-
Goodrum, A.; Hibbard, C.E.; Fels, C.D.; Woodcock, C.K.: ¬The creation of keysigns : American sign language metadata (2008)
0.03
0.0264105 = product of:
0.052821 = sum of:
0.052821 = product of:
0.105642 = sum of:
0.105642 = weight(_text_:language in 2272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.105642 = score(doc=2272,freq=8.0), product of:
0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.051766515 = queryNorm
0.52016 = fieldWeight in 2272, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2272)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- This paper reports preliminary results from a pilot test of the creation of a folksonomic gestural taxonomy for sign language indexing and retrieval. Skilled sign language interpreters and deaf participants were asked to create sign language metadata or 'Keysigns' that they would assign to classify topics presented by three deaf scientists during a day-log workshop. Although their Keysigns demonstrate a high degree of content conformity, the physical signing itself lacked consistency. Comments made by participants revealed that signed metadata was not a commonly understood concept and that the exercise was cognitively challenging. The paper concludes with suggestions for ways to make the creation of folksonomic Keysign metadata easier from cognitive and physical perspectives.
-
Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007)
0.02
0.021040944 = product of:
0.04208189 = sum of:
0.04208189 = product of:
0.08416378 = sum of:
0.08416378 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08416378 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051766515 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Noruzi, A.: Folksonomies : (un)controlled vocabulary? (2006)
0.02
0.015406125 = product of:
0.03081225 = sum of:
0.03081225 = product of:
0.0616245 = sum of:
0.0616245 = weight(_text_:language in 404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0616245 = score(doc=404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.051766515 = queryNorm
0.30342668 = fieldWeight in 404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=404)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Folksonomy, a free-form tagging, is a user-generated classification system of web contents that allows users to tag their favorite web resources with their chosen words or phrases selected from natural language. These tags (also called concepts, categories, facets or entities) can be used to classify web resources and to express users' preferences. Folksonomy-based systems allow users to classify web resources through tagging bookmarks, photos or other web resources and saving them to a public web site like Del.icio.us. Thus information about web resources and online articles can be shared in an easy way. The purpose of this study is to provide an overview of the folksonomy tagging phenomenon (also called social tagging and social bookmarking) and explore some of the reasons why we need controlled vocabularies, discussing the problems associated with folksonomy.
-
Peters, I.; Stock, W.G.: Folksonomies in Wissensrepräsentation und Information Retrieval (2008)
0.01
0.01320525 = product of:
0.0264105 = sum of:
0.0264105 = product of:
0.052821 = sum of:
0.052821 = weight(_text_:language in 1597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052821 = score(doc=1597,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.051766515 = queryNorm
0.26008 = fieldWeight in 1597, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1597)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Die populären Web 2.0-Dienste werden von Prosumern - Produzenten und gleichsam Konsumenten - nicht nur dazu genutzt, Inhalte zu produzieren, sondern auch, um sie inhaltlich zu erschließen. Folksonomies erlauben es dem Nutzer, Dokumente mit eigenen Schlagworten, sog. Tags, zu beschreiben, ohne dabei auf gewisse Regeln oder Vorgaben achten zu müssen. Neben einigen Vorteilen zeigen Folksonomies aber auch zahlreiche Schwächen (u. a. einen Mangel an Präzision). Um diesen Nachteilen größtenteils entgegenzuwirken, schlagen wir eine Interpretation der Tags als natürlichsprachige Wörter vor. Dadurch ist es uns möglich, Methoden des Natural Language Processing (NLP) auf die Tags anzuwenden und so linguistische Probleme der Tags zu beseitigen. Darüber hinaus diskutieren wir Ansätze und weitere Vorschläge (Tagverteilungen, Kollaboration und akteurspezifische Aspekte) hinsichtlich eines Relevance Rankings von getaggten Dokumenten. Neben Vorschlägen auf ähnliche Dokumente ("more like this!") erlauben Folksonomies auch Hinweise auf verwandte Nutzer und damit auf Communities ("more like me!").
-
Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008)
0.01
0.012398495 = product of:
0.02479699 = sum of:
0.02479699 = product of:
0.04959398 = sum of:
0.04959398 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04959398 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051766515 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.14-22
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Wesch, M.: Information R/evolution (2006)
0.01
0.012273884 = product of:
0.024547769 = sum of:
0.024547769 = product of:
0.049095538 = sum of:
0.049095538 = weight(_text_:22 in 1267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049095538 = score(doc=1267,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051766515 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1267, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1267)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 5. 1.2008 19:22:48
-
Morrison, P.J.: Tagging and searching : search retrieval effectiveness of folksonomies on the World Wide Web (2008)
0.01
0.010520472 = product of:
0.021040944 = sum of:
0.021040944 = product of:
0.04208189 = sum of:
0.04208189 = weight(_text_:22 in 2109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04208189 = score(doc=2109,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051766515 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2109, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2109)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.2008 12:39:22
-
Trant, J.: Exploring the potential for social tagging and folksonomy in art museums : proof of concept (2006)
0.01
0.008803501 = product of:
0.017607002 = sum of:
0.017607002 = product of:
0.035214003 = sum of:
0.035214003 = weight(_text_:language in 5900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035214003 = score(doc=5900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.051766515 = queryNorm
0.17338668 = fieldWeight in 5900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5900)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Documentation of art museum collections has been traditionally written by and for art historians. To make art museum collections broadly accessible, and to enable art museums to engage their communities, means of access need to reflect the perspectives of other groups and communities. Social Tagging (the collective assignment of keywords to resources) and its resulting Folksonomy (the assemblage of concepts expressed in such a cooperatively developed system of classification) offer ways for art museums to engage with their communities and to understand what users of online museum collections see as important. Proof of Concept studies at The Metropolitan Museum of Art compared terms assigned by trained cataloguers and untrained cataloguers to existing museum documentation, and explored the potential for social tagging to improve access to museum collections. These preliminary studies, the results of which are reported here, have shown the potential of social tagging and folksonomy to open museum collections to new, more personal meanings. Untrained cataloguers identified content elements not described in formal museum documentation. Results from these tests - the first in the domain - provided validation for exploring social tagging and folksonomy as an access strategy within The Metropolitan Museum, motivation to proceed with a broader inter-institutional collaboration, and input into the development of a multi-institutional collaboration exploring tagging in art museums. Tags assigned by users might help bridge the semantic gap between the professional discourse of the curator and the popular language of the museum visitor. The steve collaboration (http://www.steve.museum) is building on these early studies to develop shared tools and research methods that enable social tagging of art museum collections and explore the utility of folksonomy for providing enhanced access to collections.
-
Kim, H.L.; Scerri, S.; Breslin, J.G.; Decker, S.; Kim, H.G.: ¬The state of the art in tag ontologies : a semantic model for tagging and folksonomies (2008)
0.01
0.00876706 = product of:
0.01753412 = sum of:
0.01753412 = product of:
0.03506824 = sum of:
0.03506824 = weight(_text_:22 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03506824 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051766515 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Braun, M.: Lesezeichen zum Stöbern : "Social bookmark"-Seiten setzen auf die Empfehlungen ihrer Nutzer (2007)
0.01
0.0070136483 = product of:
0.014027297 = sum of:
0.014027297 = product of:
0.028054593 = sum of:
0.028054593 = weight(_text_:22 in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028054593 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051766515 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 5.1997 8:44:22
