Search (841 results, page 1 of 43)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Park, J.-r.; Lu, C.; Marion, L.: Cataloging professionals in the digital environment : a content analysis of job descriptions (2009) 0.16
    0.16347966 = product of:
      0.24521948 = sum of:
        0.02263261 = weight(_text_:on in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02263261 = score(doc=2766,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.20619515 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
        0.22258687 = sum of:
          0.18201777 = weight(_text_:demand in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18201777 = score(doc=2766,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.31127608 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04990557 = queryNorm
              0.5847471 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
          0.040569093 = weight(_text_:22 in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040569093 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04990557 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This study assesses the current state of responsibilities and skill sets required of cataloging professionals. It identifies emerging roles and competencies focusing on the digital environment and relates these to the established knowledge of traditional cataloging standards and practices. We conducted a content analysis of 349 job descriptions advertised in AutoCAT in 2005-2006. Multivariate techniques of cluster and multidimensional-scaling analyses were applied to the data. Analysis of job titles, required and preferred qualifications/skills, and responsibilities lends perspective to the roles that cataloging professionals play in the digital environment. Technological advances increasingly demand knowledge and skills related to electronic resource management, metadata creation, and computer and Web applications. Emerging knowledge and skill sets are increasingly being integrated into the core technical aspects of cataloging such as bibliographic and authority control and integrated library-system management. Management of cataloging functions is also in high demand. The results of the study provide insight on current and future curriculum design of library and information-science programs.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:20:24
  2. Leysen, J.M.; Boydston, J.M.K.: Supply and demand for catalogers : present and future (2005) 0.16
    0.15906036 = product of:
      0.23859054 = sum of:
        0.016003672 = weight(_text_:on in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016003672 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
        0.22258687 = sum of:
          0.18201777 = weight(_text_:demand in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18201777 = score(doc=121,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.31127608 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04990557 = queryNorm
              0.5847471 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
          0.040569093 = weight(_text_:22 in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040569093 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04990557 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents results from a fall 2003 survey of heads of cataloging at Association of Research Libraries United States academic libraries. The survey focused on the current number of professional catalogers and their responsibilities as well as future projections for demand for catalogers and thoughts about their roles. The study found that the numbers of professional catalogers are remaining constant or decreasing, and approximately one-third are projected to retire in the next decade. In addition, the role of the professional cataloger is perceived as continuing to evolve toward more cataloging-related activities and management and less direct cataloging. Most respondents predicted the professional cataloger has a role in the future and felt prepared for that future. Some respondents suggested that metadata cataloging would be a growing role in that future. This paper concludes with additional questions about the future of professional catalogers and cataloging.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Münnich, M.: REUSE or rule harmonization : just a project? (2000) 0.11
    0.11392245 = product of:
      0.17088367 = sum of:
        0.029821085 = weight(_text_:on in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029821085 = score(doc=192,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.271686 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
        0.14106259 = sum of:
          0.107255004 = weight(_text_:demand in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.107255004 = score(doc=192,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31127608 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04990557 = queryNorm
              0.3445655 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
          0.03380758 = weight(_text_:22 in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03380758 = score(doc=192,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04990557 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    German academic libraries acquire a large number of books from British and American publishers. The bibliographic records of the Library of Congress and the British National Bibliography are offered in most German library networks. Thus, projects REUSE and REUSE+ were undertaken when there was a demand for harmonization of Germany cataloging rules with AACR2 (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules). Experts in the United States and Germany systematically analyzed bibliographic data and compared the codes on which the data were based. Major and minor differences in cataloging rules were identified. The REUSE group proposed German participation in international authority files and changes in RAK, the German cataloging rules. In REUSE+ the different types of hierarchical bibliographic structures in USMARC and MAB2 and other German formats were analyzed. The German project group made suggestions concerning both the German formats and the USMARC format. Steps toward rule alignment and harmonization of online requirements were made when the German Cataloging Rules Conference made decisions on resolutions prepared by the Working Groups on Descriptive Cataloging that dealt with titles, encoding of form titles and conference terms, prefixes in names, hierarchies, entries under persons and corporate bodies, and the conceptual basis of RAK2 in the context of harmonization. Although problems remain, German rule makers have made progress toward internationality.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale": papers from the ALCTS preconference, June 26, 1998 "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale". ALCTS Preconference, Washington, D.C.
