Search (668 results, page 1 of 34)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Kaiser, R.; Ockenfeld, M.; Skurcz, N.: Wann versteht mich mein Computer endlich? : 1. DGI-Konfernz: Semantic Web & Linked Data - Elemente zukünftiger Informationsinfrastrukturen (2011) 0.10 
    0.097549655 = product of:
  0.24387413 = sum of:
    0.18973003 = weight(_text_:400 in 4392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18973003 = score(doc=4392,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32745647 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049953517 = queryNorm
        0.57940537 = fieldWeight in 4392, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4392)
    0.054144096 = weight(_text_:22 in 4392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054144096 = score(doc=4392,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17492871 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049953517 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4392, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4392)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    »Wann versteht mich mein Computer endlich?« So könnte man die Quintessenz der 1. DGI-Konferenz, ausgerichtet von der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis (DGI) anlässlich der diesjährigen Frankfurter Buchmesse zusammenfassen, in deren Rahmen zugleich die 62. DGI-Jahrestagung stattgefunden hat. Unter dem Motto »Semantic Web & Linked Data - Elemente zukünftiger Informationsinfrastrukturen« kamen vom 7. bis 9. Oktober 2010 über 400 Informationsfachleute aus Wissenschaft, Bildung, Verwaltung, Wirtschaft und Bibliotheken zusammen, um ihre Arbeiten und Erkenntnisse zur nächsten Generation der Webtechnologien vorzustellen und untereinander zu diskutieren.
    Source
    BuB. 63(2011) H.1, S.22-23
  2. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.10 
    0.09520731 = product of:
  0.47603655 = sum of:
    0.47603655 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.47603655 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.42350647 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049953517 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  3. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.08 
    0.07933943 = product of:
  0.39669713 = sum of:
    0.39669713 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.39669713 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.42350647 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049953517 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  4. Giannella, C.: ¬An improved algorithm for unsupervised decomposition of a multi-author document (2016) 0.07 
    0.07316225 = product of:
  0.18290561 = sum of:
    0.14229754 = weight(_text_:400 in 2642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14229754 = score(doc=2642,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32745647 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049953517 = queryNorm
        0.43455404 = fieldWeight in 2642, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2642)
    0.04060807 = weight(_text_:22 in 2642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04060807 = score(doc=2642,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17492871 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049953517 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2642, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2642)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:08:11
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.2, S.400-411
  5. Schmolz, H.: Anaphora resolution and text retrieval : a lnguistic analysis of hypertexts (2015) 0.07 
    0.06707969 = product of:
  0.33539847 = sum of:
    0.33539847 = weight(_text_:400 in 1172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.33539847 = score(doc=1172,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.32745647 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049953517 = queryNorm
        1.0242536 = fieldWeight in 1172, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1172)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Classification
    400
    Ddc
    400
    DDC
    400
  6. Murphy, M.L.: Lexical meaning (2010) 0.06 
    0.064492576 = product of:
  0.16123144 = sum of:
    0.1341594 = weight(_text_:400 in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1341594 = score(doc=998,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.32745647 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049953517 = queryNorm
        0.40970147 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
    0.027072048 = weight(_text_:22 in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027072048 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17492871 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049953517 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Classification
    ET 400 (BVB)
    Date
    22. 7.2013 10:53:30
    RVK
    ET 400 (BVB)
  7. Yi, K.: Harnessing collective intelligence in social tagging using Delicious (2012) 0.06 
    0.06096853 = product of:
  0.15242133 = sum of:
    0.11858127 = weight(_text_:400 in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11858127 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32745647 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049953517 = queryNorm
        0.36212835 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
    0.03384006 = weight(_text_:22 in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03384006 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17492871 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049953517 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    A new collaborative approach in information organization and sharing has recently arisen, known as collaborative tagging or social indexing. A key element of collaborative tagging is the concept of collective intelligence (CI), which is a shared intelligence among all participants. This research investigates the phenomenon of social tagging in the context of CI with the aim to serve as a stepping-stone towards the mining of truly valuable social tags for web resources. This study focuses on assessing and evaluating the degree of CI embedded in social tagging over time in terms of two-parameter values, number of participants, and top frequency ranking window. Five different metrics were adopted and utilized for assessing the similarity between ranking lists: overlapList, overlapRank, Footrule, Fagin's measure, and the Inverse Rank measure. The result of this study demonstrates that a substantial degree of CI is most likely to be achieved when somewhere between the first 200 and 400 people have participated in tagging, and that a target degree of CI can be projected by controlling the two factors along with the selection of a similarity metric. The study also tests some experimental conditions for detecting social tags with high CI degree. The results of this study can be applicable to the study of filtering social tags based on CI; filtered social tags may be utilized for the metadata creation of tagged resources and possibly for the retrieval of tagged resources.
    Date
    25.12.2012 15:22:37
  8. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.06 
    0.0555376 = product of:
  0.277688 = sum of:
    0.277688 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.277688 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.42350647 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049953517 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  9. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.05 
    0.047603656 = product of:
  0.23801827 = sum of:
    0.23801827 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23801827 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.42350647 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049953517 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  10. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.05 
    0.047603656 = product of:
  0.23801827 = sum of:
    0.23801827 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23801827 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.42350647 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049953517 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  11. Reichenberger, K.: Kompendium semantische Netze : Konzepte, Technologie, Modellierung (2010) 0.04 
    0.04024782 = product of:
  0.2012391 = sum of:
    0.2012391 = weight(_text_:400 in 4413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2012391 = score(doc=4413,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.32745647 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049953517 = queryNorm
        0.6145522 = fieldWeight in 4413, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4413)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Classification
    ET 400
    RVK
    ET 400
  12. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.04 
    0.039669715 = product of:
  0.19834857 = sum of:
    0.19834857 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19834857 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.42350647 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049953517 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  13. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.04 
    0.039669715 = product of:
  0.19834857 = sum of:
    0.19834857 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19834857 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.42350647 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049953517 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  14. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.04 
    0.039669715 = product of:
  0.19834857 = sum of:
    0.19834857 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19834857 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.42350647 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049953517 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  15. Kleineberg, M.: Reconstructionism : a comparative method for viewpoint analysis and indexing using the example of Kohlberg's moral stages (2018) 0.04 
    0.03794601 = product of:
  0.18973003 = sum of:
    0.18973003 = weight(_text_:400 in 4772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18973003 = score(doc=4772,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32745647 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049953517 = queryNorm
        0.57940537 = fieldWeight in 4772, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4772)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Pages
    S.400-408
  16. Graphic details : a scientific study of the importance of diagrams to science (2016) 0.04 
    0.036581125 = product of:
  0.09145281 = sum of:
    0.07114877 = weight(_text_:400 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07114877 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32745647 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049953517 = queryNorm
        0.21727702 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
    0.020304035 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020304035 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17492871 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049953517 = queryNorm
        0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Bill Howe and his colleagues at the University of Washington, in Seattle, decided to find out. First, they trained a computer algorithm to distinguish between various sorts of figures-which they defined as diagrams, equations, photographs, plots (such as bar charts and scatter graphs) and tables. They exposed their algorithm to between 400 and 600 images of each of these types of figure until it could distinguish them with an accuracy greater than 90%. Then they set it loose on the more-than-650,000 papers (containing more than 10m figures) stored on PubMed Central, an online archive of biomedical-research articles. To measure each paper's influence, they calculated its article-level Eigenfactor score-a modified version of the PageRank algorithm Google uses to provide the most relevant results for internet searches. Eigenfactor scoring gives a better measure than simply noting the number of times a paper is cited elsewhere, because it weights citations by their influence. A citation in a paper that is itself highly cited is worth more than one in a paper that is not.
    As the team describe in a paper posted (http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.04951) on arXiv, they found that figures did indeed matter-but not all in the same way. An average paper in PubMed Central has about one diagram for every three pages and gets 1.67 citations. Papers with more diagrams per page and, to a lesser extent, plots per page tended to be more influential (on average, a paper accrued two more citations for every extra diagram per page, and one more for every extra plot per page). By contrast, including photographs and equations seemed to decrease the chances of a paper being cited by others. That agrees with a study from 2012, whose authors counted (by hand) the number of mathematical expressions in over 600 biology papers and found that each additional equation per page reduced the number of citations a paper received by 22%. This does not mean that researchers should rush to include more diagrams in their next paper. Dr Howe has not shown what is behind the effect, which may merely be one of correlation, rather than causation. It could, for example, be that papers with lots of diagrams tend to be those that illustrate new concepts, and thus start a whole new field of inquiry. Such papers will certainly be cited a lot. On the other hand, the presence of equations really might reduce citations. Biologists (as are most of those who write and read the papers in PubMed Central) are notoriously mathsaverse. If that is the case, looking in a physics archive would probably produce a different result.
  17. Chomsky, N.: Was für Lebewesen sind wir? (2016) 0.03 
    0.033539847 = product of:
  0.16769923 = sum of:
    0.16769923 = weight(_text_:400 in 1621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16769923 = score(doc=1621,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.32745647 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049953517 = queryNorm
        0.5121268 = fieldWeight in 1621, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1621)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Classification
    400 / 23sdnb
    DDC
    400 / 23sdnb
  18. Watters, C.; Nizam, N.: Knowledge organization on the Web : the emergent role of social classification (2012) 0.03 
    0.03320276 = product of:
  0.16601379 = sum of:
    0.16601379 = weight(_text_:400 in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16601379 = score(doc=828,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32745647 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049953517 = queryNorm
        0.5069797 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    There are close to a billion websites on the Internet with approximately 400 million users worldwide [www.internetworldstats.com]. People go to websites for a wide variety of different information tasks, from finding a restaurant to serious research. Many of the difficulties with searching the Web, as it is structured currently, can be attributed to increases to scale. The content of the Web is now so large that we only have a rough estimate of the number of sites and the range of information is extremely diverse, from blogs and photos to research articles and news videos.
  19. López-Huertas, M.: Reflexions on multidimensional knowledge : its influence on the foundation of knowledge organization (2013) 0.03 
    0.03320276 = product of:
  0.16601379 = sum of:
    0.16601379 = weight(_text_:400 in 1362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16601379 = score(doc=1362,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32745647 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049953517 = queryNorm
        0.5069797 = fieldWeight in 1362, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1362)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 40(2013) no.6, S.400-407
  20. Dextre Clarke, S.: Knowledge organization - making a difference : Report of the Fourth Biennial Conference of ISKO UK (London, 13-14 July 2015) (2015) 0.03 
    0.03320276 = product of:
  0.16601379 = sum of:
    0.16601379 = weight(_text_:400 in 2374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16601379 = score(doc=2374,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32745647 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049953517 = queryNorm
        0.5069797 = fieldWeight in 2374, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2374)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 42(2015) no.6, S.399-400

Authors

Languages

  • e 476
  • d 183
  • a 1
  • hu 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 578
  • el 60
  • m 47
  • s 15
  • x 13
  • r 7
  • b 5
  • i 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications