Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Geschichte der Kataloge"
  1. Panizzi, A.K.C.B.: Passages in my official life (1871) 0.03
    0.03389704 = product of:
      0.06779408 = sum of:
        0.06779408 = product of:
          0.13558815 = sum of:
            0.13558815 = weight(_text_:22 in 935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13558815 = score(doc=935,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 935, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=935)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2007 12:05:26
    22. 7.2007 12:08:24
  2. Laaff, M.: Googles genialer Urahn (2011) 0.03
    0.032041192 = product of:
      0.064082384 = sum of:
        0.064082384 = sum of:
          0.04696179 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04696179 = score(doc=4610,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.1601965 = fieldWeight in 4610, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4610)
          0.017120589 = weight(_text_:22 in 4610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.017120589 = score(doc=4610,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050545633 = queryNorm
              0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 4610, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4610)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Karteikästen, Telefone, Multimedia-Möbel 1934 entwickelte Otlet die Idee eines weltweiten Wissens-"Netzes". Er versuchte, kaum dass Radio und Fernsehen erfunden waren, Multimedia-Konzepte zu entwickeln, um die Kooperationsmöglichkeiten für Forscher zu verbessern. Otlet zerbrach sich den Kopf darüber, wie Wissen über große Distanzen zugänglich gemacht werden kann. Er entwickelte Multimedia-Arbeitsmöbel, die mit Karteikästen, Telefonen und anderen Features das versuchten, was heute an jedem Rechner möglich ist. Auch ohne die Hilfe elektronischer Datenverarbeitung entwickelte er Ideen, deren Umsetzung wir heute unter Begriffen wie Web 2.0 oder Wikipedia kennen. Trotzdem sind sein Name und seine Arbeit heute weitgehend in Vergessenheit geraten. Als Vordenker von Hypertext und Internet gelten die US-Amerikaner Vannevar Bush, Ted Nelson und Douglas Engelbart. Die Überbleibsel der Mundaneum-Sammlung vermoderten jahrzehntelang auf halb verfallenen Dachböden.
    Date
    24.10.2008 14:19:22
  3. Zerbst, H.-J.; Kaptein, O.: Gegenwärtiger Stand und Entwicklungstendenzen der Sacherschließung : Auswertung einer Umfrage an deutschen wissenschaftlichen und Öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1993) 0.03
    0.026759956 = product of:
      0.053519912 = sum of:
        0.053519912 = product of:
          0.16055973 = sum of:
            0.16055973 = weight(_text_:3a in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16055973 = score(doc=7394,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.42852643 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Ergebnis einer Umfrage aus dem Frühjahr 1993. A. Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken: Versandt wurde der Fragebogen an die Mitglieder der Sektion IV des DBV. Fragen: (1a) Um welchen Bestand handelt es sich, der sachlich erschlossen wird? (1b) Wie groß ist dieser Bestand? (1c) Wird dieser Bestand vollständig oder nur in Auswahl (einzelne Fächer, Lehrbücher, Dissertationen o.ä.) sachlich erschlossen? (1d) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (2) Auf welche Art wird der Bestand zur Zeit sachlich erschlossen? (3a) Welche Klassifikation wird angewendet? (3b) Gibt es alphabetisches SyK-Register bzw. einen Zugriff auf die Klassenbeschreibungen? (3c) Gibt es ergänzende Schlüssel für die Aspekte Ort, Zeit, Form? (4) Falls Sie einen SWK führen (a) nach welchem Regelwerk? (b) Gibt es ein genormtes Vokabular oder einen Thesaurus (ggf. nur für bestimmte Fächer)? (5) In welcher Form existieren die Sachkataloge? (6) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. in einem Verbund beteiligt? [Nein: 79%] (7) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 46%] (8) Welche sachlichen Suchmöglichkeiten gibt es für Benutzer? (9) Sind zukünftige Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Ja: 73%]. - B. Öffentliche Bibliotheken: Die Umfrage richtete sich an alle ÖBs der Sektionen I, II und III des DBV. Fragen: (1) Welche Sachkataloge führen Sie? (2) Welche Klassifikationen (Systematiken) liegen dem SyK zugrunde? [ASB: 242; KAB: 333; SfB: 4 (???); SSD: 11; Berliner: 18] (3) Führen Sie ein eigenes Schlagwort-Register zum SyK bzw. zur Klassifikation (Systematik)? (4) Führen Sie den SWK nach ...? [RSWK: 132 (= ca. 60%) anderen Regeln: 93] (5) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (6) In welcher Form existiern die Sachkataloge? (7) In welchem Umfang wird der Bestand erschlossen? (8) Welche Signaturen verwenden Sie? (9) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. einem Verbund, beteiligt? [Nein: 96%] (10) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 70%] (11) Woher beziehen Sie diese Fremdleistungen? (12) Verfügen Sie über ein Online-Katalogsystem mit OPAC? [Ja: 78; Nein: 614] (13) Sind zukünftig Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Nein: 458; Ja: 237]; RESÜMEE für ÖB: "(i) Einführung von EDV-Katalogen bleibt auch in den 90er Jahren ein Thema, (ii) Der Aufbau von SWK wird in vielen Bibliotheken in Angriff genommen, dabei spielt die Fremddatenübernahme eine entscheidende Rolle, (iii) RSWK werden zunehmend angewandt, Nutzung der SWD auch für andere Regeln wirkt normierend, (iv) Große Bewegung auf dem 'Systematik-Markt' ist in absehbarer Zeit nicht zu erwarten, (v) Für kleinere Bibliotheken wird der Zettelkatalog auf absehbare Zeit noch die herrschende Katalogform sein, (vi) Der erhebliche Nachholbedarf in den neuen Bundesländern wird nur in einem größeren Zeitraum zu leisten sein. ??? SPEZIALBIBIOTHEKEN ???
  4. Dousa, T.M.: E. Wyndham Hulme's classification of the attributes of books : On an early model of a core bibliographical entity (2017) 0.02
    0.018784717 = product of:
      0.037569433 = sum of:
        0.037569433 = product of:
          0.07513887 = sum of:
            0.07513887 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 3859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07513887 = score(doc=3859,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.2563144 = fieldWeight in 3859, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3859)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Modelling bibliographical entities is a prominent activity within knowledge organization today. Current models of bibliographic entities, such as Functional Requirements for Bibliographical Records (FRBR) and the Bibliographic Framework (BIBFRAME), take inspiration from data - modelling methods developed by computer scientists from the mid - 1970s on. Thus, it would seem that the modelling of bibliographic entities is an activity of very recent vintage. However, it is possible to find examples of bibliographical models from earlier periods of knowledge organization. The purpose of this paper is to draw attention to one such model, outlined by the early 20th - century British classification theorist E. Wyndham Hulme in his essay on "Principles of Book Classification" (1911 - 1912). There, Hulme set forth a classification of various attributes by which books can conceivably be classified. These he first divided into accidental and inseparable attributes. Accidental attributes were subdivided into edition - level and copy - level attributes and inseparable attitudes, into physical and non - physical attributes. Comparison of Hulme's classification of attributes with those of FRBR and BIBFRAME 2.0 reveals that the different classes of attributes in Hulme's classification correspond to groups of attributes associated with different bibliographical entities in those models. These later models assume the existence of different bibliographic entities in an abstraction hierarchy among which attributes are distributed, whereas Hulme posited only a single entity - the book - , whose various aspects he clustered into different classes of attributes. Thus, Hulme's model offers an interesting alternative to current assumptions about how to conceptualize the relationship between attributes and entities in the bibliographical universe.
  5. Dousa, T.M.: E. Wyndham Hulme's classification of the attributes of books : on an early model of a core bibliographical entity (2017) 0.02
    0.018784717 = product of:
      0.037569433 = sum of:
        0.037569433 = product of:
          0.07513887 = sum of:
            0.07513887 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07513887 = score(doc=4141,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.2563144 = fieldWeight in 4141, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4141)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Modelling bibliographical entities is a prominent activity within knowledge organization today. Current models of bibliographic entities, such as Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and the Bibliographic Framework (BIBFRAME), take inspiration from data-modelling methods developed by computer scientists from the mid-1970s on. Thus, it would seem that the modelling of bibliographic entities is an activity of very recent vintage. However, it is possible to find examples of bibliographical models from earlier periods of knowledge organization. The purpose of this paper is to draw attention to one such model, outlined by the early twentiethcentury British classification theorist E. Wyndham Hulme in his essay on "Principles of Book Classification" (1911-1912). There, Hulme set forth a classification of various attributes by which books can be classified. These he first divided into "accidental" and "inseparable" attributes. Accidental attributes were subdivided into edition-level and copy-level attributes and inseparable attitudes, into "physical" and "non-physical" attributes. Comparison of Hulme's classification of attributes with those of FRBR and BIBFRAME 2.0 reveals that the different classes of attributes in Hulme's classification correspond to groups of attributes associated with different bibliographical entities in those models. These later models assume the existence of different bibliographic entities in an abstract hierarchy among which attributes are distributed, whereas Hulme posited only a single entity-the book-whose various aspects he clustered into different classes of attributes. Thus, Hulme's model offers an interesting alternative to current assumptions about how to conceptualize the relationship between attributes and entities in the bibliographical universe.
  6. Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American Cataloging Alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2003) 0.02
    0.017120589 = product of:
      0.034241177 = sum of:
        0.034241177 = product of:
          0.068482354 = sum of:
            0.068482354 = weight(_text_:22 in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.068482354 = score(doc=4056,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.3-22
  7. Steinhagen, E.N.: Historical perspective of a union catalog in Chile : authorities and periodicals (2003) 0.02
    0.017120589 = product of:
      0.034241177 = sum of:
        0.034241177 = product of:
          0.068482354 = sum of:
            0.068482354 = weight(_text_:22 in 4064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.068482354 = score(doc=4064,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4064, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4064)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29. 7.2006 20:06:22
  8. Eversberg, B.: ADV und Zetteldruck : ein Widerspruch? (1975) 0.01
    0.01369647 = product of:
      0.02739294 = sum of:
        0.02739294 = product of:
          0.05478588 = sum of:
            0.05478588 = weight(_text_:22 in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05478588 = score(doc=4431,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 22(1975) H.5, S.387-390
  9. Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American cataloging alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2002) 0.01
    0.011984412 = product of:
      0.023968823 = sum of:
        0.023968823 = product of:
          0.047937647 = sum of:
            0.047937647 = weight(_text_:22 in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047937647 = score(doc=5479,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 35(2002) nos.1/2, S.3-22
  10. Pettee, J.: ¬The subject approach to books and the development of the dictionary catalog (1985) 0.01
    0.006848235 = product of:
      0.01369647 = sum of:
        0.01369647 = product of:
          0.02739294 = sum of:
            0.02739294 = weight(_text_:22 in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02739294 = score(doc=3624,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050545633 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Original in: Pettee, J.: The history and theory of the alphabetical subject approach to books. New York: Wilson 1946. S.22-25.