Search (4972 results, page 1 of 249)

0.18058956 = product of:
  0.3611791 = sum of:
    0.3611791 = sum of:
      0.22166902 = weight(_text_:book in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22166902 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.9753932 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
      0.1395101 = weight(_text_:22 in 3204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1395101 = score(doc=3204,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 3204, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=3204)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

RRZK-Kompass. 1995, Nr.65, S.21-22

0.15854912 = product of:
  0.31709823 = sum of:
    0.31709823 = sum of:
      0.21944116 = weight(_text_:book in 2504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.21944116 = score(doc=2504,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.96559006 = fieldWeight in 2504, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2504)
      0.09765706 = weight(_text_:22 in 2504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09765706 = score(doc=2504,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2504, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2504)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

6. 3.1999 12:36:22

Object

World Book

0.12703542 = product of:
  0.25407085 = sum of:
    0.25407085 = sum of:
      0.19826682 = weight(_text_:book in 2335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19826682 = score(doc=2335,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.8724182 = fieldWeight in 2335, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2335)
      0.055804037 = weight(_text_:22 in 2335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055804037 = score(doc=2335,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2335, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2335)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

A survey in spring 94 indicates that most prominent book vendor provide: cataloguing records, authority control and shelf ready book. Considers the advantages and disadvantages of using book vendor cataloguing. Currently most libraries use book vendor supplied cataloguing to process approval books. Explains the process. Procedures worked out by the fast cataloguing project, PromptCat run by OCLC, Yankee Books and Michigan State Libraries may simplify work flow further

Date

17.10.1995 18:22:54

0.12641269 = product of:
  0.25282538 = sum of:
    0.25282538 = sum of:
      0.15516832 = weight(_text_:book in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15516832 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.68277526 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
      0.09765706 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09765706 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22

0.12641269 = product of:
  0.25282538 = sum of:
    0.25282538 = sum of:
      0.15516832 = weight(_text_:book in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15516832 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.68277526 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
      0.09765706 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09765706 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13

0.10835374 = product of:
  0.21670748 = sum of:
    0.21670748 = sum of:
      0.13300143 = weight(_text_:book in 3902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13300143 = score(doc=3902,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.58523595 = fieldWeight in 3902, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3902)
      0.08370605 = weight(_text_:22 in 3902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08370605 = score(doc=3902,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3902, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3902)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

17. 7.1996 9:33:22

0.10835374 = product of:
  0.21670748 = sum of:
    0.21670748 = sum of:
      0.13300143 = weight(_text_:book in 4585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.13300143 = score(doc=4585,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.58523595 = fieldWeight in 4585, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4585)
      0.08370605 = weight(_text_:22 in 4585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08370605 = score(doc=4585,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4585, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4585)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

First published in 1993, this book presents a new process approach to library and information services.

Date

25.11.2005 18:58:22

0.10469043 = product of:
  0.20938087 = sum of:
    0.20938087 = sum of:
      0.15357682 = weight(_text_:book in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15357682 = score(doc=1427,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.6757723 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
      0.055804037 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055804037 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Considers whether, when there is a choice, a back-of-book indexer should use a duplicate entry or a see reference. Guidelines suggest that it is preferable to use the duplicate entry if it would not add to the length or complexity of the index. Studies 1.100 see references in 202 back-of-book indexes and concludes that 22% of the see references should have been replaced by duplicate entries. Failure to select a duplicate entry instead of a see reference occurs most frequently in science and techology books and in indexes with no subheadings

0.10469043 = product of:
  0.20938087 = sum of:
    0.20938087 = sum of:
      0.15357682 = weight(_text_:book in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15357682 = score(doc=4642,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.6757723 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
      0.055804037 = weight(_text_:22 in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055804037 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Comments on Douglas Hofstadter's index to his book 'Le ton beau de Marot: in praise of the music of language'. Hofstadter took charge of the book design, typography, typesetting and copy-editing, and also compiled the index which covers 23 pages of 3 columnes and is set in a practically illegible 4-point. Although the index breaks all the rules of indexing, it is a masterly creation showing the author's industry, exhuberance and wit. Summarizes Hofstadter's own remarks on how creating the index gave hin new insights into what his book was essentially about

Source

Indexer. 21(1998) no.1, S.22-23

0.10269832 = sum of:
  0.081771806 = product of:
    0.2453154 = sum of:
      0.2453154 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2453154 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.43649027 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.020926513 = product of:
    0.041853026 = sum of:
      0.041853026 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041853026 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.

Date

8. 1.2013 10:22:32

0.0958106 = product of:
  0.1916212 = sum of:
    0.1916212 = sum of:
      0.15674368 = weight(_text_:book in 5617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.15674368 = score(doc=5617,freq=16.0), product of:
          0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.68970716 = fieldWeight in 5617, product of:
            4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
              16.0 = termFreq=16.0
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5617)
      0.034877524 = weight(_text_:22 in 5617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034877524 = score(doc=5617,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5617, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5617)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In a digital library, book search is one of the most important information services. However, with the rapid development of network technologies such as cloud computing, the server-side of a digital library is becoming more and more untrusted; thus, how to prevent the disclosure of users' book query privacy is causing people's increasingly extensive concern. In this article, we propose to construct a group of plausible fake queries for each user book query to cover up the sensitive subjects behind users' queries. First, we propose a basic framework for the privacy protection in book search, which requires no change to the book search algorithm running on the server-side, and no compromise to the accuracy of book search. Second, we present a privacy protection model for book search to formulate the constraints that ideal fake queries should satisfy, that is, (i) the feature similarity, which measures the confusion effect of fake queries on users' queries, and (ii) the privacy exposure, which measures the cover-up effect of fake queries on users' sensitive subjects. Third, we discuss the algorithm implementation for the privacy model. Finally, the effectiveness of our approach is demonstrated by theoretical analysis and experimental evaluation.

Date

6. 1.2020 17:22:25

0.09404621 = product of:
  0.18809243 = sum of:
    0.18809243 = product of:
      0.37618485 = sum of:
        0.37618485 = weight(_text_:book in 2142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37618485 = score(doc=2142,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051484983 = queryNorm
            1.6552973 = fieldWeight in 2142, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
              0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=2142)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Classification

002 / The book

DDC

002 / The book

0.09059949 = product of:
  0.18119898 = sum of:
    0.18119898 = sum of:
      0.12539494 = weight(_text_:book in 2485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12539494 = score(doc=2485,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.55176574 = fieldWeight in 2485, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2485)
      0.055804037 = weight(_text_:22 in 2485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055804037 = score(doc=2485,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2485, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2485)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Although the 'information poor' are already present, the arrival of a much greater gap between the 'information poor' and 'information rich' is forecast in the book: Sovereign individual, by J.D. Davidson and W. Rees-Mogg. Concludes that, if the events forecast in the book come about, there will not be an information society but an unacceptable society

Date

3. 1.1999 14:40:22

0.09059949 = product of:
  0.18119898 = sum of:
    0.18119898 = sum of:
      0.12539494 = weight(_text_:book in 208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12539494 = score(doc=208,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.55176574 = fieldWeight in 208, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=208)
      0.055804037 = weight(_text_:22 in 208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055804037 = score(doc=208,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 208, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=208)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Libraries must learn to accommodate themselves to Google, and complement its mass digitization efforts with niche digitization of our own. We need to plan for what our activities and services will look like when our primary activity is no longer the storage and circulation of widely-available print materials, and once the printed book is no longer the only major vehicle for scholarly communication.

Object

Google book search

Pages

S.5-22

0.09029478 = product of:
  0.18058956 = sum of:
    0.18058956 = sum of:
      0.11083451 = weight(_text_:book in 7672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11083451 = score(doc=7672,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.4876966 = fieldWeight in 7672, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7672)
      0.06975505 = weight(_text_:22 in 7672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06975505 = score(doc=7672,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7672, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7672)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Starting from the publication of the book: Use of the chemical literature; ed. by R.T. Bottle in 1962, illustrates how chemistry information resources and the ways of dealing with them have changed over the ensuing decades with particular reference to the 4 editions of Bottle's guide

Source

Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.6, S.437-445

0.085581936 = sum of:
  0.068143174 = product of:
    0.2044295 = sum of:
      0.2044295 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2044295 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.43649027 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.017438762 = product of:
    0.034877524 = sum of:
      0.034877524 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034877524 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968

0.08404892 = product of:
  0.16809784 = sum of:
    0.16809784 = sum of:
      0.14019582 = weight(_text_:book in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14019582 = score(doc=4631,freq=20.0), product of:
          0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.6168929 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
            4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
              20.0 = termFreq=20.0
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
      0.027902018 = weight(_text_:22 in 4631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.027902018 = score(doc=4631,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4631, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4631)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the evolution in terms of shares of scholarly book publications in the social sciences and humanities (SSH) in five European countries, i.e. Flanders (Belgium), Finland, Norway, Poland and Slovenia. In addition to aggregate results for the whole of the social sciences and the humanities, the authors focus on two well-established fields, namely, economics & business and history. Design/methodology/approach Comprehensive coverage databases of SSH scholarly output have been set up in Flanders (VABB-SHW), Finland (VIRTA), Norway (NSI), Poland (PBN) and Slovenia (COBISS). These systems allow to trace the shares of monographs and book chapters among the total volume of scholarly publications in each of these countries. Findings As expected, the shares of scholarly monographs and book chapters in the humanities and in the social sciences differ considerably between fields of science and between the five countries studied. In economics & business and in history, the results show similar field-based variations as well as country variations. Most year-to-year and overall variation is rather limited. The data presented illustrate that book publishing is not disappearing from an SSH. Research limitations/implications The results presented in this paper illustrate that the polish scholarly evaluation system has influenced scholarly publication patterns considerably, while in the other countries the variations are manifested only slightly. The authors conclude that generalizations like "performance-based research funding systems (PRFS) are bad for book publishing" are flawed. Research evaluation systems need to take book publishing fully into account because of the crucial epistemic and social roles it serves in an SSH. Originality/value The authors present data on monographs and book chapters from five comprehensive coverage databases in Europe and analyze the data in view of the debates regarding the perceived detrimental effects of research evaluation systems on scholarly book publishing. The authors show that there is little reason to suspect a dramatic decline of scholarly book publishing in an SSH.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.081771806 = product of:
  0.16354361 = sum of:
    0.16354361 = product of:
      0.4906308 = sum of:
        0.4906308 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4906308 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43649027 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051484983 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.08124471 = product of:
  0.16248941 = sum of:
    0.16248941 = sum of:
      0.08866761 = weight(_text_:book in 1842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08866761 = score(doc=1842,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.39015728 = fieldWeight in 1842, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1842)
      0.073821805 = weight(_text_:22 in 1842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.073821805 = score(doc=1842,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.4094577 = fieldWeight in 1842, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1842)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

A system of library classification that flashed across the inquiring mind of young Melvil Louis Kossuth Dewey (known as Melvil Dewey) in 1873 is still the most popular classification scheme.. The modern library classification begins with Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). Melvil Dewey devised DDC in 1876. DDC has is credit of 128 years of boudless success. The DDC is being taught as a practical subject throughout the world and it is being used in majority of libraries in about 150 countries. This is the result of continuous revision that 22nd Edition of DDC has been published in July 2003. No other classification scheme has published so many editions. Some welcome changes have been made in DDC 22. To reduce the Christian bias in 200 religion, the numbers 201 to 209 have been devoted to specific aspects of religion. In the previous editions these numbers were devoted to Christianity. to enhance the classifier's efficiency, Table 7 has been removed from DDC 22 and the provision of adding group of persons is made by direct use of notation already available in schedules and in notation -08 from Table 1 Standard Subdivision. The present book is an attempt to explain, with suitable examples, the salient provisions of DDC 22. The book is written in simple language so that the students may not face any difficulty in understanding what is being explained. The examples in the book are explained in a step-by-step procedure. It is hoped that this book will prove of great help and use to the library professionals in general and library and information science students in particular.

Content

1. Introduction to DDC 22 2. Major changes in DDC 22 3. Introduction to the schedules 4. Use of Table 1 : Standard Subdivisions 5. Use of Table 2 : Areas 6. Use of Table 3 : Subdivisions for the arts, for individual literatures, for specific literary forms 7. Use to Table 4 : Subdivisions of individual languages and language families 8. Use of Table 5 : Ethic and National groups 9. Use of Table 6 : Languages 10. Treatment of Groups of Persons

Object

DDC-22

0.07927456 = product of:
  0.15854912 = sum of:
    0.15854912 = sum of:
      0.10972058 = weight(_text_:book in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.10972058 = score(doc=2823,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2272612 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.48279503 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.414126 = idf(docFreq=1454, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
      0.04882853 = weight(_text_:22 in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04882853 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18029164 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051484983 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Book dedications by authors, often in verse form and appearing just before the title page, are one of the 6 elements describes by the French scholar Genette as paratextual. For some reasons dedications have failed to interest librarians, yet books containing them can be a valid object of bibliographic study, for the reasons that they carry special markings: are an example of a specific literary or semantic class; and reveal linguistic/stylistic features. Examines the history of literary dedications, citing examples by well-known writers, and suggests that cataloguing software should have a special field to record dedication

Date

22. 2.1999 20:41:06

Footnote

Übers. d. Titels: The study and indexing of book dedications