Search (3662 results, page 2 of 184)

  1. Jones, W.: Personal Information Management (PIM) (2009) 0.05 
    0.048211824 = product of:
  0.24105912 = sum of:
    0.24105912 = weight(_text_:friend in 3861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24105912 = score(doc=3861,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41791734 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0480301 = queryNorm
        0.57681054 = fieldWeight in 3861, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3861)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Personal information management (PIM) refers to the practice and the study of the activities a person performs in order to acquire or create, store, organize, maintain, retrieve, use, and distribute the information needed to meet life's many goals (everyday and long-term, work-related and not) and to fulfill life's many roles and responsibilities (as parent, spouse, friend, employee, member of community, etc.). PIM activities are an effort to establish, use, and maintain a mapping between information and need. Activities of finding (and re-finding) move from a current need toward information while activities of keeping move from encountered information toward anticipated need. Metalevel activities such as maintaining, organizing, and managing the flow of information focus on the mapping itself. Tools and techniques of PIM can promote information integration with benefits for each kind of PIM activity and across the life cycle of personal information. Understanding how best to accomplish this integration without inadvertently creating problems along the way is a key challenge of PIM.
  2. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.05 
    0.04577072 = product of:
  0.2288536 = sum of:
    0.2288536 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2288536 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40719974 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0480301 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  3. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.05 
    0.04577072 = product of:
  0.2288536 = sum of:
    0.2288536 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2288536 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40719974 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0480301 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
  4. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.05 
    0.04577072 = product of:
  0.2288536 = sum of:
    0.2288536 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2288536 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40719974 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0480301 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  5. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.05 
    0.04577072 = product of:
  0.2288536 = sum of:
    0.2288536 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2288536 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40719974 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0480301 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  6. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.05 
    0.04577072 = product of:
  0.2288536 = sum of:
    0.2288536 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2288536 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40719974 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0480301 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  7. Continuing education of reference librarians (1990) 0.04 
    0.040176522 = product of:
  0.2008826 = sum of:
    0.2008826 = weight(_text_:friend in 5630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2008826 = score(doc=5630,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41791734 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0480301 = queryNorm
        0.48067543 = fieldWeight in 5630, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5630)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: HIEBING, D.: Current trends in the continuing education and training of reference staff; COLLINS, M.E.: Continuing education for ARL librarians in multi-faceted public service positions; SHERBY, L.S.: Educating reference librarians: a basic course; BAUNER, R.E.: Reference ready beyond the M.L.S.; EZELL, C.: A fast track over rocky roads: continuing education for reference librarians; WESLEY, T.L.: The reference librarian's critical skill: critical thinking and professional service; PATTERSON, C.D.: Library user instruction in the curriculum: background and status update; LARSON, M.E.: Connecting to the electronic library: a paradigm shift in training reference librarians; MOSBY, A.P. u. G. HUGHES:: Continuing education for librarians: training for online searching; FRIEND, L.: Online searcher education and training: options and opportunities; STABLER, K.Y.: The dynamics of reference librarianship; JANES, P. u. E. MELTZER: Origins and attitudes: training reference librarians for a pluralistic world; GOLDEN, F.A.: The ethics of reference service for the public librarian; LAYMAN, M. u. S. VANDERCOOK: Reference training in California libraries: back to basics; LAUGHLIN, S. u. K. NISSEN: The role of multitype networks in providing continuing education for reference workers; BERKOV, E. u. B. MORGANSTERN: Getting to the core: training librarians in basic reference tools; PATRICK, R.J.: Self-directed, contract learning for the reference librarian; SPALDING, H.H.: The developing reference librarian: an administrative perspective; ALBRITTON, R.L.: Continuing professional education: a management development approach; FULTON, T.L.: Mentor meets telemachus: the role of the department head in orienting and inducting the beginning reference librarian
  8. Thelwall, M.: Social networks, gender, and friending : an analysis of MySpace member profiles (2008) 0.04 
    0.040176522 = product of:
  0.2008826 = sum of:
    0.2008826 = weight(_text_:friend in 1883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2008826 = score(doc=1883,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41791734 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0480301 = queryNorm
        0.48067543 = fieldWeight in 1883, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1883)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    In 2007, the social networking Web site MySpace apparently overthrew Google as the most visited Web site for U.S. Web users. If this heralds a new era of widespread online social networking, then it is important to investigate user behaviour and attributes. Although there has been some research into social networking already, basic demographic data is essential to set previous results in a wider context and to give insights to researchers, marketers and developers. In this article, the demographics of MySpace members are explored through data extracted from two samples of 15,043 and 7,627 member profiles. The median declared age of users was surprisingly high at 21, with a small majority of females. The analysis confirmed some previously reported findings and conjectures about social networking, for example, that female members tend to be more interested in friendship and males more interested in dating. In addition, there was some evidence of three different friending dynamics, oriented towards close friends, acquaintances, or strangers. Perhaps unsurprisingly, female and younger members had more friends than others, and females were more likely to maintain private profiles, but both males and females seemed to prefer female friends, with this tendency more marked in females for their closest friend. The typical MySpace user is apparently female, 21, single, with a public profile, interested in online friendship and logging on weekly to engage with a mixed list of mainly female friends who are predominantly acquaintances.
  9. Wilkinson, D.; Thelwall, M.: Social network site changes over time : the case of MySpace (2010) 0.04 
    0.040176522 = product of:
  0.2008826 = sum of:
    0.2008826 = weight(_text_:friend in 4106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2008826 = score(doc=4106,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41791734 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0480301 = queryNorm
        0.48067543 = fieldWeight in 4106, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4106)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The uptake of social network sites (SNSs) has been highly trend-driven, with Friendster, MySpace, and Facebook being successively the most popular. Given that teens are often early adopters of communication technologies, it seems reasonable to assume that the typical user of any particular SNS would change over time, probably becoming older and covering different segments of the population. This article analyzes changes in MySpace self-reported member demographics and behavior from 2007 to 2010 using four large samples of members and focusing on the United States. The results indicate that despite its take-up rate declining, with only about 1 in 10 members being active a year after joining, the dominant (modal) age for active U.S. members remains midadolescence, but has shifted by about 2 years from 15 to 17, and the U.S. dominance of MySpace is shrinking. There also has been a dramatic increase in the median number of Friends for new U.S. members, from 12 to 96-probably due to MySpace's automated Friend Finder. Some factors show little change, however, including the female majority, the 5% minority gay membership, and the approximately 50% private profiles. In addition, there has been an increase in the proportion of Latino/Hispanic U.S. members, suggesting a shifting ethnic profile. Overall, MySpace has surprisingly stable membership demographics and is apparently maintaining its primary youth appeal, perhaps because of its music orientation.
  10. Knitting the semantic Web (2007) 0.04 
    0.039772727 = product of:
  0.19886363 = sum of:
    0.19886363 = weight(_text_:friend in 1397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19886363 = score(doc=1397,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.41791734 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0480301 = queryNorm
        0.47584438 = fieldWeight in 1397, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.701155 = idf(docFreq=19, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1397)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The Semantic Web, the extension that goes beyond the current Web, better enables computers and people to effectively work together by giving information well-defined meaning. Knitting the Semantic Web explains the interdisciplinary efforts underway to build a more library-like Web through "semantic knitting." The book examines tagging information with standardized semantic metadata to result in a network able to support computational activities and provide people with services efficiently. Leaders in library and information science, computer science, and information intensive domains provide insight and inspiration to give readers a greater understanding in the development, growth, and maintenance of the Semantic Web. Librarians are uniquely qualified to play a major role in the development and maintenance of the Semantic Web. Knitting the Semantic Web closely examines this crucial relationship in detail. This single source reviews the foundations, standards, and tools of the Semantic Web, as well as discussions on projects and perspectives. Many chapters include figures to illustrate concepts and ideas, and the entire text is extensively referenced. Topics in Knitting the Semantic Web include: - RDF, its expressive power, and its ability to underlie the new Library catalog card for the coming century - the value and application for controlled vocabularies - SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organization System), the newest Semantic Web language - managing scheme versioning in the Semantic Web - Physnet portal service for physics - Semantic Web technologies in biomedicine - developing the United Nations Food and Agriculture ontology - Friend Of A Friend (FOAF) vocabulary specification-with a real world case study at a university - and more Knitting the Semantic Web is a stimulating resource for professionals, researchers, educators, and students in library and information science, computer science, information architecture, Web design, and Web services.
  11. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.04 
    0.038142268 = product of:
  0.19071133 = sum of:
    0.19071133 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19071133 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40719974 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0480301 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  12. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.04 
    0.038142268 = product of:
  0.19071133 = sum of:
    0.19071133 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19071133 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40719974 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0480301 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  13. Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020) 0.04 
    0.038142268 = product of:
  0.19071133 = sum of:
    0.19071133 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19071133 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40719974 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0480301 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
  14. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.04 
    0.038142268 = product of:
  0.19071133 = sum of:
    0.19071133 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19071133 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40719974 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0480301 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
  15. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.04 
    0.038142268 = product of:
  0.19071133 = sum of:
    0.19071133 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19071133 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40719974 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0480301 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  16. Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001) 0.04 
    0.038142268 = product of:
  0.19071133 = sum of:
    0.19071133 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19071133 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40719974 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0480301 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
  17. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.04 
    0.038142268 = product of:
  0.19071133 = sum of:
    0.19071133 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19071133 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40719974 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0480301 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  18. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.04 
    0.038142268 = product of:
  0.19071133 = sum of:
    0.19071133 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19071133 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.40719974 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0480301 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  19. #2434 0.04 
    0.03644153 = product of:
  0.18220764 = sum of:
    0.18220764 = weight(_text_:22 in 2433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18220764 = score(doc=2433,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16819324 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0480301 = queryNorm
        1.0833232 = fieldWeight in 2433, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2433)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    4. 9.2011 12:28:22
  20. #2819 0.04 
    0.03644153 = product of:
  0.18220764 = sum of:
    0.18220764 = weight(_text_:22 in 2818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18220764 = score(doc=2818,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16819324 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0480301 = queryNorm
        1.0833232 = fieldWeight in 2818, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2818)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 19:49:25

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 3057
  • m 347
  • el 161
  • s 142
  • b 39
  • x 35
  • i 23
  • r 17
  • ? 8
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • n 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications