Search (25 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  • × theme_ss:"Verbale Doksprachen für präkombinierte Einträge"
  1. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996) 0.02
    0.024192145 = product of:
      0.036288217 = sum of:
        0.016003672 = weight(_text_:on in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016003672 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
        0.020284547 = product of:
          0.040569093 = sum of:
            0.040569093 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040569093 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Structured abstracts are abstracts which include subheadings such as: background, aims, participants methods and results. These are rapidly replacing traditional abstracts in medical periodicals, but the number and detail of the subheadings used varies, and there is a range of different typographic settings. Reviews a number of studies designed to investigate readers' preferences for different typographic settings and layout. Over 400 readers took part in the study: students; postgraduates; research workers and academics in the social sciences. The most preferred version emerged from the last of 3 studies and 2 additional studies were then carried out to determine preferences for the overall position and layout of this most preferred version on a A4 page. The most preferred version for the setting of the subheadings are printed in bold capital letters
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
  2. Duncan, D.: IFLA Core Programme for Universal Bibliographic Control and International MARC (UBCIM) and Division of Bibliographic Control reports on activities 1994-1995 : Section on Classification and Indexing (1996) 0.01
    0.014225486 = product of:
      0.042676456 = sum of:
        0.042676456 = weight(_text_:on in 4927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042676456 = score(doc=4927,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 4927, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4927)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the work of the Section on Classification and Indexing, covering the working group on principles underlying subject heading languages; a state of the art survey of subject heading systems; requirements for a format for classification data; DDC edition 20; open programs at the Istanbul conference; the section newsletter; and cooperative projects
  3. Chan, L.M.: Library of Congress Subject Headings : principles and application (1995) 0.01
    0.013523031 = product of:
      0.040569093 = sum of:
        0.040569093 = product of:
          0.081138186 = sum of:
            0.081138186 = weight(_text_:22 in 3985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.081138186 = score(doc=3985,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3985, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3985)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    25.11.2005 18:37:22
  4. Jouguelet, S.: Indexation: mode d'emploi international (1993) 0.01
    0.010669115 = product of:
      0.032007344 = sum of:
        0.032007344 = weight(_text_:on in 7526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032007344 = score(doc=7526,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.29160398 = fieldWeight in 7526, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7526)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Survey on the indexing systems used in 11 countries, such as thesauri, RSWK, LCSH and COMPASS as well as less known systems
  5. Drabenstott, K.M.; Dede, B.A.R.; Leavit, M.: ¬The changes of meaning in subdivided subject headings (1999) 0.01
    0.010669115 = product of:
      0.032007344 = sum of:
        0.032007344 = weight(_text_:on in 5353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032007344 = score(doc=5353,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.29160398 = fieldWeight in 5353, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5353)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The impetus for a large-scale study on subject heading understanding was a recommendation of the Library of Congress (LC) Subject Subdivisions Conference that suggested standardizing the order of subject subdivisions for the purpose of simplifying subject cataloging. This paper focuses on unexpected large-scale study findings about multiple meanings for subdivided subject headings and the effects that changes of meaning for different orders of subdivisions had on the meanings that end users and librarians provided to subdivided subject headings. Findings about changes of meaning in subdivided subject headings did not dissuade the authors regarding their recommendation that the library community adopt a standard order of subdivisions. The authors also give suggestions for additional studies of subject heading understanding that build on this one.
