Search (87 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Söhler, M.: Schluss mit Schema F (2011) 0.03 
    0.028269565 = product of:
  0.14134783 = sum of:
    0.14134783 = weight(_text_:crawler in 4439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14134783 = score(doc=4439,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39420572 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048587184 = queryNorm
        0.3585636 = fieldWeight in 4439, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4439)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    "Wörter haben oft mehrere Bedeutungen. Einige kennen den "Kanal" als künstliche Wasserstraße, andere vom Fernsehen. Die Waage kann zum Erfassen des Gewichts nützlich sein oder zur Orientierung auf der Horoskopseite. Casablanca ist eine Stadt und ein Film zugleich. Wo Menschen mit der Zeit Bedeutungen unterscheiden und verarbeiten lernen, können dies Suchmaschinen von selbst nicht. Stets listen sie dumpf hintereinander weg alles auf, was sie zu einem Thema finden. Damit das nicht so bleibt, haben sich nun Google, Yahoo und die zu Microsoft gehörende Suchmaschine Bing zusammengetan, um der Suche im Netz mehr Verständnis zu verpassen. Man spricht dabei auch von einer "semantischen Suche". Das Ergebnis heißt Schema.org. Wer die Webseite einmal besucht, sich ein wenig in die Unterstrukturen hereinklickt und weder Vorkenntnisse im Programmieren noch im Bereich des semantischen Webs hat, wird sich überfordert und gelangweilt wieder abwenden. Doch was hier entstehen könnte, hat das Zeug dazu, Teile des Netzes und speziell die Funktionen von Suchmaschinen mittel- oder langfristig zu verändern. "Große Player sind dabei, sich auf Standards zu einigen", sagt Daniel Bahls, Spezialist für Semantische Technologien beim ZBW Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft in Hamburg. "Die semantischen Technologien stehen schon seit Jahren im Raum und wurden bisher nur im kleineren Kontext verwendet." Denn Schema.org lädt Entwickler, Forscher, die Semantic-Web-Community und am Ende auch alle Betreiber von Websites dazu ein, an der Umgestaltung der Suche im Netz mitzuwirken. Inhalte von Websites sollen mit einem speziellen, aber einheitlichen Vokabular für die Crawler - die Analyseprogramme der Suchmaschinen - gekennzeichnet und aufbereitet werden.
  2. Söhler, M.: "Dumm wie Google" war gestern : semantische Suche im Netz (2011) 0.02 
    0.024735868 = product of:
  0.12367934 = sum of:
    0.12367934 = weight(_text_:crawler in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12367934 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.39420572 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048587184 = queryNorm
        0.31374314 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.113368 = idf(docFreq=35, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    - Neue Standards Doch was hier entstehen könnte, hat das Zeug dazu, Teile des Netzes und speziell die Funktionen von Suchmaschinen mittel- oder langfristig zu verändern. "Große Player sind dabei, sich auf Standards zu einigen", sagt Daniel Bahls, Spezialist für Semantische Technologien beim ZBW Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft in Hamburg. "Die semantischen Technologien stehen schon seit Jahren im Raum und wurden bisher nur im kleineren Kontext verwendet." Denn Schema.org lädt Entwickler, Forscher, die Semantic-Web-Community und am Ende auch alle Betreiber von Websites dazu ein, an der Umgestaltung der Suche im Netz mitzuwirken. "Damit wollen Google, Bing und Yahoo! dem Info-Chaos im WWW den Garaus machen", schreibt André Vatter im Blog ZBW Mediatalk. Inhalte von Websites sollen mit einem speziellen, aber einheitlichen Vokabular für die Crawler der Suchmaschinen gekennzeichnet und aufbereitet werden. Indem Schlagworte, so genannte Tags, in den Code von Websites eingebettet werden, sind Suchmachinen nicht mehr so sehr auf die Analyse der natürlichen Sprache angewiesen, um Texte inhaltlich zu erfassen. Im Blog wird dies als "Semantic Web light" bezeichnet - ein semantisches Web auf niedrigster Ebene. Aber selbst das werde "schon viel bewirken", meint Bahls. "Das semantische Web wird sich über die nächsten Jahrzehnte evolutionär weiterentwickeln." Einen "Abschluss" werde es nie geben, "da eine einheitliche Formalisierung von Begrifflichkeiten auf feiner Stufe kaum möglich ist."
  3. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.02 
    0.02234308 = product of:
  0.1117154 = sum of:
    0.1117154 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1117154 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17014404 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048587184 = queryNorm
        0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  4. Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000) 0.02 
    0.021065256 = product of:
  0.10532628 = sum of:
    0.10532628 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10532628 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17014404 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048587184 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    16. 7.2000 20:58:22
  5. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02 
    0.021065256 = product of:
  0.10532628 = sum of:
    0.10532628 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10532628 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17014404 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048587184 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  6. Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001) 0.02 
    0.0184321 = product of:
  0.09216049 = sum of:
    0.09216049 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09216049 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17014404 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048587184 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    28. 3.2002 9:22:34
  7. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.02 
    0.0184321 = product of:
  0.09216049 = sum of:
    0.09216049 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09216049 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17014404 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048587184 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  8. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004) 0.02 
    0.0184321 = product of:
  0.09216049 = sum of:
    0.09216049 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09216049 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17014404 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048587184 = queryNorm
        0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
  9. Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007) 0.02 
    0.015798941 = product of:
  0.078994706 = sum of:
    0.078994706 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.078994706 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17014404 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048587184 = queryNorm
        0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
  10. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.01 
    0.014895386 = product of:
  0.07447693 = sum of:
    0.07447693 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07447693 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17014404 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048587184 = queryNorm
        0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  11. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.01 
    0.014895386 = product of:
  0.07447693 = sum of:
    0.07447693 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07447693 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17014404 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048587184 = queryNorm
        0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  12. Hoffmann, L.: Metadaten von Internetressourcen und ihre Integrierung in Bibliothekskataloge (1998) 0.01 
    0.013165786 = product of:
  0.06582893 = sum of:
    0.06582893 = weight(_text_:22 in 1032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06582893 = score(doc=1032,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17014404 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048587184 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1032, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1032)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 18:45:36
  13. Essen, F. von: Metadaten - neue Perspektiven für die Erschließung von Netzpublikationen in Bibliotheken : Erster META-LIB-Workshop in Göttingen (1998) 0.01 
    0.013165786 = product of:
  0.06582893 = sum of:
    0.06582893 = weight(_text_:22 in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06582893 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17014404 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048587184 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Bericht über den Workshop, der am 22. u. 23.6.98 in der SUB Göttingen stattfand
  14. Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016) 0.01 
    0.013165786 = product of:
  0.06582893 = sum of:
    0.06582893 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06582893 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17014404 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048587184 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  15. Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016) 0.01 
    0.013165786 = product of:
  0.06582893 = sum of:
    0.06582893 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06582893 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17014404 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048587184 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  16. Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016) 0.01 
    0.013165786 = product of:
  0.06582893 = sum of:
    0.06582893 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06582893 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17014404 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048587184 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  17. Brugger, J.M.: Cataloging for digital libraries (1996) 0.01 
    0.010532628 = product of:
  0.05266314 = sum of:
    0.05266314 = weight(_text_:22 in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05266314 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17014404 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048587184 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.59-73
  18. Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004) 0.01 
    0.010532628 = product of:
  0.05266314 = sum of:
    0.05266314 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05266314 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17014404 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048587184 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
  19. McCallum, S.H.: ¬An introduction to the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) (2004) 0.01 
    0.010532628 = product of:
  0.05266314 = sum of:
    0.05266314 = weight(_text_:22 in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05266314 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17014404 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048587184 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.82-88
  20. Rogers, D.: Cataloguing Internet resources : the evolution of the Dublin Core metadata set (1997) 0.01 
    0.010532628 = product of:
  0.05266314 = sum of:
    0.05266314 = weight(_text_:22 in 903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05266314 = score(doc=903,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17014404 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.048587184 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 903, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=903)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 23(1997) nos.1/2, S.17-22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 74
  • d 11
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 80
  • el 7
  • s 5
  • b 2
  • m 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications