-
Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983)
0.09
0.09009206 = product of:
0.1351381 = sum of:
0.02442182 = weight(_text_:of in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02442182 = score(doc=2417,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
0.11071627 = sum of:
0.040008247 = weight(_text_:science in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040008247 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
0.07070802 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07070802 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Pages
- S.22-25
- Series
- Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science; vol. 20
- Source
- Productivity in the information age : proceedings of the 46th ASIS annual meeting, 1983. Ed.: Raymond F Vondra
-
Saracevic, T.: Charting the future of information science (1990)
0.05
0.051445797 = product of:
0.077168696 = sum of:
0.03190453 = weight(_text_:of in 4078) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03190453 = score(doc=4078,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 4078, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4078)
0.045264166 = product of:
0.09052833 = sum of:
0.09052833 = weight(_text_:science in 4078) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09052833 = score(doc=4078,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.6585298 = fieldWeight in 4078, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4078)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 16(1990) no.4, S.13
-
Saracevic, T.: Information science (1999)
0.05
0.045472093 = product of:
0.068208136 = sum of:
0.028199887 = weight(_text_:of in 4325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028199887 = score(doc=4325,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.34554482 = fieldWeight in 4325, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4325)
0.040008247 = product of:
0.080016494 = sum of:
0.080016494 = weight(_text_:science in 4325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.080016494 = score(doc=4325,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.5820636 = fieldWeight in 4325, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4325)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes: The 50th Anniversary of the Journal of the American Society for Information Science. Pt.2: Paradigms, models, and models of information science
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.12, S.1051
-
Saracevic, T.: ¬The concept of 'relevance' in information science : a historical review (1970)
0.05
0.04521605 = product of:
0.06782407 = sum of:
0.02255991 = weight(_text_:of in 2010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02255991 = score(doc=2010,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 2010, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2010)
0.045264166 = product of:
0.09052833 = sum of:
0.09052833 = weight(_text_:science in 2010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09052833 = score(doc=2010,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.6585298 = fieldWeight in 2010, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2010)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Introduction to information science. Ed.: T. Saracevic
-
Saracevic, T.: Relevance: a review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science (1975)
0.04
0.043752283 = product of:
0.065628424 = sum of:
0.029843956 = weight(_text_:of in 626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029843956 = score(doc=626,freq=14.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 626, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=626)
0.035784468 = product of:
0.071568936 = sum of:
0.071568936 = weight(_text_:science in 626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071568936 = score(doc=626,freq=10.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.52061355 = fieldWeight in 626, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=626)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Footnote
- Vg. auch die Beiträge in: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58(2007) no.13, S.1915-1933 (Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II: nature and manifestations of relevance) und S.2126 - 2144 (Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part III: Behavior and effects of relevance).
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 26(1975), S.321-343
-
Saracevic, T.: Information science (2009)
0.04
0.041505605 = product of:
0.062258407 = sum of:
0.03050284 = weight(_text_:of in 3812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03050284 = score(doc=3812,freq=26.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.37376386 = fieldWeight in 3812, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3812)
0.031755567 = product of:
0.06351113 = sum of:
0.06351113 = weight(_text_:science in 3812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06351113 = score(doc=3812,freq=14.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.4619987 = fieldWeight in 3812, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3812)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The purpose of this entry is to provide an overview of information science as a field or discipline, including a historical perspective to illustrate the events and forces that shaped it. Information science is a field of professional practice and scientific inquiry dealing with effective communication of information and information objects, particularly knowledge records, among humans in the context of social, organizational, and individual need for and use of information. Information science emerged in the aftermath of the Second World War, as did a number of other fields, addressing the problem of information explosion and using technology as a solution. Presently, information science deals with the same problems in the Web and digital environments. This entry covers problems addressed by information science, the intellectual structure of the field, and the description of main areas-information retrieval, human information behavior, metric studies, and digital libraries. This entry also includes an account of education related to information science and conclusions about major characteristics.
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
-
Saracevic, T.: Ciencia da informacao, origem, evolucao e relacoes (1996)
0.04
0.03524346 = product of:
0.052865185 = sum of:
0.01891706 = weight(_text_:of in 811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01891706 = score(doc=811,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 811, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=811)
0.033948127 = product of:
0.067896254 = sum of:
0.067896254 = weight(_text_:science in 811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067896254 = score(doc=811,freq=16.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.49389738 = fieldWeight in 811, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=811)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Information science is best defined as a discipline in terms of the problems it addresses. Its origins date back to the scientific and technical revolution after the 2nd World War, and its development has been essentially characterised by interdisciplinarity. Librarianship, computer science, cognitive science and communication studies all share interests with infomation science, but with increasing emphasis on the information society and the information industry dictated by technological imparatives, information science is now at a critical point in its evolution. The problem it sets out to solve are not decreasing but changing, with the pressure to improve access to an ever increasing store of knowledge. The social need for information science is evident, whatever the name given to the knowledge and skills which it encompasses
- Content
- Translation of a presentation given at the International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science held at the University of Tampere in Aug 1991
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: Information science: origin, evolution and relations
-
Saracevic, T.: Why is relevance still the basic notion in information science? (2015)
0.03
0.03249874 = product of:
0.048748106 = sum of:
0.014099943 = weight(_text_:of in 2980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014099943 = score(doc=2980,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 2980, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2980)
0.03464816 = product of:
0.06929632 = sum of:
0.06929632 = weight(_text_:science in 2980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06929632 = score(doc=2980,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.5040819 = fieldWeight in 2980, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2980)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff
-
Saracevic, T.; Kantor, P.: ¬A study of information seeking and retrieving : pt.2: users, questions, and effectiveness (1988)
0.03
0.031955566 = product of:
0.047933348 = sum of:
0.023928396 = weight(_text_:of in 3258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023928396 = score(doc=3258,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 3258, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3258)
0.02400495 = product of:
0.0480099 = sum of:
0.0480099 = weight(_text_:science in 3258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0480099 = score(doc=3258,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 3258, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3258)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 39(1988) no.3, S.177-196
-
Saracevic, T.; Kantor, P.: ¬A study of information seeking and retrieving : pt.3: searchers, searches, and overlap (1988)
0.03
0.031955566 = product of:
0.047933348 = sum of:
0.023928396 = weight(_text_:of in 3259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023928396 = score(doc=3259,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 3259, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3259)
0.02400495 = product of:
0.0480099 = sum of:
0.0480099 = weight(_text_:science in 3259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0480099 = score(doc=3259,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 3259, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3259)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 39(1988) no.3, S.197-216
-
Wolfram, D.; Spink, A.; Jansen, B.J.; Saracevic, T.: Vox populi : the public searching of the Web (2001)
0.03
0.031955566 = product of:
0.047933348 = sum of:
0.023928396 = weight(_text_:of in 6949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023928396 = score(doc=6949,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 6949, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6949)
0.02400495 = product of:
0.0480099 = sum of:
0.0480099 = weight(_text_:science in 6949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0480099 = score(doc=6949,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 6949, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6949)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.12, S.1073-1074
-
Saracevic, T.; Kantor, P.B.: Studying the value of library and information services : Part II: Methodology and taxonomy (1997)
0.03
0.030561559 = product of:
0.04584234 = sum of:
0.033839863 = weight(_text_:of in 353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033839863 = score(doc=353,freq=32.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.41465378 = fieldWeight in 353, product of:
5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
32.0 = termFreq=32.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=353)
0.012002475 = product of:
0.02400495 = sum of:
0.02400495 = weight(_text_:science in 353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02400495 = score(doc=353,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 353, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=353)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Details with specifics of the study: importance of taxonomy; the method used for gathering data on user assessments of value in 5 research libraries, involving 18 services and 528 interviews with users; development and presentation of the taxonomy; and statistics and tests of the taxonomy. A novel aspect is the division of value of information services into 3 general classes or facets; reasons for use of a service in the given instance; quality of interaction (use) related to that service; and worth, benefits, or implications of subsequent results from use
- Footnote
- 2nd part of a study to develop a taxonomy of value-in-use of library and information services based on users assessments and to propose methods and instruments for similar studies of library and information services in general
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 48(1997) no.6, S.543-563
-
Saracevic, T.; Kantor, P.B.: Studying the value of library and information services : Part I: Establishing a theoretical framework (1997)
0.03
0.029845191 = product of:
0.044767786 = sum of:
0.03276531 = weight(_text_:of in 352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03276531 = score(doc=352,freq=30.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.4014868 = fieldWeight in 352, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=352)
0.012002475 = product of:
0.02400495 = sum of:
0.02400495 = weight(_text_:science in 352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02400495 = score(doc=352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=352)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Discusses underlying concepts related to value that must be clarified in order to proceed with any pragmatic study of value, and establishes a theory of use-oriented value of information and information services. Examines the notion of value in philosophy and economics and in relation to library and information services as well as the connection between value and relevance. Develops 2 models: one related to use of information and the other to use of library and information services. They are a theoretical framework for pragmatic study of value and a guide for the development of a Derived Taxonomy of Value in Using Library and Information Services
- Footnote
- 1st part of a study to develop a taxonomy of value-in-use of library and information services based on users assessments and to propose methods and instruments for similar studies of library and information services in general
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 48(1997) no.6, S.527-542
-
Belkin, N.J.; Chang, S.J.; Downs, T.; Saracevic, T.; Zhao, S.: Taking account of user tasks, goals and behavior for the design of online public access catalogs (1990)
0.03
0.029617295 = product of:
0.044425942 = sum of:
0.02442182 = weight(_text_:of in 5261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02442182 = score(doc=5261,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 5261, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5261)
0.020004123 = product of:
0.040008247 = sum of:
0.040008247 = weight(_text_:science in 5261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040008247 = score(doc=5261,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 5261, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5261)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- ASIS'90: Information in the year 2000: from research to application. Proc. 33rd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science
-
Kantor, P.B.; Saracevic, T.: Quantitative study of the value of research libraries : a foundation for the evaluation of digital libraries (1999)
0.03
0.029370368 = product of:
0.04405555 = sum of:
0.029910497 = weight(_text_:of in 6711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029910497 = score(doc=6711,freq=36.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.36650562 = fieldWeight in 6711, product of:
6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
36.0 = termFreq=36.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6711)
0.014145052 = product of:
0.028290104 = sum of:
0.028290104 = weight(_text_:science in 6711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028290104 = score(doc=6711,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 6711, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6711)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In anticipation of the explosive growth of digital libraries, a complex study was undertaken seeking to evaluate 21 diverse services at 5 major academic research libraries. This work stands as a model for evaluation of digital libraries, through its focus on both the costs of operations and the impacts of the services that those operations provide. The data have been analyzed using both statistical methods and methods of Data Envelopment Analysis. The results of the study, which are presented in detail, serve to demonstrate that a cross-functional approach to library services is feasible. They also highlight a new measure of impact, which is a weighted logarithmic combination of the amount of time that users spend interacting with the service, combined with a Likert-scale indication of the value of that service in relation to the time expended. The measure derived, incorporating simple information obtainable from the user, together with information which is readily available in server/client logs, provides an excellent foundation for transferring these measurement principles to the Digital Library environment
- Series
- Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science; vol.36
- Source
- Knowledge: creation, organization and use. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 31.10.-4.11.1999. Ed.: L. Woods
-
Spink, A.; Saracevic, T.: Sources and use of search terms in online searching (1992)
0.03
0.02907518 = product of:
0.043612767 = sum of:
0.02960988 = weight(_text_:of in 4523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02960988 = score(doc=4523,freq=18.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 4523, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4523)
0.0140028875 = product of:
0.028005775 = sum of:
0.028005775 = weight(_text_:science in 4523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028005775 = score(doc=4523,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 4523, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4523)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Reports selected results from a larger study whose objectives are to observe, under real life conditions, the nature and patterns of interaction between users, intermediaries, and computer sysrtems in the context of online information searching and retrieval. Reports various analyses on the relation of search term sources and the retrieval of items judges as to their relevance. While the users generated the largest proportion of search terms (61%) which were responsible for 68% of retrieved items judges relevant, other sources in the interaction process played an important role
- Source
- Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Pittsburgh, 26.-29.10.92. Ed.: D. Shaw
-
Saracevic, T.: Relevance: a review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part III : behavior and effects of relevance (2007)
0.03
0.028495412 = product of:
0.042743117 = sum of:
0.025419034 = weight(_text_:of in 798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025419034 = score(doc=798,freq=26.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.31146988 = fieldWeight in 798, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=798)
0.01732408 = product of:
0.03464816 = sum of:
0.03464816 = weight(_text_:science in 798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03464816 = score(doc=798,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.25204095 = fieldWeight in 798, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=798)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Relevance is a, if not even the, key notion in information science in general and information retrieval in particular. This two-part critical review traces and synthesizes the scholarship on relevance over the past 30 years or so and provides an updated framework within which the still widely dissonant ideas and works about relevance might be interpreted and related. It is a continuation and update of a similar review that appeared in 1975 under the same title, considered here as being Part I. The present review is organized in two parts: Part II addresses the questions related to nature and manifestations of relevance, and Part III addresses questions related to relevance behavior and effects. In Part II, the nature of relevance is discussed in terms of meaning ascribed to relevance, theories used or proposed, and models that have been developed. The manifestations of relevance are classified as to several kinds of relevance that form an interdependent system of relevancies. In Part III, relevance behavior and effects are synthesized using experimental and observational works that incorporated data. In both parts, each section concludes with a summary that in effect provides an interpretation and synthesis of contemporary thinking on the topic treated or suggests hypotheses for future research. Analyses of some of the major trends that shape relevance work are offered in conclusions.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.13, S.2126-2144
-
Spink, A.; Saracevic, T.: Dynamics of search term selection during mediated online searching (1993)
0.03
0.027539104 = product of:
0.041308656 = sum of:
0.029306183 = weight(_text_:of in 7968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029306183 = score(doc=7968,freq=24.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 7968, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7968)
0.012002475 = product of:
0.02400495 = sum of:
0.02400495 = weight(_text_:science in 7968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02400495 = score(doc=7968,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 7968, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7968)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- One in a series of studies on the selection of search terms during an online search involving users and intermediaries in real online interactive situations. Considers: during what stage of the search process were search terms from different sources selected?; how were the search terms selected at different stages of the search process connected with retrieval of relevant answers as judges by users?; and in what sequences were the search terms selected, in respect to their sources. Sequences of selected search terms were analyzed to describe the types and frequencies of changes that occur in such sequences. Results indicate that search term selection follows regular patterns in the dynamics of the search process. Discusses implications of findings
- Source
- Integrating technologies - converging professions: proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Columbus, OH, 24-28 October 1993. Ed.: S. Bonzi
-
Mokros, H.B.; Mullins, L.S.; Saracevic, T.: Practice and personhood in professional interaction : social identities and information needs (1995)
0.03
0.02670734 = product of:
0.04006101 = sum of:
0.028058534 = weight(_text_:of in 4080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028058534 = score(doc=4080,freq=22.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.34381276 = fieldWeight in 4080, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4080)
0.012002475 = product of:
0.02400495 = sum of:
0.02400495 = weight(_text_:science in 4080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02400495 = score(doc=4080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 4080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4080)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Information seeking and provision does not occur in a vacuum, but is shaped and affected by the way that individuals convey regard for themselves and for each other. Reports 2 studies that explore the intersection between professional and personal or relational dimensions of intermediary practice during the research phase of a set of online computer search interactions that aim to address user information queries. The 1st study examines and compares, through an interpretative microanalytic approach, explicit and implicit situation defining assumptions contained in the initial talk, or opening moves, of 4 intermediaries in interaction with 2 users each. The 2nd study seeks to verify, quantitatively, interpretative claims developed in the 1st study through an analysis of intermediaries' use of pronouns in the course of their interactions with users. The specific patterns of results gained through this quantitiative study were consistent with those achieved interpretatively in the 1st study. The results of these studies are discussed within a proposed theoretic framework developed from the perspective of a constitutive theory of communication
- Source
- Library and information science research. 17(1995) no.3, S.237-257
-
Spink, A.; Saracevic, T.: Interaction in information retrieval : selection and effectiveness of search terms (1997)
0.03
0.02670734 = product of:
0.04006101 = sum of:
0.028058534 = weight(_text_:of in 206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028058534 = score(doc=206,freq=22.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.34381276 = fieldWeight in 206, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=206)
0.012002475 = product of:
0.02400495 = sum of:
0.02400495 = weight(_text_:science in 206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02400495 = score(doc=206,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 206, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=206)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- We investigated the sources and effectiveness of search terms used during mediated on-line searching under real-life (as opposed to laboratory) circumstances. A stratified model of information retrieval (IR) interaction served as a framework for the analysis. For the analysis, we used the on-line transaction logs, videotapes, and transcribed dialogue of the presearch and on-line interaction between 40 users and 4 professional intermediaries. Each user provided one question and interacted with one of the four intermediaries. Searching was done using DIALOG. Five sources of search terms were identified: (1) the users' written question statements, (2) terms derived from users' domain knowledge during the interaction, (3) terms extracted from retrieved items as relevance feedback, (4) database thesaurus, and (5) terms derived by intermediaries during the interaction. Distribution, retrieval effectiveness, transition sequences, and correlation of search terms from different sources were investigated. Search terms from users' written question statements and term relevance feedback were the most productive sources of terms contributing to the retrieval of items judged relevant by users. Implications of the findings are discussed
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 48(1997) no.8, S.741-761
