Search (460 results, page 1 of 23)

  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  1. Gstrein, S.: VuFind: Ebooks on demand Suchmaschine (2011) 0.09
    0.09278791 = product of:
      0.13918185 = sum of:
        0.027719175 = weight(_text_:on in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027719175 = score(doc=192,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.25253648 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
        0.111462675 = product of:
          0.22292535 = sum of:
            0.22292535 = weight(_text_:demand in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22292535 = score(doc=192,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.31127608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.716166 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    eBooks on Demand (EOD) ist ein europaweites Netzwerk von mehr als 30 Bibliotheken in 12 europäischen Ländern mit dem Ziel, urheberrechtsfreie Bücher auf Anfrage zu digitalisieren und zur Verfügung zu stellen. Zur Digitalisierung kann jedes Buch bestellt werden, das im Online-Katalog der Bibliothek mit dem sog. EOD-Button versehen ist. Das so bestellte Buch wird dann innerhalb weniger Tage hochauflösend gescannt und nach erfolgreicher Bezahlung als PDF mit hinterlegtem OCR-Text zur Verfügung gestellt. Bisher musste in jedem einzelnen Katalog jeder teilnehmenden Bibliothek separat gesucht werden, um ein bestimmtes Buch zu finden. Seit Ende 2010 wird nun unter der Adresse http://search.books2ebooks.eu eine bibliotheksübergreifende Suchmaschine angeboten, die mit der Open Source Software VuFind realisiert wurde. Derzeit werden hier 1,8 Mio. Datensätze von 12 Bibliotheken durchsuchbar gemacht. Den NutzerInnen der bibliotheksübergreifenden Suchmaschine wird so schnell und unkompliziert Zugang zu bereits digitalisierten Werken als auch Büchern, die zur Digitalisierung auf Anfrage zur Verfügung stehen, gegeben.
    Object
    eBooks on Demand
  2. Wood, A.J.: OPACs in public libraries : a second look (1989) 0.08
    0.08184194 = product of:
      0.1227629 = sum of:
        0.0369589 = weight(_text_:on in 2518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0369589 = score(doc=2518,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.33671528 = fieldWeight in 2518, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2518)
        0.085804 = product of:
          0.171608 = sum of:
            0.171608 = weight(_text_:demand in 2518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.171608 = score(doc=2518,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.31127608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.5513048 = fieldWeight in 2518, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2518)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    2nd of two articles based on the results of a survey of on-line public access catalogues (OPACs) in public libraries carried out by Manchester Library School. 20 UK libraries provided data for the survey. Discusses types of OPAC configurations in use, suppliers of systems, help facilities, display of data, and subject searching on OPACs. Concludes that, in general, OPACs make accessing a catalogue easy and that this encourages catalogue use, resulting in increased document demand levels and in more satisfied customers.
  3. Walker, S.: Improving subject access painlessly : recent work on the Okapi online catalogue projects (1988) 0.06
    0.064512394 = product of:
      0.09676859 = sum of:
        0.042676456 = weight(_text_:on in 7403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042676456 = score(doc=7403,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 7403, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7403)
        0.054092128 = product of:
          0.108184256 = sum of:
            0.108184256 = weight(_text_:22 in 7403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.108184256 = score(doc=7403,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7403, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7403)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Program. 22(1988), S.21-31
  4. Riesthuis, G.J.A.; Stuurman, P.: Tendenzen in de onderwerpsontsluiting : T.4: Onderwerpsontsluiting en on-line catalogi (1990) 0.06
    0.05644834 = product of:
      0.08467251 = sum of:
        0.0373419 = weight(_text_:on in 211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0373419 = score(doc=211,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.34020463 = fieldWeight in 211, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=211)
        0.04733061 = product of:
          0.09466122 = sum of:
            0.09466122 = weight(_text_:22 in 211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09466122 = score(doc=211,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 211, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=211)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Open. 22(1990) no.10, S.326-330
  5. Porter, M.; Galpin, V.: Relevance feedback in a public access catalogue for a research library : Muscat at the Scott Polar Research Institute (1988) 0.05
    0.049839865 = product of:
      0.074759796 = sum of:
        0.047713734 = weight(_text_:on in 4165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047713734 = score(doc=4165,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.43469757 = fieldWeight in 4165, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4165)
        0.027046064 = product of:
          0.054092128 = sum of:
            0.054092128 = weight(_text_:22 in 4165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054092128 = score(doc=4165,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4165, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4165)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the successful introduction of a sophisticated online catalogue system at the library of the Scott Polar Research Institute, Cambridge, using the Muscat program package. The system provides to both end-users and library staff a choice between boolean searching on keywords and access using relevance feedback based on free text in English, mixed with UDC classification numbers. The system is implemented on an IBM 3084 computer. Significant benefits from the application of relevance feedback are reported with 10,000 records on file.
    Source
    Program. 22(1988), S.1-20
  6. Cathro, W.: New frameworks for resource discovery and delivery : the changing role of the catalogue (2006) 0.05
    0.04832534 = product of:
      0.07248801 = sum of:
        0.01886051 = weight(_text_:on in 6107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01886051 = score(doc=6107,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.1718293 = fieldWeight in 6107, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6107)
        0.053627502 = product of:
          0.107255004 = sum of:
            0.107255004 = weight(_text_:demand in 6107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.107255004 = score(doc=6107,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.31127608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.3445655 = fieldWeight in 6107, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6107)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    There is currently a lively debate about the role of the library catalogue and its relationship to other resource discovery tools. An example of this debate is the recent publication of a report commissioned by the Library of Congress on "the changing nature of the catalogue" As part of this debate, the role of union catalogues is also being re-examined. Some commentators have suggested that union catalogues, by virtue of their size, can aggregate both supply and demand, thus increasing the chance that a relatively little-used resource will be discovered by somebody for whom it is relevant. During the past year, the National Library of Australia (NLA) has been considering the future of its catalogue and its role in the resource discovery and delivery process. The review was prompted, in part, by the redevelopment of the Australian union catalogue and its exposure on the web as a free public service, badged as Libraries Australia. The NLA examined the enablers and inhibitors to proposition "that it replace its catalogue with Libraries Australia, as the primary database to be searched by users". Flowing from this review, the NLA is aiming to undertake a number of tasks to move in the medium to long term towards a scenario in which it could deprecate its local catalogue. Bezug zum Calhoun-Report
  7. Cherry, J.M.; Clinton, M.: ¬An experimental investigation of two types of instruction for OPAC users (1991) 0.04
    0.042669978 = product of:
      0.064004965 = sum of:
        0.0369589 = weight(_text_:on in 3098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0369589 = score(doc=3098,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.33671528 = fieldWeight in 3098, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3098)
        0.027046064 = product of:
          0.054092128 = sum of:
            0.054092128 = weight(_text_:22 in 3098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054092128 = score(doc=3098,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3098, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3098)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports an investigation into the feasibility of usinf tutorials to train students to use on-line public access catalogues (OPACs). The library developed instructional software which conveys a conceptual model of an on-line catalogue and how it works. Reports the results of an experiment conducted to compare the effectiveness of the computer tutorial and the standard introductory classroom lecture on using the OPAC at the University of Toronto
    Source
    Canadian journal of information science. 16(1991) no.4, S.2-22
  8. Mischo, W.H.; Lee, J.: End-user searching in bibliographic databases (1987) 0.04
    0.038148586 = product of:
      0.057222877 = sum of:
        0.030176813 = weight(_text_:on in 336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030176813 = score(doc=336,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 336, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=336)
        0.027046064 = product of:
          0.054092128 = sum of:
            0.054092128 = weight(_text_:22 in 336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054092128 = score(doc=336,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 336, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=336)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The growing interest in end user or direct patron access to on-line bibliographic databases is reviewed with references to online catalogues, databases, and CD-ROMs. The literature of end user searching is surveyed with notes on: user training, software search aids, end user services in libraries: characterisation of end user searches; the role of librarians; and CD-ROMs as end user media
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.227-263
  9. Nuttall, H.D.; McAbee, S.L.: Pathfinders on-line : adding pathfinders to a NOTIS on-line system (1997) 0.04
    0.038148586 = product of:
      0.057222877 = sum of:
        0.030176813 = weight(_text_:on in 510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030176813 = score(doc=510,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 510, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=510)
        0.027046064 = product of:
          0.054092128 = sum of:
            0.054092128 = weight(_text_:22 in 510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054092128 = score(doc=510,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 510, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=510)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    27.11.1995 17:07:22
  10. Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: Searching behaviour and the evaluation of online catalogues (1991) 0.04
    0.038148586 = product of:
      0.057222877 = sum of:
        0.030176813 = weight(_text_:on in 2765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030176813 = score(doc=2765,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 2765, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2765)
        0.027046064 = product of:
          0.054092128 = sum of:
            0.054092128 = weight(_text_:22 in 2765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054092128 = score(doc=2765,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2765, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2765)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a brief report on a study, carried out by the Centre for Interactive Systems Research, City University, to investigate the techniques used for evaluating OPACs: to explore and assess different data gathering methods in studying information seeking behaviour at the on-line catalogue; and to examine how a transaction logging facility could be enhanced to serve as a more effective diagnostic tool. For a full report see British Library research paper 78
    Pages
    S.20-22
  11. Casale, M.: Searching for a common language (1996) 0.04
    0.03733623 = product of:
      0.05600434 = sum of:
        0.032339036 = weight(_text_:on in 4439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032339036 = score(doc=4439,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.29462588 = fieldWeight in 4439, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4439)
        0.023665305 = product of:
          0.04733061 = sum of:
            0.04733061 = weight(_text_:22 in 4439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04733061 = score(doc=4439,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4439, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4439)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the availability, use and value of Z39.50, an international standard which allows a librarian accessing a database on one computer platform to search an OPAC hosted on another computer with a totally different database structure. Experiences of those working with the standard are given, and its use by the European Union IRIS project to link 6 major Irish research libraries is examined. Despite some problems encountered with different forms of author cataloguing and possible competition from the WWW, the standard is seen as possessing considerable strengths, for example in searching different catalogues and presenting the results in a standard format on screen, which justify the continuing interest of librarians
    Source
    Library manager. 1996, no.14, S.22-23
  12. Fieldhouse, M.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: ¬The design of a graphical user interface for a highly interactive information retrieval system (1996) 0.04
    0.03733623 = product of:
      0.05600434 = sum of:
        0.032339036 = weight(_text_:on in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032339036 = score(doc=6958,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.29462588 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
        0.023665305 = product of:
          0.04733061 = sum of:
            0.04733061 = weight(_text_:22 in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04733061 = score(doc=6958,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on the design of a GUI for the Okapi 'best match' retrieval system developed at the Centre for Interactive Systems Research, City University, UK, for online library catalogues. The X-Windows interface includes an interactive query expansion (IQE) facilty which involves the user in the selection of query terms to reformulate a search. Presents the design rationale, based on a game board metaphor, and describes the features of each of the stages of the search interaction. Reports on the early operational field trial and discusses relevant evaluation issues and objectives
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  13. Horn, M.E.: "Garbage" in, "refuse and refuse disposal" out : making the most of the subject authority file in the OPAC (2002) 0.04
    0.03733623 = product of:
      0.05600434 = sum of:
        0.032339036 = weight(_text_:on in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032339036 = score(doc=156,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.29462588 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
        0.023665305 = product of:
          0.04733061 = sum of:
            0.04733061 = weight(_text_:22 in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04733061 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Subject access in the OPAC, as discussed in this article, is predicated on two different kinds of searching: subject (authority, alphabetic, or controlled vocabulary searching) or keyword (uncontrolled, free text, natural language vocabulary). The literature has focused on demonstrating that both approaches are needed, but very few authors address the need to integrate keyword into authority searching. The article discusses this difference and compares, with a query on the term garbage, search results in two online catalogs, one that performs keyword searches through the authority file and one where only bibliographic records are included in keyword searches.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. Dijk, J.v.: Foundation, de basis voor een successvolle klantenbenadering : nieuw catalogusconcept op basis van wensprofielen (1995) 0.03
    0.033380013 = product of:
      0.050070018 = sum of:
        0.026404712 = weight(_text_:on in 4696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026404712 = score(doc=4696,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 4696, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4696)
        0.023665305 = product of:
          0.04733061 = sum of:
            0.04733061 = weight(_text_:22 in 4696) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04733061 = score(doc=4696,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4696, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4696)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    At Limburg Provincial Central Library and Information Service in the Netherlands the online public catalogue has been replaced by a new system, Foundation. The OPAC network was an automated version of the card catalogue, whereas Foundation has been developed entirely from scratch. The system runs on Windows software and assists even inexperienced users to formulate suitable search strategies. The system accepts online catalogue records from other sources and has attracted considerable intersts from several areas, including the publishing industry
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Foundation, tha basis for a successful approach to customers: a new catalogue concept on the basis of user requirement
    Source
    Bibliotheek en samenleving. 23(1995) no.6, S.20-22
  15. Sandlian, P.: Rethinking the rules (1995) 0.03
    0.032256197 = product of:
      0.048384294 = sum of:
        0.021338228 = weight(_text_:on in 3099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021338228 = score(doc=3099,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 3099, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3099)
        0.027046064 = product of:
          0.054092128 = sum of:
            0.054092128 = weight(_text_:22 in 3099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054092128 = score(doc=3099,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3099, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3099)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Rules regarding cataloguing, subject headings, the way information in bibliographic records is organised and the catalogue's interface, or the way the screen is set up, are barriers to the use of online catalogues by children Describes the background to and implementation of a project to create a child orientation catalogue with a graphical user interface, or one that relies on pictures instead of text, within Denver Public Library in Colorado. Now called the Kid's catalog and commercially available from the Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries Co., the catalogue's software acts as a front end to a library's regular catalogue
    Source
    School library journal. 41(1995) no.7, S.22-25
  16. Martin, G.: Main entry : the argument for a defence of main entry in the OPAC (1996) 0.03
    0.032256197 = product of:
      0.048384294 = sum of:
        0.021338228 = weight(_text_:on in 7234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021338228 = score(doc=7234,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 7234, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7234)
        0.027046064 = product of:
          0.054092128 = sum of:
            0.054092128 = weight(_text_:22 in 7234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054092128 = score(doc=7234,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7234, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7234)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the Australian Committee on Cataloguing (ACOC) seminar 'Rule revisions: who needs them' held prior to the National Cataloguing Conference in Oct. 95
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.1/2, S.21-25
  17. Ballard, T.; Grimaldi, A.: Improve OPAC searching by reducing tagging errors in MARC records (1997) 0.03
    0.032256197 = product of:
      0.048384294 = sum of:
        0.021338228 = weight(_text_:on in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021338228 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
        0.027046064 = product of:
          0.054092128 = sum of:
            0.054092128 = weight(_text_:22 in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054092128 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    One of the most common errors in cataloguing library materials involves miscoding of the nonfiling indicator of title fields. Notes the extent of the problem and its negative effect on searching in the library's online catalogue and surveys how librarians have approached solutions to the problems. Describes how the major library automation system address this problem
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  18. Lee, Y.-R.: ¬A study on the conditions of using OPAC access points and subject searching by users (1997) 0.03
    0.032256197 = product of:
      0.048384294 = sum of:
        0.021338228 = weight(_text_:on in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021338228 = score(doc=933,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
        0.027046064 = product of:
          0.054092128 = sum of:
            0.054092128 = weight(_text_:22 in 933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054092128 = score(doc=933,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 933, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=933)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Bulletin of library and information science. 1997, no.22, S.39-55
  19. Sharma, A.: ¬The Z39.50 information retrieval protocol (1998) 0.03
    0.032256197 = product of:
      0.048384294 = sum of:
        0.021338228 = weight(_text_:on in 1406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021338228 = score(doc=1406,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 1406, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1406)
        0.027046064 = product of:
          0.054092128 = sum of:
            0.054092128 = weight(_text_:22 in 1406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054092128 = score(doc=1406,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1406, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1406)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of the work of a new member of the ELINOR project team to review the development taking place in Z39.50 networked information retrieval protocol with a view to bringing the University's electronic library pilot systems, including ELINOR and the online catalogue into a single, unified system. Focuses particularly on the WWW client server environment
    Series
    British Library Research and Innovation Centre (BLRIC) report; 22
  20. Wallace, P.M.: Periodical title searching in online catalogues (1997) 0.03
    0.032256197 = product of:
      0.048384294 = sum of:
        0.021338228 = weight(_text_:on in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021338228 = score(doc=1628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
        0.027046064 = product of:
          0.054092128 = sum of:
            0.054092128 = weight(_text_:22 in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054092128 = score(doc=1628,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a dramatic shift from subject to periodical title searching at Colorado University Libraries. States possible reasons for the change, examines problems encountered by users with searching the periodical title index and suggests how this change in online catalogue searching may affect future catalogue design and bibliographic instruction
    Date
    29. 7.1998 10:57:22

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 404
  • m 18
  • el 16
  • r 15
  • s 11
  • b 3
  • i 2
  • p 2
  • x 2
  • ? 1
  • n 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects