Search (41 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × author_ss:"Bawden, D."
  1. Rowlands, I.; Bawden, D.: Building the digital library on solid research foundations (1999) 0.06
    0.060973078 = product of:
      0.09145962 = sum of:
        0.0139582325 = weight(_text_:of in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0139582325 = score(doc=730,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.17103596 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
        0.07750139 = sum of:
          0.028005775 = weight(_text_:science in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028005775 = score(doc=730,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
          0.049495615 = weight(_text_:22 in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049495615 = score(doc=730,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The digital library is a socio-technical concept of great significance. It redefines the relationships between information providers and intermediaries and, potentially, transforms the way that services are delivered to users. This article, based on a British Library Research & Innovation Centre funded study, reviews current themes and directions in digital library research and scholarship. It locates the digital library in a simple work-oriented framework emphasising its social as well as its systems and informational dimensions. The article highlights differences in understanding of the digital library construct between the library and computer science communities and identifies some critical areas for further research.
    Date
    21. 1.2007 12:03:22
  2. Bawden, D.: Google and the universe of knowledge (2008) 0.05
    0.051608056 = product of:
      0.077412084 = sum of:
        0.027916465 = weight(_text_:of in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027916465 = score(doc=844,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
        0.049495615 = product of:
          0.09899123 = sum of:
            0.09899123 = weight(_text_:22 in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09899123 = score(doc=844,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    7. 6.2008 16:22:20
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 64(2008) no.3, S.xxx
  3. Bawden, D.: Information systems and the stimulation of creativity (1986) 0.04
    0.04260742 = product of:
      0.063911125 = sum of:
        0.03190453 = weight(_text_:of in 3887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03190453 = score(doc=3887,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 3887, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3887)
        0.0320066 = product of:
          0.0640132 = sum of:
            0.0640132 = weight(_text_:science in 3887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0640132 = score(doc=3887,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 3887, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3887)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 12(1986) no.5, S.203-216
  4. Bawden, D.: Smoother pebbles and the shoulders of giants : the developing foundations of information science (2009) 0.04
    0.040614195 = product of:
      0.06092129 = sum of:
        0.02960988 = weight(_text_:of in 3645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02960988 = score(doc=3645,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 3645, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3645)
        0.031311408 = product of:
          0.062622815 = sum of:
            0.062622815 = weight(_text_:science in 3645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062622815 = score(doc=3645,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.45553684 = fieldWeight in 3645, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3645)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Some developments in the information science discipline over a period of 30 years are discussed, by selecting topics covered in the early issues of Journal of Information Science, and tracing their influence on subsequent developments, largely though by no means exclusively through JIS papers. Five main themes are covered: the information discipline per se; the foundations of that discipline; the nature of information; relations between discipline and profession; and education for information science. The continuing resonance of the writings of Farradane and Brookes is noted.
    Source
    Information science in transition, Ed.: A. Gilchrist
  5. Bawden, D.: Encountering on the road to serendip? : Browsing in new information environments (2011) 0.04
    0.036238458 = product of:
      0.054357685 = sum of:
        0.02960988 = weight(_text_:of in 3361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02960988 = score(doc=3361,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 3361, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3361)
        0.024747808 = product of:
          0.049495615 = sum of:
            0.049495615 = weight(_text_:22 in 3361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049495615 = score(doc=3361,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3361, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3361)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This chapter considers the continuing relevance of the ideas of browsing, serendipity, information encountering and literature discovery in the context of the information retrieval (IR) environment of 2010, though its scope extends to the ideas in the broader contexts of information seeking and information-related behaviour. It is based around a selective review of the literature since 1990 and reflection and speculation on the results. The central focus is on questions of how the concept of browsing, serendipity and related ideas have changed in the new IR environment of the web and whether, indeed, they are still meaningfull concepts.
    Pages
    S.1-22
  6. Bawden, D.; Robinson, L.: ¬An introduction to information science (2012) 0.04
    0.036026567 = product of:
      0.05403985 = sum of:
        0.01973992 = weight(_text_:of in 4966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01973992 = score(doc=4966,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 4966, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4966)
        0.03429993 = product of:
          0.06859986 = sum of:
            0.06859986 = weight(_text_:science in 4966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06859986 = score(doc=4966,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.49901563 = fieldWeight in 4966, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4966)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Landmark textbook taking a whole subject approach to information science as a discipline. The authors' expert narratives guides you through each of the essential components of information science, offering a concise introduction an expertly chosen readings and resources. This is the definitve science textbook for students of this subject, and of information and knowledge management, librarianship, archives and records management worldwide.
    LCSH
    Information science
    Subject
    Information science
  7. Bawden, D.; Robinson, L.; Siddiqui, T.: "Potentialities or possibilities" : towards quantum information science? (2015) 0.04
    0.035552226 = product of:
      0.053328335 = sum of:
        0.023928396 = weight(_text_:of in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023928396 = score(doc=1659,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
        0.029399939 = product of:
          0.058799878 = sum of:
            0.058799878 = weight(_text_:science in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058799878 = score(doc=1659,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.42772767 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The use of quantum concepts and formalisms in the information sciences is assessed through an analysis of published literature. Five categories are identified: use of loose analogies and metaphors between concepts in quantum physics and library/information science; use of quantum concepts and formalisms in information retrieval; use of quantum concepts and formalisms in studying meaning and concepts; quantum social science, in areas adjacent to information science; and the qualitative application of quantum concepts in the information disciplines. Quantum issues have led to demonstrable progress in information retrieval and semantic modelling, with less clear-cut progress elsewhere. Whether there may be a future "quantum turn" in the information sciences is debated, the implications of such a turn are considered, and a research agenda outlined.
    Series
    Advances in information science
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.3, S.437-449
  8. Bawden, D.; Robinson, L.: "Waiting for Carnot" : Information and complexity (2015) 0.03
    0.034780122 = product of:
      0.05217018 = sum of:
        0.027916465 = weight(_text_:of in 2254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027916465 = score(doc=2254,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 2254, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2254)
        0.024253715 = product of:
          0.04850743 = sum of:
            0.04850743 = weight(_text_:science in 2254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04850743 = score(doc=2254,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.35285735 = fieldWeight in 2254, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2254)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The relationship between information and complexity is analyzed using a detailed literature analysis. Complexity is a multifaceted concept, with no single agreed definition. There are numerous approaches to defining and measuring complexity and organization, all involving the idea of information. Conceptions of complexity, order, organization, and "interesting order" are inextricably intertwined with those of information. Shannon's formalism captures information's unpredictable creative contributions to organized complexity; a full understanding of information's relation to structure and order is still lacking. Conceptual investigations of this topic should enrich the theoretical basis of the information science discipline, and create fruitful links with other disciplines that study the concepts of information and complexity.
    Series
    Advances in information science
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.11, S.2177-2186
  9. Bawden, D.: Information policy or knowledge policy? (1997) 0.03
    0.033907514 = product of:
      0.05086127 = sum of:
        0.026113462 = weight(_text_:of in 683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026113462 = score(doc=683,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 683, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=683)
        0.024747808 = product of:
          0.049495615 = sum of:
            0.049495615 = weight(_text_:22 in 683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049495615 = score(doc=683,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 683, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=683)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the types of information that are generally involved in information policy, from data, through information with varying degrees of structure, to knowledge and perhaps to wisdom. Information with lower levels of structure and raw data may be managed by systems, technical and administrative, and by procedures. Knowledge can only be managed by policies. There is, therefore, a close link between information policy formulation and evaluation and the emerging discipline of knowledge management. Concludes that information policy is: inevitably complex, not concerned with technical solutions; and dependent upon an appreciation of the meaning and significance of knowledge in its proper context
    Source
    Understanding information policy. Proceedings of a British Library funded Information Policy Unit Workshop, Cumberland Lodge, UK, 22-24 July 1996. Ed. by Ian Rowlands
  10. Bawden, D.: Users, user studies and human information behaviour : a three-decade perspective on Tom Wilson's "On user studies and information needs" (2006) 0.03
    0.03339672 = product of:
      0.05009508 = sum of:
        0.029306183 = weight(_text_:of in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029306183 = score(doc=737,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
        0.020788899 = product of:
          0.041577797 = sum of:
            0.041577797 = weight(_text_:science in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041577797 = score(doc=737,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.30244917 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review Wilson's (1981) seminal article, "On user studies and information needs" (Journal of Documentation, 1981, Vol. 37 No. 1, pp. 3-15) as part of a series celebrating the Journal's 60th anniversary. Design/methodology/approach - This paper adopts a literature-based conceptual analysis, taking Wilson's paper as the starting point, and evaluating the significance of, and later developments in, the issues dealt with in that article. Findings - Wilson's article has had a significant effect on the development of information science. It dealt with several fundamental issues, including the nature of information itself and of information need, models of information seeking and information behaviour, particularly those based on phenomenological or "whole life" concepts, appropriate research methods for these areas, and the nature of information science as an academic discipline. Originality/value - The paper provides a perspective on the development of information science over 30 years, with particular emphasis on the study of human information behaviour.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 62(2006) no.6, S.671-679
  11. Robinson, L.; Priego, E.; Bawden, D.: Library and information science and digital humanities : two disciplines, joint future? (2015) 0.03
    0.03249874 = product of:
      0.048748106 = sum of:
        0.014099943 = weight(_text_:of in 2982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014099943 = score(doc=2982,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 2982, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2982)
        0.03464816 = product of:
          0.06929632 = sum of:
            0.06929632 = weight(_text_:science in 2982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06929632 = score(doc=2982,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.5040819 = fieldWeight in 2982, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2982)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff
  12. Bawden, D.; Robinson, L.: ¬"A few exciting words" : information and entropy revisited (2015) 0.03
    0.030853499 = product of:
      0.046280246 = sum of:
        0.029306183 = weight(_text_:of in 2211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029306183 = score(doc=2211,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 2211, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2211)
        0.016974064 = product of:
          0.033948127 = sum of:
            0.033948127 = weight(_text_:science in 2211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033948127 = score(doc=2211,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 2211, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2211)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    A review is presented of the relation between information and entropy, focusing on two main issues: the similarity of the formal definitions of physical entropy, according to statistical mechanics, and of information, according to information theory; and the possible subjectivity of entropy considered as missing information. The paper updates the 1983 analysis of Shaw and Davis. The difference in the interpretations of information given respectively by Shannon and by Wiener, significant for the information sciences, receives particular consideration. Analysis of a range of material, from literary theory to thermodynamics, is used to draw out the issues. Emphasis is placed on recourse to the original sources, and on direct quotation, to attempt to overcome some of the misunderstandings and oversimplifications that have occurred with these topics. Although it is strongly related to entropy, information is neither identical with it, nor its opposite. Information is related to order and pattern, but also to disorder and randomness. The relations between information and the "interesting complexity," which embodies both patterns and randomness, are worthy of attention.
    Series
    Advances in information science
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.10, S.1965-1987
  13. Bawden, D.: Organised complexity, meaning and understanding : an approach to a unified view of information for information science (2007) 0.03
    0.029772839 = product of:
      0.044659257 = sum of:
        0.022293966 = weight(_text_:of in 816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022293966 = score(doc=816,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.27317715 = fieldWeight in 816, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=816)
        0.022365293 = product of:
          0.044730585 = sum of:
            0.044730585 = weight(_text_:science in 816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044730585 = score(doc=816,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.32538348 = fieldWeight in 816, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=816)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The paper seeks to outline an approach to a unified framework for understanding the concept of "information" in the physical, biological and human domains, and to see what links and interactions may be found between them. It also aims to re-examine the information science discipline, with a view to locating it in a larger context, so as to reflect on the possibility that information science may not only draw from these other disciplines, but that its insights may contribute to them. Design/methodology/approach - The paper takes the form of an extensive literature review and analysis, loosely based on the approaches of Stonier, Madden and Bates, and including analysis of both scientific and library/information literature. Findings - The paper identifies the concept of information as being identified with organised complexity in the physical domain, with meaning in context in the biological domain, and with Kvanvig's concept of understanding in the human domain. The linking thread is laws of emergent self-organised complexity, applicable in all domains. Argues that a unified perspective for the information sciences, based on Popperian ontology, may be derived, with the possibility of not merely drawing insights from physical and biological science, but also of contributing to them. Based on Hirst's educational philosophy, derives a definition for the information sciences around two poles: information science and library/information management.
  14. Robinson, L.; Bawden, D.: Mind the gap : transitions between concepts of information in varied domains (2014) 0.03
    0.029617295 = product of:
      0.044425942 = sum of:
        0.02442182 = weight(_text_:of in 1315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02442182 = score(doc=1315,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 1315, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1315)
        0.020004123 = product of:
          0.040008247 = sum of:
            0.040008247 = weight(_text_:science in 1315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040008247 = score(doc=1315,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 1315, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1315)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Series
    Studies in history and philosophy of science ; 34
    Source
    Theories of information, communication and knowledge : a multidisciplinary approach. Eds.: F. Ibekwe-SanJuan u. T.M. Dousa
  15. Mason, T.; Bawden, D.: Times new plural : the multiple temporalities of contemporary life and the infosphere (2023) 0.03
    0.027946234 = product of:
      0.04191935 = sum of:
        0.027916465 = weight(_text_:of in 1052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027916465 = score(doc=1052,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 1052, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1052)
        0.0140028875 = product of:
          0.028005775 = sum of:
            0.028005775 = weight(_text_:science in 1052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028005775 = score(doc=1052,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 1052, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1052)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Experiences of time and temporalities in contemporary life are analysed, with Floridi's conception of the infosphere as a central concept. The effects of instantaneous communication and digital information are shown to result not simply in the obvious acceleration of many aspects of life, but in multiple temporalities. The informational spaces of Floridi's hyperhistorical time form a new time-based society, with our informational activities expressed in linear, cyclic, re-cyclic, and iterative processes. Examples from the information sciences, particularly information seeking and "slow information," are given, and an outline model for time literacy is presented.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.10, S.1159-1169
  16. Bawden, D.; Robinson, L.: No such thing as society? : On the individuality of information behavior (2013) 0.03
    0.02748403 = product of:
      0.041226044 = sum of:
        0.025222747 = weight(_text_:of in 1139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025222747 = score(doc=1139,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 1139, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1139)
        0.0160033 = product of:
          0.0320066 = sum of:
            0.0320066 = weight(_text_:science in 1139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0320066 = score(doc=1139,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 1139, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1139)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This opinion piece considers the relative importance of individual and social factors in determining information behavior. It concludes that individual factors are more central and fundamental, although they may certainly be qualified by social and cultural factors and even though there are good reasons for studying and analyzing information behavior in terms of social groups. More studies of interesting emergent factors and behaviors in social settings would be valuable.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.12, S.2587-2590
  17. Bawden, D.: Information as self-organized complexity : a unifying viewpoint (2007) 0.03
    0.027268305 = product of:
      0.040902458 = sum of:
        0.023928396 = weight(_text_:of in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023928396 = score(doc=649,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
        0.016974064 = product of:
          0.033948127 = sum of:
            0.033948127 = weight(_text_:science in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033948127 = score(doc=649,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Introduction. This short paper proposes that a unified concept of information as a form of self-organized complexity may be equally applicable to the physical, biological and human/social domains. This is seen as the evolutionary emergence of organized complexity in the physical universe, meaning in context in the biological domain, and understanding through knowledge in the human domain. Method.This study is based on analysis of literature from a wide range of disciplines. Conclusions.This perspective allows for the possibility that not only may the library/information sciences be able to draw insights from the natural sciences, but that library and information science research and scholarship may in turn contribute insights to these disciplines, normally thought of as more 'fundamental'.
    Content
    Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science-"Featuring the Future". - Vgl.: http://informationr.net/ir/12-4/colis/colis31.html.
  18. Bawden, D.: ¬The shifting terminology's of information (2001) 0.03
    0.026608374 = product of:
      0.03991256 = sum of:
        0.029910497 = weight(_text_:of in 706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029910497 = score(doc=706,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.36650562 = fieldWeight in 706, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=706)
        0.010002062 = product of:
          0.020004123 = sum of:
            0.020004123 = weight(_text_:science in 706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020004123 = score(doc=706,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 706, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=706)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    At the heart of any discussion of the information sciences, at least when this discussion is held in the English language, lies the problem of the variant, and shifting, set of concepts and meanings of the terms 'library' and 'information'. The term 'information', in particular, has a variety of meanings in different contexts and communities of discourse, providing an excellent example of Wittgenstein's language game. This implies that any terminology built around this central concept is in danger of being constructed on 'shifting sands'. This article outlines, for the English language only, some of these diverse meanings of information, and their consequences for the terminology of the information sciences. It focuses on the variant relationships between information and related concepts, particularly data and knowledge. It also includes an account of the view information taken in the hard and soft methodologies of system science, as well as the new discipline of 'information physics'. From this, some remarks may be made on the changing meanings of the complex terms such as 'information technology' and 'information literacy', as well as those complex terms involving 'management', information management, knowledge management, document management etc. A similar, though shorter, treatment will de given to terminology around the 'library' concept, particularly in view of the change toward viewing a library as an organised virtual information space, rather than physical environment.
  19. Bawden, D.; Robinson, L.: Curating the infosphere : Luciano Floridi's philosophy of information as the foundation for library and information science (2018) 0.03
    0.02623802 = product of:
      0.03935703 = sum of:
        0.022382967 = weight(_text_:of in 4047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022382967 = score(doc=4047,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 4047, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4047)
        0.016974064 = product of:
          0.033948127 = sum of:
            0.033948127 = weight(_text_:science in 4047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033948127 = score(doc=4047,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 4047, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4047)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to re-examine the proposal that Luciano Floridi's philosphy of information (PI) may be an appropriate conceptual foundation for the discipline of library and information science (LIS). Design/methodology/approach A selective literature review and analysis are carried out. Findings It is concluded that LIS is in need of a new conceptual framework, and that PI is appropriate for this purpose. Originality/value Floridi proposed a close relationship between PI and LIS more than a decade ago. Although various authors have addressed the aspects of this relationship since then, this is the first proposal from an LIS perspective that PI be adopted as a basis for LIS.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 74(2018) no.1, S.2-17
  20. Bawden, D.; Robinson, L.: Information and the gaining of understanding (2015) 0.03
    0.025452837 = product of:
      0.038179256 = sum of:
        0.024176367 = weight(_text_:of in 893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024176367 = score(doc=893,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 893, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=893)
        0.0140028875 = product of:
          0.028005775 = sum of:
            0.028005775 = weight(_text_:science in 893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028005775 = score(doc=893,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 893, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=893)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    It is suggested that, in addition to data, information and knowledge, the information sciences should focus on understanding, understood as a higher-order knowledge, with coherent and explanatory potential. The limited ways in which understanding has been addressed in the design of information systems, in studies of information behaviour, in formulations of information literacy and in impact studies are briefly reviewed, and future prospects considered. The paper is an extended version of a keynote presentation given at the i3 conference in June 2015.
    Source
    Journal of information science. 41(2015) no.x, S.1-6