  6. Villiers, L. de: On-line subject retrieval on CPALS : help us choose! (1996) 0.01
    0.010058938 = product of:
      0.030176813 = sum of:
        0.030176813 = weight(_text_:on in 4935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030176813 = score(doc=4935,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 4935, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4935)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  7. Library of Congress Subject Headings (1999) 0.01
    0.009239726 = product of:
      0.027719175 = sum of:
        0.027719175 = weight(_text_:on in 6114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027719175 = score(doc=6114,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.25253648 = fieldWeight in 6114, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6114)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    The new edition adds 6,000 new headings and their references; LCSH now has a total of 245,000 authority records (of which 185,000 topical, 37,200 geographical). There 229,000 non-descriptors. There exists also a cumulative Microform Edition (LCSH 17th ed. on Microfiche), distributed quarterly, a weekly tape update service and a CDROM version (quarterly). 1992). Also, an LC Subject Headings Weekly List is available, an uptodate source of the latest subject authority information on new, changed, and deleted headings. (available on the Web hhtp://Icweb.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/wls.html). Instructions how to use the LCSH in: Subject Cataloging Manual: Subject Headings (5th. ed. 1996) with semiannual updates
  8. Biswas, S.C.; Smith, F.: Efficiency and effectiveness of deep structure based indexing languages : PRECIS vs. DSIS (1991) 0.01
    0.008890929 = product of:
      0.026672786 = sum of:
        0.026672786 = weight(_text_:on in 2187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026672786 = score(doc=2187,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.24300331 = fieldWeight in 2187, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2187)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    A subject indexing language (SIL) is an artificial language used for formulating names of subjects and is composed of (a) a vocabulary, (b) a list of elementary categories, and (c) the rules of syntax. A string indexing language is an SIL, whose expressions are multiple overlappimg index entries, constructed accordingly to explicit syntax rules. PRECIS, developed by Austin, and POPSI, developed by Bhattacharyya, are two such string indexing languages. DSIS is a more versatile version of the POPSI system, developed by Devadason. There have been several attempts to compare and evaluate the superiority of one system over another, with the exception that none of these tried to compare their performances from the searcher's point of view. This present study tries to compare the efficiency and effectiveness of printed subject indexes produced by PRECIS and DSIS on a non-empirical basis and based on the following five major characteristics of index entries identified by Craven as desirable from the searcher's viewpoint: (1) predicitibility, (2) collocation, (3) clarity, (4) succinctness, and (5) eliminability. A representative sample of 600 documents (both macro and micro), chosen from three different social science subject fields, has been used as the test data. The main points of discussion are (a) the term structure, (b) the term relationships, and (c) the entry structure, generated by the two systems. On the whole, a PRECIS index performs better than a DSIS index in terms of most of the above characteristics. It has been concluded that the user will search the former more efficiently and effectively than the latter
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 16(1991), S.6-21
  9. Bloomfield, M.: ¬A look at subject headings : a plea for standardization (1993) 0.01
    0.008801571 = product of:
      0.026404712 = sum of:
        0.026404712 = weight(_text_:on in 2475) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026404712 = score(doc=2475,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 2475, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2475)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In the preparation of a book on how to do a literature search, many inconsistencies were found in the assignment of subject terms. The Library of Congress Subject Headings is cited for not bringing computer languages into a consistent pattern. BASIC and FORTRAN are treated differently in their see also references and are without references to the words "computers" or "computer." Also index terms for the literature search on the "search for extraterrestrial life" showed inconsistent patterns in indexing. Catalogers and indexers need to review the work they are currently publishing and try to decide how to bring some standardization to the construction of subject terms. There is a need to provide a single thesaurus for all English index terms.
  10. (Sears') List of Subject Headings (1994) 0.01
    0.007888435 = product of:
      0.023665305 = sum of:
        0.023665305 = product of:
          0.04733061 = sum of:
            0.04733061 = weight(_text_:22 in 3789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04733061 = score(doc=3789,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3789, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3789)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.45-46 (M.P. Satija)
  11. Da Silva, A.M.; Azevedo, L.M. de; Nogueira, M.D.L.R.: ¬A aplicacao do SIPORbase : uma proposta de indexacao do manuscrito e do livro antigo (1995) 0.01
    0.0075442037 = product of:
      0.02263261 = sum of:
        0.02263261 = weight(_text_:on in 1639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02263261 = score(doc=1639,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.20619515 = fieldWeight in 1639, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1639)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    SIPORbase, the System for Indexing in Portuguese, was developed by the National Library of Portugal, based on the LCSH. In contrast to the Brunet-Parguez system used in France, SIPORbase is a coextensive indexing language. Its initial application in 1989 to current bibliography has been extended to the collection of codices. Experience with manuscripts only indicates a high degree of relevance in retrieval, from the several hundred subject headings created so far
    Content
    Revised version of a presentation given at a LIBER workshop on The Brunet-Parguez system for subject indexing of ancient books, held in Toulouse in Feb 1994
  12. Principles underlying subject heading languages (SHLs) (1999) 0.01
    0.0075442037 = product of:
      0.02263261 = sum of:
        0.02263261 = weight(_text_:on in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02263261 = score(doc=1659,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.20619515 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Issue
    Working Group on Principles Underlying Subject Heading Languages; approved by the Standing Committee of the IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing.
  13. McIlwaine, I.C.: Subject control : the British viewpoint (1995) 0.01
    0.007112743 = product of:
      0.021338228 = sum of:
        0.021338228 = weight(_text_:on in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021338228 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting Held in Lisbon, Portugal, 17-18 August 1993, and sponsored by the IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing and the Instituto da Biblioteca Nacional e do Livro, Lisbon, Portugal. Ed.: R.P. Holley et al
  14. Chan, L.M.: Subject access systems in the USA (1995) 0.01
    0.007112743 = product of:
      0.021338228 = sum of:
        0.021338228 = weight(_text_:on in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021338228 = score(doc=1633,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting Held in Lisbon, Portugal, 17-18 August 1993, and sponsored by the IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing and the Instituto da Biblioteca Nacional e do Livro, Lisbon, Portugal. Ed.: R.P. Holley et al
  15. Studwell, W.E.: ¬The three camps : the present and possible future status of subject access in online catalogues (1996) 0.01
    0.007112743 = product of:
      0.021338228 = sum of:
        0.021338228 = weight(_text_:on in 6579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021338228 = score(doc=6579,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 6579, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6579)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the future of LCSH and whether their viability can be maintained through a written standardization code. Until there is an online substitute for LC subject headings which has been tested on a large scale over a period of time, a successor to the present combination of LC's controlled vocabulary headings plus computerized techniques such as keyword searching is unlikely to emerge
  16. Danesi, D.: Chi ha paura dell'uomo nero? : Maltese e il controllo terminologico (1997) 0.01
    0.007112743 = product of:
      0.021338228 = sum of:
        0.021338228 = weight(_text_:on in 3749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021338228 = score(doc=3749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 3749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3749)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Takes issue with the views of Diego Maltese on the control of terms for subject indexing, as promulgated by GRIS, an Italian body developing a guide and thesauri in this area, for Italian subjects
  17. Svenonius, E.: Precoordination or not? (1995) 0.01
    0.007112743 = product of:
      0.021338228 = sum of:
        0.021338228 = weight(_text_:on in 3606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021338228 = score(doc=3606,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.19440265 = fieldWeight in 3606, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3606)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting Held in Lisbon, Portugal, 17-18 August 1993, and sponsored by the IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing and the Instituto da Biblioteca Nacional e do Livro, Lisbon, Portugal. Ed.: R.P. Holley et al
  18. (Sears') List of Subject Headings (1997) 0.01
    0.0067615155 = product of:
      0.020284547 = sum of:
        0.020284547 = product of:
          0.040569093 = sum of:
            0.040569093 = weight(_text_:22 in 3788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040569093 = score(doc=3788,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3788, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3788)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Vorgänger: 'List of Subject Headings for small libraries, compiled from lists used in nine representative small libraries', Ed.: M.E. Sears. - 1st ed. 1923. - 2nd ed. 1926. - 3rd ed. 1933. - 4th ed. 1939, Ed.: I.S. Monro. - 5th ed. 1944: 'Sears List of Subject Headings', Ed. I. S. Monro. - 6th ed. 1950, Ed.: B.M. Frick. - 7th ed. 1954 - 8th ed. 1959. - 'List of Subject Headings'. - 9th. ed. 1965, Ed.: B.M. Westby. - 10th ed. 1972. - 11th ed. 1977. - 12th ed. 1982. - 13th ed. 1986, Ed.: C. Rovira u. C. Reyes. - 14th ed. 1991. Ed. M.T. Mooney. - 15th ed. 1994, Ed.: J. Miller // Rez. 15th ed.: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.45-46 (M.P. Satija)
  19. Conway, M. O'Hara: Characteristics of subject headings in the Library of Congress BOOKSM database (1993) 0.01
    0.00622365 = product of:
      0.01867095 = sum of:
        0.01867095 = weight(_text_:on in 3135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01867095 = score(doc=3135,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 3135, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3135)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    A thourough understanding of current subject cataloging practice, especially Library of Congress practice, will assist librarians in making the best use of new and emerging technology to ease the task of constructing subject headings. To gain insight into the most current subject cataloging practices at the Library of Congress, a random sample of one thousand bibliographic records with one or more 6XX fields and Library of Congress card numbers assigned from 1988 to the present was drawn from the BOOKSM database. Library of Congress catalogers rely heavily on the system of free-floating subdivisions in the process of constructing subject headings. Attempts to improve the subject cataloging process must take into account this fundamental characteristic of the Library of Congress subject headings system
  20. Maltese, D.: ¬Sul controllo dei termini di indicizzazione per soggetti : contributo al testo definitivo della Guida GRIS (1997) 0.01
    0.00622365 = product of:
      0.01867095 = sum of:
        0.01867095 = weight(_text_:on in 1166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01867095 = score(doc=1166,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 1166, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1166)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The 'Guida all'indicizzazione per soggetto', the outcome of the work of the GRIS collaborative project of Italian research and academic libraries on subject heading schemes for Italian libraries, was published in 1996, though not in a definitive form. Presents some notes as a contribution to the definitive version, particularly section 3. The latter is concerned with the control of terms, including the analysis of categories, the morphology of terms and the structure of vocabulary