-
Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980)
0.05
0.047685735 = product of:
0.0715286 = sum of:
0.03772102 = weight(_text_:on in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03772102 = score(doc=5835,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.3436586 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
0.03380758 = product of:
0.06761516 = sum of:
0.06761516 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06761516 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 13:22:44
- Source
- Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u, L. Kajberg
-
Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992)
0.03
0.032256197 = product of:
0.048384294 = sum of:
0.021338228 = weight(_text_:on in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021338228 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
0.027046064 = product of:
0.054092128 = sum of:
0.054092128 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054092128 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 13:22:08
- Source
- Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Proc. 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991. Ed. by N.J. Williamson u. M. Hudon
-
Chen, S.-J.; Lee, H.-L.: Art images and mental associations : a preliminary exploration (2014)
0.03
0.032002483 = product of:
0.048003722 = sum of:
0.027719175 = weight(_text_:on in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027719175 = score(doc=1416,freq=6.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.25253648 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
0.020284547 = product of:
0.040569093 = sum of:
0.040569093 = weight(_text_:22 in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040569093 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper reports on the preliminary findings of a study that explores mental associations made by novices viewing art images. In a controlled environment, 20 Taiwanese college students responded to the question "What does the painting remind you of?" after viewing each digitized image of 15 oil paintings by a famous Taiwanese artist. Rather than focusing on the representation or interpretation of art, the study attempted to solicit information about how non-experts are stimulated by art. This paper reports on the analysis of participant responses to three of the images, and describes a12-type taxonomy of association emerged from the analysis. While 9 of the types are derived and adapted from facets in the Art & Architecture Thesaurus, three new types - Artistic Influence Association, Reactive Association, and Prototype Association - are discovered. The conclusion briefly discusses both the significance of the findings and the implications for future research.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Sigel, A.: How can user-oriented depth analysis be constructively guided? (2000)
0.03
0.031249817 = product of:
0.046874724 = sum of:
0.009335475 = weight(_text_:on in 133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009335475 = score(doc=133,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.08505116 = fieldWeight in 133, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=133)
0.03753925 = product of:
0.0750785 = sum of:
0.0750785 = weight(_text_:demand in 133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0750785 = score(doc=133,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31127608 = queryWeight, product of:
6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.24119586 = fieldWeight in 133, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=133)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- It is vital for library and information science to understand the subject indexing process thoroughly. However, document analysis, the first and most important step in indexing, has not received sufficient attention. As this is an exceptionally hard problem, we still do not dispose of a sound indexing theory. Therefore we have difficulties in teaching indexing and in explaining why a given subject representation is "better" than another. Technological advancements have not helped to close this fundamental gap. To proceed, we should ask the right questions instead. Several types of indexer inconsistencies can be explained as acceptable, yet different conceptualizations which resulting of the variety of groups dealing with a problem from their respective viewpoints. Multiple indexed documents are regarded as the normal case. Intersubjectively replicable indexing results are often questionable or do not constitute interesting cases of indexing at all. In the context of my ongoing dissertation in which I intend to develop an enhanced indexing theory by investigating improvements within a social sciences domain, this paper explains user-oriented selective depth analysis and why I chose that configuration. Strongly influenced by Mai's dissertation, I also communicate my first insights concerning current indexing theories. I agree that I cannot ignore epistemological stances and philosophical issues in language and meaning related to indexing and accept the openness of the interpretive nature of the indexing process. Although I present arguments against the employment of an indexing language as well, it is still indispensable in situations which demand easier access and control by devices. Despite the enormous difficulties the user-oriented and selective depth analysis poses, I argue that it is both feasible and useful if one achieves careful guidance of the possible interpretations. There is some hope because the number of useful interpretations is limited: Every summary is tailored to a purpose, audience and situation. Domain, discourse and social practice entail additional constraints. A pluralistic method mix that focusses on ecologically valid, holistic contexts and employs qualitative methods is recommended. Domain analysis urgently has to be made more practical and applicable. Only then we will be able to investigate empirically domains in order to identify their structures shaped by the corresponding discourse communities. We plan to represent the recognized problem structures and indexing questions of relevance to a small domain in formal, ontological computer models -- if we can find such stable knowledge structures. This would allow us to tailor dynamically summaries for user communities. For practical purposes we suggest to assume a less demanding position than Hjorland's "totality of the epistemological potential". It is sufficent that we identify and represent iteratively the information needs of today's user groups in interactive knowledge-based systems. The best way to formalize such knowledge gained about discourse communities is however unknown. Indexers should stay in direct contact with the community they serve or be part of it to ensure agreement with their viewpoints. Checklist/request-oriented indexing could be very helpful but it remains to be demonstrated how well it will be applicable in the social sciences. A frame-based representation or at least a sophisticated grouping of terms could help to express relational knowledge structures. There remains much work to do since in practice no one has shown yet how such an improved indexing system would work and if the indexing results were really "better".
-
Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012)
0.02
0.024827976 = product of:
0.03724196 = sum of:
0.013336393 = weight(_text_:on in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013336393 = score(doc=4888,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.121501654 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
0.023905568 = product of:
0.047811136 = sum of:
0.047811136 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047811136 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper centres on the tools for the management of new digital documents, which are not only textual, but also visual-video, audio or multimedia in the full sense. Among the aims is to demonstrate that operating within the terms of generic Information Retrieval through textual language only is limiting, and it is instead necessary to consider ampler criteria, such as those of MultiMedia Information Retrieval, according to which, every type of digital document can be analyzed and searched by the proper elements of language for its proper nature. MMIR is presented as the organic complex of the systems of Text Retrieval, Visual Retrieval, Video Retrieval, and Audio Retrieval, each of which has an approach to information management that handles the concrete textual, visual, audio, or video content of the documents directly, here defined as content-based. In conclusion, the limits of this content-based objective access to documents is underlined. The discrepancy known as the semantic gap is that which occurs between semantic-interpretive access and content-based access. Finally, the integration of these conceptions is explained, gathering and composing the merits and the advantages of each of the approaches and of the systems to access to information.
- Date
- 22. 1.2012 13:02:10
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
-
White, M.D.; Marsh, E.E.: Content analysis : a flexible methodology (2006)
0.02
0.024192145 = product of:
0.036288217 = sum of:
0.016003672 = weight(_text_:on in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016003672 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
0.020284547 = product of:
0.040569093 = sum of:
0.040569093 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040569093 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Content analysis is a highly flexible research method that has been widely used in library and information science (LIS) studies with varying research goals and objectives. The research method is applied in qualitative, quantitative, and sometimes mixed modes of research frameworks and employs a wide range of analytical techniques to generate findings and put them into context. This article characterizes content analysis as a systematic, rigorous approach to analyzing documents obtained or generated in the course of research. It briefly describes the steps involved in content analysis, differentiates between quantitative and qualitative content analysis, and shows that content analysis serves the purposes of both quantitative research and qualitative research. The authors draw on selected LIS studies that have used content analysis to illustrate the concepts addressed in the article. The article also serves as a gateway to methodological books and articles that provide more detail about aspects of content analysis discussed only briefly in the article.
- Source
- Library trends. 55(2006) no.1, S.22-45
-
Arastoopoor, S.; Fattahi, R.: Users' perception of aboutness and ofness in images : an approach to subject indexing based on Ervin Panofsky's theory and users'' view (2012)
0.01
0.013336394 = product of:
0.040009182 = sum of:
0.040009182 = weight(_text_:on in 872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040009182 = score(doc=872,freq=18.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.364505 = fieldWeight in 872, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=872)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- It is widely accepted that subject indexing of an image is based on a two-dimensional approach. The first is the ofness and the second focuses on aboutness of the image. Assigning a suitable set of subject tags based on these two groups depends, to a great deal, on users' perception of the image. This study aims at analyzing users' perception of aboutness and ofness of images. 25 in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted in two phases. In the first phase a collection of 10 widely known photographs were given to the interviewees and they were asked to assign subject tags (as many as they wanted) to each image. In the second phase some facts regarding each image were given to him / her to assign further tags (again as many as they wanted) or even modify their previous tags. The results show that the interviewees do focus both on ofness and aboutness in subject tagging; but it seems that they emphasize more on aboutness in describing images. On the other hand, as soon as the interviewees were able to distinguish the iconographical ofness, they could speak of iconographical and iconological aboutness. The results also show that subject indexers must focus on the iconographical level, especially regarding those tags which represent the ofness at this level.
-
Hjoerland, B.: Subject representation and information seeking : contributions to a theory based on the theory of knowledge (1993)
0.01
0.0124473 = product of:
0.0373419 = sum of:
0.0373419 = weight(_text_:on in 7555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0373419 = score(doc=7555,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.34020463 = fieldWeight in 7555, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7555)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Sauperl, A.: Subject determination during the cataloging process : the development of a system based on theoretical principles (2002)
0.01
0.012096073 = product of:
0.018144108 = sum of:
0.008001836 = weight(_text_:on in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008001836 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.072900996 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
0.010142273 = product of:
0.020284547 = sum of:
0.020284547 = weight(_text_:22 in 2293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020284547 = score(doc=2293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2293)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 27. 9.2005 14:22:19
-
Bertrand-Gastaldy, S.B.: Convergent theories : using a multidisciplinary approach to expalin indexing results (1995)
0.01
0.011928434 = product of:
0.0357853 = sum of:
0.0357853 = weight(_text_:on in 3832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0357853 = score(doc=3832,freq=10.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.32602316 = fieldWeight in 3832, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3832)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In order to explain how indexers chose their keywords and how their results can differ between each other, focuses on certain properties of the terms rather than on the terms themselves. Bases the study on 4 premises borrowed from research in semiotics, cognitive science, discourse analysis and reading theories. Reports on the methodology used, and some of the findings obtained by comparing properties of indexing terms with the content of titles and abstracts of 844 bibliographic records extracted from a database on environment. Characterizes some tendencies of the special reading which indexing constitutes as a series of properties of the selected or rejected works and explains the differences among several indexers by the porperties toward which they are inclined
-
Austin, J.; Pejtersen, A.M.: Fiction retrieval: experimental design and evaluation of a search system based on user's value criteria. Pt.1 (1983)
0.01
0.010669115 = product of:
0.032007344 = sum of:
0.032007344 = weight(_text_:on in 142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032007344 = score(doc=142,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.29160398 = fieldWeight in 142, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=142)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a computer-aided user-system dialogue based on an analysis of users' search behaviour (1984)
0.01
0.010669115 = product of:
0.032007344 = sum of:
0.032007344 = weight(_text_:on in 1044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032007344 = score(doc=1044,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.29160398 = fieldWeight in 1044, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1044)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Belkin, N.J.: ¬The problem of 'matching' in information retrieval (1980)
0.01
0.010669115 = product of:
0.032007344 = sum of:
0.032007344 = weight(_text_:on in 1329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032007344 = score(doc=1329,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.29160398 = fieldWeight in 1329, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1329)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u. L. Kajberg
-
Pejtersen, A.M.: Implications of users' value perception for the design of knowledge based bibliographic retrieval systems (1985)
0.01
0.010669115 = product of:
0.032007344 = sum of:
0.032007344 = weight(_text_:on in 2088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032007344 = score(doc=2088,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.29160398 = fieldWeight in 2088, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2088)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- 2nd Symposium on Empirical Foundations of Information and Software Science, 3.-5.10.84, Atlanta
-
Wyllie, J.: Concept indexing : the world beyond the windows (1990)
0.01
0.010669115 = product of:
0.032007344 = sum of:
0.032007344 = weight(_text_:on in 2977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032007344 = score(doc=2977,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.29160398 = fieldWeight in 2977, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2977)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper argues that the realisation of the electronic hypermedia of the future depends on integrating the technology of free text retrieval with the classification-based discipline of content analysis
-
Martindale, C.; McKenzie, D.: On the utility of content analysis in author attribution : 'The federalist' (1995)
0.01
0.010669115 = product of:
0.032007344 = sum of:
0.032007344 = weight(_text_:on in 822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032007344 = score(doc=822,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.29160398 = fieldWeight in 822, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=822)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Chen, H.; Ng, T.: ¬An algorithmic approach to concept exploration in a large knowledge network (automatic thesaurus consultation) : symbolic branch-and-bound search versus connectionist Hopfield Net Activation (1995)
0.01
0.010669115 = product of:
0.032007344 = sum of:
0.032007344 = weight(_text_:on in 2203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032007344 = score(doc=2203,freq=8.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.29160398 = fieldWeight in 2203, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2203)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Presents a framework for knowledge discovery and concept exploration. In order to enhance the concept exploration capability of knowledge based systems and to alleviate the limitation of the manual browsing approach, develops 2 spreading activation based algorithms for concept exploration in large, heterogeneous networks of concepts (eg multiple thesauri). One algorithm, which is based on the symbolic AI paradigma, performs a conventional branch-and-bound search on a semantic net representation to identify other highly relevant concepts (a serial, optimal search process). The 2nd algorithm, which is absed on the neural network approach, executes the Hopfield net parallel relaxation and convergence process to identify 'convergent' concepts for some initial queries (a parallel, heuristic search process). Tests these 2 algorithms on a large text-based knowledge network of about 13.000 nodes (terms) and 80.000 directed links in the area of computing technologies
-
Nohr, H.: ¬The training of librarians in content analysis : some thoughts on future necessities (1991)
0.01
0.010058938 = product of:
0.030176813 = sum of:
0.030176813 = weight(_text_:on in 5149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030176813 = score(doc=5149,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 5149, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5149)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The training of librarians in content analysis undergoes influences resulting both from the realities existing in the various application fields and from technological innovations. The present contribution attempts to identify components of such training that are necessary for a future-oriented instruction, and it stresses the importance of furnishing a sound theoretical basis, especially in the light of technological developments. Purpose of the training is to provide the foundation for 'action competence' on the part of the students
-
Todd, R.J.: Subject access: what's it all about? : some research findings (1993)
0.01
0.010058938 = product of:
0.030176813 = sum of:
0.030176813 = weight(_text_:on in 8193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030176813 = score(doc=8193,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 8193, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8193)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Describes some findings of research conducted into activities related to the process of deciding subjects of documents which sought to identify the goals and intentions of indexers in determining subjects; specific strategies and prescriptions indexers actually use to determine subjects; and some of the variables which impact on the process of determining subjects
- Footnote
- Paper presented at the 10th National Cataloguing Conference on Subject to change: subject access and the role of the cataloguer, Freemantle, Western Australia, 4-6 Nov 93
-
Bednarek, M.: Intellectual access to pictorial information (1993)
0.01
0.009239726 = product of:
0.027719175 = sum of:
0.027719175 = weight(_text_:on in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027719175 = score(doc=5631,freq=6.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.25253648 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Visual materials represent a significantly different type of communication to textual materials and therefore present distinct challenges for the process of retrieval, especially if by retireval we mean intellectual access to the content of images. This paper outlines the special characteristics of visual materials, focusing on their pontential complexity and subjectivity, and the methods used and explored for gaining access to visual materials as reported in the literature. It concludes that methods of access to visual materials are dominated by the relative mature systems developed for textual materials and that access methods based on visual communication are still largely in the developmental or prototype stage. Although reported research on user requirements in the retrieval of visual information is noticeably lacking, the results of at least one study indicate that the visually-based retrieval methods of structured and unstructered browsing seem to be preferred for visula materials and that effective retrieval methods are ultimately related to characteristics of the enquirer and the visual information sought
