-
Sacco, G.M.: Dynamic taxonomies and guided searches (2006)
0.05
0.04720646 = product of:
0.07080969 = sum of:
0.0373419 = weight(_text_:on in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0373419 = score(doc=5295,freq=8.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.34020463 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
0.033467796 = product of:
0.06693559 = sum of:
0.06693559 = weight(_text_:22 in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06693559 = score(doc=5295,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- A new search paradigm, in which the primary user activity is the guided exploration of a complex information space rather than the retrieval of items based on precise specifications, is proposed. The author claims that this paradigm is the norm in most practical applications, and that solutions based on traditional search methods are not effective in this context. He then presents a solution based on dynamic taxonomies, a knowledge management model that effectively guides users to reach their goal while giving them total freedom in exploring the information base. Applications, benefits, and current research are discussed.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:56:22
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
-
Vaughan, M.W.; Resnick, M.L.: Search user interfaces : best practices and future visions (2006)
0.04
0.040320244 = product of:
0.060480364 = sum of:
0.026672786 = weight(_text_:on in 5191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026672786 = score(doc=5191,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.24300331 = fieldWeight in 5191, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5191)
0.03380758 = product of:
0.06761516 = sum of:
0.06761516 = weight(_text_:22 in 5191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06761516 = score(doc=5191,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5191, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5191)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:37:31
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
-
Roto, V.: Search on mobile phones. (2006)
0.04
0.038148586 = product of:
0.057222877 = sum of:
0.030176813 = weight(_text_:on in 5304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030176813 = score(doc=5304,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 5304, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5304)
0.027046064 = product of:
0.054092128 = sum of:
0.054092128 = weight(_text_:22 in 5304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054092128 = score(doc=5304,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5304, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5304)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:35:39
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
-
Hendry, D.G.: Workspaces for search (2006)
0.03
0.033380013 = product of:
0.050070018 = sum of:
0.026404712 = weight(_text_:on in 5297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026404712 = score(doc=5297,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 5297, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5297)
0.023665305 = product of:
0.04733061 = sum of:
0.04733061 = weight(_text_:22 in 5297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04733061 = score(doc=5297,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5297, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5297)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Progress in search interfaces requires vigorous inquiry into how search features can be embedded into application environments such as those for decision-making, personal information collecting, and designing. Progress can be made by focusing on mid-level descriptions of how search components can draw upon and update workspace content and structure. The immediate goal is to advance our understanding of how to shape and exploit context in search. The long-term goal is to develop an interdisciplinary design resource that enables stakeholders in the computing, social, and information sciences to more richly impact each others' work.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:01:11
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
-
Mochel, K.: Search in the Web shopping environment (2006)
0.03
0.033380013 = product of:
0.050070018 = sum of:
0.026404712 = weight(_text_:on in 5301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026404712 = score(doc=5301,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 5301, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5301)
0.023665305 = product of:
0.04733061 = sum of:
0.04733061 = weight(_text_:22 in 5301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04733061 = score(doc=5301,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5301, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5301)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The author presents a design case study of a search user interface for Web catalogs in the context of online shopping for consumer products such as clothing, furniture, and sporting goods. The case study provides a review of the user data for the user interface (UI), and the resulting redesign recommendations. Based on the case study and its user data, a set of common user requirements for searching in the context of online shopping is provided.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:23:19
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
-
Wildemuth, B.M.: Evidence-based practice in search interface design (2006)
0.03
0.033380013 = product of:
0.050070018 = sum of:
0.026404712 = weight(_text_:on in 5302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026404712 = score(doc=5302,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 5302, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5302)
0.023665305 = product of:
0.04733061 = sum of:
0.04733061 = weight(_text_:22 in 5302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04733061 = score(doc=5302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5302)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- An evidence-based practice approach to search interface design is proposed, with the goal of designing interfaces that adequately support search strategy formulation and reformulation. Relevant findings from studies of information professionals' searching behaviors, end users' searching of bibliographic databases, and search behaviors on the Web are highlighted. Three brief examples are presented to illustrate the ways in which findings from such studies can be used to make decisions about the design of search interfaces. If academic research can be effectively connected with design practice, we can discover which design practices truly are best practices and incorporate them into future search interfaces.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:30:09
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
-
Davis, L.: Designing a search user interface for a digital library (2006)
0.03
0.032256197 = product of:
0.048384294 = sum of:
