Search (1523 results, page 1 of 77)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Bloss, M.E.: Testing RDA at Dominican University's Graduate School of Library and Information Science : the students' perspectives (2011) 0.08
    0.080048636 = product of:
      0.120072946 = sum of:
        0.022069903 = weight(_text_:of in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022069903 = score(doc=1899,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
        0.098003045 = sum of:
          0.04850743 = weight(_text_:science in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04850743 = score(doc=1899,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.35285735 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
          0.049495615 = weight(_text_:22 in 1899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049495615 = score(doc=1899,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1899, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1899)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Dominican University's Graduate School of Library and Information Science (GSLIS) was one of a funnel group of graduate schools of library and information science selected to test RDA. A seminar specifically for this purpose was conducted from August to December 2010. Fifteen students participated in the test, creating records in AACR2 and in RDA, encoding them in the MARC format, and responding to the required questionnaires. In addition to record creation, the students were also asked to submit a final paper in which they described their experiences and recommended whether or not to accept RDA as a replacement for AACR2.
    Date
    25. 5.2015 18:36:22
  2. Park, J.-r.; Lu, C.; Marion, L.: Cataloging professionals in the digital environment : a content analysis of job descriptions (2009) 0.07
    0.07045275 = product of:
      0.10567912 = sum of:
        0.029306183 = weight(_text_:of in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029306183 = score(doc=2766,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
        0.07637294 = sum of:
          0.033948127 = weight(_text_:science in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033948127 = score(doc=2766,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
          0.042424813 = weight(_text_:22 in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042424813 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This study assesses the current state of responsibilities and skill sets required of cataloging professionals. It identifies emerging roles and competencies focusing on the digital environment and relates these to the established knowledge of traditional cataloging standards and practices. We conducted a content analysis of 349 job descriptions advertised in AutoCAT in 2005-2006. Multivariate techniques of cluster and multidimensional-scaling analyses were applied to the data. Analysis of job titles, required and preferred qualifications/skills, and responsibilities lends perspective to the roles that cataloging professionals play in the digital environment. Technological advances increasingly demand knowledge and skills related to electronic resource management, metadata creation, and computer and Web applications. Emerging knowledge and skill sets are increasingly being integrated into the core technical aspects of cataloging such as bibliographic and authority control and integrated library-system management. Management of cataloging functions is also in high demand. The results of the study provide insight on current and future curriculum design of library and information-science programs.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:20:24
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.844-857
  3. Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005) 0.07
    0.06968352 = product of:
      0.10452528 = sum of:
        0.015952265 = weight(_text_:of in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015952265 = score(doc=126,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
        0.088573016 = sum of:
          0.0320066 = weight(_text_:science in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0320066 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
          0.056566417 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056566417 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    As libraries attempt to incorporate increasing amounts of electronic resources into their catalogs, utilizing a growing variety of metadata standards, library and information science programs are grappling with how to educate catalogers to meet these challenges. In this paper, an employer considers the characteristics and skills that catalogers will need and how they might acquire them.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. Snow, K.; Hoffman, G.L.: What makes an effective cataloging course? : a study of the factors that promote learning (2015) 0.07
    0.06907657 = product of:
      0.10361485 = sum of:
        0.026113462 = weight(_text_:of in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026113462 = score(doc=2609,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
        0.07750139 = sum of:
          0.028005775 = weight(_text_:science in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028005775 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
          0.049495615 = weight(_text_:22 in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049495615 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents the results of a research study, a survey of library and information science master's degree holders who have taken a beginning cataloging course, to identify the elements of a beginning cataloging course that help students to learn cataloging concepts and skills. The results suggest that cataloging practice (the hands-on creation of bibliographic records or catalog cards), the effectiveness of the instructor, a balance of theory and practice, and placing cataloging in a real-world context contribute to effective learning. However, more research is needed to determine how, and to what the extent, each element should be incorporated into beginning cataloging courses.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Aalberg, T.; Haugen, F.B.; Husby, O.: ¬A Tool for Converting from MARC to FRBR (2006) 0.06
    0.06482754 = product of:
      0.097241305 = sum of:
        0.01973992 = weight(_text_:of in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01973992 = score(doc=2425,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
        0.07750139 = sum of:
          0.028005775 = weight(_text_:science in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028005775 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
          0.049495615 = weight(_text_:22 in 2425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049495615 = score(doc=2425,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2425, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2425)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The FRBR model is by many considered to be an important contribution to the next generation of bibliographic catalogues, but a major challenge for the library community is how to use this model on already existing MARC-based bibliographic catalogues. This problem requires a solution for the interpretation and conversion of MARC records, and a tool for this kind of conversion is developed as a part of the Norwegian BIBSYS FRBR project. The tool is based on a systematic approach to the interpretation and conversion process and is designed to be adaptable to the rules applied in different catalogues.
    Series
    Lecture notes in computer science; vol.4172
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  6. D'Angelo, C.A.; Giuffrida, C.; Abramo, G.: ¬A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments (2011) 0.06
    0.06382397 = product of:
      0.095735945 = sum of:
        0.029306183 = weight(_text_:of in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029306183 = score(doc=4190,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
        0.066429764 = sum of:
          0.02400495 = weight(_text_:science in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02400495 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
          0.042424813 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042424813 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    National exercises for the evaluation of research activity by universities are becoming regular practice in ever more countries. These exercises have mainly been conducted through the application of peer-review methods. Bibliometrics has not been able to offer a valid large-scale alternative because of almost overwhelming difficulties in identifying the true author of each publication. We will address this problem by presenting a heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometric datasets for large-scale research assessments. The application proposed concerns the Italian university system, comprising 80 universities and a research staff of over 60,000 scientists. The key advantage of the proposed approach is the ease of implementation. The algorithms are of practical application and have considerably better scalability and expandability properties than state-of-the-art unsupervised approaches. Moreover, the performance in terms of precision and recall, which can be further improved, seems thoroughly adequate for the typical needs of large-scale bibliometric research assessments.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:06:52
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.257-269
  7. O'Neill, E.; Zumer, M.; Mixter, J.: FRBR aggregates : their types and frequency in library collections (2015) 0.06
    0.0629922 = product of:
      0.0944883 = sum of:
        0.028058534 = weight(_text_:of in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028058534 = score(doc=2610,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.34381276 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
        0.066429764 = sum of:
          0.02400495 = weight(_text_:science in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02400495 = score(doc=2610,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
          0.042424813 = weight(_text_:22 in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042424813 = score(doc=2610,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Aggregates have been a frequent topic of discussion between library science researchers. This study seeks to better understand aggregates through the analysis of a sample of bibliographic records and review of the cataloging treatment of aggregates. The study focuses on determining how common aggregates are in library collections, what types of aggregates exist, how aggregates are described in bibliographic records, and the criteria for identifying aggregates from the information in bibliographic records. A sample of bibliographic records representing textual resources was taken from OCLC's WorldCat database. More than 20 percent of the sampled records represented aggregates and more works were embodied in aggregates than were embodied in single work manifestations. A variety of issues, including cataloging practices and the varying definitions of aggregates, made it difficult to accurately identify and quantify the presence of aggregates using only the information from bibliographic records.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  8. Devaul, H.; Diekema, A.R.; Ostwald, J.: Computer-assisted assignment of educational standards using natural language processing (2011) 0.06
    0.05920849 = product of:
      0.08881273 = sum of:
        0.022382967 = weight(_text_:of in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022382967 = score(doc=4199,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
        0.066429764 = sum of:
          0.02400495 = weight(_text_:science in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02400495 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
          0.042424813 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042424813 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Educational standards are a central focus of the current educational system in the United States, underpinning educational practice, curriculum design, teacher professional development, and high-stakes testing and assessment. Digital library users have requested that this information be accessible in association with digital learning resources to support teaching and learning as well as accountability requirements. Providing this information is complex because of the variability and number of standards documents in use at the national, state, and local level. This article describes a cataloging tool that aids catalogers in the assignment of standards metadata to digital library resources, using natural language processing techniques. The research explores whether the standards suggestor service would suggest the same standards as a human, whether relevant standards are ranked appropriately in the result set, and whether the relevance of the suggested assignments improve when, in addition to resource content, metadata is included in the query to the cataloging tool. The article also discusses how this service might streamline the cataloging workflow.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:25:32
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.395-405
  9. Das, S.; Paik, J.H.: Gender tagging of named entities using retrieval-assisted multi-context aggregation : an unsupervised approach (2023) 0.06
    0.058101576 = product of:
      0.08715236 = sum of:
        0.020722598 = weight(_text_:of in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020722598 = score(doc=941,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
        0.066429764 = sum of:
          0.02400495 = weight(_text_:science in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02400495 = score(doc=941,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
          0.042424813 = weight(_text_:22 in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042424813 = score(doc=941,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Inferring the gender of named entities present in a text has several practical applications in information sciences. Existing approaches toward name gender identification rely exclusively on using the gender distributions from labeled data. In the absence of such labeled data, these methods fail. In this article, we propose a two-stage model that is able to infer the gender of names present in text without requiring explicit name-gender labels. We use coreference resolution as the backbone for our proposed model. To aid coreference resolution where the existing contextual information does not suffice, we use a retrieval-assisted context aggregation framework. We demonstrate that state-of-the-art name gender inference is possible without supervision. Our proposed method matches or outperforms several supervised approaches and commercially used methods on five English language datasets from different domains.
    Date
    22. 3.2023 12:00:14
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.4, S.461-475
  10. Hsieh-Yee, I.: Cataloging and metatdata education in North American LIS programs (2004) 0.05
    0.054491144 = product of:
      0.08173671 = sum of:
        0.02637858 = weight(_text_:of in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02637858 = score(doc=138,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.32322758 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
        0.055358134 = sum of:
          0.020004123 = weight(_text_:science in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.020004123 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
          0.03535401 = weight(_text_:22 in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03535401 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents findings of a survey an the state of cataloging and metadata education. in ALA-accredited library and information science progranis in North America. The survey was conducted in response to Action Item 5.1 of the "Bibliographic Control of Web Resources: A Library of Congress Action Plan," which focuses an providing metadata education to new LIS professionals. The study found LIS programs increased their reliance an introductory courses to cover cataloging and metadata, but fewer programs than before had a cataloging course requirement. The knowledge of cataloging delivered in introductory courses was basic, and the coverage of metadata was limited to an overview. Cataloging courses showed similarity in coverage and practice and focused an print mater!als. Few cataloging educators provided exercises in metadata record creation using non-AACR standards. Advanced cataloging courses provided in-depth coverage of subject cataloging and the cataloging of nonbook resources, but offered very limited coverage of metadata. Few programs offered full courses an metadata, and even fewer offered advanced metadata courses. Metadata topics were well integrated into LIS curricula, but coverage of metadata courses varied from program to program, depending an the interests of instructors. Educators were forward-looking and agreed an the inclusion of specific knowledge and skills in metadata instruction. A series of actions were proposed to assist educators in providing students with competencies in cataloging and metadata.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. Madison, O.M:A.: ¬The role of the name main-entry heading in the online environment (1992) 0.05
    0.052750885 = product of:
      0.07912633 = sum of:
        0.02255991 = weight(_text_:of in 4397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02255991 = score(doc=4397,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 4397, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4397)
        0.056566417 = product of:
          0.113132834 = sum of:
            0.113132834 = weight(_text_:22 in 4397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.113132834 = score(doc=4397,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4397, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4397)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Serials librarian. 22(1992), S.371-391
  12. Kim, J.(im); Kim, J.(enna): Effect of forename string on author name disambiguation (2020) 0.05
    0.051768064 = product of:
      0.0776521 = sum of:
        0.022293966 = weight(_text_:of in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022293966 = score(doc=5930,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.27317715 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
        0.055358134 = sum of:
          0.020004123 = weight(_text_:science in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.020004123 = score(doc=5930,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
          0.03535401 = weight(_text_:22 in 5930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03535401 = score(doc=5930,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5930, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5930)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In author name disambiguation, author forenames are used to decide which name instances are disambiguated together and how much they are likely to refer to the same author. Despite such a crucial role of forenames, their effect on the performance of heuristic (string matching) and algorithmic disambiguation is not well understood. This study assesses the contributions of forenames in author name disambiguation using multiple labeled data sets under varying ratios and lengths of full forenames, reflecting real-world scenarios in which an author is represented by forename variants (synonym) and some authors share the same forenames (homonym). The results show that increasing the ratios of full forenames substantially improves both heuristic and machine-learning-based disambiguation. Performance gains by algorithmic disambiguation are pronounced when many forenames are initialized or homonyms are prevalent. As the ratios of full forenames increase, however, they become marginal compared to those by string matching. Using a small portion of forename strings does not reduce much the performances of both heuristic and algorithmic disambiguation methods compared to using full-length strings. These findings provide practical suggestions, such as restoring initialized forenames into a full-string format via record linkage for improved disambiguation performances.
    Date
    11. 7.2020 13:22:58
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.7, S.839-855
  13. Mönch, C.; Aalberg, T.: Automatic conversion from MARC to FRBR (2003) 0.05
    0.04841798 = product of:
      0.07262697 = sum of:
        0.017268835 = weight(_text_:of in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017268835 = score(doc=2422,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.21160212 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
        0.055358134 = sum of:
          0.020004123 = weight(_text_:science in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.020004123 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
          0.03535401 = weight(_text_:22 in 2422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03535401 = score(doc=2422,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2422, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2422)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogs have for centuries been the main tool that enabled users to search for items in a library by author, title, or subject. A catalog can be interpreted as a set of bibliographic records, where each record acts as a surrogate for a publication. Every record describes a specific publication and contains the data that is used to create the indexes of search systems and the information that is presented to the user. Bibliographic records are often captured and exchanged by the use of the MARC format. Although there are numerous rdquodialectsrdquo of the MARC format in use, they are usually crafted on the same basis and are interoperable with each other -to a certain extent. The data model of a MARC-based catalog, however, is rdquo[...] extremely non-normalized with excessive replication of datardquo [1]. For instance, a literary work that exists in numerous editions and translations is likely to yield a large result set because each edition or translation is represented by an individual record, that is unrelated to other records that describe the same work.
    Series
    Lecture notes in computer science; vol.2769
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
  14. Savoy, J.: Estimating the probability of an authorship attribution (2016) 0.05
    0.04841798 = product of:
      0.07262697 = sum of:
        0.017268835 = weight(_text_:of in 2937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017268835 = score(doc=2937,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.21160212 = fieldWeight in 2937, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2937)
        0.055358134 = sum of:
          0.020004123 = weight(_text_:science in 2937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.020004123 = score(doc=2937,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 2937, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2937)
          0.03535401 = weight(_text_:22 in 2937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03535401 = score(doc=2937,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2937, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2937)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In authorship attribution, various distance-based metrics have been proposed to determine the most probable author of a disputed text. In this paradigm, a distance is computed between each author profile and the query text. These values are then employed only to rank the possible authors. In this article, we analyze their distribution and show that we can model it as a mixture of 2 Beta distributions. Based on this finding, we demonstrate how we can derive a more accurate probability that the closest author is, in fact, the real author. To evaluate this approach, we have chosen 4 authorship attribution methods (Burrows' Delta, Kullback-Leibler divergence, Labbé's intertextual distance, and the naïve Bayes). As the first test collection, we have downloaded 224 State of the Union addresses (from 1790 to 2014) delivered by 41 U.S. presidents. The second test collection is formed by the Federalist Papers. The evaluations indicate that the accuracy rate of some authorship decisions can be improved. The suggested method can signal that the proposed assignment should be interpreted as possible, without strong certainty. Being able to quantify the certainty associated with an authorship decision can be a useful component when important decisions must be taken.
    Date
    7. 5.2016 21:22:27
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.6, S.1462-1472
  15. Zhang, L.; Lu, W.; Yang, J.: LAGOS-AND : a large gold standard dataset for scholarly author name disambiguation (2023) 0.05
    0.0474149 = product of:
      0.07112235 = sum of:
        0.015764216 = weight(_text_:of in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015764216 = score(doc=883,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.19316542 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
        0.055358134 = sum of:
          0.020004123 = weight(_text_:science in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.020004123 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
          0.03535401 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03535401 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, we present a method to automatically build large labeled datasets for the author ambiguity problem in the academic world by leveraging the authoritative academic resources, ORCID and DOI. Using the method, we built LAGOS-AND, two large, gold-standard sub-datasets for author name disambiguation (AND), of which LAGOS-AND-BLOCK is created for clustering-based AND research and LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE is created for classification-based AND research. Our LAGOS-AND datasets are substantially different from the existing ones. The initial versions of the datasets (v1.0, released in February 2021) include 7.5 M citations authored by 798 K unique authors (LAGOS-AND-BLOCK) and close to 1 M instances (LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE). And both datasets show close similarities to the whole Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG) across validations of six facets. In building the datasets, we reveal the variation degrees of last names in three literature databases, PubMed, MAG, and Semantic Scholar, by comparing author names hosted to the authors' official last names shown on the ORCID pages. Furthermore, we evaluate several baseline disambiguation methods as well as the MAG's author IDs system on our datasets, and the evaluation helps identify several interesting findings. We hope the datasets and findings will bring new insights for future studies. The code and datasets are publicly available.
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:40:36
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.2, S.168-185
  16. Viswanathan, C.G.: Cataloguing:theory & practice (2007) 0.05
    0.046114635 = product of:
      0.06917195 = sum of:
        0.03042126 = weight(_text_:of in 1475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03042126 = score(doc=1475,freq=76.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.37276423 = fieldWeight in 1475, product of:
              8.717798 = tf(freq=76.0), with freq of:
                76.0 = termFreq=76.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1475)
        0.038750693 = sum of:
          0.0140028875 = weight(_text_:science in 1475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0140028875 = score(doc=1475,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.101861134 = fieldWeight in 1475, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1475)
          0.024747808 = weight(_text_:22 in 1475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024747808 = score(doc=1475,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1475, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1475)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Most Likely, this revision of Cataloguing Theory and Practice 6th Edition by Professor C.G. Viswanathan has the distinction of commanding continued use since 1954, both in India and abroad . Besides providing a comprehensive and balanced perspective of library catalogues from Collimates to AACR-2 1988 revision, enabling students and the faculty of library and information science at universities, and practicing cataloguers towards rationalization, the work projects an analysis of pros and cons of continuing the cataloguing procedures and techniques and maintaining it in the traditional form of cards filed in cabinet or to adopt the MARC techniques, and computerise it online with the advanced countries of the West. The impact of computerisation on the users, library staff and library administration with regard to its cost effectiveness has been discussed. Two new chapters. Computerised Catalogue (chapter-8) and Headings for Name Entries (Chapter-26) according to AACR2, 1988 revision has been added. The data and been brought to date. A brief account of the British Library's Cataloguing Conversion Project of the British Museum's General Catalogue to Machine Readable From presents an exciting experience. The Library of Congress MARC System has also been given due consideration. The select working bibliography of a cataloguer has also been revised. he order of the chapters has been, as in previous editions, retained. It is expected that the sixth edition of Cataloguing Theory and Practice' would command the same respect of the author's colleagues, as justify its value as an unfailing companion in all cataloguing assignments.
    Content
    Inhalt: 1. Library Catalogue : Its Nature, Factions, and Importance in a Library System 2. History of Modern Library Catalogues 3. Catalogue Codes: Origin, Growth and Development 4. Principles of Planning and Provision of the Library Catalogue 5.Catalogue Entries and their Functions in Achieving the Objectives of the Library Catalogue 6.Descriptive Cataloguing 7. Physical Forms of the Catalogue-I Manual Catalogues 8. Physical Forms of the Catalogues-II Computerised Cataloges 9. Varieties of Catalogues, their Scope and Functions 10. Subject Cataloguing 11. Cataloguing Department: Organization and Administration. 12. Cost Analysis of Cataloguing Procedures and Suggested Economies 13. Co-operation and Centralization in Cataloguing 14. Union Catalogues and Subject Specialisation 15. Cataloguing of Special Material 16. Arrangement, Filing, Guiding of catalogue and Instructions for its Use 17. Education and Training of Cataloguers 18.Documentation : An Extension of Cataloguing and Classification Applied to Isolates 19.Catalogue Cards, Their Style and Reproduction Methods 20. Work of Personal Authors 21. Choice and Entry of Personal Names 22. Works of Corporate Authors 23. Legal Publications 24. Choice of Headings for Corporate Bodies 25. Works of Unknown Authorship : Entry under Uniform Titles 26. Acces Points to Books and Meta- Books by A-ACR2 27. AACR2 1988 revision : Choice of Access Points to Name Headings and Uniform Titles 28. Added Entries Other Than Subject Entries 29. Subject Entries 30. Analytiacal Entries 31. Series Note and Series Entry 32. Contents, Notes and Annotation 33. References 34. Display of Entries Appendix-I Select Aids and Guides for the Cataloguer Appendix-II Definitions of Terms Commonly used in Cataloguing Appendix-III Cataloguing Examination: Select Questions Appendix-IV Implications of the adoption of A-ACR2
  17. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.05
    0.045085754 = product of:
      0.06762863 = sum of:
        0.027630134 = weight(_text_:of in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027630134 = score(doc=2845,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
        0.039998498 = product of:
          0.079996996 = sum of:
            0.079996996 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.079996996 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The current library bibliographic infrastructure was constructed in the early days of computers - before the Web, XML, and a variety of other technological advances that now offer new opportunities. General requirements of a modern metadata infrastructure for libraries are identified, including such qualities as versatility, extensibility, granularity, and openness. A new kind of metadata infrastructure is then proposed that exhibits at least some of those qualities. Some key challenges that must be overcome to implement a change of this magnitude are identified.
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  18. Patterson, E.L.: ¬The bibliographic control of microforms (1992) 0.04
    0.04260742 = product of:
      0.063911125 = sum of:
        0.03190453 = weight(_text_:of in 1285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03190453 = score(doc=1285,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 1285, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1285)
        0.0320066 = product of:
          0.0640132 = sum of:
            0.0640132 = weight(_text_:science in 1285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0640132 = score(doc=1285,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 1285, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1285)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.50, [=Suppl.13]
  19. Education for library cataloging : international perspectives (2006) 0.04
    0.041143358 = product of:
      0.061715037 = sum of:
        0.022570923 = weight(_text_:of in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022570923 = score(doc=207,freq=82.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.2765708 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
              9.055386 = tf(freq=82.0), with freq of:
                82.0 = termFreq=82.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
        0.039144114 = sum of:
          0.014145052 = weight(_text_:science in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.014145052 = score(doc=207,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.10289528 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
          0.02499906 = weight(_text_:22 in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02499906 = score(doc=207,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Classification
    025.3/071 22
    Content
    Inhalt: Education and training for cataloguing at the University of Botswana Library : an overview / Rose Tiny Kgosiemang -- The relevance of cataloguing in library science curriculum in Cross River State of Nigeria in this technological age / J.I. Iwe -- The education and training of cataloguing students in South Africa through distance education / Linda M. Cloete -- Education of cataloging and classification in China / Zhanghua Ma -- The status quo and future development of cataloging and classification education in China / Li Si -- Education for knowledge organization : the Indian scene / K.S. Raghavan -- Current status of cataloging and classification education in Japan / Shoichi Taniguchi -- A study on the job training and self-training of the cataloging and classification librarians working in South Korean academic libraries / Chul-Wan Kwak -- Beyond our expectations : a review of an independent learning module in descriptive cataloguing at the Queensland University of for cataloguing and classification in Australia / Ross Harvey, Susan Reynolds -- Education for cataloging and classification in Austria and Germany / Monika Münnich, Heidi Zotter-Straka, Petra Hauke -- Education and training on studies and professional librarianship schools / Anna Sitarska -- Cataloging education on the sunny side of the Alps / Jerry D. Saye, Alenka ^Sauperl -- Education for cataloging in Spanish universities : a descriptive and López-Cózar -- Education and training for cataloguing and classification in the British Isles / J.H. Bowman -- The teaching of information processing in the University of Buenos Aires, Argentina / Elsa E. Barber, Silvia L. Pisano -- Education for cataloging and classification in Mexico / Filiberto Felipe Martínez Arellano -- Education for cataloging and related areas in Peru / Ana María Talavera Ibarra -- Cataloging and classification education in Egypt : stressing the fundamentals while moving toward automated applications / Mohammed Fat'hy Abdel Hady, Ali Kamal Shaker -- An account of cataloging and classification education in Iranian universities / Mortaza Kokabi -- Cataloging instruction in Israel / Snunith Shoham -- Continuing education for catalogers in Saudi Arabia / Zahiruddin Khurshid.
    DDC
    025.3/071 22
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 33(2006) no.2, S.119-20 (S.S. Intner): "This survey of cataloging education around the world offers readers a rich menu of experiences, educational offerings, and approaches to the subject of cataloging education as it is currently practiced in 24 countries of the world, excluding the United States and Canada. The exclusion does not mean that English-speaking countries are entirely absent from the book, however. Two nations outside North America, South Africa (in one chapter) and Australia (in two chapters), are covered. The chapters are organized geographically, beginning with the African continent, and followed by several each under headings for Asia, Australia (two chapters), Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East. Nations whose cataloging education programs are described include (in order of presentation) Botswana, Nigeria, South Africa, China (both the People's Republic of China and Taiwan), India, Japan, South Korea, Australia, Austria and Germany (described together in one chapter), Poland, Slovenia, Spain, the British Isles (England, Scotland, and Wales), Argentina, Mexico, Peru, Egypt, Iran, Israel, and Saudi Arabia. As readers might expect, many chapters reflect common experiences among the countries, particularly regarding the proliferation of subjects in competition with cataloging and classification in library school curricula. There are also some common problems, such as dealing with the changes in education and training prompted by automation. Generally, computer-based cataloging is not a new issue anywhere, although in some areas of the world, catalogers still work with manual systems. Describing cataloging education in Nigeria, J. I. Iwe states: "... the card catalogue is still being used in all libraries, including the University of Calabar library where the only library school in the state exists (p. 33)." In other places, computer infrastructure has developed to a level that supports coursework online. As Linda M. Cloete writes, "The ultimate goal of the training resource program is to develop an online, fully interactive course: an online virtual cataloging classroom (p. 66)."
    The eternal debate in the teaching of cataloging over theory versus practice emerges in this volume. As Li Si suggests in describing cataloging education in the People's Republic of China, the matter might be laid at the door of the faculty, stating, "Although the majority of teaching faculty members in the library and information science programs have a solid theoretical foundation from their school education and training, they do not normally possess practical work experience in their field of specialty and they are not familiar with the application of technologies in the field. In order to enhance their practical skills, these faculty members should be given the opportunity to work in libraries... This way, they would be able to put theory into practice and gain rich, practical field experience, thus improving the relevance and quality of their teaching (p. 97)." One wonders how warmly faculty members would welcome that kind of opportunity! On the other hand, in many places, onthe-job training is weak, as Shoichi Taniguchi describes it in Japan, "on the job training and continuing education are neither encouraged nor promoted (p. 132)." Among the most interesting and important aspects of this book are the tables of hard data it presents. Almost every chapter reports on surveys done by the authors on the state of library education in general and/or the kinds of offerings in cataloging and classification available within their countries. Some authors also include statistics on the numbers of persons receiving certificates, diplomas, and/or master's degrees, which is useful in understanding the different levels of expertise being developed over time. While one could argue that there are gaps in coverage, with large, influential countries such as France and Italy in Europe, Brazil, Bolivia, and Chile in South America, and Thailand and Myanmar in Asia, left out of the book, for the most part there is good representation from different parts of the globe. Education for Library Cataloging is a good choice as a textbook for coursework in International Librarianship as well as a primer in what to expect if one's information center is affiliated with partners outside the United States and Canada. This book should be seen as an important "must read" for all library students and practitioners concerned about issues of increasing globalization in bibliographic control. It is highly recommended."
  20. Brugger, J.M.: Cataloging for digital libraries (1996) 0.04
    0.04012516 = product of:
      0.06018774 = sum of:
        0.03190453 = weight(_text_:of in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03190453 = score(doc=6732,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
        0.028283209 = product of:
          0.056566417 = sum of:
            0.056566417 = weight(_text_:22 in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056566417 = score(doc=6732,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the problem of applying standard concepts of cataloguing and bibliographic control to electronic media by studying the degree of fit between the Standford Integrated Digital Library Project (SDLP) and both the USMARC format and the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI). Notes the lack of fit of both USMARC and TEI but stresses the advantages of the latter due its lack of dependency on 3 digit tags and its use of SGML conventions
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4

Languages

Types

  • a 1383
  • m 81
  • el 70
  • s 28
  • b 17
  • r 9
  • n 7
  • p 3
  • ag 2
  • l 2
  • x 2
  • ? 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications