Search (3958 results, page 1 of 198)

  1. Strobel, S.: ¬The complete Linux kit : fully configured LINUX system kernel (1997) 0.20
    0.20048304 = product of:
      0.40096608 = sum of:
        0.40096608 = sum of:
          0.31878725 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 8959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.31878725 = score(doc=8959,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              1.08745 = fieldWeight in 8959, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8959)
          0.08217882 = weight(_text_:22 in 8959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08217882 = score(doc=8959,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 8959, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8959)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16. 7.2002 20:22:55
    RSWK
    LINUX 2.0
    Subject
    LINUX 2.0
  2. Becker, H.-G.; Lemanski, T.; Ziebarth, T.: Web 1.0 - 4.0 : Zwischen Reparaturbetrieb und ferner Vision (2008) 0.17
    0.17098251 = product of:
      0.34196502 = sum of:
        0.34196502 = sum of:
          0.29402736 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.29402736 = score(doc=1940,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              1.0029888 = fieldWeight in 1940, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1940)
          0.047937647 = weight(_text_:22 in 1940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047937647 = score(doc=1940,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1940, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1940)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die 10. InetBib-Tagung fand vom 9. bis 11. April in den Räumlichkeiten der neuen Universität in Würzburg und damit zum ersten Mal in Bayern statt. Über 450 Teilnehmer und rund 40 Vorträge bedeuteten eine neue Rekordbeteiligung. InetBib 2.0 - der Name der Tagung war Programm: Diskutiert wurden die Web-2.0-Technologien und deren Einsatz in Bibliotheken sowie ihr Mehrwert für Nutzer und Mitarbeiter. Neben diesen Themen, die auch das Second Life, die Bibliothek 2.0, den Katalog 2.0 sowie den Bibliothekar 2.0 berührten, wurden ebenfalls eher praktische Fragen aus dem Alltag behandelt, wie zum Beispiel das neue Urheberrecht und seine Konsequenzen für den Kopien­versand, die Anforderungen virtueller Studiengänge an Bibliotheken und die Möglichkeiten, Benutzern eBooks anzubieten.
    Date
    22. 6.2008 17:20:09
  3. Blumauer, A.; Pellegrini, T.: Semantic Web Revisited : Eine kurze Einführung in das Social Semantic Web (2009) 0.16
    0.15546185 = product of:
      0.3109237 = sum of:
        0.3109237 = sum of:
          0.26298603 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.26298603 = score(doc=4855,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.8971004 = fieldWeight in 4855, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4855)
          0.047937647 = weight(_text_:22 in 4855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047937647 = score(doc=4855,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4855, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4855)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Während in den vergangenen Monaten Themen wie Web 2.0 und Social Software ein erstaunliches Konjunkturhoch erlebt haben, vollzieht sich weitgehend abseits der öffentlichen Wahrnehmung eine technologische Komplementärinnovation. Die wachsende Adaption semantischer Technologien zu Zwecken der strukturierten Erschließung von "Web 2.0 Content", aber auch der Einsatz von Social Software zur kollaborativen Anreicherung von Web Content mit maschinenlesbaren Metadaten sind Ausdruck eines Trends in Richtung "Social Semantic Web". Bezeichnendes Merkmal dieser Entwicklung ist die voranschreitende Konvergenz zwischen Social Software und Semantic Web Technologien. Dieser Beitrag hat das Ziel ein allgemeines Bewusstsein und Verständnis dieser Entwicklung zu schaffen und nähert sich dem Phänomen aus einer nichttechnischen Perspektive.
    Object
    Web 2.0
    Pages
    S.3-22
    Source
    Social Semantic Web: Web 2.0, was nun? Hrsg.: A. Blumauer u. T. Pellegrini
  4. Zimmer, D.E.: Neues Leben für die Dicke : die Encyclopaedia Britannica geht on line - für sie eine Frage des Überlebens (1995) 0.15
    0.15379772 = product of:
      0.30759543 = sum of:
        0.30759543 = sum of:
          0.2254166 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 6062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.2254166 = score(doc=6062,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.7689432 = fieldWeight in 6062, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6062)
          0.08217882 = weight(_text_:22 in 6062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08217882 = score(doc=6062,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6062, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6062)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Bericht über die Version 2.0 (mit grafischen Elementen) und der Verzahnung mit dem Internet-Angebot
    Date
    10. 1.1996 20:27:22
  5. Schneider, R.: Bibliothek 1.0, 2.0 oder 3.0? (2008) 0.14
    0.13784513 = product of:
      0.27569026 = sum of:
        0.27569026 = sum of:
          0.2277526 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 6122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.2277526 = score(doc=6122,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.7769118 = fieldWeight in 6122, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6122)
          0.047937647 = weight(_text_:22 in 6122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047937647 = score(doc=6122,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6122, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6122)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Noch ist nicht entschieden mit welcher Vehemenz das sogenannte Web 2.0 die Bibliotheken verändern wird. Allerdings wird hier und da bereits mit Bezugnahme auf das sogenannte Semantic Web von einer dritten und mancherorts von einer vierten Generation des Web gesprochen. Der Vortrag hinterfragt kritisch, welche Konzepte sich hinter diesen Bezeichnungen verbergen und geht der Frage nach, welche Herausforderungen eine Übernahme dieser Konzepte für die Bibliothekswelt mit sich bringen würde. Vgl. insbes. Folie 22 mit einer Darstellung von der Entwicklung vom Web 1.0 zum Web 4.0
    Object
    Web 2.0
  6. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.14
    0.13663402 = sum of:
      0.080279864 = product of:
        0.24083959 = sum of:
          0.24083959 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.24083959 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.42852643 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.05635415 = product of:
        0.1127083 = sum of:
          0.1127083 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1127083 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.3844716 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This research revisits the classic Turing test and compares recent large language models such as ChatGPT for their abilities to reproduce human-level comprehension and compelling text generation. Two task challenges- summary and question answering- prompt ChatGPT to produce original content (98-99%) from a single text entry and sequential questions initially posed by Turing in 1950. We score the original and generated content against the OpenAI GPT-2 Output Detector from 2019, and establish multiple cases where the generated content proves original and undetectable (98%). The question of a machine fooling a human judge recedes in this work relative to the question of "how would one prove it?" The original contribution of the work presents a metric and simple grammatical set for understanding the writing mechanics of chatbots in evaluating their readability and statistical clarity, engagement, delivery, overall quality, and plagiarism risks. While Turing's original prose scores at least 14% below the machine-generated output, whether an algorithm displays hints of Turing's true initial thoughts (the "Lovelace 2.0" test) remains unanswerable.
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  7. Wesch, M.: Web 2.0 ... The Machine is Us/ing Us (2006) 0.13
    0.13365535 = product of:
      0.2673107 = sum of:
        0.2673107 = sum of:
          0.21252482 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 3478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.21252482 = score(doc=3478,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.72496665 = fieldWeight in 3478, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3478)
          0.05478588 = weight(_text_:22 in 3478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05478588 = score(doc=3478,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3478, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3478)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Web 2.0 in just under 5 minutes.
    Date
    5. 1.2008 19:22:48
  8. ak: ¬Der Umwelt zuliebe ... (2000) 0.13
    0.12816477 = product of:
      0.25632954 = sum of:
        0.25632954 = sum of:
          0.18784717 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18784717 = score(doc=4745,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.640786 = fieldWeight in 4745, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4745)
          0.068482354 = weight(_text_:22 in 4745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.068482354 = score(doc=4745,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4745, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4745)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Unter dem Titel Ökobase präsentiert die Fa. Clemes Hölter 2 neue Umwelt CD-ROMs, die in Zusammenarbeit mit dem Umweltbundesamt entwickelt worden sind. Der Umweltatlas 2.0 ist eher für Firmen und Personen vom Fach interessant, die CD 'Multimedia 8.0' hingegen ist für das breite Publikum konzoiert
    Source
    CD-Info. 2000, H.6, S.22
  9. Sauermann, L.; Kiesel, M.; Schumacher, K.; Bernardi, A.: Semantic Desktop (2009) 0.12