0.021338228 = weight(_text_:on in 5294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021338228 = score(doc=5294,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 5294, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5294)
0.027046064 = product of:
0.054092128 = sum of:
0.054092128 = weight(_text_:22 in 5294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054092128 = score(doc=5294,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5294, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5294)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:48:54
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
-
Gremett, P.: Utilizing a user's context to improve search results (2006)
0.03
0.032256197 = product of:
0.048384294 = sum of:
0.021338228 = weight(_text_:on in 5299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021338228 = score(doc=5299,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 5299, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5299)
0.027046064 = product of:
0.054092128 = sum of:
0.054092128 = weight(_text_:22 in 5299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054092128 = score(doc=5299,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5299, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5299)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:17:44
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
-
Komlodi, A.; Soergel, D.; Marchionini, G.: Search histories for user support in user interfaces (2006)
0.03
0.032002483 = product of:
0.048003722 = sum of:
0.027719175 = weight(_text_:on in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027719175 = score(doc=5298,freq=6.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.25253648 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
0.020284547 = product of:
0.040569093 = sum of:
0.040569093 = weight(_text_:22 in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040569093 = score(doc=5298,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The authors describe user interface tools based on search histories to support legal information seekers. The design of the tools was informed by the results of a user study (Komlodi, 2002a) that examined the use of human memory, external memory aids, and search histories in legal information seeking and derived interface design recommendations for information storage and retrieval systems. The data collected were analyzed to identify potential task areas where search histories can support information seeking and use. The results show that many information-seeking tasks can take advantage of automatically and manually recorded history information. These findings encouraged the design of user interface tools building on search history information: direct search history displays, history-enabled scratchpad facilities, and organized results collection tools.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:04:19
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
-
Dorner, D.G.; Curtis, A.M.: ¬A comparative review of common user interface products (2004)
0.03
0.02822417 = product of:
0.042336255 = sum of:
0.01867095 = weight(_text_:on in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01867095 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
0.023665305 = product of:
0.04733061 = sum of:
0.04733061 = weight(_text_:22 in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04733061 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- A common user interface replaces the multiple interfaces found among individual electronic library resources, reducing the time and effort spent by the user in both searching and learning to use a range of databases. Although the primary function of a common user interface is to simplify the search process, such products can be holistic solutions designed to address requirements other than searching, such as user authentication and site branding. This review provides a detailed summary of software currently on the market. The products reviewed were EnCompass, MetaLib, Find-It-All OneSearch, ZPORTAL, CPORTAL, InfoTrac Total Access, MetaFind, MuseSearch, SiteSearch, Single Search, Chameleon Gateway, and WebFeat.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.182-197
-
Jones, M.; Buchanan, G.; Cheng, T.-C.; Jain, P.: Changing the pace of search : supporting background information seeking (2006)
0.03
0.02822417 = product of:
0.042336255 = sum of:
0.01867095 = weight(_text_:on in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01867095 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
0.023665305 = product of:
0.04733061 = sum of:
0.04733061 = weight(_text_:22 in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04733061 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:37:49
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
-
Rose, D.E.: Reconciling information-seeking behavior with search user interfaces for the Web (2006)
0.03
0.02822417 = product of:
0.042336255 = sum of:
0.01867095 = weight(_text_:on in 5296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01867095 = score(doc=5296,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 5296, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5296)
0.023665305 = product of:
0.04733061 = sum of:
0.04733061 = weight(_text_:22 in 5296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04733061 = score(doc=5296,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5296, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5296)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:58:06
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
-
Beale, R.: Improving Internet interaction : from theory to practice (2006)
0.03
0.02822417 = product of:
0.042336255 = sum of:
0.01867095 = weight(_text_:on in 5303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01867095 = score(doc=5303,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 5303, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5303)
0.023665305 = product of:
0.04733061 = sum of:
0.04733061 = weight(_text_:22 in 5303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04733061 = score(doc=5303,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5303, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5303)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:31:43
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
-
Thomas, D.H.: ¬The effect of interface design on item selection in an online catalog (2001)
0.03
0.027833907 = product of:
0.04175086 = sum of:
0.028227827 = weight(_text_:on in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028227827 = score(doc=168,freq=14.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.25717056 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
0.013523032 = product of:
0.027046064 = sum of:
0.027046064 = weight(_text_:22 in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027046064 = score(doc=168,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The effect that content and layout of bibliographic displays had on the ability of end-users to process catalog information was tested using a 2 x 2 factorial experimental design. Participants were asked to perform two related tasks during the course of the experiment. In the first task, they were asked to select a set of items that they would examine further for a hypothetical paper they must write, using a simulated online catalog to make their assessments of relevance. In the second task, they were asked to examine 20 bibliographic records, decide whether they would choose to examine these items further on the shelf, and identify the data elements that they used to formulate their relevance decision. One group viewed bibliographic records on an interface similar to current online catalogs, one that used data labels and contained data elements commonly found. A second group viewed these records on an interface in which the labels had been removed, but the data elements were the same as those in the first. The third group viewed these records on a labeled display that included enhanced data elements on the brief record display. The final group viewed these records with the same brief record data elements as the third group, but with the labels removed, using ISBD and AACR2 punctuation standards. For the first task, participants using enhanced brief screen interfaces viewed more brief screens and fewer full screens than their counterparts. Screen durations for the second 10 screens were found to have dropped from those of the first 10 screens. Statistical analyses comparing demographic variables to the screen frequencies uncovered many significant differences. Participants using the enhanced-content interfaces made fewer selections from index and full screens, and more selections from brief screens. For the second task, participants who used enhanced-content interfaces were able to make some sort of relevance judgment more frequently than those who used standard-content interfaces.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Kalbach, J.: "I'm feeling lucky" : the role of emotions in seeking information on the Web (2006)
0.03
0.026668733 = product of:
0.0400031 = sum of:
0.02309931 = weight(_text_:on in 5300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02309931 = score(doc=5300,freq=6.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.21044704 = fieldWeight in 5300, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5300)
0.01690379 = product of:
0.03380758 = sum of:
0.03380758 = weight(_text_:22 in 5300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03380758 = score(doc=5300,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5300, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5300)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Recent research highlights the potential relevance of emotions in interface design. People can no longer be modeled as purely goal-driven, task-solving agents: They also have affective motivations for their choices and behavior implying an extended mandate for search design. Absent from current Web design practice, however, is a pattern for emotive criticism and design reflecting these new directions. Further, discussion of emotions and Web design is not limited to visual design or aesthetic appeal: Emotions users have as they interact with information also have design implications. The author outlines a framework for understanding users' emotional states as they seek information on the Web. It is inspired largely by Carol Kuhlthau's (1991, 1993, 1999) work in library services, particularly her information searching process (ISP), which is adapted to Web design practice. A staged approach resembling traditional models of information seeking behavior is presented here as the basis for creating appropriate search and navigation systems. This user-centered framework is flexible and solution-oriented, enjoys longevity, and considers affective factors. Its aim is a more comprehensive, conceptual analysis of the user's entire information search experience.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:19:20
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
-
Resnick, M.L.; Vaughan, M.W.: Best practices and future visions for search user interfaces (2006)
0.02
0.024192145 = product of:
0.036288217 = sum of:
0.016003672 = weight(_text_:on in 5293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016003672 = score(doc=5293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 5293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5293)
0.020284547 = product of:
0.040569093 = sum of:
0.040569093 = weight(_text_:22 in 5293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040569093 = score(doc=5293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5293)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:38:51
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
-
Buzydlowski, J.W.; White, H.D.; Lin, X.: Term Co-occurrence Analysis as an Interface for Digital Libraries (2002)
0.02
0.02342258 = product of:
0.07026774 = sum of:
0.07026774 = product of:
0.14053547 = sum of:
0.14053547 = weight(_text_:22 in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14053547 = score(doc=1339,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.804159 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 2.2003 17:25:39
22. 2.2003 18:16:22
-
Visual interfaces to digital libraries : [extended papers presented at the first and second International Workshops on Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries, held at the Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL) in 2001 and 2002] (2002)
0.02
0.022629172 = product of:
0.033943757 = sum of:
0.019600416 = weight(_text_:on in 1784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019600416 = score(doc=1784,freq=12.0), product of:
0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.17857024 = fieldWeight in 1784, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1784)
0.014343342 = product of:
0.028686684 = sum of:
0.028686684 = weight(_text_:22 in 1784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028686684 = score(doc=1784,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.16414827 = fieldWeight in 1784, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1784)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries exploit the power of human vision and spatial cognition to help individuals mentally organize and electronically access and manage large and complex information spaces. They draw on progress in the field of information visualization and seek to shift the users' mental load from slow reading to faster perceptual processes such as visual pattern recognition.Based on two workshops, the book presents an introductory overview as well as a closing listing of the top ten problems in the area by the volume editors. Also included are 16 thoroughly reviewed and revised full papers organized in topical sections on visual interfaces to documents, document parts, document variants, and document usage data; visual interfaces to image and video documents; visualization of knowledge domains; cartographic interfaces to digital libraries; and a general framework.
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: Katy Börner and Chaomei Chen: Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries: Motivation, Utilization, and Socio-technical Challenges - Part I. Visual interfaces to Documents, Document Parts, Document Variants, and Document Usage Data - George Buchanan, Ann Blandford, Matt Jones, and Harold Thimbleby: Spatial Hypertext as a Reader Tool in Digital Libraries; Michael Christoffel and Bethina Schmitt: Accessing Libraries as Easy as a Game; Carlos Monroy, Rajiv Kochumman, Richard Furuta, and Eduardo Urbina: Interactive Timeline Viewer (ItLv): A Tool to Visualize Variants Among Documents; Mischa Weiss-Lijn, Janet T. McDonnell, and Leslie James: An Empirical Evaluation of the Interactive Visualization of Metadata to Support Document Use; Stephen G. Eick: Visual Analysis of Website Browsing Patterns - Part II. Visual Interfaces to Image and Video Documents - Adrian Graham, Hector Garcia-Molina, Andreas Paepcke, and Terry Winograd: Extreme Temporal Photo Browsing; Michael G. Christel: Accessing News Video Libraries through Dynamic Information Extraction, Summarization, and Visualization; Anselm Spoerri: Handwritten Notes as a Visual Interface to Index, Edit and Publish Audio/Video Highlights - Part III. Visualization of Knowledge Domains - Jan W. Buzydlowski, Howard D. White, and Xia Lin: Term Co-occurrence Analysis as an Interface for Digital Libraries; Kevin W. Boyack, Brian N. Wylie, and George S. Davidson: Information Visualization, Human-Computer Interaction, and Cognitive Psychology: Domain Visualizations - Part IV. Cartographic Interfaces to Digital Libraries - André Skupin: On Geometry and Transformation in Map-Like Information Visualization; Guoray Cai: GeoVIBE: A Visual Interface for Geographic Digital Libraries: Teong Joo Ong, John J. Leggett, Hugh D. Wilson, Stephan L. Hatch, and Monique D. Reed: Interactive Information Visualization in the Digital Flora of Texas; Dan Ancona, Mike Freeston, Terry Smith, and Sara Fabrikant: Visual Explorations for the Alexandria Digital Earth Prototype - Part V. Towards a General Framework - Rao Shen, Jun Wang, and Edward A. Fox: A Lightweight Protocol between Digital Libraries and Visualization Systems; Chaomei Chen and Katy Börner: Top Ten Problems in Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries
- Date
- 22. 2.2003 17:25:39
22. 3.2008 15:02:37
-
Chen, C.: Top Ten Problems in Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries (2002)
0.02
0.019124456 = product of:
0.057373367 = sum of:
0.057373367 = product of:
0.114746734 = sum of:
0.114746734 = weight(_text_:22 in 4840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.114746734 = score(doc=4840,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4840, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4840)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 2.2003 17:25:39
22. 2.2003 18:13:11
-
Shen, R.; Wang, J.; Fox, E.A.: ¬A Lightweight Protocol between Digital Libraries and Visualization Systems (2002)
0.02
0.019124456 = product of:
0.057373367 = sum of:
0.057373367 = product of:
0.114746734 = sum of:
0.114746734 = weight(_text_:22 in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.114746734 = score(doc=666,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04990557 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 2.2003 17:25:39
22. 2.2003 18:15:14
