Search (3958 results, page 2 of 198)

  1. Reiß, M.; Steffens, D.: Neue Medien im Dienste des Change Managements : Empirische Modellierung des Blending konventioneller und web-basierter Kommunikationsmedien (2008) 0.10 
    0.102531806 = product of:
  0.20506361 = sum of:
    0.20506361 = sum of:
      0.15027773 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15027773 = score(doc=766,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050545633 = queryNorm
          0.5126288 = fieldWeight in 766, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=766)
      0.05478588 = weight(_text_:22 in 766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05478588 = score(doc=766,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050545633 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 766, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=766)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Dass sich Kommunikation über einen Me­dienmix vollzieht, stellt schon seit sehr langer Zeit den Regelfall dar. In letzter Zeit wird verstärkt für Mischungen aus gegensätzlichen Medien plädiert, allen voran aus konventionellen und elektro­nischen Medien. Der Beitrag behandelt die Frage, nach welchen Mustern derar­tige hybride Kommunikationsmixe kon­struiert sind und wie deren Effektivität und Effizienz zu beurteilen sind. Die Beantwortung dieser Fragen erfolgt auf der Basis einer Expertenbefragung zum Einsatz von Web-2.0-Medien in Verände­rungsprozessen.
    Date
    22. 6.2008 16:55:24
  2. Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009) 0.10 
    0.102531806 = product of:
  0.20506361 = sum of:
    0.20506361 = sum of:
      0.15027773 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15027773 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050545633 = queryNorm
          0.5126288 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
      0.05478588 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05478588 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050545633 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Der Artikel betrachtet anhand einer Studie zum Benutzerverhalten bei der Online-Katalogrecherche den gegenwärtigen Stellenwert und das zukünftige Potential der Web-OPACs. Dabei werden zunächst die Ergebnisse einer quantitativen Logfile-Analyse sowie qualitativer Benutzertests erörtert, bevor aktuelle Entwicklungen der Webtechnologie, die unter den Schlagworten Web 2.0 und Web 3.0 propagiert werden, im Zusammenhang mit der Online-Recherche und der Entwicklung neuartiger Suchverfahren kurz diskutiert werden.
    Date
    22. 2.2009 18:50:43
  3. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.10 
    0.10082457 = sum of:
  0.080279864 = product of:
    0.24083959 = sum of:
      0.24083959 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.24083959 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.42852643 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050545633 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.020544706 = product of:
    0.04108941 = sum of:
      0.04108941 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04108941 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050545633 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  4. Degkwitz, A.: Bologna, University 2.0 : Akademisches Leben als Web-Version? (2008) 0.10 
    0.09964354 = product of:
  0.19928709 = sum of:
    0.19928709 = sum of:
      0.13149302 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13149302 = score(doc=1423,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050545633 = queryNorm
          0.4485502 = fieldWeight in 1423, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1423)
      0.06779408 = weight(_text_:22 in 1423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06779408 = score(doc=1423,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050545633 = queryNorm
          0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1423, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1423)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.2008 13:28:00
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 55(2008) H.1, S.18-22
  5. Schmolling, R.: Neue Kommunikationsformen mit den Bibliotheksbenutzern 2.0 der Universität : Integration von Bibliotheksinformationen und Schulungsangeboten in das Kursmanagementsystem Studip (2007) 0.10 
    0.09846081 = product of:
  0.19692162 = sum of:
    0.19692162 = sum of:
      0.16268043 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16268043 = score(doc=1279,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050545633 = queryNorm
          0.554937 = fieldWeight in 1279, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1279)
      0.034241177 = weight(_text_:22 in 1279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034241177 = score(doc=1279,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050545633 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1279, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1279)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Die Literatur- und Informationsbeschaffung der aktuellen Studierendengeneration erfolgt heute auf anderen Wegen als noch vor 10 Jahren. Ob im privaten Umfeld MyTube für Videoangebote im Internet, Google Earth für geographische Orientierungen, oder Wikipedia anstelle des Brockhaus, der Informationseinstieg läuft nicht mehr in Form der Konsultation eines Lehrbuchs oder Nachschlagewerkes aus der Bibliothek: "Benutzer warten heute nicht mehr darauf, die Grundsätze des Umgangs mit Informationen in der Bibliothek neu erklärt zu bekommen; hier sind neue, weniger "verschulte" Kommunikationswege gefragt." Unaufhaltsam ergreift der Web 2.0-Hype auch vom Studienalltag Besitz und führt zum Umbau etablierter Informations- und Kommunikationswege. Die neue Internetgemeinde setzt anstelle von medialer Berieselung auf aktives Mitmachen. Zum "Social Networking" gehört, dass "Siegfried Sorglos" seine Urlaubsfotos, seine Handy-Nummer, seine Hobbies für Freunde ins Netz stellt. Der Datenschutz zur Wahrung der Privatsphäre hat ausgedient. Informationen, auch über Persönliches, sind Public Domain. Man gruschelt Freunde und kommuniziert über SMS, ICQ oder Skype Termine und Verabredungen.
    700000 Studierende aus knapp 2000 Hochschulen in Deutschland zählte die 2005 gegründete Internetplattform StudiVZ im Oktober 2006, eine Nachnutzung des amerikanischen Facebook. StudiVZ lebt von der Vernetzung, man verlinkt auf der eigenen Homepage alle Freunde mit ebenfalls eigenem Auftritt in StudiVZ. Wer eine Reise ins Ausland plant, ermittelt in der Gemeinde die zu besuchenden In-Kneipen, sucht Mitfahrgelegenheiten, tauscht sich über den Impact-Faktor eigener Hochschulprofessoren aus. Zu unterschiedlichsten Themen gibt es derzeit 50.000 Foren. Die "Bibliothekare 2.0" waren bereits aktiv, zur Themengruppe "Bibliothek" gibt es im StudiVZ allein 15 Chatgruppen mit animierenden Titeln wie "Zweitwohnsitz Uni-Bibliothek", 52 Mitglieder, "Bibliotheksconnection Jena", 7 Mitglieder sowie die bibliothekarische Unterwelt: "Manager der leisesten Clubs der Welt: die Bibliothekare, 214 Mitglieder."
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 41(2007) H.1, S.22-33
  6. Ziegler, C.: Smartes Chaos : Web 2.0 versus Semantic Web (2006) 0.09 
    0.09392358 = product of:
  0.18784717 = sum of:
    0.18784717 = product of:
      0.37569433 = sum of:
        0.37569433 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37569433 = score(doc=4868,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050545633 = queryNorm
            1.281572 = fieldWeight in 4868, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4868)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Web 2.0 und Semantic Web schicken sich gleichermaßen an, dem klassischen WWW neuen Lebensatem einzuhauchen. Dabei könnte Web 2.0 sich zu genau dem entwickeln, was das Semantic Web sein wollte, nie wurde und womöglich niemals sein kann
    Object
    Web 2.0
  7. Maaß, C.; Pietsch, G.: Web 2.0 als Mythos, Symbol und Erwartung (2007) 0.09 
    0.09297961 = product of:
  0.18595922 = sum of:
    0.18595922 = product of:
      0.37191844 = sum of:
        0.37191844 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 5037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37191844 = score(doc=5037,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050545633 = queryNorm
            1.2686917 = fieldWeight in 5037, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5037)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Object
    Web 2.0
  8. Perez, M.: Web 2.0 im Einsatz für die Wissenschaft (2010) 0.09 
    0.09297961 = product of:
  0.18595922 = sum of:
    0.18595922 = product of:
      0.37191844 = sum of:
        0.37191844 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37191844 = score(doc=4848,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050545633 = queryNorm
            1.2686917 = fieldWeight in 4848, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4848)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In diesem Artikel geht es darum, was Web 2.0 für die Wissenschaft bedeutet und welchen Nutzen Web 2.0-Dienste für Wissenschaftler haben. Im Rahmen dieses Themas wird eine Studie vorgestellt, bei der Wissenschaftler unterschiedlicher Fachbereiche unter anderem gefragt wurden, welche Web 2.0-Dienste sie kennen und warum sie Web 2.0-Dienste nutzen. Nach einer kurzen Einleitung zu Web 2.0 und dem bisherigen Forschungsstand folgen die Ergebnisse der Studie, die zeigen werden, dass Web 2.0-Dienste bekannt sind und für private Zwecke und zur Unterhaltung genutzt werden, sie sich allerdings noch nicht als Werkzeuge für die Wissenschaft etabliert haben.
    Object
    Web 2.0
  9. Bettel, S.: Warum Web 2.0? Oder : Was vom Web 2.0 wirklich bleiben wird (2009) 0.09 
    0.09202594 = product of:
  0.18405189 = sum of:
    0.18405189 = product of:
      0.36810377 = sum of:
        0.36810377 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.36810377 = score(doc=4856,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050545633 = queryNorm
            1.255679 = fieldWeight in 4856, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4856)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Dieser Beitrag diskutiert die Entwicklungsgeschichte und den Facettenreichtum eines Begriffes, der gleichsam für technologische Innovation, soziale Modernisierung und eine schlaue Marketingstrategie steht. Es zeigt sich, dass die Verortung des Phänomens Web 2.0, gerade aufgrund der Polemik und Polarisierung, die der Begriff hervorgerufen hat, schwieriger ist, als man vermuten mag. Doch eines ist gewiss: Seit das Web 2.0 in unser Bewusstsein gelangt ist, ist das Internet wieder "in".
    Object
    Web 2.0
    Source
    Social Semantic Web: Web 2.0, was nun? Hrsg.: A. Blumauer u. T. Pellegrini
  10. Wesch, M.: Information R/evolution (2006) 0.09 
    0.08971533 = product of:
  0.17943066 = sum of:
    0.17943066 = sum of:
      0.13149302 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13149302 = score(doc=1267,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050545633 = queryNorm
          0.4485502 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
      0.047937647 = weight(_text_:22 in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047937647 = score(doc=1267,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050545633 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This video explores the changes in the way we find, store, create, critique, and share information. This video was created as a conversation starter, and works especially well when brainstorming with people about the near future and the skills needed in order to harness, evaluate, and create information effectively. Ein sehr schöner Kurzfilm von Michael Wesch, dem wir auch den Beitrag zu Web 2.0 (The Machine is Us/ing Us) verdanken (vor einiger Zeit hier besprochen), thematisiert die Veränderung der Handhabung von Information (insbesondere die Strukturierung und Ordnung, aber auch die Generierung und Speicherung), die auf ihre digitale Gestalt zurückzuführen ist. Kernaussage: Da die Informationen keine physikalischen Beschränkungen mehr unterworfen sind, wird die Ordnung der Informationen vielfältiger, flexibler und für jedermann einfacher zugänglich.
    Date
    5. 1.2008 19:22:48
  11. Warr, W.A.: Social software : fun and games, or business tools? (2009) 0.09 
    0.08971533 = product of:
  0.17943066 = sum of:
    0.17943066 = sum of:
      0.13149302 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 3663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13149302 = score(doc=3663,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050545633 = queryNorm
          0.4485502 = fieldWeight in 3663, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3663)
      0.047937647 = weight(_text_:22 in 3663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047937647 = score(doc=3663,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050545633 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3663, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3663)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This is the era of social networking, collective intelligence, participation, collaborative creation, and borderless distribution. Every day we are bombarded with more publicity about collaborative environments, news feeds, blogs, wikis, podcasting, webcasting, folksonomies, social bookmarking, social citations, collaborative filtering, recommender systems, media sharing, massive multiplayer online games, virtual worlds, and mash-ups. This sort of anarchic environment appeals to the digital natives, but which of these so-called 'Web 2.0' technologies are going to have a real business impact? This paper addresses the impact that issues such as quality control, security, privacy and bandwidth may have on the implementation of social networking in hide-bound, large organizations.
    Date
    8. 7.2010 19:24:22
  12. Gamperl, J.: AJAX : Web 2.0 in der Praxis ; [Grundlagen der Ajax-Programmierung, Ajax-Bibliotheken und APIs nutzen, direkt einsetzbare Praxisbeispiele im Buch und auf CD-ROM] (2002) 0.09 
    0.088835336 = product of:
  0.17767067 = sum of:
    0.17767067 = sum of:
      0.15027773 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 92) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15027773 = score(doc=92,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050545633 = queryNorm
          0.5126288 = fieldWeight in 92, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=92)
      0.02739294 = weight(_text_:22 in 92) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02739294 = score(doc=92,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050545633 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 92, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=92)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Online-Mitteilungen 2006, Nr.87, S.21-22 (M. Buzinkay):"Web 2.0 ist in aller Munde, Social Software und interaktive Web-Anwendungen boomen. Welche Technologie steckt dahinter, und wie lässt sich diese für individuelle Zwecke einsetzen? Diese Frage beantwortet Johannes Gamperl in "AJAX. Web 2.0 in der Praxis", weiches im Galileo Verlag erschienen ist. Das Zauberwort hinter Web 2.0 heißt AJAX. AJAX heißt "asynchron javascript and xml" und deutet an, woraus diese neue Programmier-Technik besteht: aus bereits vorhandenen und gut eingeführten Sprachen wie JavaScript und XML. Die Grundlagen sind nicht neu, doch die kreative Art ihrer Verwendung macht sie zur Zukunftstechnologie im Web schlechthin. Mit AJAX lassen sich Daten im Hintergrund und ohne ein neuerliches Laden einer Webseite übertragen. Das hat wesentliche Vorteile, denn so können Webseiten fortlaufend und interaktiv aktualisiert werden. Die Hauptbestandteile von AJAX sind neben XML und Javascript noch Cascading Style Sheets, das Document Object Model und XHTML. Das Buch vermittelt auf rund 400 Seiten Einblicke in die fortgeschrittene JavaScript Programmierung im Hinblick auf AJAX und das Web. Schritt für Schritt werden Beispiele aufgebaut, Techniken erläutert und eigene Kreationen gefördert. Allerdings ist das Buch kein Einsteigerbuch. Es wendet sich dezidiert an Programmierer, die über entsprechende Erfahrung mit JavaScript und XML verfügen. Die Kernthemen des Buches beinhalten - die Grundlagen des Document Object Model - die dynamische Bearbeitung von StyleSheet Angaben - den Zugriff auf XML-Daten über JavaScript - die Einführung in die Client/Server-Kommunikation - diverse JavaScript Bibliotheken Ergänzt werden diese Themen durch eine Reihe von Anwendungsbeispielen, die übersichtlich entwickelt und beschrieben werden. Eine CD mit dem Code liegt dem Buch bei. Weitere Unterstützung bieten diverse WebQuellen des Verlags und des Autors. Bekannte Beispiele für in AJAX programmierte Anwendungen sind Google Maps und Yahoo! Maps. Diese interaktiven Landkarten ermöglichen ein Heranzoomen, ein Sich-Bewegen auf Landkarten über Geo-Positioning; Satellitenbilder können eingeblendet werden. Über eine Schnittstelle (API) können externe Entwickler weitere Anwendungen auf Basis dieser Karten entwickeln, so z.B. ein Tankstellen-Netz mit den aktuellen Spritpreisen oder nutzergenerierten Reiserouten inklusive Entfernungsmessung."
  13. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.08 
    0.08402048 = sum of:
  0.06689989 = product of:
    0.20069966 = sum of:
      0.20069966 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.20069966 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.42852643 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050545633 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.017120589 = product of:
    0.034241177 = sum of:
      0.034241177 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034241177 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050545633 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  14. Srinivasan, R.; Boast, R.; Becvar, K.M.; Furner, J.: Blobgects : digital museum catalogs and diverse user communities (2009) 0.08 
    0.0835346 = product of:
  0.1670692 = sum of:
    0.1670692 = sum of:
      0.13282801 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13282801 = score(doc=2754,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050545633 = queryNorm
          0.45310414 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
      0.034241177 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034241177 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050545633 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article presents an exploratory study of Blobgects, an experimental interface for an online museum catalog that enables social tagging and blogging activity around a set of cultural heritage objects held by a preeminent museum of anthropology and archaeology. This study attempts to understand not just whether social tagging and commenting about these objects is useful but rather whose tags and voices matter in presenting different expert perspectives around digital museum objects. Based on an empirical comparison between two different user groups (Canadian Inuit high-school students and museum studies students in the United States), we found that merely adding the ability to tag and comment to the museum's catalog does not sufficiently allow users to learn about or engage with the objects represented by catalog entries. Rather, the specialist language of the catalog provides too little contextualization for users to enter into the sort of dialog that proponents of Web 2.0 technologies promise. Overall, we propose a more nuanced application of Web 2.0 technologies within museums - one which provides a contextual basis that gives users a starting point for engagement and permits users to make sense of objects in relation to their own needs, uses, and understandings.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:52:32
  15. Tang, K.-H.; Tsai, L.-C.; Hwang, S.-L.: ¬The development and validation of a one-bit comparison for evaluating the maturity of tag distributions in a Web 2.0 environment (2016) 0.08 
    0.0835346 = product of:
  0.1670692 = sum of:
    0.1670692 = sum of:
      0.13282801 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13282801 = score(doc=2934,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050545633 = queryNorm
          0.45310414 = fieldWeight in 2934, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2934)
      0.034241177 = weight(_text_:22 in 2934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034241177 = score(doc=2934,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050545633 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2934, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2934)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Tags generated by domain experts reaching a consensus under social influence reflect the core concepts of the tagged resource. Such tags can act as navigational cues that enable users to discover meaningful and relevant information in a Web 2.0 environment. This is particularly critical for nonexperts for understanding formal academic or scientific resources, also known as hard content. The goal of this study was to develop a novel one-bit comparison (OBC) metric and to assess in what circumstances a set of tags describing a hard-content resource is mature and representative. We compared OBC with the conventional Shannon entropy approach to determine performance when distinguishing tags generated by domain experts and nonexperts in the early and later stages under social influence. The results indicated that OBC can accurately distinguish mature tags generated by a strong expert consensus from other tags, and outperform Shannon entropy. The findings support tag-based learning, and provide insights and tools for the design of applications involving tags, such as tag recommendation and tag-based organization.
    Date
    7. 5.2016 20:13:22
  16. Dalip, D.H.; Gonçalves, M.A.; Cristo, M.; Calado, P.: ¬A general multiview framework for assessing the quality of collaboratively created content on web 2.0 (2017) 0.08 
    0.0835346 = product of:
  0.1670692 = sum of:
    0.1670692 = sum of:
      0.13282801 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 3343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13282801 = score(doc=3343,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050545633 = queryNorm
          0.45310414 = fieldWeight in 3343, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3343)
      0.034241177 = weight(_text_:22 in 3343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034241177 = score(doc=3343,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050545633 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3343, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3343)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    16.11.2017 13:04:22
    Object
    Web 2.0
  17. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.08 
    0.080279864 = product of:
  0.16055973 = sum of:
    0.16055973 = product of:
      0.48167917 = sum of:
        0.48167917 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.48167917 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42852643 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050545633 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  18. DIALOG announces DialogSelect 2.0 (1998) 0.08 
    0.07969681 = product of:
  0.15939362 = sum of:
    0.15939362 = product of:
      0.31878725 = sum of:
        0.31878725 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 25) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31878725 = score(doc=25,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050545633 = queryNorm
            1.08745 = fieldWeight in 25, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=25)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The DIALOG Coorporation, CA, have annonced DialogSelect 2.0, a WWW based, guided search service with access to over 300 of the most popular DIALOG databases
  19. Joint, N.: ¬The Web 2.0 challenge to libraries (2009) 0.08 
    0.07787733 = product of:
  0.15575466 = sum of:
    0.15575466 = product of:
      0.3115093 = sum of:
        0.3115093 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3115093 = score(doc=2959,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050545633 = queryNorm
            1.0626235 = fieldWeight in 2959, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2959)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to illustrate issues surrounding Web 2.0 technologies and their relevance to libraries by general discussion and examples from library practice. Design/methodology/approach - A broad narrative account of Web 2.0 developments combined with illustrations of how one library in particular reacted to these developments. Findings - It was found that all libraries need to evolve a Web 2.0 strategy to promote this aspect of their services, but that they will need to devise solutions to specific problems as part of this strategy. These include the range of Web 2.0 platforms that are on offer and the authentication and workload issues associated with this diversity. A single, unified library system-based approach to Web 2.0 is offered as a viable alternative to using disparate external services. Research limitations/implications - This paper does not resolve the difference between a multi-platform Web 2.0 strategy and the single, unified library system-based approach, although a preference for the systems-based approach is suggested. The relative strengths and weaknesses of these two approaches is worthy of further research. Practical implications - At the level of practice, this viewpoint article offers two alternative Web 2.0 strategies which can be applied quite readily in everyday library work. Originality/value - This paper tries to offer a clear range of options for librarians interested in pursuing Web 2.0 services, facilitating successful service enhancement in the working library.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Special Issue: Web 2.0 and gaming in libraries
    Object
    Web 2.0
  20. Méndez, E.; López, L.M.; Siches, A.; Bravo, A.G.: DCMF: DC & Microformats, a good marriage (2008) 0.08 
    0.07689886 = product of:
  0.15379772 = sum of:
    0.15379772 = sum of:
      0.1127083 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1127083 = score(doc=2634,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.29315117 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050545633 = queryNorm
          0.3844716 = fieldWeight in 2634, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2634)
      0.04108941 = weight(_text_:22 in 2634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04108941 = score(doc=2634,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17700219 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050545633 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2634, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2634)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This report introduces the Dublin Core Microformats (DCMF) project, a new way to use the DC element set within X/HTML. The DC microformats encode explicit semantic expressions in an X/HTML webpage, by using a specific list of terms for values of the attributes "rev" and "rel" for <a> and <link> elements, and "class" and "id" of other elements. Microformats can be easily processed by user agents and software, enabling a high level of interoperability. These characteristics are crucial for the growing number of social applications allowing users to participate in the Web 2.0 environment as information creators and consumers. This report reviews the origins of microformats; illustrates the coding of DC microformats using the Dublin Core Metadata Gen tool, and a Firefox extension for extraction and visualization; and discusses the benefits of creating Web services utilizing DC microformats.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 3267
  • m 407
  • el 189
  • s 154
  • x 40
  • b 39
  • i 27
  • r 19
  • ? 8
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • n 3
  • h 2
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • l 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications