-
Wusteman, J.: Whither HTML? (2004)
0.10
0.102531806 = product of:
0.20506361 = sum of:
0.20506361 = sum of:
0.15027773 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15027773 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.050545633 = queryNorm
0.5126288 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
0.05478588 = weight(_text_:22 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05478588 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050545633 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- HTML has reinvented itself as an XML application. The working draft of the latest version, XHTML 2.0, is causing controversy due to its lack of backward compatibility and the deprecation - and in some cases disappearance - of some popular tags. But is this commotion distracting us from the big picture of what XHTML has to offer? Where is HTML going? And is it taking the Web community with it?
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.99-105
-
Méndez, E.; López, L.M.; Siches, A.; Bravo, A.G.: DCMF: DC & Microformats, a good marriage (2008)
0.08
0.07689886 = product of:
0.15379772 = sum of:
0.15379772 = sum of:
0.1127083 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1127083 = score(doc=2634,freq=2.0), product of:
0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.050545633 = queryNorm
0.3844716 = fieldWeight in 2634, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2634)
0.04108941 = weight(_text_:22 in 2634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04108941 = score(doc=2634,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050545633 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2634, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2634)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This report introduces the Dublin Core Microformats (DCMF) project, a new way to use the DC element set within X/HTML. The DC microformats encode explicit semantic expressions in an X/HTML webpage, by using a specific list of terms for values of the attributes "rev" and "rel" for <a> and <link> elements, and "class" and "id" of other elements. Microformats can be easily processed by user agents and software, enabling a high level of interoperability. These characteristics are crucial for the growing number of social applications allowing users to participate in the Web 2.0 environment as information creators and consumers. This report reviews the origins of microformats; illustrates the coding of DC microformats using the Dublin Core Metadata Gen tool, and a Firefox extension for extraction and visualization; and discusses the benefits of creating Web services utilizing DC microformats.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Toth, M.B.; Emery, D.: Applying DCMI elements to digital images and text in the Archimedes Palimpsest Program (2008)
0.06
0.064082384 = product of:
0.12816477 = sum of:
0.12816477 = sum of:
0.09392358 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09392358 = score(doc=2651,freq=2.0), product of:
0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.050545633 = queryNorm
0.320393 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
0.034241177 = weight(_text_:22 in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034241177 = score(doc=2651,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050545633 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The digitized version of the only extant copy of Archimedes' key mathematical and scientific works contains over 6,500 images and 130 pages of transcriptions. Metadata is essential for managing, integrating and accessing these digital resources in the Web 2.0 environment. The Dublin Core Metadata Element Set meets many of our needs. It offers the needed flexibility and applicability to a variety of data sets containing different texts and images in a dynamic technical environment. The program team has continued to refine its data dictionary and elements based on the Dublin Core standard and feedback from the Dublin Core community since the 2006 Dublin Core Conference. This presentation cites the application and utility of the DCMI Standards during the final phase of this decade-long program. Since the 2006 conference, the amount of data has grown tenfold with new imaging techniques. Use of the DCMI Standards for integration across digital images and transcriptions will allow the hosting and integration of this data set and other cultural works across service providers, libraries and cultural institutions.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Belém, F.M.; Almeida, J.M.; Gonçalves, M.A.: ¬A survey on tag recommendation methods : a review (2017)
0.06
0.064082384 = product of:
0.12816477 = sum of:
0.12816477 = sum of:
0.09392358 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09392358 = score(doc=3524,freq=2.0), product of:
0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.050545633 = queryNorm
0.320393 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
0.034241177 = weight(_text_:22 in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034241177 = score(doc=3524,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050545633 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Tags (keywords freely assigned by users to describe web content) have become highly popular on Web 2.0 applications, because of the strong stimuli and easiness for users to create and describe their own content. This increase in tag popularity has led to a vast literature on tag recommendation methods. These methods aim at assisting users in the tagging process, possibly increasing the quality of the generated tags and, consequently, improving the quality of the information retrieval (IR) services that rely on tags as data sources. Regardless of the numerous and diversified previous studies on tag recommendation, to our knowledge, no previous work has summarized and organized them into a single survey article. In this article, we propose a taxonomy for tag recommendation methods, classifying them according to the target of the recommendations, their objectives, exploited data sources, and underlying techniques. Moreover, we provide a critical overview of these methods, pointing out their advantages and disadvantages. Finally, we describe the main open challenges related to the field, such as tag ambiguity, cold start, and evaluation issues.
- Date
- 16.11.2017 13:30:22
-
Peters, I.; Stock, W.G.: Power tags in information retrieval (2010)
0.03
0.033207003 = product of:
0.066414006 = sum of:
0.066414006 = product of:
0.13282801 = sum of:
0.13282801 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13282801 = score(doc=865,freq=4.0), product of:
0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.050545633 = queryNorm
0.45310414 = fieldWeight in 865, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=865)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Many Web 2.0 services (including Library 2.0 catalogs) make use of folksonomies. The purpose of this paper is to cut off all tags in the long tail of a document-specific tag distribution. The remaining tags at the beginning of a tag distribution are considered power tags and form a new, additional search option in information retrieval systems. Design/methodology/approach - In a theoretical approach the paper discusses document-specific tag distributions (power law and inverse-logistic shape), the development of such distributions (Yule-Simon process and shuffling theory) and introduces search tags (besides the well-known index tags) as a possibility for generating tag distributions. Findings - Search tags are compatible with broad and narrow folksonomies and with all knowledge organization systems (e.g. classification systems and thesauri), while index tags are only applicable in broad folksonomies. Based on these findings, the paper presents a sketch of an algorithm for mining and processing power tags in information retrieval systems. Research limitations/implications - This conceptual approach is in need of empirical evaluation in a concrete retrieval system. Practical implications - Power tags are a new search option for retrieval systems to limit the amount of hits. Originality/value - The paper introduces power tags as a means for enhancing the precision of search results in information retrieval systems that apply folksonomies, e.g. catalogs in Library 2.0environments.
-
Blumauer, A.; Hochmeister, M.: Tag-Recommender gestützte Annotation von Web-Dokumenten (2009)
0.03
0.032873254 = product of:
0.06574651 = sum of:
0.06574651 = product of:
0.13149302 = sum of:
0.13149302 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13149302 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.050545633 = queryNorm
0.4485502 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Social Semantic Web: Web 2.0, was nun? Hrsg.: A. Blumauer u. T. Pellegrini
-
Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999)
0.03
0.029054604 = product of:
0.05810921 = sum of:
0.05810921 = product of:
0.11621842 = sum of:
0.11621842 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11621842 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050545633 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 30. 3.2002 19:45:22
- Source
- Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
-
Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000)
0.03
0.02739294 = product of:
0.05478588 = sum of:
0.05478588 = product of:
0.10957176 = sum of:
0.10957176 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10957176 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050545633 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16. 7.2000 20:58:22
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.03
0.02739294 = product of:
0.05478588 = sum of:
0.05478588 = product of:
0.10957176 = sum of:
0.10957176 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10957176 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050545633 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001)
0.02
0.023968823 = product of:
0.047937647 = sum of:
0.047937647 = product of:
0.09587529 = sum of:
0.09587529 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09587529 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050545633 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28. 3.2002 9:22:34
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.02
0.023968823 = product of:
0.047937647 = sum of:
0.047937647 = product of:
0.09587529 = sum of:
0.09587529 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09587529 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050545633 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004)
0.02
0.023968823 = product of:
0.047937647 = sum of:
0.047937647 = product of:
0.09587529 = sum of:
0.09587529 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09587529 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050545633 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
-
Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007)
0.02
0.020544706 = product of:
0.04108941 = sum of:
0.04108941 = product of:
0.08217882 = sum of:
0.08217882 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08217882 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050545633 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.02
0.019369734 = product of:
0.03873947 = sum of:
0.03873947 = product of:
0.07747894 = sum of:
0.07747894 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07747894 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050545633 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.02
0.019369734 = product of:
0.03873947 = sum of:
0.03873947 = product of:
0.07747894 = sum of:
0.07747894 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07747894 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050545633 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Alemu, G.: ¬A theory of metadata enriching and filtering (2016)
0.02
0.018784717 = product of:
0.037569433 = sum of:
0.037569433 = product of:
0.07513887 = sum of:
0.07513887 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 5068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07513887 = score(doc=5068,freq=2.0), product of:
0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.050545633 = queryNorm
0.2563144 = fieldWeight in 5068, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5068)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper presents a new theory of metadata enriching and filtering. The theory emerged from a rigorous grounded theory data analysis of 57 in-depth interviews with metadata experts, library and information science researchers, librarians as well as academic library users (G. Alemu, A Theory of Digital Library Metadata: The Emergence of Enriching and Filtering, University of Portsmouth PhD thesis, Portsmouth, 2014). Partly due to the novelty of Web 2.0 approaches and mainly due to the absence of foundational theories to underpin socially constructed metadata approaches, this research adapted a social constructivist philosophical approach and a constructivist grounded theory method (K.?Charmaz, Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis, SAGE Publications, London, 2006). The theory espouses the importance of enriching information objects with descriptions pertaining to the about-ness of information objects. Such richness and diversity of descriptions, it is argued, could chiefly be achieved by involving users in the metadata creation process. The theory includes four overarching metadata principles - metadata enriching, linking, openness and filtering. The theory proposes a mixed metadata approach where metadata experts provide the requisite basic descriptive metadata, structure and interoperability (a priori metadata) while users continually enrich it with their own interpretations (post-hoc metadata). Enriched metadata is inter- and cross-linked (the principle of linking), made openly accessible (the principle of openness) and presented (the principle of filtering) according to user needs. It is argued that enriched, interlinked and open metadata effectively rises and scales to the challenges presented by the growing digital collections and changing user expectations. This metadata approach allows users to pro-actively engage in co-creating metadata, hence enhancing the findability, discoverability and subsequent usage of information resources. This paper concludes by indicating the current challenges and opportunities to implement the theory of metadata enriching and filtering.
-
Hoffmann, L.: Metadaten von Internetressourcen und ihre Integrierung in Bibliothekskataloge (1998)
0.02
0.017120589 = product of:
0.034241177 = sum of:
0.034241177 = product of:
0.068482354 = sum of:
0.068482354 = weight(_text_:22 in 1032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068482354 = score(doc=1032,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050545633 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1032, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1032)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.1998 18:45:36
-
Essen, F. von: Metadaten - neue Perspektiven für die Erschließung von Netzpublikationen in Bibliotheken : Erster META-LIB-Workshop in Göttingen (1998)
0.02
0.017120589 = product of:
0.034241177 = sum of:
0.034241177 = product of:
0.068482354 = sum of:
0.068482354 = weight(_text_:22 in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068482354 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050545633 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Bericht über den Workshop, der am 22. u. 23.6.98 in der SUB Göttingen stattfand
-
Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016)
0.02
0.017120589 = product of:
0.034241177 = sum of:
0.034241177 = product of:
0.068482354 = sum of:
0.068482354 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068482354 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050545633 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016)
0.02
0.017120589 = product of:
0.034241177 = sum of:
0.034241177 = product of:
0.068482354 = sum of:
0.068482354 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068482354 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050545633 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
