Search (16 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"ja"
  1. Matsushita, A.: Science Citation Index on CD-ROM (1992) 0.01
    0.014225486 = product of:
      0.042676456 = sum of:
        0.042676456 = weight(_text_:on in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042676456 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  2. Sugano, I.: ¬The study of criteria for evaluating OPACs as information retrieval systems (1996) 0.01
    0.014225486 = product of:
      0.042676456 = sum of:
        0.042676456 = weight(_text_:on in 1626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042676456 = score(doc=1626,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 1626, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1626)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Most of the criteria proposed to date for the evaluation of OPACs focus on evaluation of their retrieval function. Argues that the storage function is more important because the quality of information retrieval systems is dependent on the quality of stored information as well as the description and depth of indexing of stored information. States that OPACs should therefore be evaluated from the perspectives of both storage and retrieval functions. Examines 4 studies on criteria for evaluating OPACs and suggests a new evaluation framework based on the work of C.R. Hildreth
  3. Matsubayashi, M.: ¬The German cataloging rules (RAK) : an introduction and annotated bibliography (1996) 0.01
    0.012319634 = product of:
      0.0369589 = sum of:
        0.0369589 = weight(_text_:on in 497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0369589 = score(doc=497,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.33671528 = fieldWeight in 497, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=497)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Provides an explpanation of the German cataloguing rules (RAK) focusing on conceptual rules and describes their current situation and the likely nature of future revisions. The special characteristics of RAK are the clearly defined 'basic bibliographic concepts (Grundbegriffe)' as literary units and the related concepts of item (Vorlage), edition (Ausgabe) and work (Werk). RAK will be revised in the near future as RAK2 with a conceptual framework based on AACR2, clearly defined bibliographical concepts on literary units and compatibility with RAK-WB
  4. Agata, T.: ¬A measure for evaluating search engines on the World Wide Web : retrieval test with ESL (Expected Search Length) (1997) 0.01
    0.010669115 = product of:
      0.032007344 = sum of:
        0.032007344 = weight(_text_:on in 3892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032007344 = score(doc=3892,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.29160398 = fieldWeight in 3892, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3892)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  5. Ito, J.: Bibliographic structure : focusing on the idea of equivalence (1996) 0.01
    0.010058938 = product of:
      0.030176813 = sum of:
        0.030176813 = weight(_text_:on in 491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030176813 = score(doc=491,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 491, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=491)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the conceptual structure of bibliographic relationships between a work and its related bibliographic entities in terms of the idea of equivalence as a mathematical concept. Bibliographic entities, such as the work, the text, the edition, and the printing, are also considered as functional foci resulting from data elements contributed by authors, translators, editors and publishers. Examines 4 types of dominant bibliographic relationships focusing on common structural patterns revealed within each entity
  6. Voshida, K.: ¬A study on improving subject access to the OPAC : a survey of catalogue use comparing an OPAC and a card catalogue in a private university library (1994) 0.01
    0.009239726 = product of:
      0.027719175 = sum of:
        0.027719175 = weight(_text_:on in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027719175 = score(doc=753,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.25253648 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a study conducted to compare the use of a new OPAC with that of the card catalogue looking primarily at the area of subject access. Library science students at a private university were asked to respond to questions concerning: the number of subject searches and searches for specific items that they carried out on the OPAC and on the card catalogue; the success rate of the catalogue searches; how the search was carried out (classification number or keywords); librarian assistance required; and knowledge of the Nippon Decimal Classification. Results revealed that while there was an increase in the number of users as a result of the introduction of OPAC facilities, there were certain aspects which required attention such as the area of subject searches
  7. Klein, R.D.: ¬The problem of cataloguing world literature using the Nippon Decimal Classification (1994) 0.01
    0.009015355 = product of:
      0.027046064 = sum of:
        0.027046064 = product of:
          0.054092128 = sum of:
            0.054092128 = weight(_text_:22 in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054092128 = score(doc=867,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Nippon Decimal Classification (NDC) system, extensively used in Japanese libraries, was devised in 1929. It is difficult to use NDC to classify world literature, such as fiction in English by non American, non British writers. This is not necessarily straightforward in other classification schemes but a survey of 40 Japanese university libraries, of which 24 responded, showed remarkable inconsistencies in the treatment of 22 world literature authors. NDC clearly needs updating to deal with this problem
  8. Watanabe, T.: ¬A new tide in the user studies : focusing on C.C. Kuhlthau's cognitive user model (1997) 0.01
    0.008801571 = product of:
      0.026404712 = sum of:
        0.026404712 = weight(_text_:on in 74) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026404712 = score(doc=74,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 74, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=74)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews a series of studies conducted by C.C, Kuhlthau who investigated users' information seeking behaviour in libraries over a 10 year period. In her study she constructed and Information Search Process (ISP) Model which represents aspects of user activities as a whole including feelings, thoughts and actions or behaviour. Argues that, while the ISP model sheds new light on user studies, it has problems in the following areas: problem solving processes; the understanding of 'feelings'; and the method of investigating users' information seeking behaviour. Recommends that the ISP model be reconstructed from different perspectives and verified in areas other than libraries. This may lead to the development of a new model of information seeking
  9. Takeda, N.: Problems in hierarchical structures in thesauri : their influences on the results of information retrieval (1994) 0.01
    0.007112743 = product of:
      0.021338228 = sum of:
        0.021338228 = weight(_text_:on in 2642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021338228 = score(doc=2642,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 2642, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2642)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  10. Suzuki, Y.: Partial information and its information structure (1995) 0.01
    0.007112743 = product of:
      0.021338228 = sum of:
        0.021338228 = weight(_text_:on in 6584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021338228 = score(doc=6584,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 6584, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6584)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Almost all information systems have their own logic. Differentiates between classical and non classical logic, the main example of which is intuitionistic logic which was created to treat partial information. Explains this, discusses the information structure based on intuitionalistic logic, and introduces an intuitionistic information retrieval system. This work represents an introduction to the development of the general theory of partial information and the theory of information retrieval systems which can treat partial information
  11. Kim, P.K.: ¬An automatic indexing of compound words based on mutual information for Korean text retrieval (1995) 0.01
    0.007112743 = product of:
      0.021338228 = sum of:
        0.021338228 = weight(_text_:on in 620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021338228 = score(doc=620,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 620, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=620)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  12. Hirawa, M.: Role of keywords in the network searching era (1998) 0.01
    0.007112743 = product of:
      0.021338228 = sum of:
        0.021338228 = weight(_text_:on in 3446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021338228 = score(doc=3446,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 3446, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3446)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    A survey of Japanese OPACs available on the Internet was conducted relating to use of keywords for subject access. The findings suggest that present OPACs are not capable of storing subject-oriented information. Currently available keyword access derives from a merely title-based retrieval system. Contents data should be added to bibliographic records as an efficient way of providing subject access, and costings for this process should be estimated. Word standardisation issues must also be addressed
  13. Ito, J.: Bibliographic structure : a frame of reference for bibliographic relationships (1994) 0.01
    0.00622365 = product of:
      0.01867095 = sum of:
        0.01867095 = weight(_text_:on in 3085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01867095 = score(doc=3085,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 3085, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3085)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Attempts to provide a theoretical rationale for the taxonomy of bibliographic relationships between a given work and its related bibliographic entities. Examines the bibliographic structure of the document carrying the messages in terms of their bibliographic functions of use and preservation, since the most common bibliographic relationships are normally revealed within the document itself. Defines the bibliographic characteristics of the document from the perspective of an analysis of the pattern of their structural elements. Presents 4 dimensions of the bibliographic structure as a frame of reference for the categorisation of bibliographic relationships, together with their subordinate types of equivalent relationships, focusing on common structural patterns revealed with in each entity itself
  14. Mirorikawa, N.: Structures of classification systems : hierarchical and multidimensional (1996) 0.01
    0.00622365 = product of:
      0.01867095 = sum of:
        0.01867095 = weight(_text_:on in 6583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01867095 = score(doc=6583,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 6583, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6583)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Considers classification systems from a structural point of view. Distinguishes between 2 kinds of methods of categorization of classification systems: the first categorized by structure, either hierarchical or multidimensional; and the second by style of expression, either enumerative or sythetic. Identifies 4 leading classification systems according to their structures: DDC, LCC, UDC and Colon Classification. Focuses on DDC referring to 2 interpretatives of its structure, one of which is hierarchical and the other is partially multidimensional. Also relates this to the matter of interpretation of the notation '0', interpreted in one instance as 'generalities', and in another as 'coordination sign'
  15. Anzai, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Ishizuka, H.: Experimental service of cataloguing database through WWW (1996) 0.01
    0.00622365 = product of:
      0.01867095 = sum of:
        0.01867095 = weight(_text_:on in 509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01867095 = score(doc=509,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 509, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=509)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    An information retrieval system for a cataloguing database through the WWW is developed, and experimentally served to Japan MARC and ULIS (Univeristy of Library and Information Science) OPAC data. Since Japanese words are not separated by obvious delimiters, ensuring the same segmentation between the query and the database is a problem. The present system solves the problem by using the multiple hash screening technique for processing both book titles and query strings, based on the same dictionary and using similar algorithms. Database management is handled by ADABAS, reducing management chores and and response time. The effectiveness of the multiple hash screening technique for a Japanese text based information system is examined, and the limitation of the Web's hypertext environment for a bibliographic information retrieval service is discussed
  16. Taniguchi, S.: Reevaluation of the 3-layered model in descriptive cataloguing (1997) 0.01
    0.00622365 = product of:
      0.01867095 = sum of:
        0.01867095 = weight(_text_:on in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01867095 = score(doc=91,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Several years ago a conceptual framework was proposed that was designed to capture a bibliographic item by means of a structured approach and to present it in a structured manner in a bibliographic record: the 3-layered approach. Recently IFLA published the report of a study entitled 'Functional requirements for bibliographic records: draft report for worldwide review' for the purpose of a thorough reexamination of the question based on an analysis of user needs. The IFLA report attempted to capture the bibliographic universe through E-R analysis and to define entities, attributes of entities and relationships between them, all of which constitute the bibliographic universe. Compares the 3-layered model and the IFLA model culminating in a reevaluation of the 3-layered model