-
Boll, J.J.: Shelf browsing, open access and storage capacity in research libraries (1985)
0.04
0.04260742 = product of:
0.063911125 = sum of:
0.03190453 = weight(_text_:of in 3326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03190453 = score(doc=3326,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 3326, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3326)
0.0320066 = product of:
0.0640132 = sum of:
0.0640132 = weight(_text_:science in 3326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0640132 = score(doc=3326,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 3326, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3326)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Imprint
- Champaign, Ill. : Univ. of Illinois, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
-
Hyman, R.J.: Shelf classification research : past, present, future? (1980)
0.04
0.037281495 = product of:
0.05592224 = sum of:
0.027916465 = weight(_text_:of in 3498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027916465 = score(doc=3498,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 3498, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3498)
0.028005775 = product of:
0.05601155 = sum of:
0.05601155 = weight(_text_:science in 3498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05601155 = score(doc=3498,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 3498, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3498)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Series
- University of Illinois, Graduate School of Library Science: occasional papers; no.146
-
Schössow, T.; Christoffersen, A.; Norlem, E.; Christensen, S.: Art in the children's library (1992)
0.04
0.035109516 = product of:
0.052664272 = sum of:
0.027916465 = weight(_text_:of in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027916465 = score(doc=913,freq=16.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
0.024747808 = product of:
0.049495615 = sum of:
0.049495615 = weight(_text_:22 in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049495615 = score(doc=913,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Describes a project designed to integrate art into the children's library at Espergaerde in Denmark. Explains the aims of the project, principally to make the use of the library an artistic experience, and the 3 tasks the project was to fulfil: the redesign of the interior using artwork by local artists; a change from the traditional arrangement of fiction; and provision of workshop facilities for children to exercise their artistic inclinations. Details how these tasks were accopmplished and discusses the results of the project, stressing the renewed appreciation of art and the importance of passing that on to children
- Source
- Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.1, S.20-22
-
Rotten, C. v.d.: oderzoek naar alternatieve plaatsing : Bijna net zoveel systemen als bibliotheken (1995)
0.03
0.032616116 = product of:
0.048924174 = sum of:
0.024176367 = weight(_text_:of in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024176367 = score(doc=4660,freq=12.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
0.024747808 = product of:
0.049495615 = sum of:
0.049495615 = weight(_text_:22 in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049495615 = score(doc=4660,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In the last 10 years a number of libraries in the Netherlands have developed akternative shelf arrangements to the standard SISO system. A survey undertaken at Felde children's library following the implementation of an alternative arrangement showed that children had been unaware of the change. In 1989 the Nederlands Bibliothekk en Lektuur Centrum (Dutch Centre for Libraries and Reading) began developing a system based on trials at 15 libraries. Further implementations of the system should take account of developments with automated catalogues
- Footnote
- Übers. des Titels: Almost as many systems as libraries: a study of alternative shelf arrangement schems
- Source
- Bibliotheek en samenleving. 23(1995) no.11, S.20-22
-
Saarti, J.: Experiments with categorising fiction in Lohtajy Library (1992)
0.03
0.031880446 = product of:
0.047820665 = sum of:
0.019537456 = weight(_text_:of in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019537456 = score(doc=31,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
0.028283209 = product of:
0.056566417 = sum of:
0.056566417 = weight(_text_:22 in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056566417 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The inspiration for categorising of fiction has been the observation that this kind of arrangement serves those clients who look for books by browsing the shelves. The evidence for this is that catgorisation has increased loans of fiction and helped clients to find older literature that current reviews have already left behind
- Source
- Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.4, S.22-24,29
-
Manzi, S.: Classifying philosophy at the Library of the Scuola Normale Superiore (Pisa, Italy) : Part B: evaluation and experience (2009)
0.03
0.031061536 = product of:
0.046592303 = sum of:
0.025379896 = weight(_text_:of in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025379896 = score(doc=1858,freq=18.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.3109903 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.021212406 = product of:
0.042424813 = sum of:
0.042424813 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042424813 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The verification of the functionality of the Philosophy classification schema adopted at the Library of the Scuola Normale Superiore needs to take into account the context: the Library is both a special and a multidisciplinary library; its collections reflect the history of the SNS. The philosophy collection has a specialized and selective nature, as do others within the same Library; the Library is open shelves, and classification is used as a shelving and location device. Bearing in mind the above conditions, the second part of this paper examines the strengths and weaknesses of the schema in order to highlight its suitability to match a coherent classification of documents with the effective fruition by the users.
- Date
- 9. 1.2010 14:22:20
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "The philosophy of classifying philosophy"
-
Minter, C.: Systematic or mechanical arrangement? : Revisiting a debate in German library science, 1790-1914 (2017)
0.03
0.030921802 = product of:
0.046382703 = sum of:
0.02637858 = weight(_text_:of in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02637858 = score(doc=5066,freq=28.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.32322758 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
0.020004123 = product of:
0.040008247 = sum of:
0.040008247 = weight(_text_:science in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040008247 = score(doc=5066,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This article examines changing views on "systematic" or classified shelf-arrangement in German library science from Kayser's 1790 work Ueber die Manipulation bey der Einrichtung einer Bibliothek to the 1914 Versammlung deutscher Bibliothekare in Leipzig, at which Georg Leyh delivered the seminal paper, "Systematische oder mechanische Aufstellung?" Systematic arrangement was, with few exceptions, held up as an ideal throughout the nineteenth century; but by 1914 it could be agreed to belong to a past era in which, in the words of Leyh, libraries ran as a "Kleinbetrieb" [small business] (Leyh 1913, 100, "Das Dogma von der systematischen Aufstellung II-IV." Zentralblatt für Bibliothekswesen 30:97-135). In particular, this article seeks to explore how changing views on the ideal of systematic shelf-arrangement in German library science during this period reflected evolving conceptions of librarianship. For nineteenth-century writers such as Ebert, Molbech, and Petzholdt, systematic classification and arrangement had meaning against the backdrop of an encyclopedic tradition within which libraries and librarians played an important role in organizing and presenting a rational overview of the universe of knowledge - an overview that was to be both physical and intellectual. The waning of the ideal of systematic arrangement at the turn of the twentieth century was associated with a sense of loss, as an intellectual or "scholarly" tradition of librarianship was seen to give way to more utilitarian and "bureaucratic" expectations. The changing fortunes of the ideal of systematic arrangement in German library science between 1790 and 1914 may be seen to illustrate how progress and loss are often inextricably linked in the history of libraries and librarianship
-
Stokmans, M.; Oomens, A.: Meer grasduinen door genreplaatsing? : genre- of alfabetische plaatsing: onderzoek naar verschillen in gebruikersgedrag (1997)
0.03
0.029658487 = product of:
0.04448773 = sum of:
0.01973992 = weight(_text_:of in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01973992 = score(doc=883,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
0.024747808 = product of:
0.049495615 = sum of:
0.049495615 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049495615 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- As part of her doctoral dissertation at Brabant Catholic University in the Netherlands A. Oomens recently held a survey to determine the relative merits of author and subject arrangements for non fiction collections. Although users browsing through the collections were more likely to find material of interest via a subject arrangement, those looking for a particular title were best served by an author arrangement. All users interviewed preferred the arrangement with which they were familiar
- Source
- BibliotheekBlad. 1(1997) no.21, S.22-23
-
Shorten, J.; Seikel, M.; Ahrberg, J.H.: Why do you still use dewey? : Academic libraries that continue with dewey decimal classification (2005)
0.03
0.026752979 = product of:
0.040129468 = sum of:
0.01891706 = weight(_text_:of in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01891706 = score(doc=125,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
0.021212406 = product of:
0.042424813 = sum of:
0.042424813 = weight(_text_:22 in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042424813 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Reclassification was a popular trend during the 1960s and 1970s for many academic libraries wanting to change from Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) to Library of Congress (LC) Classification. In 2002, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale's Morris Library changed from DDC to LC. If one academic library recently converted, might other DDC academic libraries consider switching, too? Conversely, for those academic libraries that remain with DDC, what are the reasons they continue with it? A survey of thirty-four DDC academic libraries in the United States and Canada determined what factors influence these libraries to continue using DDC, and if reclassification is something they have considered or are considering. The survey also investigated whether patrons of these DDC libraries prefer LC and if their preference influences the library's decision to reclassify. Results from the survey indicate that the issue of reclassification is being considered by some of these libraries even though, overall, they are satisfied with DDC. The study was unable to determine if patrons' preference for a classification scheme influenced a library's decision to reclassify.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Whelan, J.A.: Public access compact shelving in an academic branch library (1996)
0.03
0.026375443 = product of:
0.039563164 = sum of:
0.011279955 = weight(_text_:of in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011279955 = score(doc=344,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.13821793 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
0.028283209 = product of:
0.056566417 = sum of:
0.056566417 = weight(_text_:22 in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056566417 = score(doc=344,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The Colorado University at Boulder Libraries, Leonard H. Gemmill Engineering Library, USA, uses mobile compact shelving for its open stack collection. Describes the library collection, the shelves, configuration and equipment, capacity and use, maintenance and repairs, and the affect of power cuts and flooding. Discusses ths staff and users' reactions and the lessons learnt
- Source
- Colorado libraries. 22(1996) no.1, S.29-32
-
Lazinger, S.S.: LC Classification of a library and information science library for maximum shelf retrieval (1984)
0.02
0.022507539 = product of:
0.033761308 = sum of:
0.0139582325 = weight(_text_:of in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0139582325 = score(doc=339,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.17103596 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
0.019803073 = product of:
0.039606147 = sum of:
0.039606147 = weight(_text_:science in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039606147 = score(doc=339,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2881068 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In reclassifying a Library and Information Science library from DDC to LC, an attempt was made to concentrate books with related subject headings on the shelf for maximum shelf retrieval even in cases where the Subject Authorities or C.I.P. assign them varying numbers. Most of the shelf concentration was achieved either by selecting a single number for a given heading and then classifying all books with the heading in that number or by replacing the standard LC number for a heading with one which placed it together with related books on the shelf.
-
Lin, W.; Yueh, H.-P.; Wu, H.-Y.; Fu, L.-C.: Developing a service robot for a children's library : a design-based research approach (2014)
0.02
0.020613022 = product of:
0.030919533 = sum of:
0.01891706 = weight(_text_:of in 1198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01891706 = score(doc=1198,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 1198, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1198)
0.012002475 = product of:
0.02400495 = sum of:
0.02400495 = weight(_text_:science in 1198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02400495 = score(doc=1198,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 1198, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1198)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Understanding book-locating behavior in libraries is important and leads to more effective services that support patrons throughout the book-locating process. This study adopted a design-based approach to incorporate robotic assistance in investigating the book-locating behaviors of child patrons, and developed a service robot for child patrons in library settings. We describe the iterative cycles and process to develop a robot to assist with locating resources in libraries. Stakeholders, including child patrons and librarians, were consulted about their needs, preferences, and performance in locating library resources with robotic assistance. Their needs were analyzed and incorporated into the design of the library robot to provide comprehensive support. The results of the study suggest that the library robot was effective as a mobile and humanoid service agent for providing motivation and knowledgeable guidance to help child patrons in the initially complicated sequence of locating resources.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.2, S.290-301
-
Müller-Dreier, A.: Einheitsklassifikation : die Geschichte einer fortwirkenden Idee (1994)
0.02
0.016484652 = product of:
0.024726978 = sum of:
0.0070499717 = weight(_text_:of in 2052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070499717 = score(doc=2052,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.086386204 = fieldWeight in 2052, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2052)
0.017677005 = product of:
0.03535401 = sum of:
0.03535401 = weight(_text_:22 in 2052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03535401 = score(doc=2052,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2052, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2052)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Mitteilungsblatt VdB NW N.F. 45(1995) H.3, S.332-333 (H. Lohse) [Auch wenn H. Lohse meint, das Buch bzw. die zugrundeliegende Assessorarbeit hätte nicht geschrieben werden müssen, so liefert doch gerade seine Rezension den Beweis, wie notwendig diese Arbeit war]; BuB 47(1995) H.10, S.955-959 (I. Nöther) ["Diese von einem Berufsanfänger vorgelegte Arbeit ist eine Spitzenleistung, ein Meisterwerk, auf das der Autor, seine Ausbildungsstätte sowie der Verlag und der Herausgeber der Reihe sotz sein können. Für jeden, der sich heute und in Zukunft mit Fragen der Klassifikation befaßt, ist die Lektüre dieses Buches Pflicht"]; Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis 20(1996) H.1, S.134-135 (W. Gödert); Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.3/4, S.178 (B. Lorenz); Journal of documentation 51(1995) no.4, S.434-437 (J.S. Andrews)
-
Frigerio, L.: From disorder to order : a challenge for the philosopher and the librarian (Milan, Italy) (2009)
0.01
0.011022434 = product of:
0.0330673 = sum of:
0.0330673 = weight(_text_:of in 3270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0330673 = score(doc=3270,freq=44.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.40518725 = fieldWeight in 3270, product of:
6.6332498 = tf(freq=44.0), with freq of:
44.0 = termFreq=44.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3270)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The Philosophy Library at the University of Milan was born in the fifties by the merger of the two Institutes of Philosophy and the History of Philosophy. Once the restoration had been completed, it was necessary to devise a suitable classification system in order to arrange the books and to meet the new research needs of the Institutes. The project was untrusted to Prof. Corrado Mangione and Prof. Maria Assunta del Torre, with the theoretical contribution of Giuliana Sapori, chief Director of Central Library of the Faculty of Laws and Humanities. The model had been conceived as completely anew, without any reference toother existing classification systems. The inspiring principles were from one hand the choice for an open shelving system, from the other one the idea that the orientation criteria and the book search had to be user-friendly for everyone. This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the making-up of the call number as applied to each section of the collection, and how the scheme has been developed over the past fifty years. Points of strenght and weakness of the scheme are also discussed at the light of the technological innovations which have gradually affected the whole of the library activities, notably with the introduction of the electronic catalogue. The original classification scheme has maintened its coherence and functionality over time, in spite of the expansion of the collection and the automation of all stages of the classification process. This is the main reason to keep using it in the future.
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "The philosophy of classifying philosophy"
-
LeBlanc, J.: Classification and shelflisting as value added : some remarks on the relative worth and price of predictibility, serendipity, and depth of access (1995)
0.01
0.010911653 = product of:
0.032734957 = sum of:
0.032734957 = weight(_text_:of in 3667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032734957 = score(doc=3667,freq=22.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 3667, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3667)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- There seems to be general agreement in the library community that a predictably ordered system of classification, leading to easy browsability of a library collection either in the stacks or in an OPAC, is an indispensible requirement for the kind of access patrons have come to expect, and for the reasonable success of the searching strategies they normally use. In this vein, examines the intrinsic value of browsing. In addition, with the help of some rough data compiled during a test conducted at Cornell University in the spring of 1994, estimates the cost of maintaining the collocative and alphabetical integrity of shelflist files for works by or about individual literary authors
-
Martínez-Ávila, D.; San Segundo, R.; Olson, H.A.: ¬The use of BISAC in libraries as new cases of Reader-Interest Classifications (2014)
0.01
0.010911653 = product of:
0.032734957 = sum of:
0.032734957 = weight(_text_:of in 1973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032734957 = score(doc=1973,freq=22.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 1973, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1973)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In the recent years, several libraries in the United States have been experimenting with Book Industry Standards and Communications (BISAC), the classification system of the book industry, as an alternative to the Dewey Decimal Classification. Although rarely discussed, these cases of implementation of BISAC arguably resemble other past cases of replacement of traditional classifications that received the name of reader-interest classifications. In this article, a comparison of the BISAC cases to the previous cases of reader-interest classifications is taken in order to determine if the current application of BISAC to libraries is susceptible to the same problems, dangers, and ends as occurred in the past.
-
Crow, L.: Shelf arrangement systems for sound recordings : survey of american academic music libraries (1991)
0.01
0.010403852 = product of:
0.031211555 = sum of:
0.031211555 = weight(_text_:of in 2473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031211555 = score(doc=2473,freq=20.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 2473, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2473)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Of the many shelf arrangement systems available for sound recordings there are two main types: those that classify and those that do not. To determine how libraries are arranging their sound recording collections today, a questionnaire was sent to 123 academic music libraries with collections of 5.000 or more sound recordings. Although LCC is used in 78% of the libraries of the libraries for books and in 74% of the libraries for scores, it is used in only 12% of the libraries for sound recordings. Accession number is the clear choice of academic music libraries for the shelving of sound recordings with 66% of the libraries surveyed using it
-
Bettella, C.; Capodaglio, C.; Ramous, C.; Vettore, M.C.: Declassifying the Library of Congress Classification : the case of the Department of Philosophy Library at the University of Padova (Padua, Italy) (2009)
0.01
0.010297143 = product of:
0.030891428 = sum of:
0.030891428 = weight(_text_:of in 3271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030891428 = score(doc=3271,freq=60.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.37852538 = fieldWeight in 3271, product of:
7.745967 = tf(freq=60.0), with freq of:
60.0 = termFreq=60.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3271)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The ongoing project to revise the arrangement of the open shelves library collections occasioned a historiographic account of the implementation phases of the Library of Congress Classification (LCC), subclasses B-BJ - Philosophy and Psychology, at the Library of the Department of Philosophy of the University of Padua (Italy). The schema was adopted as a collection shelving and location device since the Library institution in 1997. The LCC international acknowledgement and the neutral framework of the schema have undoubtedly played a role of driving factors at the first stage of the selection process. However, the implementation of the classification scheme had to consider critical issues like the shortage of the library area, the selection criteria of the appropriate bibliographic material, as well as the effort to settle and tailor the original schema to the specific needs of the library collections and its end-users. The purpose of this paper is twofold: from one hand, we aim to examine in detail each stage of the implementation project in order to provide a preliminary impact evaluation of the classification schema both on the collections management and development and on the research practices of the local users community; from the other, we intend to highlight the principal factors that have implied a sort of declassification process of the system itself. In conclusion, we argue that the declassification of library collections can be read, from a bottom-up perspective, as index of vitality of the collections themselves, as well as a valuable basis for planning the next steps of the Library project.
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "The philosophy of classifying philosophy"
-
Massey, S.A.; Malinconico, S.M.: Cutting cataloging costs : accepting LC Classification call numbers from OCLC cataloging copy (1997)
0.01
0.00986996 = product of:
0.02960988 = sum of:
0.02960988 = weight(_text_:of in 507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02960988 = score(doc=507,freq=18.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 507, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=507)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Cataloging policy at the Alabama University Libraries allows the acceptance of LCC call numbers from OCLC cataloguing copy into the local database without shelflisting. Reports results of a study to measure error rates for locally unshelflisted samples and a control group of locally assigned and shelflisted call numbers to determine whether this policy produces disarrangement of the local online shelflist. Results show no significant differences between samples, indicating that the cataloguer's task of local shelflisting is not a cost effective use of their time. Analysis of the error data suggests that the types of disorder created by shelflisting errors would not impede the retrieval of items while subject browsing, but further study is needed to confirm this
-
Tiggelen, N. van: ¬Een landelijk systeem zou ideaal zijn : bibliotheken van Leerdam en Weert experimenteren met alternatieve plaatsing (1998)
0.01
0.0094277365 = product of:
0.028283209 = sum of:
0.028283209 = product of:
0.056566417 = sum of:
0.056566417 = weight(_text_:22 in 4494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056566417 = score(doc=4494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4494)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- BibliotheekBlad. 2(1998) no.10/11, S.22-24
