicht das Institut für Museumskunde die bisherigen Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe "Datenaustausch" in der Fachgruppe Dokumentation des Deutschen Museumsbunds (DMB). Kolleginnen und Kollegen verschiedener Interessenschwerpunkte aus Museen und Informatik-Einrichtungen haben seit dem Jahre 2000 die Entwicklung des CIDOC-CRM (das "Conceptual Reference Model" des Dokumentationskomitees von ICOM, dem Internationalen Museumsrat) zu einem Arbeitsinstrument begleitet, das derzeit auf dem Wege ist, als Norm ISO 21 127 Anerkennung zu finden. Die Arbeitsgruppe hat sich intensiv damit beschäftigt, zunächst das komplexe Modell zu verstehen, und sie hat diskutiert, inwieweit es eine Hilfestellung für die Arbeit von Museen miteinander und für einen Datenaustausch zwischen ihnen bietet. Die Ergebnisse der Überlegungen werden hier vorgestellt in der Hoffnung, dass dadurch viele Kolleginnen und Kollegen mit dem Modell bekannt werden, ihnen das Verständnis des CRM erleichtert wird und das Modell auch in Deutschland für die Konzeption von Informationssystemen und die Vermittlung zwischen unterschiedlichen Dokumentationen genutzt werden kann.

0.01731034 = product of:
  0.06924136 = sum of:
    0.06924136 = weight(_text_:reference in 7173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06924136 = score(doc=7173,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.35959643 = fieldWeight in 7173, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7173)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Findings of the Croydon Libraries Internet Project (CLIP), 1994 Mar 96, which aimed to assess the value of the Internet for UK public libraries. Reviews the Internet as a staff tool (the Electronic Reference model), the potential benefits of providing public access and a range of technical issues which will be relevant to public libraries establishing such services

0.015146547 = product of:
  0.060586188 = sum of:
    0.060586188 = weight(_text_:reference in 2428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060586188 = score(doc=2428,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.31464687 = fieldWeight in 2428, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2428)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Final report of a British Library supported conducted at University College, London, computer science department, the aim of which was to build a demonstration and test bed facility for online access to a large electronic library of multimedia documents. The project was a pilot experiment in the use of a database of compound documents (text and images) in the Open Document Architecture format. The database used is part of the contents of information in the Journal of the American Chemical Society. Discusses the overall view of the project with particular reference to the WAIS information retrieval server which was developed and used

0.012982754 = product of:
  0.051931016 = sum of:
    0.051931016 = weight(_text_:reference in 756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051931016 = score(doc=756,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19255297 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047329273 = queryNorm
        0.2696973 = fieldWeight in 756, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0683694 = idf(docFreq=2055, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=756)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Summarizes the workshop, held in Oxford, 19th Jun 94, to launch SARA, the SGML Aware Retrieval Application, a sophisticated searching and retrieval software product development as part of the British National Corpus (BNC) project to allow rapid and sophisticated analysis of the BNC and other text materials encoded using SGML, and to allow the academic community access to BNC as easily as possible. The British National Corpus is a 3 year project to build a 100 million word corpus of contemporary (mostly post 1974) spoken and written English, taken from a range of sources, including fiction and non fiction books, academic periodicals, unpublished materials, radio broadcasts, and transcriptions of spoken conversations. The entire tagged corpus is due to be released in 1994 and is expected to be used for purposes such as: reference book publishing; linguistic research; and the development of systems for natural langugae processing and artificial intelligence