    0.11694843 = product of:
      0.23389687 = sum of:
        0.23389687 = sum of:
          0.18595922 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18595922 = score(doc=2416,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.6343458 = fieldWeight in 2416, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2416)
          0.047937647 = weight(_text_:22 in 2416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047937647 = score(doc=2416,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2416, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2416)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3. 1.2012 16:00:22
    Object
    Web 2.0
    Source
    Social Semantic Web: Web 2.0, was nun? Hrsg.: A. Blumauer u. T. Pellegrini
  10. Social Media und Web Science : das Web als Lebensraum, Düsseldorf, 22. - 23. März 2012, Proceedings, hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld, Isabella Peters und Katrin Weller. DGI, Frankfurt am Main 2012 (2012) 0.12
    0.11694843 = product of:
      0.23389687 = sum of:
        0.23389687 = sum of:
          0.18595922 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18595922 = score(doc=1517,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.6343458 = fieldWeight in 1517, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1517)
          0.047937647 = weight(_text_:22 in 1517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047937647 = score(doc=1517,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1517, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1517)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    RSWK
    Soziale Software / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Düsseldorf <2012>
    Subject
    Soziale Software / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Düsseldorf <2012>
  11. Shoffner, M.; Greenberg, J.; Kramer-Duffield, J.; Woodbury, D.: Web 2.0 semantic systems : collaborative learning in science (2008) 0.11
    0.11309586 = product of:
      0.22619171 = sum of:
        0.22619171 = sum of:
          0.19879878 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.19879878 = score(doc=2661,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.6781442 = fieldWeight in 2661, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2661)
          0.02739294 = weight(_text_:22 in 2661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02739294 = score(doc=2661,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2661, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2661)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The basic goal of education within a discipline is to transform a novice into an expert. This entails moving the novice toward the "semantic space" that the expert inhabits-the space of concepts, meanings, vocabularies, and other intellectual constructs that comprise the discipline. Metadata is significant to this goal in digitally mediated education environments. Encoding the experts' semantic space not only enables the sharing of semantics among discipline scientists, but also creates an environment that bridges the semantic gap between the common vocabulary of the novice and the granular descriptive language of the seasoned scientist (Greenberg, et al, 2005). Developments underlying the Semantic Web, where vocabularies are formalized in the Web Ontology Language (OWL), and Web 2.0 approaches of user-generated folksonomies provide an infrastructure for linking vocabulary systems and promoting group learning via metadata literacy. Group learning is a pedagogical approach to teaching that harnesses the phenomenon of "collective intelligence" to increase learning by means of collaboration. Learning a new semantic system can be daunting for a novice, and yet it is integral to advance one's knowledge in a discipline and retain interest. These ideas are key to the "BOT 2.0: Botany through Web 2.0, the Memex and Social Learning" project (Bot 2.0).72 Bot 2.0 is a collaboration involving the North Carolina Botanical Garden, the UNC SILS Metadata Research center, and the Renaissance Computing Institute (RENCI). Bot 2.0 presents a curriculum utilizing a memex as a way for students to link and share digital information, working asynchronously in an environment beyond the traditional classroom. Our conception of a memex is not a centralized black box but rather a flexible, distributed framework that uses the most salient and easiest-to-use collaborative platforms (e.g., Facebook, Flickr, wiki and blog technology) for personal information management. By meeting students "where they live" digitally, we hope to attract students to the study of botanical science. A key aspect is to teach students scientific terminology and about the value of metadata, an inherent function in several of the technologies and in the instructional approach we are utilizing. This poster will report on a study examining the value of both folksonomies and taxonomies for post-secondary college students learning plant identification. Our data is drawn from a curriculum involving a virtual independent learning portion and a "BotCamp" weekend at UNC, where students work with digital plan specimens that they have captured. Results provide some insight into the importance of collaboration and shared vocabulary for gaining confidence and for student progression from novice to expert in botany.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  12. Hahn, U.; Schulze, M.: Katalogerweiterungen, Mashups und Elemente der Bibliothek 2.0" in der Praxis : der Katalog der Universitätsbibliothek der Helmut-Schmidt-Universität (IHSU) Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg (2009) 0.11
    0.11309586 = product of:
      0.22619171 = sum of:
        0.22619171 = sum of:
          0.19879878 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.19879878 = score(doc=2672,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.6781442 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
          0.02739294 = weight(_text_:22 in 2672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02739294 = score(doc=2672,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2672, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2672)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die verschiedenen unter dem Schlagwort "Bibliothek 2.0" zusammengefassten neuen Dienste und Komponenten wie etwa Wikis, Tagging-Systeme und Blogs sind seit einiger Zeit in aller Munde und dringen über Fortbildungsveranstaltungen, Konferenzen und Publikationsorgane immer mehr in das deutschsprachige Bibliothekswesen ein. Darüber hinaus gibt es öffentlich geförderte Projekte zu bibliothekarischen 2.0-Themen und sogar ein Projekt, welches sich explizit einen 2.0-Katalog zum Ziel gesetzt hat. In diesem Beitrag soll es nun nicht um die Vorstellung eines weiteren Projekts im Dienste des Themas "Bibliothek 2.0" gehen, ebenso hat dieser Beitrag nicht den Anspruch, die Diskussion über die möglichen Vor- oder Nachteile dieser Thematik auf theoretischer Ebene voranzubringen. Vielmehr wird hier ganz praktisch aus Sicht einer kleinen Universitätsbibliothek, der Bibliothek der Helmut-SchmidtUniversität (HSU) - Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg, aufgezeigt, wie das Thema "Web/Bibliothek 2.0" durchaus neben und in Unterstützung von weiteren nutzerorientierten Servicedienstleistungen auch in kleinen Schritten positive Auswirkungen für die Nutzerinnen und Nutzer haben kann. Der Focus wird dabei auf dem zentralen Arbeits- und Rechercheinstrument der Bibliotheksnutzer liegen, dem Bibliothekskatalog. Speziell wird es darum gehen, wie auf relativ einfache Art und Weise durch Anwendung verschiedener Elemente anderer Dienste und Anbieter sowie das Aufgreifen von Schnittstellen und wenig aufwendigen Verbesserungen, Mehrwert für die Nutzerinnen und Nutzer zu erzielen ist. Ein zentraler Begriff bei fast allen Überlegungen, die im Zusammenhang mit der Verbesserung und Anreicherung des Kataloges stehen, war und ist das Thema "Mash-up". Unter Mashups - ein Begriff, der gerade im Zusammenhang mit dem Thema "Web 2.0" im deutschsprachigen Raum eingeführt und adaptiert wurde - wird das Verfahren bezeichnet, Web-Inhalte neu zu kombinieren. Dabei nutzt man bei und für Mashups offene "APIs" (Application Programming Interfaces, also offene Programmierschnittstellen), die von anderen Web-Anwendungen zur Verfügung gestellt werden.
    Date
    22. 2.2009 19:40:38
  13. Joint, N.: Web 2.0 and the library : a transformational technology? (2010) 0.11
    0.11309586 = product of:
      0.22619171 = sum of:
        0.22619171 = sum of:
          0.19879878 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.19879878 = score(doc=4202,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.6781442 = fieldWeight in 4202, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4202)
          0.02739294 = weight(_text_:22 in 4202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02739294 = score(doc=4202,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4202, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4202)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper is the final one in a series which has tried to give an overview of so-called transformational areas of digital library technology. The aim has been to assess how much real transformation these applications can bring about, in terms of creating genuine user benefit and also changing everyday library practice. Design/methodology/approach - The paper provides a summary of some of the legal and ethical issues associated with web 2.0 applications in libraries, associated with a brief retrospective view of some relevant literature. Findings - Although web 2.0 innovations have had a massive impact on the larger World Wide Web, the practical impact on library service delivery has been limited to date. What probably can be termed transformational in the effect of web 2.0 developments on library and information work is their effect on some underlying principles of professional practice. Research limitations/implications - The legal and ethical challenges of incorporating web 2.0 platforms into mainstream institutional service delivery need to be subject to further research, so that the risks associated with these innovations are better understood at the strategic and policy-making level. Practical implications - This paper makes some recommendations about new principles of library and information practice which will help practitioners make better sense of these innovations in their overall information environment. Social implications - The paper puts in context some of the more problematic social impacts of web 2.0 innovations, without denying the undeniable positive contribution of social networking to the sphere of human interactivity. Originality/value - This paper raises some cautionary points about web 2.0 applications without adopting a precautionary approach of total prohibition. However, none of the suggestions or analysis in this piece should be considered to constitute legal advice. If such advice is required, the reader should consult appropriate legal professionals.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 17:54:04
  14. Danowski, P.: Authority files and Web 2.0 : Wikipedia and the PND. An Example (2007) 0.11
    0.11104417 = product of:
      0.22208834 = sum of:
        0.22208834 = sum of:
          0.18784717 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18784717 = score(doc=1291,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.640786 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
          0.034241177 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034241177 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    More and more users index everything on their own in the web 2.0. There are services for links, videos, pictures, books, encyclopaedic articles and scientific articles. All these services are library independent. But must that really be? Can't libraries help with their experience and tools to make user indexing better? On the experience of a project from German language Wikipedia together with the German person authority files (Personen Namen Datei - PND) located at German National Library (Deutsche Nationalbibliothek) I would like to show what is possible. How users can and will use the authority files, if we let them. We will take a look how the project worked and what we can learn for future projects. Conclusions - Authority files can have a role in the web 2.0 - there must be an open interface/ service for retrieval - everything that is indexed on the net with authority files can be easy integrated in a federated search - O'Reilly: You have to found ways that your data get more important that more it will be used
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
    Object
    Web 2.0
  15. Chianese, A.; Cantone, F.; Caropreso, M.; Moscato, V.: ARCHAEOLOGY 2.0 : Cultural E-Learning tools and distributed repositories supported by SEMANTICA, a System for Learning Object Retrieval and Adaptive Courseware Generation for e-learning environments. (2010) 0.11
    0.11104417 = product of:
      0.22208834 = sum of:
        0.22208834 = sum of:
          0.18784717 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 3733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18784717 = score(doc=3733,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.640786 = fieldWeight in 3733, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3733)
          0.034241177 = weight(_text_:22 in 3733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034241177 = score(doc=3733,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3733, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3733)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The focus of the present research has been the development and the application to Virtual Archaeology of a Web-Based framework for Learning Objects indexing and retrieval. The paper presents the main outcomes of a experimentation carried out by an interdisciplinary group of Federico II University of Naples. Our equipe is composed by researchers both in ICT and in Humanities disciplines, in particular in the domain of Virtual Archaeology and Cultural Heritage Informatics in order to develop specific ICT methodological approaches to Virtual Archaeology. The methodological background is the progressive diffusion of Web 2.0 technologies and the attempt to analyze their impact and perspectives in the Cultural Heritage field. In particular, we approached the specific requirements of the so called Learning 2.0, and the possibility to improve the automation of modular courseware generation in Virtual Archaeology Didactics. The developed framework was called SEMANTICA, and it was applied to Virtual Archaeology Domain Ontologies in order to generate a didactic course in a semi-automated way. The main results of this test and the first students feedback on the course fruition will be presented and discussed..
    Object
    ARCHAEOLOGY 2.0
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  16. Steiner, E.S.: OPAC 2.0 : Mit Web 2.0-Technologie zum Bibliothekskatalog der Zukunft? (2007) 0.11
    0.10626241 = product of:
      0.21252482 = sum of:
        0.21252482 = product of:
          0.42504963 = sum of:
            0.42504963 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.42504963 = score(doc=678,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                1.4499333 = fieldWeight in 678, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=678)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Diese Arbeit besteht im Wesentlichen aus zwei Teilen: Der erste Teil beinhaltet eine Einführung in den Begriff Web 2.0 und in die allgemeinen Rahmenbedingungen der zugehörigen technischen Entwicklungen. Des Weiteren werden exemplarische Techniken vorgestellt, die Web 2.0 zugeschrieben werden können sowie einige beispielhafte Anwendungen. Im zweiten Teil wird die Diskussion um Bibliothek 2.0 aufgegriffen, um anschließend näher auf Web 2.0 Techniken in Bibliothekskatalogen bzw. den OPAC 2.0 einzugehen. Verschiedene Techniken, die im OPAC 2.0 Anwendung finden können, werden diskutiert und zuletzt werden einige beispielhafte OPACs vorgestellt.
  17. Keen, A.: ¬Die Stunde der Stümper : wie wir im Internet unsere Kultur zerstören (2008) 0.11
    0.10572241 = product of:
      0.21144482 = sum of:
        0.21144482 = sum of:
          0.18405189 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18405189 = score(doc=2667,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.6278395 = fieldWeight in 2667, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2667)
          0.02739294 = weight(_text_:22 in 2667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02739294 = score(doc=2667,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2667, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2667)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Das Internet und besonders das Web 2.0 sind ein Segen für die Meinungsfreiheit, so heißt es: Endlich können alle bestimmen, worüber diskutiert wird - nicht nur wenige Experten, Top-Journalisten und wortgewaltige Autoren, die das Meinungsmonopol für sich beanspruchen. Doch was haben wir uns da eingehandelt? Forumsbeiträge, die vor Dummheit und falschen Fakten strotzen, und an Idiotie kaum zu überbietende Videoclips bei YouTube. Es kommt noch schlimmer: - Politische Splitterparteien und verschrobene Wirrköpfe maskieren sich immer häufiger als harmlose Blogger, um demokratiefeindliche Hetzkampagnen zu verbreiten. Betroffene können sich kaum dagegen wehren. - Unternehmen betreiben auf subtile Weise "virales Marketing", um ihre Produkte von vermeintlich begeisterten Kunden empfehlen zu lassen. - Clevere Lobbyisten mischen sich unter falscher Identität in Diskussionen ein, um ihre fragwürdigen Interessen durchzusetzen. Wir befinden uns auf einem gefährlichen Irrweg, sagt Andrew Keen: Wo Halbwissen und blanke Lügen herrschen statt verlässlicher Information, da fehlt auch die Basis für vernünftige und tragfähige politische Entscheidungen, da ist unsere Kultur in ihren Grundfesten erschüttert. Ein scharf formuliertes Plädoyer gegen die absurden Auswüchse der großen Verdummungsmaschine, die sich Internet nennt.
    Date
    22. 2.2009 12:33:37
    Footnote
    Rez. in: FR, Nr.289 vom 10.12.2008, S.36: "Das Internet: Unser Fluch? - Schon Internet-Pionier Nicholas Negroponte erklärte das World Wide Web zu einem riesigen Müllhaufen, und dieser Befund dürfte durch die Entwicklung des Netzes eher bestätigt worden sein. Aber wie das so ist mit dem Müll: Für die einen ist es Abfall, andere suchen und finden meistens etwas, das sich zur Wiederverwer- tung eignet. Das muss Andrew Keen entgangen sein, obwohl der IT-Unternehmer (audiocafe.com), sich in der Materie auskennt. Aber das hindert ihn nicht, sich mit geradezu pietistischem Eifer wider den neu-bösen Feind zu wenden: den Blogger. Keen sieht im durch soziale Netzwerke und demokratische Teilhabe geprägten Web 2.0 nicht nur den "Kult des Amateurs" (so der Originaltitel, korrekt übersetzt), sondern sogar die "Vernichtung unserer Kultur". So richtig der eine oder andere Befund sein mag - etwa die Selbstbezüglichkeit vieler Slogger - er wird nicht richtiger durch penetrante Wiederholung. Falsch aber ist eine Behauptung wie die, dass Einträge bei Wikipedia (noch ein Lieblingsfeind Keens) nicht redigiert würden. Da hat sich einer in sein Bedürfnis nach werbewirksamer Polemik verrannt". Vgl. auch: http://www.faz.net/s/Rub117C535CDF414415BB243B181B8B60AE/Doc~E7A6DAB48D2D745FC9054DBF8D9FD8C4F~ATpl~Ecommon~Scontent.html.
    RSWK
    Informationsgesellschaft / Soziokultureller Wandel / Internet / World Wide Web 2.0 / User Generated Content / Geltungsbedürfnis
    World Wide Web 2.0 / Kritik (GBV)
    Subject
    Informationsgesellschaft / Soziokultureller Wandel / Internet / World Wide Web 2.0 / User Generated Content / Geltungsbedürfnis
    World Wide Web 2.0 / Kritik (GBV)
  18. Probst, S.; Flaxa, R.: Power LINUX für Durchstarter : LINUX 2.0 - LST-Distribution 2.2 (1997) 0.11
    0.10500976 = product of:
      0.21001951 = sum of:
        0.21001951 = product of:
          0.42003903 = sum of:
            0.42003903 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.42003903 = score(doc=4698,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                1.4328411 = fieldWeight in 4698, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4698)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    RSWK
    LINUX 2.0
    LINUX 2.0 / CD-ROM
    Subject
    LINUX 2.0
    LINUX 2.0 / CD-ROM
  19. Wusteman, J.: Whither HTML? (2004) 0.10
    0.102531806 = product of:
      0.20506361 = sum of:
        0.20506361 = sum of:
          0.15027773 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15027773 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.5126288 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
          0.05478588 = weight(_text_:22 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05478588 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    HTML has reinvented itself as an XML application. The working draft of the latest version, XHTML 2.0, is causing controversy due to its lack of backward compatibility and the deprecation - and in some cases disappearance - of some popular tags. But is this commotion distracting us from the big picture of what XHTML has to offer? Where is HTML going? And is it taking the Web community with it?
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.99-105
  20. Münnich, K.; Reichelt, D.: XML-Helfer : Acht XML-Werkzeuge im Vergleich (2003) 0.10
    0.102531806 = product of:
      0.20506361 = sum of:
        0.20506361 = sum of:
          0.15027773 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15027773 = score(doc=1890,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.5126288 = fieldWeight in 1890, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1890)
          0.05478588 = weight(_text_:22 in 1890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05478588 = score(doc=1890,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1890, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1890)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25.10.2003 18:22:41
    Object
    Oxygen XML Editor 2.0

Languages

Types

  • a 3267
  • m 407
  • el 189
  • s 154
  • x 40
  • b 39
  • i 27
  • r 19
  • ? 8
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • n 3
  • h 2
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • l 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications