-
Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980)
0.10
0.09683596 = product of:
0.14525394 = sum of:
0.03453767 = weight(_text_:of in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03453767 = score(doc=5835,freq=12.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.42320424 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
0.11071627 = sum of:
0.040008247 = weight(_text_:science in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040008247 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
0.07070802 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07070802 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 13:22:44
- Source
- Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u, L. Kajberg
-
Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012)
0.06
0.06487112 = product of:
0.09730667 = sum of:
0.027304424 = weight(_text_:of in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027304424 = score(doc=4888,freq=30.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.33457235 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
0.07000224 = sum of:
0.020004123 = weight(_text_:science in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020004123 = score(doc=4888,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
0.04999812 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04999812 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper centres on the tools for the management of new digital documents, which are not only textual, but also visual-video, audio or multimedia in the full sense. Among the aims is to demonstrate that operating within the terms of generic Information Retrieval through textual language only is limiting, and it is instead necessary to consider ampler criteria, such as those of MultiMedia Information Retrieval, according to which, every type of digital document can be analyzed and searched by the proper elements of language for its proper nature. MMIR is presented as the organic complex of the systems of Text Retrieval, Visual Retrieval, Video Retrieval, and Audio Retrieval, each of which has an approach to information management that handles the concrete textual, visual, audio, or video content of the documents directly, here defined as content-based. In conclusion, the limits of this content-based objective access to documents is underlined. The discrepancy known as the semantic gap is that which occurs between semantic-interpretive access and content-based access. Finally, the integration of these conceptions is explained, gathering and composing the merits and the advantages of each of the approaches and of the systems to access to information.
- Date
- 22. 1.2012 13:02:10
- Footnote
- Bezugnahme auf: Enser, P.G.B.: Visual image retrieval. In: Annual review of information science and technology. 42(2008), S.3-42.
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
-
White, M.D.; Marsh, E.E.: Content analysis : a flexible methodology (2006)
0.06
0.056897886 = product of:
0.085346825 = sum of:
0.01891706 = weight(_text_:of in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01891706 = score(doc=5589,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
0.066429764 = sum of:
0.02400495 = weight(_text_:science in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02400495 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
0.042424813 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042424813 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Content analysis is a highly flexible research method that has been widely used in library and information science (LIS) studies with varying research goals and objectives. The research method is applied in qualitative, quantitative, and sometimes mixed modes of research frameworks and employs a wide range of analytical techniques to generate findings and put them into context. This article characterizes content analysis as a systematic, rigorous approach to analyzing documents obtained or generated in the course of research. It briefly describes the steps involved in content analysis, differentiates between quantitative and qualitative content analysis, and shows that content analysis serves the purposes of both quantitative research and qualitative research. The authors draw on selected LIS studies that have used content analysis to illustrate the concepts addressed in the article. The article also serves as a gateway to methodological books and articles that provide more detail about aspects of content analysis discussed only briefly in the article.
- Source
- Library trends. 55(2006) no.1, S.22-45
-
Chubin, D.E.; Moitra, S.D.: Content analysis of references : adjunct or alternative to citation counting? (1975)
0.04
0.04260742 = product of:
0.063911125 = sum of:
0.03190453 = weight(_text_:of in 5647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03190453 = score(doc=5647,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 5647, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5647)
0.0320066 = product of:
0.0640132 = sum of:
0.0640132 = weight(_text_:science in 5647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0640132 = score(doc=5647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 5647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5647)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Social studies of science. 5(1975), S.423-441
-
Hicks, C.; Rush, J.; Strong, S.: Content analysis (1977)
0.04
0.036377676 = product of:
0.05456651 = sum of:
0.02255991 = weight(_text_:of in 7514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02255991 = score(doc=7514,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 7514, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7514)
0.0320066 = product of:
0.0640132 = sum of:
0.0640132 = weight(_text_:science in 7514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0640132 = score(doc=7514,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 7514, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7514)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of computer science and technology, vol.6
-
Farrow, J.: Indexing as a cognitive process (1994)
0.04
0.036377676 = product of:
0.05456651 = sum of:
0.02255991 = weight(_text_:of in 1257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02255991 = score(doc=1257,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 1257, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1257)
0.0320066 = product of:
0.0640132 = sum of:
0.0640132 = weight(_text_:science in 1257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0640132 = score(doc=1257,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 1257, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1257)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.53, [=Suppl.16]
-
Kremer-Marietti, A.: Thematic analysis (1986)
0.04
0.036377676 = product of:
0.05456651 = sum of:
0.02255991 = weight(_text_:of in 1273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02255991 = score(doc=1273,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 1273, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1273)
0.0320066 = product of:
0.0640132 = sum of:
0.0640132 = weight(_text_:science in 1273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0640132 = score(doc=1273,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 1273, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1273)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.41, [=Suppl.6]
-
Baxendale, P.: Content analysis, specification and control (1966)
0.04
0.036377676 = product of:
0.05456651 = sum of:
0.02255991 = weight(_text_:of in 218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02255991 = score(doc=218,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 218, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=218)
0.0320066 = product of:
0.0640132 = sum of:
0.0640132 = weight(_text_:science in 218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0640132 = score(doc=218,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 218, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=218)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 1(1966), S.71-106
-
Sharp, J.R.: Content analysis, specification, and control (1967)
0.04
0.036377676 = product of:
0.05456651 = sum of:
0.02255991 = weight(_text_:of in 226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02255991 = score(doc=226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=226)
0.0320066 = product of:
0.0640132 = sum of:
0.0640132 = weight(_text_:science in 226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0640132 = score(doc=226,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 226, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=226)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 2(1967), S.87-122
-
Taulbee, O.E.: Content analysis, specification, and control (1968)
0.04
0.036377676 = product of:
0.05456651 = sum of:
0.02255991 = weight(_text_:of in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02255991 = score(doc=232,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
0.0320066 = product of:
0.0640132 = sum of:
0.0640132 = weight(_text_:science in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0640132 = score(doc=232,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 3(1968), S.105-136
-
Fairthorne, R.A.: Content analysis, specification, and control (1969)
0.04
0.036377676 = product of:
0.05456651 = sum of:
0.02255991 = weight(_text_:of in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02255991 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
0.0320066 = product of:
0.0640132 = sum of:
0.0640132 = weight(_text_:science in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0640132 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 4(1969), S.73-110
-
Belkin, N.J.: ¬The problem of 'matching' in information retrieval (1980)
0.04
0.035540756 = product of:
0.053311132 = sum of:
0.029306183 = weight(_text_:of in 1329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029306183 = score(doc=1329,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 1329, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1329)
0.02400495 = product of:
0.0480099 = sum of:
0.0480099 = weight(_text_:science in 1329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0480099 = score(doc=1329,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 1329, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1329)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u. L. Kajberg
-
Pejtersen, A.M.: Implications of users' value perception for the design of knowledge based bibliographic retrieval systems (1985)
0.04
0.035540756 = product of:
0.053311132 = sum of:
0.029306183 = weight(_text_:of in 2088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029306183 = score(doc=2088,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 2088, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2088)
0.02400495 = product of:
0.0480099 = sum of:
0.0480099 = weight(_text_:science in 2088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0480099 = score(doc=2088,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 2088, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2088)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- 2nd Symposium on Empirical Foundations of Information and Software Science, 3.-5.10.84, Atlanta
-
Roberts, C.W.; Popping, R.: Computer-supported content analysis : some recent developments (1993)
0.03
0.034355037 = product of:
0.051532555 = sum of:
0.031528432 = weight(_text_:of in 4236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031528432 = score(doc=4236,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.38633084 = fieldWeight in 4236, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4236)
0.020004123 = product of:
0.040008247 = sum of:
0.040008247 = weight(_text_:science in 4236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040008247 = score(doc=4236,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 4236, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4236)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Presents an overview of some recent developments in the clause-based content analysis of linguistic data. Introduces network analysis of evaluative texts, for the analysis of cognitive maps, and linguistic content analysis. Focuses on the types of substantive inferences afforded by the three approaches
- Source
- Social science computer review. 11(1993) no.3, S.283-291
-
Shaw, R.: Information organization and the philosophy of history (2013)
0.03
0.034009755 = product of:
0.05101463 = sum of:
0.031211555 = weight(_text_:of in 946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031211555 = score(doc=946,freq=20.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 946, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=946)
0.019803073 = product of:
0.039606147 = sum of:
0.039606147 = weight(_text_:science in 946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039606147 = score(doc=946,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2881068 = fieldWeight in 946, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=946)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The philosophy of history can help articulate problems relevant to information organization. One such problem is "aboutness": How do texts relate to the world? In response to this problem, philosophers of history have developed theories of colligation describing how authors bind together phenomena under organizing concepts. Drawing on these ideas, I present a theory of subject analysis that avoids the problematic illusion of an independent "landscape" of subjects. This theory points to a broad vision of the future of information organization and some specific challenges to be met.
- Series
- Advances in information science
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.6, S.1092-1103
-
Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992)
0.03
0.033895414 = product of:
0.05084312 = sum of:
0.02255991 = weight(_text_:of in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02255991 = score(doc=5830,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
0.028283209 = product of:
0.056566417 = sum of:
0.056566417 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056566417 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper examnines various isues that arise in establishing a theoretical basis for an experimental fiction analysis system. It analyzes the warrants of fiction and of works about fiction. From this analysis, it derives classificatory requirements for a fiction system. Classificatory techniques that may contribute to the specification of data elements in fiction are suggested
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 13:22:08
-
Hjoerland, B.: Towards a theory of aboutness, subject, topicality, theme, domain, field, content ... and relevance (2001)
0.03
0.032941967 = product of:
0.04941295 = sum of:
0.02960988 = weight(_text_:of in 6032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02960988 = score(doc=6032,freq=18.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 6032, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6032)
0.019803073 = product of:
0.039606147 = sum of:
0.039606147 = weight(_text_:science in 6032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039606147 = score(doc=6032,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2881068 = fieldWeight in 6032, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6032)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Theories of aboutness and theories of subject analysis and of related concepts such as topicality are often isolated from each other in the literature of information science (IS) and related disciplines. In IS it is important to consider the nature and meaning of these concepts, which is closely related to theoretical and metatheoretical issues in information retrieval (IR). A theory of IR must specify which concepts should be regarded as synonymous concepts and explain how the meaning of the nonsynonymous concepts should be defined
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.9, S.774-778
-
Hjoerland, B.: ¬The concept of 'subject' in information science (1992)
0.03
0.032418907 = product of:
0.04862836 = sum of:
0.031654295 = weight(_text_:of in 2247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031654295 = score(doc=2247,freq=28.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.38787308 = fieldWeight in 2247, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2247)
0.016974064 = product of:
0.033948127 = sum of:
0.033948127 = weight(_text_:science in 2247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033948127 = score(doc=2247,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.24694869 = fieldWeight in 2247, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2247)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This article presents a theoretical investigation of the concept of 'subject' or 'subject matter' in library and information science. Most conceptions of 'subject' in the literature are not explicit but implicit. Various indexing and classification theories, including automatic indexing and citation indexing, have their own more or less implicit concepts of subject. This fact puts the emphasis on making the implicit theorie of 'subject matter' explicit as the first step. ... The different conceptions of 'subject' can therefore be classified into epistemological positions, e.g. 'subjective idealism' (or the empiric/positivistic viewpoint), 'objective idealism' (the rationalistic viewpoint), 'pragmatism' and 'materialism/realism'. The third and final step is to propose a new theory of subject matter based on an explicit theory of knowledge. In this article this is done from the point of view of a realistic/materialistic epistemology. From this standpoint the subject of a document is defined as the epistemological potentials of that document
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 48(1992), S.172-200
-
Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Content analysis : a special case of text compression (1989)
0.03
0.03213601 = product of:
0.048204012 = sum of:
0.028199887 = weight(_text_:of in 3549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028199887 = score(doc=3549,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.34554482 = fieldWeight in 3549, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3549)
0.020004123 = product of:
0.040008247 = sum of:
0.040008247 = weight(_text_:science in 3549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040008247 = score(doc=3549,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 3549, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3549)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Presents a theoretical model, based on the Flower/Hayes model of expository writing, of the process involved in content analysis for abstracting and indexing.
- Imprint
- Amsterdam : Elsevier Science Publishers
- Source
- Information, knowledge, evolution. Proceedings of the 44th FID Congress, Helsinki, 28.8.-1.9.1988. Ed. by S. Koshiala and R. Launo
-
Chen, S.-J.; Lee, H.-L.: Art images and mental associations : a preliminary exploration (2014)
0.03
0.03197678 = product of:
0.04796517 = sum of:
0.02675276 = weight(_text_:of in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02675276 = score(doc=1416,freq=20.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.32781258 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
0.021212406 = product of:
0.042424813 = sum of:
0.042424813 = weight(_text_:22 in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042424813 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper reports on the preliminary findings of a study that explores mental associations made by novices viewing art images. In a controlled environment, 20 Taiwanese college students responded to the question "What does the painting remind you of?" after viewing each digitized image of 15 oil paintings by a famous Taiwanese artist. Rather than focusing on the representation or interpretation of art, the study attempted to solicit information about how non-experts are stimulated by art. This paper reports on the analysis of participant responses to three of the images, and describes a12-type taxonomy of association emerged from the analysis. While 9 of the types are derived and adapted from facets in the Art & Architecture Thesaurus, three new types - Artistic Influence Association, Reactive Association, and Prototype Association - are discovered. The conclusion briefly discusses both the significance of the findings and the implications for future research.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