  4. Zyroff, E.: Cataloguing is a prime number (1996) 0.07
    0.07142815 = product of:
      0.107142225 = sum of:
        0.021338228 = weight(_text_:on in 5050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021338228 = score(doc=5050,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 5050, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5050)
        0.085804 = product of:
          0.171608 = sum of:
            0.171608 = weight(_text_:demand in 5050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.171608 = score(doc=5050,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.31127608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.5513048 = fieldWeight in 5050, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5050)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Argues against various trends towards the downgrading of cataloguing in librarianship. These include the administrative response to the ready availability of shared catalogue records, the targeting of cataloguing positions when library budgets shrink, the 'supply and demand' attitude of library schools in the USA which less often insist on students studying cataloguing, and the lack of a core and prescriptive curriculum for library professionals sponsored by the ALA. The study of cataloguing and cataloguing theory promotes skills that ensure consistency, predictibility and repeatability of access to materials, and the lack of these skills among librarians harms the services they provide
  5. Condon, P.: ¬The end of an era? : the forces marshalling against cataloguing (1995) 0.07
    0.067655474 = product of:
      0.10148321 = sum of:
        0.026404712 = weight(_text_:on in 5750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026404712 = score(doc=5750,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 5750, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5750)
        0.0750785 = product of:
          0.150157 = sum of:
            0.150157 = weight(_text_:demand in 5750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.150157 = score(doc=5750,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.31127608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.48239172 = fieldWeight in 5750, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5750)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Challenges the mind sets that exist about cataloguing in libraries today by offereing arguments for new priorities based on a formula of blending the users' needs with the need for libraries to take a more proactive role in helping users find and use information relevant to their learning needs in a world of rapid and complex change. Argues that inhouse cataloguing is in decline due to the explosion of technological innovations and a high demand for new services pushing for a new order of priorities to ensure effective management at a time of shrinking resources. Focuses on examples from the university environment
  6. Lange, H.R.: Catalogers and workstations : a retrospective and future view (1993) 0.07
    0.067655474 = product of:
      0.10148321 = sum of:
        0.026404712 = weight(_text_:on in 5534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026404712 = score(doc=5534,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 5534, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5534)
        0.0750785 = product of:
          0.150157 = sum of:
            0.150157 = weight(_text_:demand in 5534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.150157 = score(doc=5534,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.31127608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.48239172 = fieldWeight in 5534, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5534)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Since the days of hand written catalog cards, catalogers have continually searched for, utilized, and implemented new technologies in an effort to provide more efficient and accurate access to library materials. From hand written locally produced cards to Library of Congress cards, and from typewriters to increasingly complex computerized workstations, catalogers have experimented with and adapted new methods that would permit them to focus less time on the mechanical aspects of cataloging and more on its intellectual side. Present automated workstations and the promise for tomorrow's more complex systems demand a continued adaptation and redefinition of the cataloger's role in information provision.
  7. Parent, I.: IFLA Section on Cataloguing: "Why in the World?" (2000) 0.05
    0.048908483 = product of:
      0.07336272 = sum of:
        0.05307818 = weight(_text_:on in 188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05307818 = score(doc=188,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.48357052 = fieldWeight in 188, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=188)
        0.020284547 = product of:
          0.040569093 = sum of:
            0.040569093 = weight(_text_:22 in 188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040569093 = score(doc=188,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 188, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=188)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Bibliographic Control Division of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) consists of three sections: bibliography, cataloguing, and classification. The cataloguing section, which focuses on descriptive cataloguing, is one of the oldest within IFLA, having been founded in 1935 as the IFLA Committee on Uniform Cataloguing Rules. It became the Committee on Cataloguing in 1970. The committee played a key role in planning and convening the International Conference on Cataloguing Principles held in Paris in 1961 and the International Meeting of Cataloguing Experts held in Copenhagen in 1969. The Copenhagen conference provided the impetus to develop the International Standard Bibliographic Descriptions (ISBD). The Committee on Cataloguing established a systematic process for the revision of the ISBDs. The cataloguing section focuses on traditional cataloguing standards and on the impact of electronic resources and technology on these standards. The section has initiated several projects at the international level to facilitate access to information.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale": papers from the ALCTS preconference, June 26, 1998 "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale". ALCTS Preconference, Washington, D.C.
  8. Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001) 0.05
    0.04838429 = product of:
      0.07257643 = sum of:
        0.032007344 = weight(_text_:on in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032007344 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.29160398 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
        0.040569093 = product of:
          0.081138186 = sum of:
            0.081138186 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.081138186 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
  9. Seymour, C.: Cataloging Internet resources (1996) 0.05
    0.047685735 = product of:
      0.0715286 = sum of:
        0.03772102 = weight(_text_:on in 4679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03772102 = score(doc=4679,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.3436586 = fieldWeight in 4679, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4679)
        0.03380758 = product of:
          0.06761516 = sum of:
            0.06761516 = weight(_text_:22 in 4679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06761516 = score(doc=4679,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4679, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4679)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the OCLC project for cataloguing Internet resources, a project aimed at developing rules for electronic material, and as a possible solution for the difficulty of locating materials on the Internet. No attempts is made to catalogue all the resources on the Internet and choice of materials is left to participating libraries
    Source
    Information and librarianship. 22(1996) no.1, S.33-35
  10. Burnett, I.S.: Quality, speed and access : alternative cataloguing sources (1994) 0.04
    0.042669978 = product of:
      0.064004965 = sum of:
        0.0369589 = weight(_text_:on in 2336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0369589 = score(doc=2336,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.33671528 = fieldWeight in 2336, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2336)
        0.027046064 = product of:
          0.054092128 = sum of:
            0.054092128 = weight(_text_:22 in 2336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054092128 = score(doc=2336,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2336, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2336)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Offers advice on avaluating alternative cataloguing sources. The steps should be: identify the possible providers; network for advice; test or sample attractive systems; develop criteria based on library size, type and location (e.g. cost and equipment needs, currency of records, types of materials accessed, customer service and reputation of vendor, impact on staff/time and other library services and ability to share or network information); and evaluate the possible services; and implement the new service
    Date
    17.10.1995 18:22:54
  11. Moir, S.; Wells, A.: Descriptive cataloguing and the Internet : recent research (1996) 0.04
    0.042669978 = product of:
      0.064004965 = sum of:
        0.0369589 = weight(_text_:on in 7230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0369589 = score(doc=7230,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.33671528 = fieldWeight in 7230, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7230)
        0.027046064 = product of:
          0.054092128 = sum of:
            0.054092128 = weight(_text_:22 in 7230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054092128 = score(doc=7230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7230)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Outlines the Coalition for Networked Information's (CNI) analysis of the networked electronic environment where the chief problem for the users appears to be finding resources on the Internet. Presents the CNI's arguments for surrogates and describes one approach to the identification and description of resources on the Internet: the OCLC Internet Cataloguing Project
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the Australian Committee on Cataloguing (ACOC) seminar 'Rule revisions: who needs them' held prior to the National Cataloguing Conference in Oct. 95
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.1/2, S.8-16
  12. Bothmann, R.: Cataloging electronic books (2004) 0.04
    0.04067147 = product of:
      0.061007205 = sum of:
        0.0373419 = weight(_text_:on in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0373419 = score(doc=129,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.34020463 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
        0.023665305 = product of:
          0.04733061 = sum of:
            0.04733061 = weight(_text_:22 in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04733061 = score(doc=129,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Papers on the cataloging of electronic resources have focused on electronic journals and Internet resources such as Web sites and not on electronic books. Electronic books are nonserial monographic resources accessed with a computer either directly or remotely. Rules and standards for cataloging electronic resources have changed and continue to change. This article discusses the electronic book as a unique manifestation and provides practical instruction on the application of current cataloging rules. The cataloging elements covered are control fields and variable data fields, including classification, uniform titles, title information, edition information, type and extent of the resource, publication and distribution information, physical description, series statements, notes, and subject analysis.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  13. Stalberg, E.; Cronin, C.: Assessing the cost and value of bibliographic control (2011) 0.04
    0.04067147 = product of:
      0.061007205 = sum of:
        0.0373419 = weight(_text_:on in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0373419 = score(doc=2592,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.34020463 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
        0.023665305 = product of:
          0.04733061 = sum of:
            0.04733061 = weight(_text_:22 in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04733061 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In June 2009, the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Heads of Technical Services in Large Research Libraries Interest Group established the Task Force on Cost/Value Assessment of Bibliographic Control to address recommendation 5.1.1.1 of On the Record: Report of the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control, which focused on developing measures for costs, benefits, and value of bibliographic control. This paper outlines results of that task force's efforts to develop and articulate metrics for evaluating the cost and value of cataloging activities specifically, and offers some next steps that the community could take to further the profession's collective understanding of the costs and values associated with bibliographic control.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. Copeland, A.W.: ¬The demand for serials catalogers : an analysis of job advertisements, 1980-1995 (1997) 0.04
    0.040448394 = product of:
      0.12134518 = sum of:
        0.12134518 = product of:
          0.24269035 = sum of:
            0.24269035 = weight(_text_:demand in 859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24269035 = score(doc=859,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.31127608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.7796627 = fieldWeight in 859, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=859)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Analyzes the demand for serials cataloguers as it is reflected in job advertisements during a 15 year period. Evaluating changes in position descriptions from 1890 to 1995, suggests that the role of the serials cataloguer has broadened in scope with developments in automation and in national standards. Expectations for candidates over the years have increased as a result
  15. Caudle, D.M.: Cataloging videotapes (1995) 0.04
    0.040320244 = product of:
      0.060480364 = sum of:
        0.026672786 = weight(_text_:on in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026672786 = score(doc=2635,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.24300331 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
        0.03380758 = product of:
          0.06761516 = sum of:
            0.06761516 = weight(_text_:22 in 2635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06761516 = score(doc=2635,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2635, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2635)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the process of cataloguing a videotape on OCLC. Considers decisions to make before cataloguing, such as the level of detail required. Describes the OCLC MARC audiovisual format and explains rules for titles and notes
    Date
    27.11.1995 17:07:22
  16. Dunkle, C.B.: Outsourcing the catalog department : a mediation inspired by the business and library literature (1996) 0.04
    0.040320244 = product of:
      0.060480364 = sum of:
        0.026672786 = weight(_text_:on in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026672786 = score(doc=4907,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.24300331 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
        0.03380758 = product of:
          0.06761516 = sum of:
            0.06761516 = weight(_text_:22 in 4907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06761516 = score(doc=4907,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4907, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4907)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Draws on parallels between outsourcing in business and in libraries to examine the difficulties and implications of outsourcing the catalogue department. Examines why cataloguing, in particular, has received outsourcing attention. 2 major reasons emerge: cataloguing is a non core activity, and catalogue departments are troublesome
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 22(1996) no.1, S.33-43
  17. Cochenour, D.: Linking remote users and information : cataloguing Internet publications (1994) 0.04
    0.038148586 = product of:
      0.057222877 = sum of:
        0.030176813 = weight(_text_:on in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030176813 = score(doc=2170,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
        0.027046064 = product of:
          0.054092128 = sum of:
            0.054092128 = weight(_text_:22 in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054092128 = score(doc=2170,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries can add value to Internet resources by adding them to the library's catalogue in a manner consistent with the other resources held within the collection. Reports on OCLC studies into cataloguing Internet resources and accessing electronic periodicals. Existing retrieval methods on the Internet are limited because of shallow directory structures and idiosyncratic naming conventions. Catalogue entries for electronic resources need to provide a complete description of the access methodology if they are to satisfactorily connect remote users without the immediate possibility of backup from reference staff
    Date
    17.10.1995 18:22:54
  18. Chang, H.-Y.: Cataloguing electronic resources (1997) 0.04
    0.038148586 = product of:
      0.057222877 = sum of:
        0.030176813 = weight(_text_:on in 1770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030176813 = score(doc=1770,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 1770, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1770)
        0.027046064 = product of:
          0.054092128 = sum of:
            0.054092128 = weight(_text_:22 in 1770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054092128 = score(doc=1770,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1770, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1770)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Considers issues surrounding cataloguing electronic resources on the MELVYL online system at the University of California, USA. Considers implications of the differences between online and paper versions of serials, difficulties in providing precises information on holdings of full text articles, cataloguing rules changes that are need to integrate MARC formats, adding URLs as a subfield, archiving electronic journals and restricting access to electronic materials
    Source
    DLA bulletin. 17(1997) no.1, S.22-24
  19. Struble, C.A.; Kohberger, P.B.: Statistical survey to determine availability of cataloging copy on OCLC (1987) 0.04
    0.038148586 = product of:
      0.057222877 = sum of:
        0.030176813 = weight(_text_:on in 358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030176813 = score(doc=358,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 358, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=358)
        0.027046064 = product of:
          0.054092128 = sum of:
            0.054092128 = weight(_text_:22 in 358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054092128 = score(doc=358,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 358, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=358)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports the results of a year-long survey conducted at the University of Pittsburgh (Pitt) to determine what level of cataloging copy (Library of Congress, member input, or none) is present on OCLC at the time an item is received in Technical Services and after a six-month waiting period. These results were used to divert selected monographs from the normal workflow in order to expedite their cataloging and to release needed shelf space for other items.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 7(1987) no.3, S.13-22
  20. Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004) 0.04
    0.038148586 = product of:
      0.057222877 = sum of:
        0.030176813 = weight(_text_:on in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030176813 = score(doc=562,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.027046064 = product of:
          0.054092128 = sum of:
            0.054092128 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054092128 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The paper performs a thought experiment on the concept of a record based on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and library system functions, and concludes that if we want to develop a functional bibliographic record we need to do it within the context of a flexible, functional library systems record structure. The article suggests a new way to look at the library systems record that would allow libraries to move forward in terms of technology but also in terms of serving library users.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174

Languages

Types

  • a 760
  • el 50
  • m 47
  • s 17
  • b 16
  • n 7
  • r 7
  • ? 1
  • l 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects