Search (42 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Taniguchi, S.: Mapping and merging of IFLA Library Reference Model and BIBFRAME 2.0 (2018) 0.07 
    0.066414006 = product of:
  0.13282801 = sum of:
    0.13282801 = product of:
      0.26565602 = sum of:
        0.26565602 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 5162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26565602 = score(doc=5162,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050545633 = queryNorm
            0.9062083 = fieldWeight in 5162, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5162)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Object
    BIBFRAME 2.0
  2. Koster, L.; Heesakkers, D.: ¬The mobile library catalogue (2013) 0.07 
    0.06574651 = product of:
  0.13149302 = sum of:
    0.13149302 = product of:
      0.26298603 = sum of:
        0.26298603 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26298603 = score(doc=1479,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050545633 = queryNorm
            0.8971004 = fieldWeight in 1479, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1479)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Catalogue 2.0: the future of the library catalogue. Ed. by Sally Chambers
  3. Callewaert, R.: FRBRizing your catalogue (2013) 0.07 
    0.06574651 = product of:
  0.13149302 = sum of:
    0.13149302 = product of:
      0.26298603 = sum of:
        0.26298603 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26298603 = score(doc=1480,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050545633 = queryNorm
            0.8971004 = fieldWeight in 1480, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1480)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Catalogue 2.0: the future of the library catalogue. Ed. by Sally Chambers
  4. Xu, A.; Hess, K.; Akerman, L.: From MARC to BIBFRAME 2.0 : Crosswalks (2018) 0.06 
    0.057516214 = product of:
  0.11503243 = sum of:
    0.11503243 = product of:
      0.23006485 = sum of:
        0.23006485 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 5172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23006485 = score(doc=5172,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050545633 = queryNorm
            0.7847994 = fieldWeight in 5172, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5172)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    One of the big challenges facing academic libraries today is to increase the relevance of the libraries to their user communities. If the libraries can increase the visibility of their resources on the open web, it will increase the chances of the libraries to reach to their user communities via the user's first search experience. BIBFRAME and library Linked Data will enable libraries to publish their resources in a way that the Web understands, consume Linked Data to enrich their resources relevant to the libraries' user communities, and visualize networks across collections. However, one of the important steps for transitioning to BIBFRAME and library Linked Data involves crosswalks, mapping MARC fields and subfields across data models and performing necessary data reformatting to be in compliance with the specifications of the new model, which is currently BIBFRAME 2.0. This article looks into how the Library of Congress has mapped library bibliographic data from the MARC format to the BIBFRAME 2.0 model and vocabulary published and updated since April 2016, available from http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/index.html based on the recently released conversion specifications and converter, developed by the Library of Congress with input from many community members. The BIBFRAME 2.0 standard and conversion tools will enable libraries to transform bibliographic data from MARC into BIBFRAME 2.0, which introduces a Linked Data model as the improved method of bibliographic control for the future, and make bibliographic information more useful within and beyond library communities.
    Object
    BIBFRAME 2.0
  5. Kinstler, T.: Making search work for the library user (2013) 0.06 
    0.05635415 = product of:
  0.1127083 = sum of:
    0.1127083 = product of:
      0.2254166 = sum of:
        0.2254166 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2254166 = score(doc=1477,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050545633 = queryNorm
            0.7689432 = fieldWeight in 1477, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1477)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Catalogue 2.0: the future of the library catalogue. Ed. by Sally Chambers
  6. Bermes, E.: Enabling your catalogue for the semantic web (2013) 0.06 
    0.05635415 = product of:
  0.1127083 = sum of:
    0.1127083 = product of:
      0.2254166 = sum of:
        0.2254166 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2254166 = score(doc=1481,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050545633 = queryNorm
            0.7689432 = fieldWeight in 1481, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1481)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Catalogue 2.0: the future of the library catalogue. Ed. by Sally Chambers
  7. Taniguchi, S.: Examining BIBFRAME 2.0 from the viewpoint of RDA metadata schema (2017) 0.05 
    0.046489805 = product of:
  0.09297961 = sum of:
    0.09297961 = product of:
      0.18595922 = sum of:
        0.18595922 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 5154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18595922 = score(doc=5154,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050545633 = queryNorm
            0.6343458 = fieldWeight in 5154, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5154)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article examines BIBFRAME 2.0 from the viewpoint of RDA metadata schema, that is, whether the present BIBFRAME is suitable for exchange and sharing of metadata created with RDA. First, an overview of RDA and BIBFRAME models is provided. Second, mapping examples of metadata records and part of the mapping tables from RDA to BIBFRAME are demonstrated. Third, some issues involved in the mapping are investigated: treatment of RDA Expression in BIBFRAME, mapping of RDA elements to BIBFRAME properties, and conversion of extant MARC21 bibliographic records to BIBFRAME metadata.
  8. Taniguchi, S.: Is BIBFRAME 2.0 a suitable schema for exchanging and sharing diverse descriptive metadata about bibliographic resources? (2018) 0.05 
    0.046489805 = product of:
  0.09297961 = sum of:
    0.09297961 = product of:
      0.18595922 = sum of:
        0.18595922 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18595922 = score(doc=5165,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050545633 = queryNorm
            0.6343458 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Object
    BIBFRAME 2.0
  9. Balster, K.; Rendall, R.; Shrader, T.: Linked serial data : mapping the CONSER standard record to BIBFRAME (2018) 0.05 
    0.046489805 = product of:
  0.09297961 = sum of:
    0.09297961 = product of:
      0.18595922 = sum of:
        0.18595922 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 5174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18595922 = score(doc=5174,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050545633 = queryNorm
            0.6343458 = fieldWeight in 5174, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5174)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The CONSER BIBFRAME mapping project began in December 2015, and completed a mapping between the elements of the CONSER Standard Record and BIBFRAME 1.0. Subsequently, the group has converted that mapping to BIBFRAME 2.0, developed sample RDF serializations for each element, and is developing recommendations for PCC best practices. This article summarizes CONSER BIBFRAME mapping outcomes, describes Valerie Bross' contributions to the project, and presents topics for further consideration within the PCC: BIBFRAME development, and serials cataloging communities, including: changes to the description, literal vs. machine actionable data, enumeration and chronology information, modeling issues, and relationships.
    Object
    BIBFRAME 2.0
  10. Breeding, M.: Next-generation discovery : an overview of the European scene (2013) 0.04 
    0.037569433 = product of:
  0.07513887 = sum of:
    0.07513887 = product of:
      0.15027773 = sum of:
        0.15027773 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15027773 = score(doc=1478,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050545633 = queryNorm
            0.5126288 = fieldWeight in 1478, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1478)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Catalogue 2.0: the future of the library catalogue. Ed. by Sally Chambers
  11. Calhoun, K.: Supporting digital scholarship : bibliographic control, library co-operatives and open access repositories (2013) 0.03 
    0.032873254 = product of:
  0.06574651 = sum of:
    0.06574651 = product of:
      0.13149302 = sum of:
        0.13149302 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13149302 = score(doc=1482,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050545633 = queryNorm
            0.4485502 = fieldWeight in 1482, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1482)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Catalogue 2.0: the future of the library catalogue. Ed. by Sally Chambers
  12. Sandberg, J.; Jin, Q.: How should catalogers provide authority control for journal article authors? : Name identifiers in the linked data world (2016) 0.03 
    0.032873254 = product of:
  0.06574651 = sum of:
    0.06574651 = product of:
      0.13149302 = sum of:
        0.13149302 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 5138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13149302 = score(doc=5138,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050545633 = queryNorm
            0.4485502 = fieldWeight in 5138, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5138)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article suggests that catalogers can provide authority control for authors of journal articles by linking to external international authority databases. It explores the representation of article authors from three disciplines in four databases: International Standard Name Identifier (ISNI), Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID), Scopus, and Virtual International Authority File (VIAF). VIAF and Scopus are particularly promising databases for journal author names, but we believe that a combination of several name databases holds more promise than relying on a single database. We provide examples of RDF links between bibliographic description and author identifiers, including a partial BIBFRAME 2.0 description.
  13. Catalogue 2.0 : the future of the library catalogue (2013) 0.03 
    0.032536086 = product of:
  0.06507217 = sum of:
    0.06507217 = product of:
      0.13014434 = sum of:
        0.13014434 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13014434 = score(doc=1339,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050545633 = queryNorm
            0.4439496 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    LCSH
    Online library catalogs / Web 2.0 / Semantic Web
    Subject
    Online library catalogs / Web 2.0 / Semantic Web
  14. Christensen, A.: Next generation catalogues : what do users think? (2013) 0.03 
    0.028177075 = product of:
  0.05635415 = sum of:
    0.05635415 = product of:
      0.1127083 = sum of:
        0.1127083 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1127083 = score(doc=1476,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050545633 = queryNorm
            0.3844716 = fieldWeight in 1476, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1476)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Catalogue 2.0: the future of the library catalogue. Ed. by Sally Chambers
  15. Dempsey, L.: Thirteen ways of look at the libraries, discovery and the catalogue : scale, workflow, attention (2013) 0.02 
    0.023480896 = product of:
  0.04696179 = sum of:
    0.04696179 = product of:
      0.09392358 = sum of:
        0.09392358 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09392358 = score(doc=1483,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050545633 = queryNorm
            0.320393 = fieldWeight in 1483, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1483)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Catalogue 2.0: the future of the library catalogue. Ed. by Sally Chambers
  16. Dousa, T.M.: E. Wyndham Hulme's classification of the attributes of books : On an early model of a core bibliographical entity (2017) 0.02 
    0.018784717 = product of:
  0.037569433 = sum of:
    0.037569433 = product of:
      0.07513887 = sum of:
        0.07513887 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 3859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07513887 = score(doc=3859,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050545633 = queryNorm
            0.2563144 = fieldWeight in 3859, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3859)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Modelling bibliographical entities is a prominent activity within knowledge organization today. Current models of bibliographic entities, such as Functional Requirements for Bibliographical Records (FRBR) and the Bibliographic Framework (BIBFRAME), take inspiration from data - modelling methods developed by computer scientists from the mid - 1970s on. Thus, it would seem that the modelling of bibliographic entities is an activity of very recent vintage. However, it is possible to find examples of bibliographical models from earlier periods of knowledge organization. The purpose of this paper is to draw attention to one such model, outlined by the early 20th - century British classification theorist E. Wyndham Hulme in his essay on "Principles of Book Classification" (1911 - 1912). There, Hulme set forth a classification of various attributes by which books can conceivably be classified. These he first divided into accidental and inseparable attributes. Accidental attributes were subdivided into edition - level and copy - level attributes and inseparable attitudes, into physical and non - physical attributes. Comparison of Hulme's classification of attributes with those of FRBR and BIBFRAME 2.0 reveals that the different classes of attributes in Hulme's classification correspond to groups of attributes associated with different bibliographical entities in those models. These later models assume the existence of different bibliographic entities in an abstraction hierarchy among which attributes are distributed, whereas Hulme posited only a single entity - the book - , whose various aspects he clustered into different classes of attributes. Thus, Hulme's model offers an interesting alternative to current assumptions about how to conceptualize the relationship between attributes and entities in the bibliographical universe.
  17. Dousa, T.M.: E. Wyndham Hulme's classification of the attributes of books : on an early model of a core bibliographical entity (2017) 0.02 
    0.018784717 = product of:
  0.037569433 = sum of:
    0.037569433 = product of:
      0.07513887 = sum of:
        0.07513887 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07513887 = score(doc=4141,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050545633 = queryNorm
            0.2563144 = fieldWeight in 4141, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4141)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Modelling bibliographical entities is a prominent activity within knowledge organization today. Current models of bibliographic entities, such as Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and the Bibliographic Framework (BIBFRAME), take inspiration from data-modelling methods developed by computer scientists from the mid-1970s on. Thus, it would seem that the modelling of bibliographic entities is an activity of very recent vintage. However, it is possible to find examples of bibliographical models from earlier periods of knowledge organization. The purpose of this paper is to draw attention to one such model, outlined by the early twentiethcentury British classification theorist E. Wyndham Hulme in his essay on "Principles of Book Classification" (1911-1912). There, Hulme set forth a classification of various attributes by which books can be classified. These he first divided into "accidental" and "inseparable" attributes. Accidental attributes were subdivided into edition-level and copy-level attributes and inseparable attitudes, into "physical" and "non-physical" attributes. Comparison of Hulme's classification of attributes with those of FRBR and BIBFRAME 2.0 reveals that the different classes of attributes in Hulme's classification correspond to groups of attributes associated with different bibliographical entities in those models. These later models assume the existence of different bibliographic entities in an abstract hierarchy among which attributes are distributed, whereas Hulme posited only a single entity-the book-whose various aspects he clustered into different classes of attributes. Thus, Hulme's model offers an interesting alternative to current assumptions about how to conceptualize the relationship between attributes and entities in the bibliographical universe.
  18. AG KIM Gruppe Titeldaten DINI: Empfehlungen zur RDF-Repräsentation bibliografischer Daten (2014) 0.02 
    0.018784717 = product of:
  0.037569433 = sum of:
    0.037569433 = product of:
      0.07513887 = sum of:
        0.07513887 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07513887 = score(doc=4668,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050545633 = queryNorm
            0.2563144 = fieldWeight in 4668, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4668)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Enthält Übersicht der RDF-Elemente für die bibliografischen Relationen. Vgl.: urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-100217673. Version 2.0 unter: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-110-18452/2153.3-7 (vgl. Mail an Inetbib vom 08.01.2019). Webversion unter: https://wiki.dnb.de/x/cYMOB.
  19. Noruzi, A.: FRBR and Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships (2012) 0.01 
    0.01369647 = product of:
  0.02739294 = sum of:
    0.02739294 = product of:
      0.05478588 = sum of:
        0.05478588 = weight(_text_:22 in 4564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05478588 = score(doc=4564,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050545633 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4564, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4564)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:13:52
  20. Hamm, S.; Schneider, K.: Automatische Erschließung von Universitätsdissertationen (2015) 0.01 
    0.01369647 = product of:
  0.02739294 = sum of:
    0.02739294 = product of:
      0.05478588 = sum of:
        0.05478588 = weight(_text_:22 in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05478588 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050545633 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 27(2015) H.1, S.18-22

Authors

Languages

  • e 39
  • d 2
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 39
  • b 4
  • el 2
  • m 2
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications