Search (4309 results, page 1 of 216)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Mittler, E.; Schulz, M.: ProPrint world-wide print-on-demand services for study and research (2004) 0.23
    0.23291 = product of:
      0.349365 = sum of:
        0.030176813 = weight(_text_:on in 2855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030176813 = score(doc=2855,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.27492687 = fieldWeight in 2855, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2855)
        0.31918818 = sum of:
          0.24269035 = weight(_text_:demand in 2855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.24269035 = score(doc=2855,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.31127608 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04990557 = queryNorm
              0.7796627 = fieldWeight in 2855, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2855)
          0.07649782 = weight(_text_:22 in 2855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07649782 = score(doc=2855,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04990557 = queryNorm
              0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2855, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2855)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The libraries of more and more universities and research institutions have local digital repositories, and the amount of material is increasing every day. Users need an integrated retrieval interface that allows aggregated searching across multiple document servers without having to resort to manual processes. ProPrint offers an on-demand print service within Germany for over 2,000 monographs and 1,000 journals. Partners worldwide are now invited to join.
    Date
    8.10.2004 14:22:14
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.227-230
  2. Park, J.-r.; Lu, C.; Marion, L.: Cataloging professionals in the digital environment : a content analysis of job descriptions (2009) 0.16
    0.16347966 = product of:
      0.24521948 = sum of:
        0.02263261 = weight(_text_:on in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02263261 = score(doc=2766,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.20619515 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
        0.22258687 = sum of:
          0.18201777 = weight(_text_:demand in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18201777 = score(doc=2766,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.31127608 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04990557 = queryNorm
              0.5847471 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
          0.040569093 = weight(_text_:22 in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040569093 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04990557 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This study assesses the current state of responsibilities and skill sets required of cataloging professionals. It identifies emerging roles and competencies focusing on the digital environment and relates these to the established knowledge of traditional cataloging standards and practices. We conducted a content analysis of 349 job descriptions advertised in AutoCAT in 2005-2006. Multivariate techniques of cluster and multidimensional-scaling analyses were applied to the data. Analysis of job titles, required and preferred qualifications/skills, and responsibilities lends perspective to the roles that cataloging professionals play in the digital environment. Technological advances increasingly demand knowledge and skills related to electronic resource management, metadata creation, and computer and Web applications. Emerging knowledge and skill sets are increasingly being integrated into the core technical aspects of cataloging such as bibliographic and authority control and integrated library-system management. Management of cataloging functions is also in high demand. The results of the study provide insight on current and future curriculum design of library and information-science programs.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:20:24
  3. Leysen, J.M.; Boydston, J.M.K.: Supply and demand for catalogers : present and future (2005) 0.16
    0.15906036 = product of:
      0.23859054 = sum of:
        0.016003672 = weight(_text_:on in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016003672 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.14580199 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
        0.22258687 = sum of:
          0.18201777 = weight(_text_:demand in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18201777 = score(doc=121,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.31127608 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04990557 = queryNorm
              0.5847471 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
          0.040569093 = weight(_text_:22 in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040569093 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04990557 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents results from a fall 2003 survey of heads of cataloging at Association of Research Libraries United States academic libraries. The survey focused on the current number of professional catalogers and their responsibilities as well as future projections for demand for catalogers and thoughts about their roles. The study found that the numbers of professional catalogers are remaining constant or decreasing, and approximately one-third are projected to retire in the next decade. In addition, the role of the professional cataloger is perceived as continuing to evolve toward more cataloging-related activities and management and less direct cataloging. Most respondents predicted the professional cataloger has a role in the future and felt prepared for that future. Some respondents suggested that metadata cataloging would be a growing role in that future. This paper concludes with additional questions about the future of professional catalogers and cataloging.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. Hearn, S.: Comparing catalogs : currency and consistency of controlled headings (2009) 0.15
    0.14926156 = product of:
      0.22389233 = sum of:
        0.026404712 = weight(_text_:on in 3600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026404712 = score(doc=3600,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 3600, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3600)
        0.19748762 = sum of:
          0.150157 = weight(_text_:demand in 3600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.150157 = score(doc=3600,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31127608 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04990557 = queryNorm
              0.48239172 = fieldWeight in 3600, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3600)
          0.04733061 = weight(_text_:22 in 3600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04733061 = score(doc=3600,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04990557 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3600, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3600)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Evaluative and comparative studies of catalog data have tended to focus on methods that are labor intensive, demand expertise, and can examine only a limited number of records. This study explores an alternative approach to gathering and analyzing catalog data, focusing on the currency and consistency of controlled headings. The resulting data provide insight into libraries' use of changed headings and their success in maintaining currency and consistency, and the systems needed to support the current pace of heading changes.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Hemminger, B.M.; Losi, T.; Bauers, A.: Survey of bioinformatics programs in the United States. (2005) 0.14
    0.14410572 = product of:
      0.21615857 = sum of:
        0.01867095 = weight(_text_:on in 5264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01867095 = score(doc=5264,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.17010231 = fieldWeight in 5264, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5264)
        0.19748762 = sum of:
          0.150157 = weight(_text_:demand in 5264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.150157 = score(doc=5264,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31127608 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04990557 = queryNorm
              0.48239172 = fieldWeight in 5264, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5264)
          0.04733061 = weight(_text_:22 in 5264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04733061 = score(doc=5264,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04990557 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5264, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5264)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Bioinformatics is a rapidly growing field, and educational programs for bioinformatics are increasing at a similar pace to answer the demand for qualified professionals. Here we survey currently available bioinformatics programs. We have compiled summaries of these programs, including university, state, degree type, department, entrance requirements, degree requirements, links to course Web pages, research interests, and funding. Complete details are presented in the Web version, and an abbreviated listing of the primary attributes of all programs is included in this article.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 14:41:40
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem special issue on bioinformatics
  6. Rohmann, G.: Media on demand : Approaches to web-based media services in libraries (2000) 0.14
    0.1428563 = product of:
      0.21428445 = sum of:
        0.042676456 = weight(_text_:on in 4694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042676456 = score(doc=4694,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 4694, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4694)
        0.171608 = product of:
          0.343216 = sum of:
            0.343216 = weight(_text_:demand in 4694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.343216 = score(doc=4694,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.31127608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                1.1026096 = fieldWeight in 4694, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4694)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
  7. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.14
    0.13533312 = sum of:
      0.07926327 = product of:
        0.23778981 = sum of:
          0.23778981 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.23778981 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.42309996 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04990557 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.0357853 = weight(_text_:on in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0357853 = score(doc=562,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04990557 = queryNorm
          0.32602316 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.020284547 = product of:
        0.040569093 = sum of:
          0.040569093 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040569093 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04990557 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Document representations for text classification are typically based on the classical Bag-Of-Words paradigm. This approach comes with deficiencies that motivate the integration of features on a higher semantic level than single words. In this paper we propose an enhancement of the classical document representation through concepts extracted from background knowledge. Boosting is used for actual classification. Experimental evaluations on two well known text corpora support our approach through consistent improvement of the results.
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
    Source
    Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2004), 1-4 November 2004, Brighton, UK
  8. Münnich, M.: REUSE or rule harmonization : just a project? (2000) 0.11
    0.11392245 = product of:
      0.17088367 = sum of:
        0.029821085 = weight(_text_:on in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029821085 = score(doc=192,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.271686 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
        0.14106259 = sum of:
          0.107255004 = weight(_text_:demand in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.107255004 = score(doc=192,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31127608 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04990557 = queryNorm
              0.3445655 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
          0.03380758 = weight(_text_:22 in 192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03380758 = score(doc=192,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04990557 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 192, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=192)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    German academic libraries acquire a large number of books from British and American publishers. The bibliographic records of the Library of Congress and the British National Bibliography are offered in most German library networks. Thus, projects REUSE and REUSE+ were undertaken when there was a demand for harmonization of Germany cataloging rules with AACR2 (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules). Experts in the United States and Germany systematically analyzed bibliographic data and compared the codes on which the data were based. Major and minor differences in cataloging rules were identified. The REUSE group proposed German participation in international authority files and changes in RAK, the German cataloging rules. In REUSE+ the different types of hierarchical bibliographic structures in USMARC and MAB2 and other German formats were analyzed. The German project group made suggestions concerning both the German formats and the USMARC format. Steps toward rule alignment and harmonization of online requirements were made when the German Cataloging Rules Conference made decisions on resolutions prepared by the Working Groups on Descriptive Cataloging that dealt with titles, encoding of form titles and conference terms, prefixes in names, hierarchies, entries under persons and corporate bodies, and the conceptual basis of RAK2 in the context of harmonization. Although problems remain, German rule makers have made progress toward internationality.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale": papers from the ALCTS preconference, June 26, 1998 "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale". ALCTS Preconference, Washington, D.C.
  9. Raban, D.R.; Rafaeli, S.: ¬The effect of source nature and status on the subjective value of information (2006) 0.11
    0.106615394 = product of:
      0.15992309 = sum of:
        0.01886051 = weight(_text_:on in 5268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01886051 = score(doc=5268,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.1718293 = fieldWeight in 5268, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5268)
        0.14106259 = sum of:
          0.107255004 = weight(_text_:demand in 5268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.107255004 = score(doc=5268,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31127608 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04990557 = queryNorm
              0.3445655 = fieldWeight in 5268, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5268)
          0.03380758 = weight(_text_:22 in 5268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03380758 = score(doc=5268,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04990557 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5268, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5268)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This is an empirical, experimental investigation of the value of information, as perceived through the willingness to purchase information (WTP) and the willingness to sell it (accept payment, WTA). We examined the effects of source nature: expertise versus content, and source status: copy versus exclusive original of information on the WTA-WTP ratio. In an animated computer simulation of a business game, players could maximize their profits by making choices regarding inventory and prices. Participants were offered the chance to bid for buying or selling information regarding the weather that may affect demand. We find, as hypothesized, that the subjective value of information does indeed follow the predictions of endowment effect theory. The ratio of willingness to accept to willingness to purchase (WTA-WTP) recorded for the 294 subjects resembles the ratio common for private goods, rather than the intuitively expected unity. The WTA-WTP ratios diverged from unity more often and in a more pronounced manner for information traded in the original form rather than as a copy of the original, although even for copies the WTA-WTP ratio is still double. The results yield a value of about three for the WTA-WTP ratio for original information whether the source is content or expertise. Copy information received a subjective value that was significantly different (lower) than original information. The implications for both online trading and online sharing of information are discussed.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:09:35
  10. ¬The Internet singularity, delayed : why limits in Internet capacity will stifle innovation on the Web (2007) 0.10
    0.10429633 = product of:
      0.15644449 = sum of:
        0.026404712 = weight(_text_:on in 1299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026404712 = score(doc=1299,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.24056101 = fieldWeight in 1299, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1299)
        0.13003978 = product of:
          0.26007956 = sum of:
            0.26007956 = weight(_text_:demand in 1299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.26007956 = score(doc=1299,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.31127608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.835527 = fieldWeight in 1299, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1299)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this research study, Nemertes performed an independent in-depth analysis of Internet and IP infrastructure (which we call capacity) and current and projected traffic (which we call demand) with the goal of understanding how each has changed over time, and determining if there will ever be a point at which demand exceeds capacity. To assess infrastructure capacity, we reviewed details of carrier expenditures and vendor revenues, and compared these against market research studies. To compute demand, we took a unique approach: Instead of modeling user behavior based on measuring the application portfolios that users had currently deployed, and projecting deployment of those applications in future, we looked directly at how user consumption of available bandwidth has changed over time.
  11. Härkönen, S.: Digital Reference Konsortien : Kooperative Online-Auskunft in Bibliotheken (2007) 0.10
    0.102932654 = product of:
      0.15439898 = sum of:
        0.013336393 = weight(_text_:on in 1883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013336393 = score(doc=1883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.121501654 = fieldWeight in 1883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1883)
        0.14106259 = sum of:
          0.107255004 = weight(_text_:demand in 1883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.107255004 = score(doc=1883,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31127608 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04990557 = queryNorm
              0.3445655 = fieldWeight in 1883, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1883)
          0.03380758 = weight(_text_:22 in 1883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03380758 = score(doc=1883,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04990557 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1883, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1883)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2009 19:50:27
    Issue
    2. Aufl. - Hergestellt on demand
  12. Schön, T.: Sondersammlungen in Bibliotheken : Theorie und Praxis bei Erschließung und Präsentation (2008) 0.09
    0.089285195 = product of:
      0.13392779 = sum of:
        0.026672786 = weight(_text_:on in 2893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026672786 = score(doc=2893,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.24300331 = fieldWeight in 2893, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2893)
        0.107255004 = product of:
          0.21451001 = sum of:
            0.21451001 = weight(_text_:demand in 2893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21451001 = score(doc=2893,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.31127608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.689131 = fieldWeight in 2893, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2893)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Imprint
    Norderstedt : Books on Demand
  13. Loeyland, K.; Ringstad, V.: Determinants of borrowing demand from Norwegian local public libraries (2008) 0.09
    0.08690288 = product of:
      0.13035432 = sum of:
        0.02309931 = weight(_text_:on in 1874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02309931 = score(doc=1874,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.21044704 = fieldWeight in 1874, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1874)
        0.107255004 = product of:
          0.21451001 = sum of:
            0.21451001 = weight(_text_:demand in 1874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21451001 = score(doc=1874,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.31127608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.689131 = fieldWeight in 1874, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1874)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The main purpose of this article is to explore the determinants of book borrowing demand from local public libraries in Norway, using balanced panel data for the period 2001-2004. The more striking results of these calculations show the basic differences between children and adults in the effects of main borrowing determinants. While income is quite important and the shadow price is quite unimportant for children, the opposite is true for adults. A likely explanation of this finding is that the real shadow price is higher for adults and that it is also higher in communities with high income levels. It was found that both stock and growth of the stock are important factors for book loans as well as loans of other media. There is a basic difference, however, in the effect of books on the demand for other media as compared with the opposite cross-effect: The book stock has a substantial and significantly negative impact on the demand for other media. The face value of this finding implies that there is actually a crowding-out effect on other media from books, while it is usually expected to be the other way around.
  14. Hawking, D.; Robertson, S.: On collection size and retrieval effectiveness (2003) 0.08
    0.07944952 = product of:
      0.11917428 = sum of:
        0.042676456 = weight(_text_:on in 4109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042676456 = score(doc=4109,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.3888053 = fieldWeight in 4109, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4109)
        0.07649782 = product of:
          0.15299565 = sum of:
            0.15299565 = weight(_text_:22 in 4109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15299565 = score(doc=4109,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4109, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4109)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    14. 8.2005 14:22:22
  15. Cimiano, P.; Völker, J.; Studer, R.: Ontologies on demand? : a description of the state-of-the-art, applications, challenges and trends for ontology learning from text (2006) 0.08
    0.075761005 = product of:
      0.1136415 = sum of:
        0.02263261 = weight(_text_:on in 6014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02263261 = score(doc=6014,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.20619515 = fieldWeight in 6014, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6014)
        0.09100889 = product of:
          0.18201777 = sum of:
            0.18201777 = weight(_text_:demand in 6014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18201777 = score(doc=6014,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.31127608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.5847471 = fieldWeight in 6014, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6014)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Ontologies are nowadays used for many applications requiring data, services and resources in general to be interoperable and machine understandable. Such applications are for example web service discovery and composition, information integration across databases, intelligent search, etc. The general idea is that data and services are semantically described with respect to ontologies, which are formal specifications of a domain of interest, and can thus be shared and reused in a way such that the shared meaning specified by the ontology remains formally the same across different parties and applications. As the cost of creating ontologies is relatively high, different proposals have emerged for learning ontologies from structured and unstructured resources. In this article we examine the maturity of techniques for ontology learning from textual resources, addressing the question whether the state-of-the-art is mature enough to produce ontologies 'on demand'.
  16. Cordeiro, M.I.: Knowledge organization from libraries to the Web : strong demands on the weakest side of international librarianship (2003) 0.07
    0.07494694 = product of:
      0.1124204 = sum of:
        0.0373419 = weight(_text_:on in 5520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0373419 = score(doc=5520,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.34020463 = fieldWeight in 5520, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5520)
        0.0750785 = product of:
          0.150157 = sum of:
            0.150157 = weight(_text_:demand in 5520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.150157 = score(doc=5520,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.31127608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.48239172 = fieldWeight in 5520, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5520)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reflects on some major aspects related to library subject access systems in the era of networked information. The main argument builds on the fact that we nowadays witness the strongest demand and expectation on subject access tools, coming from far beyond the traditional library world, but the field remains the weakest side of international librarianship. While the emergence to cope with the practical challenges of a wider environment is emphasized, the need to reinforce the internationalization of knowledge organization as a professional library matter is stressed, not only at the pragmatic level but also, more importantly, in theoretical terms.
  17. Plath, J.: Allianz gegen Google : Streit um die Verwertungsrechte von Büchern (2008) 0.07
    0.07205286 = product of:
      0.108079284 = sum of:
        0.009335475 = weight(_text_:on in 1333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009335475 = score(doc=1333,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.08505116 = fieldWeight in 1333, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1333)
        0.09874381 = sum of:
          0.0750785 = weight(_text_:demand in 1333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0750785 = score(doc=1333,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31127608 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04990557 = queryNorm
              0.24119586 = fieldWeight in 1333, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1333)
          0.023665305 = weight(_text_:22 in 1333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023665305 = score(doc=1333,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04990557 = queryNorm
              0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1333, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1333)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Empört zogen US-Autoren und -Verlage vor Gericht und handelten im Herbst einen Vergleich aus, den das Gericht noch genehmigen muss. Er sieht vor, dass Google die Verfahrenskosten trägt, jedem Autor eines ungenehmigt digitalisierten Buches 60 US-Dollar zahlt (insgesamt 45 Millionen US-Dollar) sowie 34,5 Millionen US-Dollar für die Gründung eines digitalen, von Google unabhängigen Buchregisters bereitstellt. Das Register soll die Einnahmen verteilen (37 Prozent an Google, 63 Prozent an die Rechteinhaber), die Google erwirtschaftet aus dem kostenpflichtigen Zugang zu Büchern oder ihrem Download (als Ebook oder Book on Demand), aus der Werbung sowie aus Online-Abonnements für Institutionen und Bibliotheken. Und natürlich dürfen die Scan-Maschinen weiter laufen. Die Konsequenzen des Vergleichs lassen tief durchatmen. Google erhält, warnt Robert Darnton in "The New York Review of Books", praktisch ein Digitalisierungsmonopol für die USA. Mehr noch: Die millionenfache Verletzung des Urheberrechts wird pragmatisch durchgewunken. Die Verlage erfreut nämlich, dass Google ein neues Geschäftsfeld erschlossen hat: all die vergriffenen Bücher, deren Nachdruck sie für nicht lohnend halten. Die Suchmaschinenfirma geht ihrerseits vom Prinzip der Finanzierung durch Werbung ab: Google wird auf einen Schlag weltgrößter Verleger und weltgrößter Buchhändler. Die Buchsuche wandelt sich zum Online-Buch(inhalte)verkauf.
    Date
    5. 1.1997 9:39:22
  18. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.07
    0.07132164 = product of:
      0.10698245 = sum of:
        0.07926327 = product of:
          0.23778981 = sum of:
            0.23778981 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23778981 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.42309996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.027719175 = weight(_text_:on in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027719175 = score(doc=2918,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.25253648 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  19. Hemminger, B.M.: Introduction to the special issue on bioinformatics (2005) 0.07
    0.06951833 = product of:
      0.10427749 = sum of:
        0.0373419 = weight(_text_:on in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0373419 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.34020463 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
        0.06693559 = product of:
          0.13387118 = sum of:
            0.13387118 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13387118 = score(doc=4189,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1747608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 14:19:22
  20. Williams, P.; Nicholas, D.; Gunter, B.: E-learning: what the literature tells us about distance education : an overview (2005) 0.07
    0.06835752 = product of:
      0.102536276 = sum of:
        0.028227827 = weight(_text_:on in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028227827 = score(doc=662,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.109763056 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04990557 = queryNorm
            0.25717056 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.199415 = idf(docFreq=13325, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
        0.07430845 = product of:
          0.1486169 = sum of:
            0.1486169 = weight(_text_:demand in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1486169 = score(doc=662,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.31127608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04990557 = queryNorm
                0.477444 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  6.237302 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The CIBER group at University College London are currently evaluating a distance education initiative funded by the Department of Health, providing in-service training to NHS staff via DiTV and satellite to PC systems. This paper aims to provide the context for the project by outlining a short history of distance education, describing the media used in providing remote education, and to review research literature on achievement, attitude, barriers to learning and learner characteristics. Design/methodology/approach - Literature review, with particular, although not exclusive, emphasis on health. Findings - The literature shows little difference in achievement between distance and traditional learners, although using a variety of media, both to deliver pedagogic material and to facilitate communication, does seem to enhance learning. Similarly, attitudinal studies appear to show that the greater number of channels offered, the more positive students are about their experiences. With regard to barriers to completing courses, the main problems appear to be family or work obligations. Research limitations/implications - The research work this review seeks to consider is examining "on-demand" showing of filmed lectures via a DiTV system. The literature on DiTV applications research, however, is dominated by studies of simultaneous viewing by on-site and remote students, rather than "on-demand". Practical implications - Current research being carried out by the authors should enhance the findings accrued by the literature, by exploring the impact of "on-demand" video material, delivered by DiTV - something no previous research appears to have examined. Originality/value - Discusses different electronic systems and their exploitation for distance education, and cross-references these with several aspects evaluated in the literature: achievement, attitude, barriers to take-up or success, to provide a holistic picture hitherto missing from the literature.

Languages

Types

  • a 3669
  • m 379
  • el 334
  • s 140
  • b 36
  • x 26
  • r 16
  • i 13
  • n 11
  • p 3
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications