Search (50 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × author_ss:"Cronin, B."
  1. Cronin, B.: Vernacular and vehicular language (2009) 0.12
    0.11649513 = product of:
      0.1747427 = sum of:
        0.01973992 = weight(_text_:of in 7192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01973992 = score(doc=7192,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 7192, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7192)
        0.15500277 = sum of:
          0.05601155 = weight(_text_:science in 7192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05601155 = score(doc=7192,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 7192, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7192)
          0.09899123 = weight(_text_:22 in 7192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09899123 = score(doc=7192,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7192, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7192)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 11:44:11
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.433
  2. Cronin, B.: Thinking about data (2013) 0.12
    0.11649513 = product of:
      0.1747427 = sum of:
        0.01973992 = weight(_text_:of in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01973992 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
        0.15500277 = sum of:
          0.05601155 = weight(_text_:science in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05601155 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
          0.09899123 = weight(_text_:22 in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09899123 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 16:18:36
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.3, S.435-436
  3. Cronin, B.: ¬The writing on the wall (2015) 0.10
    0.09985297 = product of:
      0.14977945 = sum of:
        0.016919931 = weight(_text_:of in 7297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016919931 = score(doc=7297,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 7297, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7297)
        0.13285953 = sum of:
          0.0480099 = weight(_text_:science in 7297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0480099 = score(doc=7297,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 7297, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7297)
          0.084849626 = weight(_text_:22 in 7297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.084849626 = score(doc=7297,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 7297, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7297)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    26. 4.2015 19:27:22
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.5, S.873-875
  4. Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Knowledge management : Semantic drift or conceptual shift? (2000) 0.09
    0.0871044 = product of:
      0.1306566 = sum of:
        0.019940332 = weight(_text_:of in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019940332 = score(doc=2277,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
        0.11071627 = sum of:
          0.040008247 = weight(_text_:science in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040008247 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
          0.07070802 = weight(_text_:22 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07070802 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05218836 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2001 20:22:57
    Footnote
    Thematisierung der Verschiebung des Verständnisses von Wissensmanagement; vgl. auch: Day, R.E.: Totality and representation: a history of knowledge management ... in: JASIS 52(2001) no.9, S.725-735
    Source
    Journal of education for library and information science. 41(2000) no.?, S.294-306
  5. Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Hypertext and the conduct of science (1990) 0.04
    0.04260742 = product of:
      0.063911125 = sum of:
        0.03190453 = weight(_text_:of in 5378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03190453 = score(doc=5378,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 5378, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5378)
        0.0320066 = product of:
          0.0640132 = sum of:
            0.0640132 = weight(_text_:science in 5378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0640132 = score(doc=5378,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 5378, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5378)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 46(1990) no.3, S.175-192
  6. Snyder, H.; Cronin, B.; Davenport, E.: What's the use of citation? : Citation analysis as a literature topic in selected disciplines of the social sciences (1995) 0.04
    0.0414435 = product of:
      0.06216525 = sum of:
        0.03276531 = weight(_text_:of in 1825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03276531 = score(doc=1825,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.4014868 = fieldWeight in 1825, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1825)
        0.029399939 = product of:
          0.058799878 = sum of:
            0.058799878 = weight(_text_:science in 1825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058799878 = score(doc=1825,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.42772767 = fieldWeight in 1825, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1825)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study to investigate the place and role of citation analysis in selected disciplines in the social sciences, including library and information science. 5 core library and information science periodicals: Journal of documentation; Library quarterly; Journal of the American Society for Information Science; College and research libraries; and the Journal of information science, were studed to determine the percentage of articles devoted to citation analysis and develop an indictive typology to categorize the major foci of research being conducted under the rubric of citation analysis. Similar analysis was conducted for periodicals in other social sciences disciplines. Demonstrates how the rubric can be used to dertermine how citatiion analysis is applied within library and information science and other disciplines. By isolating citation from bibliometrics in general, this work is differentiated from other, previous studies. Analysis of data from a 10 year sample of transdisciplinary social sciences literature suggests that 2 application areas predominate: the validity of citation as an evaluation tool; and impact or performance studies of authors, periodicals, and institutions
    Source
    Journal of information science. 21(1995) no.2, S.75-85
  7. Cronin, B.: ¬The sociological turn in information science (2009) 0.04
    0.04067148 = product of:
      0.061007217 = sum of:
        0.025222747 = weight(_text_:of in 3655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025222747 = score(doc=3655,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 3655, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3655)
        0.035784468 = product of:
          0.071568936 = sum of:
            0.071568936 = weight(_text_:science in 3655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071568936 = score(doc=3655,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.52061355 = fieldWeight in 3655, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3655)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper explores the history of 'the social' in information science. It traces the influence of social scientific thinking on the development of the field's intellectual base. The continuing appropriation of both theoretical and methodological insights from domains such as social studies of science, science and technology studies, and socio-technical systems is discussed.
    Source
    Information science in transition, Ed.: A. Gilchrist
  8. Cronin, B.: ¬The resilience of rejected manuscripts (2012) 0.04
    0.037281495 = product of:
      0.05592224 = sum of:
        0.027916465 = weight(_text_:of in 446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027916465 = score(doc=446,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 446, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=446)
        0.028005775 = product of:
          0.05601155 = sum of:
            0.05601155 = weight(_text_:science in 446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05601155 = score(doc=446,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 446, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=446)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.10, S.1903-1904
  9. Davenport, L.; Cronin, B.: What does hypertext offer the information scientist? (1989) 0.04
    0.036377676 = product of:
      0.05456651 = sum of:
        0.02255991 = weight(_text_:of in 5293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02255991 = score(doc=5293,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 5293, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5293)
        0.0320066 = product of:
          0.0640132 = sum of:
            0.0640132 = weight(_text_:science in 5293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0640132 = score(doc=5293,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 5293, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5293)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 15(1989) no.6, S.369-372
  10. Cronin, B.; Davenport, E.: Social intelligence (1993) 0.04
    0.036377676 = product of:
      0.05456651 = sum of:
        0.02255991 = weight(_text_:of in 7239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02255991 = score(doc=7239,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 7239, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7239)
        0.0320066 = product of:
          0.0640132 = sum of:
            0.0640132 = weight(_text_:science in 7239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0640132 = score(doc=7239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 7239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7239)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 28(1993), S.1-44
  11. Cronin, B.; Meho, L.I.: Timelines of creativity : A study of intellectual innovators in information science (2007) 0.04
    0.036079492 = product of:
      0.054119237 = sum of:
        0.026113462 = weight(_text_:of in 480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026113462 = score(doc=480,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 480, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=480)
        0.028005775 = product of:
          0.05601155 = sum of:
            0.05601155 = weight(_text_:science in 480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05601155 = score(doc=480,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 480, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=480)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    We explore the relationship between creativity and both chronological and professional age in information science using a novel bibliometric approach that allows us to capture the shape of a scholar's career. Our approach draws on D.W. Galenson's (2006) analyses of artistic creativity, notably his distinction between conceptual and experimental innovation, and also H.C. Lehman's (1953) seminal study of the relationship between stage of career and outstanding performance. The data presented here suggest that creativity is expressed in different ways, at different times, and with different intensities in academic information science.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.13, S.1948-1959
  12. Cronin, B.; Shaw, D.; LaBarre, K.: Visible, Less Visible, and Invisible Work : Patterns of Collaboration in 20th Century Chemistry (2004) 0.04
    0.035025354 = product of:
      0.05253803 = sum of:
        0.032734957 = weight(_text_:of in 2094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032734957 = score(doc=2094,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 2094, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2094)
        0.019803073 = product of:
          0.039606147 = sum of:
            0.039606147 = weight(_text_:science in 2094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039606147 = score(doc=2094,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.2881068 = fieldWeight in 2094, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2094)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    We chronicle the use of acknowledgments in 20th century chemistry by analyzing and classifying over 2,000 specimens covering a 100-year period. Our results show that acknowledgment has gradually established itself as a constitutive element of academic writing- one that provides a revealing insight into the structural nature of subauthorship collaboration in science. Complementary data an rates of coauthorship are also presented to highlight the growing importance of teamwork and the increasing division of labor in contemporary chemistry. The results of this study are compared with the findings of a parallel study of collaboration in both the social sciences and the humanities.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 55(2004) no.2, S.160-168
  13. Cronin, B.: Library and information science in context (1998) 0.03
    0.03498403 = product of:
      0.05247604 = sum of:
        0.029843956 = weight(_text_:of in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029843956 = score(doc=1416,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
        0.022632083 = product of:
          0.045264166 = sum of:
            0.045264166 = weight(_text_:science in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045264166 = score(doc=1416,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.3292649 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of the ways in which the library and information science (LIS) profession is adapting to the growing informatization of society, the emergence of an information society and how librarians and information scientists are positioning themselves as players in an information society, characterized by metaphors such as 'information superhighway' and 'Worldwide Library'. Identifies major change drivers and considers the kinds of strategic responses being made by, and required of, the LIS field in the face of pervasive technologization and shifting social practices
  14. Cronin, B.: On the epistemic significance of place (2008) 0.03
    0.034355037 = product of:
      0.051532555 = sum of:
        0.031528432 = weight(_text_:of in 4853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031528432 = score(doc=4853,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.38633084 = fieldWeight in 4853, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4853)
        0.020004123 = product of:
          0.040008247 = sum of:
            0.040008247 = weight(_text_:science in 4853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040008247 = score(doc=4853,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 4853, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4853)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The author describes an exploratory analysis of the influence of place and proximity on collaboration. Bibliometric data and biographical information are combined to reveal the extent to which co-authorship relationships are a function of physical collocation.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.6, S.1002-1006
  15. Cronin, B.: Bowling alone together : academic writing as distributed cognition (2004) 0.03
    0.033508144 = product of:
      0.050262216 = sum of:
        0.027630134 = weight(_text_:of in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027630134 = score(doc=2265,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
        0.022632083 = product of:
          0.045264166 = sum of:
            0.045264166 = weight(_text_:science in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045264166 = score(doc=2265,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.3292649 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The twentieth century saw the progressive collectivization of science-dramatic growth in teamwork in general and large-scale collaboration in particular. Cognitive partnering in the conduct of research and scholarship has become commonplace, and this trend is reflected in rates of co-authorship and sub-authorship collaboration. The effects of these developments an academic writing are discussed and theorized in terms of distributed cognition.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.6, S.557-560
  16. Cronin, B.: Acknowledgement trends in the research literature of information science (2001) 0.03
    0.033508144 = product of:
      0.050262216 = sum of:
        0.027630134 = weight(_text_:of in 4488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027630134 = score(doc=4488,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 4488, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4488)
        0.022632083 = product of:
          0.045264166 = sum of:
            0.045264166 = weight(_text_:science in 4488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045264166 = score(doc=4488,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.3292649 = fieldWeight in 4488, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4488)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Data were gathered on acknowledgements in five leading information science journals for the years 1991-1999. The results were compared with data from two earlier studies of the same journals. Analysis of the aggregate data (1971-1999) confirms the general impression that acknowledgement has become an institutionalised element of the scholarly communication process, reflecting the growing cognitive and structural complexity of contemporary research.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 57(2001) no.3, S.427-433
  17. Larivière, V.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Cronin, B.: ¬A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science's first hundred years (2012) 0.03
    0.03213601 = product of:
      0.048204012 = sum of:
        0.028199887 = weight(_text_:of in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028199887 = score(doc=244,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.34554482 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
        0.020004123 = product of:
          0.040008247 = sum of:
            0.040008247 = weight(_text_:science in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040008247 = score(doc=244,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents a condensed history of Library and Information Science (LIS) over the course of more than a century using a variety of bibliometric measures. It examines in detail the variable rate of knowledge production in the field, shifts in subject coverage, the dominance of particular publication genres at different times, prevailing modes of production, interactions with other disciplines, and, more generally, observes how the field has evolved. It shows that, despite a striking growth in the number of journals, papers, and contributing authors, a decrease was observed in the field's market-share of all social science and humanities research. Collaborative authorship is now the norm, a pattern seen across the social sciences. The idea of boundary crossing was also examined: in 2010, nearly 60% of authors who published in LIS also published in another discipline. This high degree of permeability in LIS was also demonstrated through reference and citation practices: LIS scholars now cite and receive citations from other fields more than from LIS itself. Two major structural shifts are revealed in the data: in 1960, LIS changed from a professional field focused on librarianship to an academic field focused on information and use; and in 1990, LIS began to receive a growing number of citations from outside the field, notably from Computer Science and Management, and saw a dramatic increase in the number of authors contributing to the literature of the field.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.5, S.997-1016
  18. Cronin, B.: Standing on ceremony (2013) 0.03
    0.031830467 = product of:
      0.047745697 = sum of:
        0.01973992 = weight(_text_:of in 1106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01973992 = score(doc=1106,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1106, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1106)
        0.028005775 = product of:
          0.05601155 = sum of:
            0.05601155 = weight(_text_:science in 1106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05601155 = score(doc=1106,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 1106, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1106)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.7, S.1309-1310
  19. Cronin, B.: Peer review (2011) 0.03
    0.031830467 = product of:
      0.047745697 = sum of:
        0.01973992 = weight(_text_:of in 1922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01973992 = score(doc=1922,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1922, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1922)
        0.028005775 = product of:
          0.05601155 = sum of:
            0.05601155 = weight(_text_:science in 1922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05601155 = score(doc=1922,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 1922, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1922)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.7, S.1215
  20. Cronin, B.: Meta-life (2014) 0.03
    0.031830467 = product of:
      0.047745697 = sum of:
        0.01973992 = weight(_text_:of in 2207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01973992 = score(doc=2207,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05218836 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 2207, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2207)
        0.028005775 = product of:
          0.05601155 = sum of:
            0.05601155 = weight(_text_:science in 2207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05601155 = score(doc=2207,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05218836 = queryNorm
                0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 2207, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2207)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.3, S.431-432