Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

0.024192145 = product of:
  0.036288217 = sum of:
    0.016003672 = weight(_text_:on in 324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016003672 = score(doc=324,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04990557 = queryNorm
        0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 324, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=324)
    0.020284547 = product of:
      0.040569093 = sum of:
        0.040569093 = weight(_text_:22 in 324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040569093 = score(doc=324,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 324, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=324)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

In subject cataloging of audiovisual materials generic terms like 'documentary' or 'absolute film' facilitate the work of users and librarians. On the concrete level the study shows 4 ways to make a list of generic terms for the application in general libraries. The heuristic function of the study is to offer methods towards the solution of problems in the field of subject cataloguing of non-book materials. (1) The formal subject heading in library science corresponds to generic terms; Anglo-American and German rules for subject cataloging, however, provide no list that is directly applicable. (2) The terminology of institutions administering many audiovisual documents has been examined; general libraries have to find a common denominator with medium depth of classification and balanced representation of fiction and nonfiction terms. (3) From encyclopedic definitions of generic terms 8 dimensions have been extracted characterizing the terms in question individually. (4) The contribution of communication science has been discussed explaining a research project

Source

Inspel. 22(1988), S.121-145

0.0075442037 = product of:
  0.02263261 = sum of:
    0.02263261 = weight(_text_:on in 1802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02263261 = score(doc=1802,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04990557 = queryNorm
        0.20619515 = fieldWeight in 1802, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1802)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Series

IFLA series on bibliographic control; vol. 42

Source

Subject access: preparing for the future. Conference on August 20 - 21, 2009 in Florence, the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section sponsored an IFLA satellite conference entitled "Looking at the Past and Preparing for the Future". Eds.: P. Landry et al

0.007112743 = product of:
  0.021338228 = sum of:
    0.021338228 = weight(_text_:on in 1627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021338228 = score(doc=1627,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04990557 = queryNorm
        0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 1627, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1627)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting Held in Lisbon, Portugal, 17-18 August 1993, and sponsored by the IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing and the Instituto da Biblioteca Nacional e do Livro, Lisbon, Portugal. Ed.: R.P. Holley et al

0.007112743 = product of:
  0.021338228 = sum of:
    0.021338228 = weight(_text_:on in 6576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021338228 = score(doc=6576,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04990557 = queryNorm
        0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 6576, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6576)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Explains the German Subject Authority File rules for subject indexing based on Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog. Discusses development in the organization of the subject authority file in Germany; contents and structure of the descriptor authority file or Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD); growth in the size of the SWD; and multilingual subject authority files

0.007112743 = product of:
  0.021338228 = sum of:
    0.021338228 = weight(_text_:on in 2555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021338228 = score(doc=2555,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04990557 = queryNorm
        0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 2555, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2555)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The RSWK-draft on music cataloguing was tested in sound recordinga cataloguing. The basic 4 part chain schme maintains the older facet concept. Experiences were generally positive, especially with some collected works. There are still some reservations about the draft, especially for doing away with provenance and period description

0.0067615155 = product of:
  0.020284547 = sum of:
    0.020284547 = product of:
      0.040569093 = sum of:
        0.040569093 = weight(_text_:22 in 3995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040569093 = score(doc=3995,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3995, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3995)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 9.2005 19:42:31